Milipede (Diplopoda) communities in agricultural landscape: influence of management form

• Autorzy: Stašiov S. , Hazuchová L. , Vician V. , Kočík K. , Svitok M.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Currently, the alternative forms of management are increasingly applied in agriculture. Although their less negative impact on environment is generally supposed, there is still a lack of a reliable data about their real favourability for the abundance and diversity of soil invertebrates, including millipedes. Therefore, the aim of our study was to find out, whether the form of agricultural management affects the structure of millipede communities and hence, the performance of their functions in soil ecosystems. The research was carried out using pitfall trapping through growing seasons 2005 to 2007 on the model territory of Agricultural Cooperative (AC) Očová (Central Slovakia). Millipedes were captured at four pairs of sites (8 sites in total). The same cultivated crop (wheat, barley, alfalfa or permanent law) with application of two different forms of agricultural management (conventional form and sustainable form with basic sustainable agro-environmental scheme) was characteristic of each pair of sites. The research results disclosed that the management form plays a significant role, especially in such agrocoenoses, in which the same crop is cultivated for several years (e.g. sites with alfalfa or permanent lawn), i.e., on the sites without ploughing or other similar agrotechnical measures. In these cases, the sites with the sustainable agro-environmental scheme had higher species richness (8 and 9 species) and higher total abundance of millipede communities (2.2 and 5.7 ind. collected per one day and one trap) than the sites with the conventional form of agrotechnical management (5 and 5 species, 0.09 and 0.3 ind. collected per one day and one trap). In order to obtain a more detailed knowledge about the impact of agricultural management forms on millipede communities, this kind of research should be carried out in different conditions (other crops, soil conditions, climate zones, etc.) as well.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

agricultural management; agroecosystem; Diplopoda; millipedes; pesticides; ploughing; synthetic fertilizers

PL

rolnicze zagospodarowanie; agrosystem; dwuparce; stonogi; pestycydy; zaorywanie; nawozy sztuczne

• Wydawca: Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Ecology
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: Vol. 62, nr 3
• Strony: 587--598
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 29 poz., il.

Twórcy

autor

Stašiov S.

• Department of Biology and General Ecology, Faculty of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Technical University in Zvolen, T.G. Masaryka 24, 96053 Zvolen, Slovakia

autor

Hazuchová L.

• Department of Biology and General Ecology, Faculty of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Technical University in Zvolen, T.G. Masaryka 24, 96053 Zvolen, Slovakia

autor

Vician V.

• Department of Landscape Planning and Design, Faculty of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Technical University in Zvolen, T.G. Masaryka 24, 96053 Zvolen, Slovakia

autor

Kočík K.

• Department of Landscape Planning and Design, Faculty of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Technical University in Zvolen, T.G. Masaryka 24, 96053 Zvolen, Slovakia

autor

Svitok M.

• Department of Biology and General Ecology, Faculty of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Technical University in Zvolen, T.G. Masaryka 24, 96053 Zvolen, Slovakia

Bibliografia

• 1. Begon M., Harper J.L., Towsend C.R. 1990 – Ecology: Individuals, Populations and Communities, 2nd ed. – Blackwell Scientific Publications, Boston, 945 pp.
• 2. Blower J.G. 1985 – Millipedes – E. J. Brill/Dr. W. Backhuys, London, 242 pp.
• 3. Brown G.G., Fragoso C., Barois I., Rojas, P., Patrón J.C., Bueno J., Moreno A.G., Lavelle P., Ordaz V., Rodríguez C. 2001 – Diversidad y rol funcional de la macrofauna edáficaen los ecosistemas tropicales mexicanos [Diversity and function of the soil macrofauna in tropical ecosystems of Mexico] – Acta Zool. Mex. 1: 79–110 (in Spain).
• 4. Demo M., Bielik P. 2000 – Regulačné technologie v produkčnom procese poľnohospodarskych plodin [Regulatory technologies in the production process of agricultural crops] – Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, 648 pp.
• 5. Demo M., Bielik P., Džatko M., Lacko-Bartošova M., Jurani B., Vilček J., Gaisbacher J. 1998 – Usporiadanie a využivanie pody v poľnohospodarskej krajine [Layout and use of soil on the agricultural land] – Slovak University of Agriculture in Ni¬tra, 275 pp. (in Slovak).
• 6. Dunger W. 1958 – Über die der Zersetzung Laubstreu durch die Boden-Makrofauna im Auenwald – Zool. Jahrb. Syst. 86: 139–180.
• 7. Epstein D.L., Zack R.S., Brunner J.F., Gut L., Brown J.J. 2000 – Effects of broad-spectrum insecticides on epigeal arthropod biodiversity in Pacific northwest apple orchards – Environ. Entomol. 29: 340–348.
• 8. Halaj J., Cady A.B., Uetz G.W. 2000 – Modular habitat refugia enhance generalist predators and lower plant damage in soybeans – Environ. Entomol. 29: 383–393.
• 9. Ivask M., Kuu A., Meriste M., Truu J., Truu M., Vaater V. 2008 – Invertebrate communities (Annelida and epigeic fauna) in three types of Estonian cultivated soils – Eur. J. Soil Biol. 44: 532–540.
• 10. Juen A., Traugott M. 2004 – Spatial distribution of epigaeic predators in a small field in relation to season and surrounding crops – Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 103: 613–620.
• 11. Kicaj H., Qirjo M. 2010 – The Influence of Ecological Factors like Rainfall, Temperature, Moisture for Evaluating the Millipede Population in the Southern Region of Albania (In: Conference of water observation and information system for decision support BALWOIS 2010, book of abstracts) – MagnaSken, Skopje, p. 96.
• 12. Kime R.D. 1997 – Biodiversity and land use with regard to diplopods on some westeuropean sites (In: Proceedings of 10th International EIS-Coll.) – Saarbrücken, pp. 75–82.
• 13. Kime R.D., Wauthy G. 1984 – Aspects of relationships between millipedes, soil texture and temperature in deciduous forest – Pedobiologia, 26: 387–402.
• 14. Kromp B., Steinberger K.H. 1992 – Grassy field margins and arthropod diversity: a case study on ground beetles and spiders in eastern Austria (Coleoptera: Carabidae; Arachnida: Aranei, Opiliones) – Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 40: 71–93.
• 15. Liu R.T., Zhao H.L., Zhao X.Y. 2012 – Influence of grazing exclusion on soil macro-invertebrate diversity in degraded sandy grassland (inner Mongolia, China) – Pol. J. Ecol. 60: 375–385.
• 16. Marasas M.E., Sarandon S.J., Cicchino A.C. 2001 – Changes in soil arthropod functional group in a wheat crop under conventional and no tillage systems in Argentina – Appl. Soil Ecol. 18: 61–68.
• 17. Marchão R.L., Lavelle P., Celini L., Balbino L.C., Vilela L., Becquer T. 2009 – Soil macrofauna under integrated crop livestock systems in a Brazilian Cerrado Ferralsol – Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras. 44: 869–878.
• 18. Paoletti M.G. 1988 – Soil invertebrates in cultivated and uncultivated soils in north-eastern Italy – Redia, 71 (2): 501– 563.
• 19. R Development Core Team 2011 – R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
• 20. Read H.J., Martin M.H., Rayner M.V. 1998 – Invertebrates in woodlands polluted by heavy metals – an evaluation using canonical correspondence analysis – Water Air Soil Poll. 106: 17–42.
• 21. Rebek E.J., Young D.K., Hogg, D.B. 1995 – Pitfall trap analysis of soil macroarthropods associated with the Wisconsin Integrated Cropping Systems Trial, 1994. Fifth Report of the Wisconsin Integrated Cropping Systems Trial – University of Wisconsin-Madison, 52–62.
• 22. Shannon C.E. 1948 – A mathematical theory of communication – Bell System Techn. J. 27: 379–423, 623–656.
• 23. Skubała P., Marzec A. 2013 – Importance of different types of beech wood for soil microarthropod – Pol. J. Ecol. 61: 545–560.
• 24. Stašiov S. 2009 – Millipede (Diplopoda) communities in mixed oak-hornbeam forest stands – effect of selected site factors – Pol. J. Ecol. 57: 785–792.
• 25. Stašiov S., Tajovský K., Resl K. 2006 – Restored meadow harvestman communities (Opiliones) in the Bílé Karpaty Protected Landscape Area, Czech Republic – Biológia, 61 (2): 165–169.
• 26. Stašiov S., Stašiová A., Svitok M., Michalková E., Slobodník B., Lukáčik I. 2012 – Millipedes (Diplopoda) communities in an arboretum: Influence of tree species and soil properties – Biologia, 67 (5): 945–952.
• 27. Štefanová M., Šálek M. 2014 – Effect of integrated farming on herbal and bird species diversity in Czech agricultural landscapes – Pol. J. Ecol. 61: 545–560.
• 28. Uhorskaiová L. 2009 – Vplyv formy obhospodarovania poľnohospodárskej krajiny na štruktúru a dynamiku koscov (Opiliones) [Influence of agricultural management form on the structure and dynamic harvestmen (Opiliones] – Ph.D. theses. Faculty of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Technical University in Zvolen, 80 pp. (in Slovak, English summary).
• 29. Wardle D.A., Nicholson K.S., Bonner K.I., Yeates G.W. 1999 – Effects of agricultural intensification on soil-associated arthropod population dynamics, community structure, diversity and temporal variability over a seven-year period – Soil Biol. Biochem. 31: 1691–1706.