A comparative analysis of text difficulty in Slovak and Canadian science textbooks

• Autorzy: Beníčková Zuzana , Vojíř Karel , Held Lubomír

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/cdem-2021-0007

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

One of the main purposes of textbooks is the mediation of educational content to students. The factual accuracy of information, as well as the clarity of the text for students plays a crucial role in this aspect. The inadequate text difficulty can complicate students' learning. Comparing different approaches to the text in textbooks, considering the objectives of education, represents key knowledge for teaching materials innovation. This research was therefore focused on the comparison of the Slovak and Canadian science textbooks for lower secondary education. The methodology for assessing text difficulty according to Nestler, Prucha and Pluskal was used for this purpose. The samples of text from the textbooks for 6th and 8th grade of lower-secondary school were assessed. It was found that the text in Slovak textbooks is significantly more difficult. While from the syntactic difficulty point of view differences were rather partial, the significant differences were found in the semantic difficulty of the text. The Slovak textbooks are burdened with an excessive number of professional terms. Considering the results in measuring scientific literacy, this approach to the text in the Slovak textbooks is not effective. The results obtained are therefore an incentive to revise used educational materials.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

science textbook; text; difficulty; science education; lower-secondary school

PL

podręcznik; nauki ścisłe; edukacja; tekst; trudności

• Wydawca: Towarzystwo Chemii i Inżynierii Ekologicznej
• Czasopismo: Chemistry-Didactics-Ecology-Metrology
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: R. 26, NR 1-2
• Strony: 89--97
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 36 poz., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Beníčková Zuzana

• Základná škola s materskou školou, Atómová 1, 91701 Trnava, Slovakia
• Faculty of Education, Trnava University in Trnava, P.O. Box 9, 91843 Trnava, Slovakia

autor

Vojíř Karel

• Faculty of Education, Charles University, Magdalény Rettigové 4, 116 39 Prague 1, Czech Republic, phone [phone]

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7619-9891

autor

Held Lubomír

• Faculty of Education, Trnava University in Trnava, P.O. Box 9, 91843 Trnava, Slovakia

Bibliografia

• [1] OECD. PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework; 2019. DOI: 10.1787/b25efab8-en.
• [2] Official J EU. 2018;61:1-13. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32018H0604(01)&rid=7.
• [3] Vojíř K, Rusek M. Int J Sci Educ. 2019;41:1496-516. DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2019.1613584.
• [4] Rusek M, Vojíř K, Šubová Š. Chem Didact Ecol Metrol. 2020;25:69-77. DOI: 10.2478/cdem-2020-0004.
• [5] Karásková N, Doležal R, Maltsevskaya N, Kolář K. Chem Didact Ecol Metrol. 2019;24:61-76. DOI: 10.2478/cdem-2019-0005.
• [6] Rusek M, Stárková D, Metelková I, Beneš P. Chem Listy. 2016;110:953-8. WOS: 000390899900017.
• [7] Rusek M, Vojíř K. Chem Edu Res Prac. 2019;20:85-94. DOI: 10.1039/c8rp00141c.
• [8] Kmeťová J. Chem listy. 2004;98:557-8. Available from: http://www.chemickelisty.cz/ojs3/index.php/chemicke-listy/article/view/3300/3262.
• [9] OECD. Pathways to Success: How knowledge and skills at age 15 shape future lives in Canada; 2010. Available from: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/9789264081925-en.pdf?expires=1614419786&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=91593BF780AE1104F5529B5DC984319D.
• [10] OECD. PISA 2018 Results: Combined executive summaries; 2019. Available from: https://www.oecd.org/pisa/Combined_Executive_Summaries_PISA_2018.pdf.
• [11] Valverde GA, Bianchi LJ, Wolfe RG, Schmidt WH, Houang RT. According to the Book: Using TIMSS to Investigate the Translation of Policy into Practice Through the World of Textbooks. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media; 2002. ISBN: 9781402010347.
• [12] Aydin S, Sinha S, Izci K. Eurasia J Mathematics Sci Technol Education. 2014;10:383-93. DOI: 10.12973/eurasia.2014.1060a.
• [13] Pyburn DT, Pazicni S. J Chem Education. 2014;91:778-83. DOI: 10.1021/ed500006u.
• [14] Mikk J. Edu Stud. 2008;34:119-27. DOI: 10.1080/03055690701811164.
• [15] Průcha J. Učebnice: Teorie a analýzy edukačního média [Textbook: Theory and analysis of educational medium]. Brno: Paido; 1998. ISBN: 8085931494.
• [16] Wellington J, Osborne J. Language and Literacy in Science Education. London: Open University Press; 2001. ISBN: 0335205984.
• [17] Hoang VV. Ling Hum Sci. 2018;14:1-35. DOI: 10.1558/lhs.31751.
• [18] Nemeth JM. J Chem Edu. 2006;83:592. DOI: 10.1021/ed083p592.
• [19] Biber D, Conrad S, Cortes V. App Ling. 2004;25:371-405. DOI: 10.1093/applin/25.3.371.
• [20] Smith BL, Holliday WG, Austin HW. J Res Sci Teach. 2010;47:363-79. DOI: 10.1002/tea.20378.
• [21] Gericke NM, Hagberg M, Jorde D. Res Sci Edu. 2013;43:755-80. DOI: 10.1007/s11165-012-9288-z.
• [22] Ibanez R, Moncada F, Carcamo B. Disc Proc. 2019;56:764-85. DOI: 10.1080/0163853x.2019.1565278.
• [23] Green C. Ling Edu. 2019;53. DOI: 10.1016/j.linged.2019.100748.
• [24] Fitzgerald WJ, Elmore J, Relyea JE, Stenner AJ. J Edu Psy. 2020;112:855-79. DOI: 10.1037/edu0000386.
• [25] Hsu WH. Eng Spec Purp. 2014;33:54-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.esp.2013.07.001.
• [26] Fitzgerald WJ, Elmore J, Kung M, Stenner AJ. Read Res Quart. 2017;52:417-42. DOI: 10.1002/rrq.184.
• [27] Hrabí L. New Edu Rev. 2010;22:143-8. WOS: 000294162000012.
• [28] Bansiong AJ. Cogent Edu. 2019;6. DOI: 10.1080/2331186x.2019.1706395.
• [29] Gul S, Ozay Kose E, Diken EH. Cukurova Univ Faculty Education J. 2020;49:1-27. DOI: 10.14812/cufej.466481.
• [30] Calado FM, Scharfenberg FJ, Bogner FX. Int J Sci Edu Part B Comm Pub Eng. 2018;8:266-86. DOI: 10.1080/21548455.2018.1486051.
• [31] Carvalho GS, Tracana RB, Skujiene G, Turcinaviciene J. Int J Sci Edu. 2011;33:2587-610. DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2011.556831.
• [32] Ge YP, Unsworth L, Wang KH, Chang HP. Res Sci Edu. 2018;48:1409-31. DOI: 10.1007/s11165-016-9608-9.
• [33] Hrabí L. Náročnost textu v učebnicích přírodopisu [Difficulty of the text in biology textbooks]. In: Maňák J, Knecht P, editors. Hodnocení učebnic [Evaluation of textbooks]. Brno: Paido; 2007. ISBN: 9788073151485.
• [34] Markic S, Childs PE. Chem Edu Res Prac. 2016;17:434-8. DOI: 10.1039/C6RP90006B.
• [35] Veselský M, Hrubišková H. Ped orien. 2014;19:45-64. Available from: https://Js.muni.cz/pedor/article/view/1259.
• [36] Beneš P, Janoušek R, Novotný M. Pedagogika. 2009;59:291-7. Available from: https://pages.pedf.cuni.cz/pedagogika/?p=1000.