Comparing the Effects of Automat Use on Assembly Line Performance in the Apparel Industry by Using a Simulation Method

Kayar, M.; Akalin, M.

doi:10.5604/12303666.1161767

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Comparing the Effects of Automat Use on Assembly Line Performance in the Apparel Industry by Using a Simulation Method

Autorzy

Kayar M. , Akalin M.

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5604/12303666.1161767

Warianty tytułu

Analiza efektywności zastosowania automatu w liniach produkcyjnych w przemyśle odzieżowym przy zastosowaniu metody symulacji

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

In this article, general information related to efficiency, assembly lines and simulation are primarily reviewed. previous studies on assembly line balancing are theoretically analysed. Thereafter two different assembly lines are designed to produce jean trousers. In one assembly line - manual machines and in another automats are used for seven selected operations. These assembly lines are modelled by the Promodel Simulation Program and the assembly line balancing problem is applied. The aim of the study is to establish which assembly lines have the highest line performance and to research the effects of using automat in assembly lines on production volume and efficiency. The simulation method formerly informs investors about the consequences of their investment in the decision making process for technology investments. The study concludes that automat usage on an assembly line increases the production volume and affects the fficiency of assembly line positively.

W artykule podano ogólne informacje dotyczące wydajności linii produkcyjnych i ich symulacji. Teoretycznie analizowano dotychczasowe studia w równoważeniu linii produkcyjnych. Następnie zaprojektowano dwie różne linie produkcyjne dla wytwarzania spodni dżinsowych. W jednej z linii produkcyjnych zastosowano ręcznie sterowane maszyny, a w drugiej automaty dla siedmiu wybranych operacji. Wykonano modele obydwu linii produkcyjnych przy zastosowaniu programu Promodel Simulation Program, po czym badano problem równoważenia obydwu linii. Celem badań było określenie, która z linii produkcyjnych ma najwyższą zdolność wytwarzania i stwierdzenie czy zastosowanie automatów linii produkcyjnej ma wpływ na ilość realizowanej produkcji i efektywność. Metoda symulacji może informować inwestorów o konsekwencji ich decyzji inwestycyjnych. Przeprowadzone badania skłaniają do wniosku, że zastosowanie automatu w rozpatrywanej linii produkcyjnej zwiększa wielkość produkcji i wpływa pozytywnie na wydajność linii produkcyjnej.

Słowa kluczowe

jean trousers assembly line balancing automat simulation

spodnie dżinsowe montaż linii produkcyjnych automat symulacja

Wydawca

Sieć Badawcza Łukasiewicz - Łódzki Instytut Technologiczny

Czasopismo

Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe

Rocznik

2015

Tom

Vol. 23, no. 5 (113)

Strony

114--123

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 53 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Kayar M.

mkayar@marmara.edu.tr

Department of Textile Engineering, Faculty of Technology, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey

autor

Akalin M.

Department of Textile Engineering, Faculty of Technology, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey

Bibliografia

1. Tangen S. Evaluation and Revision of Performance Measurement Systems. PhD Thesis, Woxen Centrum Department of Production Engineering Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, 2004.
2. Prokopenko J. Productivity Management: A Practical Handbook. 2. Edition, International Labour Office, Geneva, Switzerland, 1992.
3. Kayar M. Üretim ve Verimlilik – Temel Esaslar ve Uygulama. Ekin Press, Bursa, Turkey, 2012.
4. Kayar M. Hazır Giyim İşletmelerinde Verimsizliği Ortaya Çıkaran Nedenlerin Araştırılması Ve Bunların Çözümüne Yönelik Alan Çalışması. PhD Thesis, University of Marmara, İstanbul, Turkey, 2008.
5. Alpkent N. Ekonomik Rekabette Ileri teknoloji Unsuru. Ed. MPM Yayinlari, No. 686, Ankara, 2005.
6. Kayar M. Kot Pantolon Dikiminde Farklı Üretim Teknolojileri Verimliliğinin Simülasyon Yöntemiyle Karşılaştırılması. MSc. Thesis, University of Marmara, Istanbul, Turkey, 2003.
7. Kursun S, Kalaoglu F. Line Balancing by Simulation in a Sewing Line. Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon 2010; 3: 257.
8. Erel E, Sabuncuoglu I, Aksu BA. Balancing of U-Type, Assembly Systems Using Simulated Annealing. International Journal of Production Research 2001; 39, 13: 3004-3015.
9. Acar N, Estas S. Kesikli Seri Üretim Sistemlerinde Planlama ve Kontrol Çalışmaları, Milli Prodüktivite Yayınları: 309, 3. Baskı, MPM Endüstri Şubesi, Ankara, 1991.
10. Scholl A, Becker C. A Survey on Problems and Methods in Generalized Assembly Line Balancing. European Journal of Operational Research 2006; 168, 3: 694–715. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2004.07.023.
11. Scholl A, Becker C. State-of-the-Art Exact and Heuristic Solution Procedures for Simple Assembly Line Balancing. European Journal of Operational Research 2006; 168, 3: 666–693. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2004.07.022.
12. Suresh G, Vinod VV, Sahu S. A Genetic Algorithm for Assembly Line Balancing. Production Planning and Control 1996; 7, 1: 38–46.
13. Graybeal WJ, Pooch UW. Simulation: Principles and Methods. Ed. Winthrop Publishers, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1980, pp. 1 -11.
14. Bryton B. Balancing of a Continuous Production Line. MSc. Thesis, Northwestern University, Evanson, ILL, 1954.
15. Salveson ME. The Assembly Line Balancing Problem. Journal of Industrial Engineering 1955; 6 (3): 18-25.
16. Bowman EH. Assembly Line Balancing by Linear Programming. Operations Research 1960; 8, 3: 385-389.
17. Helgeson WP, Birnie DP. Assembly Line Balancing Using the Ranked Positional Weight Technique. Journal of Industrial Engineering 1961; 12(6): 384-398.
18. Kilbridge MD, Wester L. A Heuristic Method for Assembly Line Balancing. Journal of Industrial Engineering 1961; 12(4): 292-298.
19. Tonge FM. A Heuristic Program of Assembly Line Balancing. Ed. Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1961.
20. Hoffman TR. Assembly Line Balancing with a Precedence Matrix. Ed. Management Science 1963; 9, 4.
21. Moodie CL, Young HH. A Heuristic Method of Assembly Line Balancing for Assumptions of Constant or Variable Work Element Times. Journal of Industrial Engineering 1965; 16(1): 23-29.
22. Arcus AL. COMSOAL: A Computer Method of Sequencing for Assembly Lines. International Journal of Production Research 1966; 4(4): 259-277.
23. Gehrlein WV, Patterson JH. Sequencing for Assembly Lines with Integer Task Times. Management Science 1975; 21, 9.
24. Talbot FB, Patterson JH. An Integer Programming with Network Cuts for Solving the Assembly Line Balancing Problem. Management Science 1984; 30, 4.
25. Talbot FB, Patterson JH, Gehrlein WV. A Comparative Evaluation of Heuristic Line Balancing Techniques. Management Science 1986; 32, 4.
26. El-Sayed EA, Boucher TO. Analysis and Control of Production Systems. Ed. Prentice Hall Inc., New Jersey, 1985.
27. Agrawal PK. The Related Activity Concept in Assembly Line Balancing. International Journal of Production Research 1985; 23(2): 403-421.
28. Baybars I. A Survey of Exact Algorithms for the Simple Assembly Line Balancing Problem. Management Science 1986; 32(8): 909.
29. Hoffman TR. Assembly Line Balancing: A Set of Challenging Problems. International Journal of Production Research 1990; 28: 1807-1815.
30. Baskak M. Çok Modelli/ Ürünlü Montaj Hatlarının Dengelenmesi İçin Yeni Bir Model ve Çözüm Yöntemi. PhD Thesis, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, 1998.
31. Eryuruk SH, Kalaoglu F, Baskak M. Assembly Line Balancing in a Clothing Company. Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe 2008; 16, 1(66): 93-98.
32. Eryuruk SH, Kalaoglu F, Baskak M. Konfeksiyon Üretiminde İstatistiksel Yöntemle Montaj Hattı Dengeleme. Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon 2011; 1: 65-71.
33. Dundar P, Guner M, Colakoglu O. An Approach to the Modular Line Balancing Problem for an Apparel Product Manufacturing with Graph Theory. Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon 2012; 4: 369-374.
34. Guner M, Yucel O, Unal C. Applıcabılıty of Dıfferent Lıne Balancıng Methods in the Productıon of Apparel. Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon 2013; 1: 77-84.
35. Kayar M, Akyalcin OC. Applying Different Heuristic Assembly Line Balancing Methods in the Apparel Industry and their Comparison. Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe 2014; 22, 6(108): 8-19.
36. Cocks S, Harlock S. Computer Aided Simulation of Production in the Sewing Room of a Clothing Factory. Journal of Textile Institute 1989; 80: 455-463.
37. Fozzard G, Spragg J, Tyler D. Simulation of Flow Lines in Clothing Manufacture: Part 1: Model Construction. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology 1996; 8: 17-27.
38. Zielinski J, Czacherska M. Optimisation of the Work of a sewing team by using simulation. Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe 2004; 12: 78-83.
39. Zielinski J. Analysis of Selected Organisational Systems of Sewing Teams. Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe 2008; 16, 4(69): 90-95.
40. Rajakumar S, Arunachalam V, Selladurai V. Simulation of Workflow Balancing in Assembly Shopfloor Operations. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 2005; 16: 265-281.
41. Kursun S, Kalaoglu F. Analyzing the Bottleneck Problems on Production Line in Clothing Manufacturing by Simulation. In: 37th International Symposium on Novelties in Textiles. Ljubljana, Slovenia, 2006.
42. Kursun S. Tekstil Endüstrisinde Benzetim Tekniği ile Üretim Hattı Modellemesi ve Uygun İş Akış Stratejisinin Belirlenmesi. MSc. Thesis, Istanbul Technical University, 2007.
43. Kursun S, Kalaoglu F, Bahadır C, Gocek I. A Study of Assembly Line Balancing Problem in Clothing Manufacturing by Simulation. In: 16th IASTED International Conference on Applied Simulation and Modeling. Palma De Mallorca, Spain, 2007.
44. Kalaoglu F, Saricam C. Analysis of Modular Manufacturing System in Clothing Industry by Using Simulation. Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe 2007; 15: 93-96.
45. Kursun S, Kalaoglu F. Simulation of Production Line Balancing in Apparel Manufacturing. Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe 2009; 17: 68-71.
46. Kursun S, Dincmen M, Kalaoglu F. Production Line Modelling in Clothing Industry by Simulation. Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon 2009; 58, 5: 186-195.
47. Eryuruk SH. Clothing Assembly Line Design Using Simulation and Heuristic Line Balancing Techniques. Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon 2012; 4: 360-368.
48. Guner M, Unal C. Line Balancing in the Apparel Industry Using Simulation Techniques. Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe 2008; 16, 2: 75-78.
49. Unal C, Tunali S, Guner M. Evaluation of Alternative Line Configurations in Apparel. Textile Research Journal 2010; 79: 908–916.
50. Kobu B. Üretim Yönetimi. Genişletilmiş ve Güncelleştirilmiş 13. Baskı, Beta Basım Yayım, İstanbul, Türkiye, 2006, pp. 3-5.
51. Kanawaty G. İş Etüdü”, Uluslararası Çalışma Örgütü (ILO), 6.Basım, Milli Prodüktivite Merkezi Yayınları /ILO:29, Ankara, Türkiye, 2004, pp. 22-23.
52. Mayer RR. Production and Operations Management. 3rd Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York - London, pp. 514-519, 1975.
53. Ercan MN. İş ve Zaman Etüdü, Genişletilmiş 3. Baskı, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Yayınları, Yayın No: 4, İzmir, Türkiye, 2004, pp. 95-103.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-45ff53b1-4d71-4482-86b5-d40ba508adb6