A systematic review of the use of organisational and management theories in reverse logistics studies

Zhao, Wenjuam; Osman, Lokhman Hakim Bin

doi:10.17270/J.LOG.2023.818

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

A systematic review of the use of organisational and management theories in reverse logistics studies

Autorzy

Zhao Wenjuam , Osman Lokhman Hakim Bin

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17270/J.LOG.2023.818

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

Background: Reverse logistics studies have received increasing attention in academic, organisational, and management research. Researchers have contributed to this field by borrowing theories from sustainable business research. However, there is a lack of literature reviewing the development and contribution of reverse logistics studies in organisational and management theories. By identifying the most frequently used management theories, this paper fills the gap and describes the theoretical contribution of reverse logistics papers to organisational and management theories. Methods: Using the vote-counting technique, this article reviews 122 papers published between 2005 and 2021 to assess how organisational and management theories developed in the studies of reverse logistics. Results: The analysis indicates that, while some, such as triple bottom line and critical success factors, have been frequently employed, the relation between reverse logistics and sustainability and other organisational theories remain undeveloped. It also discovered that the research topics only focused on product and material recycling, but few on product return and exchange logistics. Conclusions: First, there is a huge gap in organisational and management theories and reverse logistics studies. It is suggested that scholars involved in reverse logistics studies can explore more connections between reverse logistics strategies and management theories in future research. Second, more theories should be used in addition to triple bottom line and critical success factors in reverse logistics research. Furthermore, although some incorporated other factors into the management theories and developed a framework after examining their interrelationship, little contribution has been made to the theories themselves. Additionally, more discussion of reverse logistics in the field can focus on product return and exchange logistics.

Słowa kluczowe

reverse logistics organisational and management theories systematic literature review sustainability theories development

logistyka odwrócona teorie organizacji i zarządzania systematyczny przegląd literatury zrównoważony rozwój

Wydawca

Wyższa Szkoła Logistyki

Czasopismo

LogForum

Rocznik

2023

Tom

Vol. 19, no. 1

Strony

141--154

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 60 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Zhao Wenjuam

P117552@siswa.ukm.edu.my

School of Management, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7642-8503

autor

Osman Lokhman Hakim Bin

lokhman@ukm.edu.my

Faculty of Economy and Management, School of Management, Selangor, Malaysia

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6630-5067

Bibliografia

1. Agrawal, S., Singh, R. K., Murtaza, Q., 2016a, Triple bottom line performance evaluation of RL, Competitiveness Review, 26(3), 289-310, https://doi.org/10.1108/cr-04-2015-0029
2. Agrawal, S., Singh, R. K., Murtaza, Q., 2016b, Outsourcing decisions in RL: Sustainable balanced scorecard and graph theoretic approach, Resources Conservation and Recycling, 108, 41-53, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.01.004
3. Ashby, A., 2018, Developing closed loop supply chains for environmental sustainability: Insights from a UK clothing case study, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 29(4), 699-722, https://doi.org/10.1108/jmtm-12-2016-0175
4. Bag, S., Gupta, S., 2020. Examining the effect of green human capital availability in adoption of reverse logistics and remanufacturing operations performance, International Journal of Manpower, 41(7), 1097-1117. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijm-07-2019-0349
5. Bag, S., Gupta, S., Luo, Z. W., 2020, Examining the role of logistics 4.0 enabled dynamic capabilities on firm performance, International Journal of Logistics Management, 31(3), 607-628. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlm-11-2019-0311
6. Barney, J., Wright, M., and Ketchen, D. J., 2001, The Resource-Based View of the Firm, Journal of Management, 17 (1): 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630102700601
7. Bhatia, M. S., 2021, Green process innovation and operational performance: The role of proactive environment strategy, technological capabilities, and organizational learning, Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(7), 2845-2857. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2775
8. Biswas, I., Raj, A., Srivastava, S. K., 2018, Supply chain channel coordination with triple bottom line approach, Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review, 115, 213-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2018.05.007
9. Bradley, R., Jawahir, I. S., Badurdeen, F., Rouch, K., 2018, A total life cycle cost model (TLCCM) for the circular economy and its application to post-recovery resource allocation, Resources Conservation and Recycling, 135, 141-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.01.017
10. Brockhaus, S., Fawcett, S., Kersten, W., Knemeyer, M., 2016, A framework for benchmarking product sustainability efforts Using systems dynamics to achieve supply chain alignment, Benchmarking-an International Journal, 23(1), 127-164. https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-09-2014-0093
11. Cui, L., Wu, H., Lang, X. X., Li, Y., 2021, Exploring circular supply chain practices from a dual perspective: using a hybrid method under uncertainty, International Journal of Logistics-Research and Applications, 24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2021.1983527
12. Daddi, Todaro, Giacomo Frey, 2018, A systematic review of the use of organization and management theories in climate change studies, Business Strategy and the Environment, 27 (4), pp.456-474. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2015
13. Darbari, J. D., Kannan, D., Agarwal, V., Jha, P. C., 2019, Fuzzy criteria programming approach for optimising the TBL performance of closed loop supply chain network design problem, Annals of Operations Research, 273(1-2), 693-738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2701-2
14. Devika, K., Jafarian, A., Nourbakhsh, V., 2014, Designing a sustainable closed-loop supply chain network based on triple bottom line approach: A comparison of metaheuristics hybridization techniques, European Journal of Operational Research, 235(3), 594-615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.12.032
15. Dixit, S., Badgaiyan, A. J., 2016, Towards improved understanding of reverse logistics - Examining mediating role of return intention, Resources Conservation and Recycling, 107, 115-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.11.021
16. Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Papadopoulos, T., Hazen, B., Giannakis, M., Roubaud, D., 2017, Examining the effect of external pressures and organizational culture on shaping performance measurement systems (PMS) for sustainability benchmarking: Some empirical findings. International Journal of Production Economics, 193, 63-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.06.029
17. Flygansvaer, B., Dahlstrom, R., Nygaard, A., 2018, Exploring the pursuit of sustainability in reverse supply chains for electronics, Journal of Cleaner Production, 189, 472-484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.014
18. Gardas, B. B., Raut, R. D., Narkhede, B., 2018, Reducing the exploration and production of oil: Reverse logistics in the automobile service sector, Sustainable Production and Consumption, 16, 141-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2018.07.005
19. Govindan, K., Jafarian, A., Nourbakhsh, V., 2015, Bi-objective integrating sustainable order allocation and sustainable supply chain network strategic design with stochastic demand using a novel robust hybrid multi-objective metaheuristic, Computers Operations Research, 62, 112-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2014.12.014
20. Hsu, C., Choon Tan, K., Hanim Mohamad Zailani, S. and Jayaraman, V., 2013, Supply chain drivers that foster the development of green initiatives in an emerging economy, International Journal of Operations Production Management, 33(6), pp. 656-688, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-10-2011-0401
21. Huang, Y. C., Yang, M. L., 2014, Reverse logistics innovation, institutional pressures and performance., Management research review. 37(7), pp. 615-641, https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-03-2013-0069
22. Islam, M. S., Moeinzadeh, S., Tseng, M. L., Tan, K., 2021, A literature review on environmental concerns in logistics: trends and future challenges., International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 24(2), 126-151, http://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2020.1732313
23. Jayaram, J., Avittathur, B., 2015, Green supply chains: A perspective from an emerging economy, International Journal of Production Economics, 164, 234-244. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.12.003
24. Kannan, D., 2018, Role of multiple stakeholders and the critical success factor theory for the sustainable supplier selection process, International Journal of Production Economics, 195, 391-418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.02.020
25. Kumar, D., Rahman, Z., 2016, Buyer supplier relationship and supply chain sustainability: empirical study of Indian automobile industry, Journal of Cleaner Production, 131, 836-848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.007
26. Li, Y. N., Ye, F., Dai, J., Zhao, X. D., Sheu, C. W., 2019, The adoption of green practices by Chinese firms: Assessing the determinants and effects of top management championship, International Journal of Operations Production Management, 39(4), 550-572. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijopm-12-2017-0753
27. Liu, J. J., Hu, H. B., Tong, X., Zhu, Q. H., 2020, Behavioral and technical perspectives of green supply chain management practices: Empirical evidence from an emerging market, Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review, 140, Article 102013. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijopm-12-2017-0753
28. Liu, J., Feng, Y., Zhu, Q. and Sarkis, J., 2018, Green supply chain management and the circular economy: Reviewing theory for advancement of both fields, International Journal of Physical Distribution Logistics Management, 48(8), 794-817, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-01-2017-0049
29. Lu, I. Y., Kuo, T., Lin, T. S., Tzeng, G. H., Huang, S. L., 2016, Multicriteria Decision Analysis to Develop Effective Sustainable Development Strategies for Enhancing Competitive Advantages: Case of the TFT-LCD Industry in Taiwan, Sustainability, 8(7), 31, Article 646. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8070646
30. Luthra, S., Govindan, K., Kannan, D., Mangla, S. K., Garg, C. P., 2017, An integrated framework for sustainable supplier selection and evaluation in supply chains, Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 1686-1698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.078
31. Luthra, S., Mangla, S. K., Shankar, R., Garg, C. P., Jakhar, S., 2018, Modelling critical success factors for sustainability initiatives in supply chains in Indian context using Grey-DEMATEL, Production Planning Control, 29(9), 705-728. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2018.1448126
32. Mangla, S. K., Luthra, S., Mishra, N., Singh, A., Rana, N. P., Dora, M., Dwivedi, Y., 2018, Barriers to effective circular supply chain management in a developing country context, Production Planning Control, 29(6), 551-569. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2018.1448126
33. Mathivathanan, D., Kannan, D., Hag, A. N., 2018, Sustainable supply chain management practices in Indian automotive industry: A multi-stakeholder view, Resources Conservation and Recycling, 128, 284-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.01.003
34. Miles, A.J., 2012, Management and organization theory: a Jossey-Bass reader. Jossey-Bass.
35. Morgan, T. R., Tokman, M., Richey, R. G., Defee, C., 2018, Resource commitment and sustainability: a reverse logistics performance process model, International Journal of Physical Distribution Logistics Management, 48(2), 164-182. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijpdlm-02-2017-0068
36. Mota, B., Gomes, M. I., Carvalho, A., Barbosa-Povoa, A. P., 2018. Sustainable supply chains: An integrated modeling approach under uncertainty, Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 77, 32-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2017.05.006
37. Munny, A. A., Ali, S. M., Kabir, G., Moktadir, M. A., Rahman, T., Mahtab, Z., 2019, Enablers of social sustainability in the supply chain: An example of footwear industry from an emerging economy, Sustainable Production and Consumption, 20, 230-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2019.07.003
38. Nag, U., Sharma, S. K., Govindan, K., 2021, Investigating drivers of circular supply chain with product-service system in automotive firms of an emerging economy, Journal of Cleaner Production, 319, Article 128629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128629
39. Nishant, R., Goh, M., Kitchen, P. J., 2016, Sustainability and differentiation: Understanding materiality from the context of Indian firms, Journal of Business Research, 69(5), 1892-1897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.075
40. Paras, M. K., Ekwall, D., Pal, R., 2019, Developing a framework for the performance evaluation of sorting and grading firms of used clothing, Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing, 12(1), 82-102. https://doi.org/10.1108/jgoss-11-2017-0047
41. Plaza-Úbeda, J., de Burgos-Jiménez, J., Carmona-Moreno, E., 2010, Measuring stakeholder integration: knowledge, interaction and adaptational behavior dimensions, Journal of Business Ethics, 93(3), 419-442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0231
42. Pourjavad, E., Mayorga, R. V., 2018, A fuzzy rule-based approach to prioritize third-party reverse logistics based on sustainable development pillars, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 35(3), 3125-3138. https://doi.org/10.3233/jifs-171069
43. Presley, A., Meade, L., Sarkis, J., 2007, A strategic sustainability justification methodology for organizational decisions: a reverse logistics illustration, International Journal of Production Research, 45(18-19), 4595-4620. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540701440220
44. Richey, G. R., Tokman, M., Wright, R., Harvey, M., 2005, Monitoring Reverse Logistics Programs: A Roadmap to Sustainable Development in Emerging Markets. Multinational Business Review, 13(3), 41-65. https://doi.org/10.1108/1525383x200500014
45. Rockart, J. F., 1979, Chief executives define their own data needs. Harvard business review, 57(2), 81-93.
46. Sachin K. M., Pradeep, K., Mukesh, K. B., 2015, Prioritizing the responses to manage risks in green supply chain: An Indian plastic manufacturer perspective, Sustainable Production and Consumption, 1, 67-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2015.05.002
47. Schenkel, M., Krikke, H., Caniels, M. C. J., van der Laan, E., 2015, Creating integral value for stakeholders in closed loop supply chains, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 21(3), 155-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2015.04.003
48. Shaharudin, M. R., Govindan, K., Zailani, S., Tan, K. C., 2015, Managing product returns to achieve supply chain sustainability: an exploratory study and research propositions, Journal of Cleaner Production, 101, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.074
49. Shaharudin, M. R., Tan, K. C., Kannan, V., Zailani, S., 2019, The mediating effects of product returns on the relationship between green capabilities and closed-loop supply chain adoption, Journal of Cleaner Production, 211, 233-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.035
50. Shekarian, E., Marandi, A., Majava, J., 2021, Dual-channel remanufacturing closed-loop supply chains under carbon footprint and collection competition, Sustainable Production and Consumption, 28, 1050-1075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.06.028
51. Silva, W. D. O., Fontana, M. E., 2020, Survey and analysis the critical success factors in the reverse flow inventory management process for returnable packaging, Brazilian Journal of Operations Production Management, 17(1), Article UNSP e2020761, https://doi.org/10.14488/bjopm.2020.003
52. Slaper, T. F., Hall, T. J., 2011, The triple bottom line: What is it and how does it work., Indiana business review, 86(1), 4-8, http://www.ibrc.indiana.edu/ibr/2011/spring/article2.html
53. Stekelorum, R., Laguir, I., Gupta, S., Kumar, S., 2021, Green supply chain management practices and third-party logistics providers’ performances: A fuzzy-set approach, International Journal of Production Economics, 235, 12, Article 108093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108093
54. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., Shuen, A., 1997, Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management, Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533, https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
55. Thakur, V., Mangla, S. K., 2019, Change management for sustainability: Evaluating the role of human, operational and technological factors in leading Indian firms in home appliances sector, Journal of Cleaner Production, 213, 847-862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.201
56. Tikir, A., Lehmann B., 2011, Climate change, theory of planned behavior and values: a structural equation model with mediation analysis, Climatic Change, 104(2), 389-402, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-010-9937-z
57. Waqas, M., Xue, H. G., Khan, S. A. R., Ahmad, N., Ullah, Z., Iqbal, M., 2021, Impact of reverse logistics barriers on sustainable firm performance via reverse logistics practices, Logforum, 17(2), 213-230. https://doi.org/10.17270/j.Log.2021.583
58. Wijewickrama, M., Chileshe, N., Rameezdeen, R., Ochoa, J. J., 2021, Minimizing Macro-Level Uncertainties for Quality Assurance in Reverse Logistics Supply Chains of Demolition Waste, Sustainability, 13(23), Article 13069, https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313069
59. Yan, W., Li, H. Y., Chai, J. W., Qian, Z. F., Chen, H., 2018, Owning or Outsourcing? Strategic Choice on Take-Back Operations for Third-Party Remanufacturing, Sustainability, 10(1), Article 151. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010151
60. Zadeh, L. A., 1996, Fuzzy sets. In Fuzzy sets, fuzzy logic, and fuzzy systems: selected papers by Lotfi A Zadeh, 394-432. https://doi.org/10.1142/2895

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2024).

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-46b40c8b-76d7-4ef4-9ab9-544f13f2b562