Group Decision Making Problem by General Convexity or Concavity and Aggregation Process

Pękala, B.

doi:10.14313/JAMRIS_4-2016/32

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Group Decision Making Problem by General Convexity or Concavity and Aggregation Process

Autorzy

Pękala B.

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.14313/JAMRIS_4-2016/32

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

The averaging aggregation operators are defined and some interesting properties are derived. Moreover, we have extended concave and convex property. The main results concerning aggregation of generalized quasiconcave and quasiconvex functions are presented and some their properties are derived and discussed. The class of concavity and convexity of two variable aggregation operators that preserve these properties are studied.

Słowa kluczowe

aggregation function interval-valued fuzzy sets S-convexity T-concavity

Wydawca

Łukasiewicz Industrial Research Institute for Automation and Measurements PIAP

Czasopismo

Journal of Automation Mobile Robotics and Intelligent Systems

Rocznik

2016

Tom

Vol. 10, No. 4

Strony

62--69

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 34 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Pękala B.

bpekala@ur.edu.pl.

University of Rzeszów, Interdisciplinary Centre for Computational Modelling, ul. Pigonia 1, 35-310 Rzeszów, Poland

Bibliografia

[1] Ammar E., Metz J., ”On fuzzy convexity and parametric fuzzy optimization”, Fuzzy Sets Syst., vol. 49, 1992, 135–141.
[2] Arrow K., ”A difficulty in the concept of social welfare”, The Journal of Political Economy, vol. 58, 1950, 328–346.
[3] Beliakov G., Bustince H., Calvo T., ”A practical Guide to Averaging Functions”. In: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, Springer, vol. 329, 2016. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-24753-3-1.
[4] Birkhoff G., Lattice Theory, AMS Coll. Publ., vol. 25, Providence, 1967.
[5] Bustince H., Jurio A., Pradera A., Mesiar R., Beliakov G., ”Generalization of the weighted voting method using penalty functions constructed via faithful restricted dissimilarity functions”, European J. Operational Research, vol. 225, no. 3, 2013, 472–478. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.10.009.
[6] Bustince H., Fernandez J., Kolesárová A., Mesiar R., ”Generation of linear orders for intervals by means of aggregation functions”, Fuzzy Sets Syst., vol. 220, 2013, 69–77. DOI: 10.1016/j.fss.2012.07.015.
[7] Bustince H., Barrenechea E., Calvo T., James S., Beliakov G., ”Consensus in multi-expert decision making problems using penalty functions defined over a Cartesian product of lattices”, Information Fusion, vol. 17, 2014, 56–64. DOI: 10.1016/j.inffus.2011.10.002.
[8] Chen H., Zhou L., ”An approach to group decision making with interval fuzzy preference relations based on induced generalized continuous ordered weighted averaging operator”, Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 10, 2011, 13432–13440. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.175.
[9] Deschrijver G., ”Quasi-arithmetic means and OWA functions in interval-valued and Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy set theory”, EUSFLAT-LFA 2011, Aix-les-Bains, France, 2011, 506–513. DOI: 10.2991/eusflat.2011.144.
[10] Dudziak U., Pękala B., ”Equivalent bifuzzy relations”, Fuzzy Sets Syst., vol. 161, no. 2, 2010, 234–253. DOI: 10.1016/j.fss.2009.06.016.
[11] Fishburn P.C., ”Intransitive indifference with unequal indifference intervals”, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, vol. 7, 1970, 144–149.
[12] Fishburn P.C., Utility theory for decision making, J. Wiley, New York, 1970.
[13] Fodor J., Roubens M., Fuzzy Preference Modelling and Multicriteria Decision Support, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1994. ISBN: 978- 94-017-1648-2.
[14] Grabisch M., Marichal J.L., Mesiar R., Pap E., ”Aggregation functions”, Encyclopedia of mathematics and its applications, vol. 127, Cambridge University Press, 2009. ISBN: 978–0–521–51926-7.
[15] Iglesias T., Montes I., Janiš V., Montes S., ”Tconvexity for lattice - valued fuzzy sets”, Proceedings of the ESTYLF Conference, 2012, 26–30.
[16] Janiš V., Král P., Renčová M., ”Aggregation operators preserving quasiconvexity”. Inf. Sci., vol. 228, 2013, 37–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2012.12.003.
[17] Klement E.P., Mesiar R., Pap E., Triangular norms, Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht, 2000.
[18] Liu F., Zhang W.G., Zhang L.H., ”A group decision making model based on a generalized ordered weighted geometric average operator with interval preference matrices”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 246, 2014, 1–18. DOI:10.1016/j.fss.2013.07.010.
[19] Murali V., Makamba B.B., ”On an equivalence of fuzzy subgroups I”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 123, no. 2, 2001, 259–264.
[20] Murali V., ”Fuzzy points of equivalent fuzzy subsets”, Inform. Sci., vol. 158, 2004, 277–288. DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2003.07.008.
[21] Paternain D., Jurio A., Barrenechea E., Bustince H., Bedregal B., Szmidt E., ”An alternative to fuzzy methods in decision-making problems”, Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 39, no. 9, 2012, 7729–7735. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.081.
[22] Pękala B., ”Aggregation Process and Some Generalized Convexity and Concavity”. In: Angelov, P; Atanassov, KT; Doukovska, L; et al. (eds.), Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 322, 2015, 23–31.
[23] Ramı́k J., Vlach M., ”Aggregation function and generalized convexity in fuzzy optimization and decision making”, Ann. Oper. Res., vol. 195, no. 1, 2012, 261–276. DOI: 10.1007/s10479-011-0965-5.
[24] Sambuc R., ”Functions 𝜙-floues. Application á l’aide au diagnostic en pathologie thyroidienne”. Ph. D. Thesis, Universitde Marseille, France, 1975.
[25] Sen A., ”Social choice theory: a re-examination”, Econometrica, vol. 45, no. 1, 1977, 53–89.
[26] Sharma D., Alam A., Dasgupta P., Saha D., ”A Ranking Algorithm for Online Social Network Search”. In: Working Paper Series of Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, WPS No. 724, 2013. DOI: 10.1145/2522548.2523134.
[27] Suri P.R., Taneja H., ”Integrated Ranking Algorithm for Effiicient Information Computing in Social Networks”, International Journal on Web Service Computing (IJWSC), vol. 3, no. 1, 2012, 31–44.
[28] Szmidt E., Kacprzyk J., ”Distances Between Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets: Straightforward Approaches may not work”. 3rd Int. IEEE Conf. Intelligent Systems IS06, London, 2006, 716–721.
[29] Szmidt E., Kacprzyk J., ”Amount of Information and its Reliability in the Ranking of Atanassov’s Intuitionistic Fuzzy Alternatives”. In: E. Rakus-Andersson, R. Yager, N. Ichalkaranje, L. Jain (Eds.), Recent Advances in Decision Making, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2009, 7–19.
[30] Wasserman S., Faust K., Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications, Cambridge University Press, 2009. ISBN-13: 978-0521387071.
[31] Xu Y., Li K.W., Wang H., ”Incomplete interval fuzzy preference relations and their applications”, Computers and Industrial Engineering, vol. 67, 2014, 93–103. DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2013.10.010.
[32] Xu Y., Wanga H., Yu D., ”Cover image Weak transitivity of interval-valued fuzzy relations”, Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 63, 2014, 24–32.
[33] Yager R.R., Xu Z., ”Intuitionistic and intervalvalued intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations and their measures of similarity for the evaluation of agreement within a group”, Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, vol. 8, no. 2, 2009, 123–139. DOI: 10.1007/s10700-009-9056-3.
[34] Zadeh L.A., ”Fuzzy sets”, Information and Control, vol. 8, 1965, 338–353.

Uwagi

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-46e0103e-1bb0-4027-aec8-c3b9b559f9b9