Early Badenian transgression on the outer flank of Western Carpathian Foredeep, Hluchov area, Czech Republic

• Autorzy: Hladilová Š. , Nehyba S. , Zágoršek K. , Tomanová-Petrová P. , Bitner M. A. , Demeny A.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This multidisciplinary study, based on borehole cores from the Hluchov area in Czech Republic, documents an early Badenian marine transgression on the outer flank of the Western Carpathian Foredeep. The shallow-marine deposits represent coastal transgression over a terrestrial topography of weathered pre-Cenozoic bedrock. The lower facies association (FA1) consists of siliciclastic sediment derived from local substrate erosion. Facies indicate a wave-dominated environment with unstable bottom, variable rate of sediment supply and an incremental rise of relative sea level. The upper facies association (FA2) consists of carbonates indicating a major landward shift of shoreline, decline in siliciclastic input and further sea-level rise. The succession represents a transgressive to highstand systems tract. The maximum flooding surface, ca. 1 m above the FA1/FA2 boundary, is signified by an anomalous decrease in K and Th, an increased Th/K ratio and highest U concentration. The heavy-mineral assemblages in FA1 confirm local sediment provenance, whereas those in FA2 indicate broader sediment derivation, including volcanic component from contemporaneous rhyolitic to rhyodacitic eruptions. The deposits contain a wide range of marine fauna, with the foraminifers and molluscs indicating an early Badenian age. Molluscs, bryozoans and echinoderms indicate a normal-salinity environment with a decreasing hydraulic energy. Foraminifers indicate salinity fluctuations in the lowest part of the succession. The isotopic composition of mollusc shells shows marked inter-species differences and a general negative shift in the δ13C and δ18O values, indicating diagenetic alteration. The impact of diagenetic processes appears to have been controlled by sedimentary facies. The highly negative δ13C and δ18O values correspond to sediment layers with the highest Th/K ratios and hence low clay content. Sediment permeability was thus probably crucial in controlling the differential circulation and impact of diagenetic fluids.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Carpathian Foredeep; borehole cores; early Badenian; marine transgression; sedimentology; palaeontology; geochemistry

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Geologiczne
• Czasopismo: Annales Societatis Geologorum Poloniae
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: Vol. 84, No. 3
• Strony: 259--279
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 72 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Hladilová Š.

• Department of Biology, Faculty of Education, Palacky University, Purkrabská 2, 771 46 Olomouc, Czech Republic

autor

Nehyba S.

• Institute of Geological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotláøská 2, 611 37 Brno, Czech Republic;

autor

Zágoršek K.

• Department of Geography, Technical University of Liberec, Studentská 2, 461 17 Liberec, Czech Republic

autor

Tomanová-Petrová P.

• Czech Geological Survey, Leitnerova 22, 658 69 Brno, Czech Republic

autor

Bitner M. A.

• Institute of Paleobiology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Twarda 51/55, 00-818 Warszawa, Poland

autor

Demeny A.

• Institute for Geological and Geochemical Research, RCSAES, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budaorsi ut 45, 1112 Budapest, Hungary

Bibliografia

• 1. Berstad, S. & Dypvik, H., 1982. Sedimentological evolution and natural radioactivity of Tertiary sediments from the central North Sea. Journal of Petroleum Geology, 5: 77-88.
• 2. Bitner, M. A., 1990. Middle Miocene (Badenian) brachiopods from the Roztocze Hills, south-eastern Poiand. Acta Geologica Polonica, 40: 129-157.
• 3. Bitner, M. A. & Kaim, A., 2004. The Miocene brachiopods from the silty facies of the intra-Carpathian Nowy Sącz Basin (Poland). Geological Quarterly, 48: 193-198.
• 4. Bitner, M. A., Zágoršek, K. & Hladilová, Š., 2013. Deep-water brachiopod assemblage from the Middle Miocene of Kralice nad Oslavou, Moravia, southeastern Czech Republic. Comptes Rendus Palevol, 12: 81-89.
• 5. Bubík, M. & Dvořák, J., 1996. O nálezu karpatu (miocén) a dalších výsledcích vrtu Slatinky MH-10. Zprávy o geologických výzkumech v roce 1995, pp. 20-21. [In Czech.]
• 6. Buday, T., 1955. Současný stav stratigrafického výzkumu ve spodním a středním miocénu na dolní Moravě. Věstník Ústředního ústavu geologického, 30: 162-168. [In Czech.]
• 7. Burbank, D. W. & Beck, R. A., 1991. Models of aggradation versus progradation in the Himalayan Foreland. Geologische Rundschau, 80: 623-638.
• 8. Cattaneo, A. & Steel, R. J., 2003. Transgressive deposits: a review of their variability. Earth-Science Reviews, 62: 187-228.
• 9. Cicha, I. & Dornič, J., 1960. Miocenní vývoj boskovické brázdy mezi Tišnovem a Ústí nad Orlicí. Sborník Ústředního ústavu geologického, Geologia, 26: 393-434. [In Czech.]
• 10. Cicha, I., Rögl, F., Rupp, Ch. & Čtyroká, J., 1998. Oligocene- Miocene foraminifera of the Central Paratethys. Abhandlungen der Senckenbergischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft, 549: 1-325.
• 11. Čopjaková, R., 2007. Odraz změn provenience v psefitické apsa- mitické frakci sedimentů myslejovického souvrství (analýza těžkých minerálů). Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Masaryk University, Brno. [In Czech.]
• 12. Doláková, N., Brzobohatý, R., Hladilová, Š. & Nehyba, S., 2008. The red algal facies of the Lower Badenian limestones of the Carpathian Foredeep in Moravia (Czech Republic). Geologica Carpathica, 59: 133-146.
• 13. Doláková, N., Holcová, K., Nehyba, S., Hladilová, Š., Brzobohatý, R., Zágoršek, K., Hrabovský, J., Seko, M. & Utescher, T., 2014. The Badenian parastratotype at Židlochovice from the perspective of the multiproxy study. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen, 271: 169-201.
• 14. Doveton, J. H. & Merriam, D. F., 2004. Borehole petrophysical chemostratigraphy of Pennsylvanian black shales in the Kansas subsurface. Chemical Geology, 206: 249-258.
• 15. Dulai, A. & Stachacz, M., 2011. New Middle Miocene Argyrotheca (Brachiopoda; Megathyrididae) species from the Central Paratethys. Földtani Közlöny, 141: 283-291.
• 16. Flemings, P. B. & Jordan, T. E., 1989. Stratigraphic modelling of foreland basins: Interpreting thrust deformation and lithospere rheology. Geology, 18: 430-434.
• 17. Folk, R. L. & Ward, W., 1957. Brazos River bar: a study in the significance of grain-size parameters. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 27: 3-26.
• 18. Force, E. R., 1980. The provenance of rutile. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 50: 485-488.
• 19. Haq, B. U., Hardenbol, J. & Vail, P. R., 1988. Mesozoic and Cenozoic chronostratigraphy and eustatic cycles. In: Wilgus, C. K., Hastings, B .S., Posamentier, H., van Wagoner, J., Ross, C. A. & Kendall, C. G. S. C. (eds), Sea-level Changes: An Integrated Approach. SEPM Special Publication, 42: 71-108.
• 20. Halgedahl, S. L., Jarrard, R. D., Brett, C. E. & Allison, P. A., 2009. Geophysical and geological signatures of relative sea level change in the upper Wheeler Formation, Drum Mounlains, West-Central Utah: A perspective into exceptional preservation of fossils. Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology, 277: 34-56.
• 21. Harloff, J. & Mackensen, A., 1997. Recent benthic foraminiferal associations and ecology of the Scotia Sea and Argentine Basin. Marine Micropalaeontology, 31: 1-29.
• 22. Hilgen, F. J., Lourens, L. J., Van Dam, J. A., Beu, A. G., Boyes, A. F., Cooper, R. A., Krijgsman, W., Ogg, J. G., Piller, W. E. & Wilson, D. S., 2012. The Neogene Period. In: Gradstein, F. M., Ogg, J. G., Schmitz, M. D. & Ogg, G. M. (eds), The Geologic Time Scale 2012. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 923-978.
• 23. Hladil, J., Geršl, M., Strnad, L., Frána, J., Langrová, A. & Spišiak, J., 2006. Stratigraphic variation of complex impurities in platform limestones and possible significance of atmospheric dust: a study with emphasis on gamma-ray spectrometry and magnetic susceptibility outcrop logging (Eifelian-Frasnian, Moravia, Czech Republic). International Journal of Earth Sciences, 95: 703-723.
• 24. Hladilová, S., Nehyba, S., Dolákova, N. & Hladíková, J., 1999. Comparison of some relics of Miocene sediments on the eastern margin of the Bohemian Massif. Geologica Carpathica, 50 (Special Issue): 31-33.
• 25. Hladíková, J., Hladilová, Š. & Nehyba, S., 1992. Preliminary results of new investigations of Miocene sediments of Hostim (SW Moravia). In: Hamršmíd, B. (ed.), New Results on Tertiary of the Western Carpathians. Knihovnička Zemního Plynu Nafty, 15: 165-176.
• 26. Hohenegger, J., Corić, S. & Wagreich, M., 2014. Timing of the Middle Miocene Badenian Stage of the Central Paratethys. Geologica Carpathica, 65: 55-66.
• 27. Hudácková, N., 1995. Ecotype variability of genus Ammonia Brünnich 1772 in the Neogene of Paratethys and their paleoecological significance. Mineralia Slovaca, 27: 133-144.
• 28. Ingle, J. C., Jr., 1980. Cenozoic paleobathymetry and depositional history of selected sequences within the Southern California continental borderland. In: Sliter, W. V. (ed.), Studies in Marine Micropaleontology and Paleoecology: Memorial Volume to Orville L. Bandy. Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research, Special Publication, 19: 163-195.
• 29. Jašková, V., 1998. Nově objevené miocénní lokality na Prostějovsku. Přírodovědné studie Muzea Prostějovska, 1: 133139. [In Czech.]
• 30. Johnson, D. C. & Beaumont, C., 1995. Preliminary results from a platform kinematic model of orogen evolution, surface processes and the development of clastic foreland basin stratigraphy. In: Dorobek, S. L. & Ross, G. M. (eds), Stratigraphic Evolution of Foreland Basins. SEPM Special Publication, 52: 1-24.
• 31. Kalabis, V., 1961. Historie výzkumu terciéru širšího okolí Prostějova. Sborník Vlastivědného Muzea v Prostějově, Oddíl přírodovědný, pp. 59-75. [In Czech.]
• 32. Kalvoda, J., Bábek, O., Devuyst, F. X. & Sevastopulo, G. D. 2011, Biostratigraphy, sequence stratigraphy and gamma-ray spectrometry of the Tournaisian-Viséan boundary interval in the Dublin Basin. Bulletin of Geosciences, 86: 683-706.
• 33. Krystek, I. & Tejkal, J., 1968. Zur Lithologie und Stratigraphie des Miozäns in sw. Teile der Karpatischen Vortiefe in Mähren. Folia Facultatis Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Purkynianae Brunensis, Geologia, 9: 1-31. [In German.]
• 34. Langmuir, D. & Herman, J. S., 1980. The mobility of thorium in natural waters at low temperatures. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 44: 1753-1766.
• 35. Leszczyński, S. & Nemec, W., 2014. Dynamic stratigraphy of composite peripheral unconformity in a foredeep basin. Sedimentology, doi: 10.1111/sed.12155.
• 36. Logan, A., 2007. Geographic distribution of extant articulated brachiopods. In: Selden, P. A. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part H. Brachiopoda Revised. Volume 6. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas, Boulder (Colorado) and Lawrence (Kansas), pp. 3082-3115.
• 37. Lüning, S., Adamson, K. & Craig, J., 2003. Frasnian organic-rich shales in North Africa; regional distribution and depositional model. In: Artur, T., MacGregor-Duncan, S. & Cameron, N. R. (eds), Petroleum Geology of Africa: New Themes and De- veloping Technologies. Geological Society of London, Special Publications, 207: 165-184.
• 38. Mandic, O., 2004. Pectinid bivalves from the Grund Formation (Lower Badenian, Middle Miocene, Alpine-Carpathian Foredeep) - taxonomic revision and stratigraphic significance. Geologica Carpathica, 55: 129-146.
• 39. Matenco, L., Krézsek, C., Merten, S., Schmid, S., Cloetingh, S. & Andriessen, P., 2010. Characteristics of collisional orogens with low topographic build-up: an example from the Carpathians. Terra Nova, 22: 155-195.
• 40. Meinhold, G., Anders, B., Kostopoulos, D. & Reischmann, T., Rutile chemistry and thermometry as provenance indicator: An example from Chios Island, Greece. Sedimentary Geology, 203: 98-111.
• 41. Mísař, Z., Dudek, A., Havlena, V. & Weiss, J., 1983. Geologie ČSSR, I - Český Masiv. SNTL, Praha, 333 pp. [In Czech.]
• 42. Murray, J., 2006. Ecology and Applications of Benthic Foraminifera. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 426 pp.
• 43. Müller, V., Curda, J., Manová, M., Otava, J., Pačesová, E., Rejchrt, M., Rýda, K. & Šalanský, K., 2000. Vysvětlivky k souboru geologických a ekologických účelových map přírodních zdrojů v měřítku 1 : 50 000, list 24-21 Jevíčko. In: Soubor geologických a ekologických účelových map. Czech Geological Survey, Praha, 62 pp. [In Czech.]
• 44. Nehyba, S., Roetzel, R. & Adamová, M., 1999. Tephrostratigraphy of the Neogene volcaniclastics (Moravia, Lower Austria, Poland). Geologica Carpathica, 50 (Special Issue): 126- 128.
• 45. Nehyba, S. M & Jašková, V., 2012. Výsledky vrtného průzkumu na lokalitě Hluchov (sedimenty spodního badenu karpatské předhlubně). Geologické výzkumy na Moravě a ve Slezsku v roce 2011, 19: 36-41. [In Czech.]
• 46. Nehyba, S. & Šikula, J., 2007. Depositional architecture, sequence stratigraphy and geodynamic development of the Carpathian Foredeep (Czech Republic). Geologica Carpathica, 58: 53-69.
• 47. Nemec, W., 2005. Principles of Lithostratigraphic Logging and Facies Analysis. Course GEOV360 Lecture Notes, University of Bergen, 28 pp.
• 48. Novák, Z., 1975. Spodnobadenské vápence karpatské předhlubně. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Masaryk Univertity, Brno. [In Czech.]
• 49. Otava, J., 1998. Trendy změn ve složení siliciklastik drahanského kulmu a jejich geotektonická interpretace. Geologické výzkumy na Moravě a ve Slezsku v roce 1997, 5: 62-64. [In Czech.]
• 50. Papp, A. & Turnovsky, K., 1953. Die Entwicklung der Uvigerinen im Vindobon (Helvet und Torton) des Wiener Beckens. Jahrbuch der Geologischen Bundesanstalt, 96: 117-143. [In German.]
• 51. Pavézková, J., Hladilová, Š. & Bitner, M. A., 2013. Miocene brachiopods from the Židlochovice locality, Czech Republic. Geological Research in Moravia and Silesia, 20: 56-59.
• 52. Powers, M. C., 1982. Comparison Chart for Estimating Roundness and Sphericity. AGI Data Sheet 18.
• 53. Pupin, J. P., 1980. Zircon and granite petrology. Contribution to Mineralogy and Petrology, 73: 207-220.
• 54. Reading, H. G. (ed.), 1996. Sedimentary Environments: Processes, Facies and Stratigraphy. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 593 pp.
• 55. Royden, L. H., 1993. Evolution of retreating subduction boundaries formed during continental collision. Tectonics, 12: 629- 638.
• 56. Royden, L. H. & Burchfiel, B. C., 1989. Are systematic variations in thrust belt style related to plate boundary processes? (the Western Alps versus the Carpathians). Tectonics, 8: 51-61.
• 57. Rögl, F. & Spezzaferri, S., 2003. Foraminiferal paleoecology and biostratigraphy of the Mühlbach section (Gaindorf Formation, Lower Badenian), Lower Austria. Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien, 104A: 23-75.
• 58. Sinclair, H. D., 1997. Tectonostratigraphic model for underfilled peripheral foreland basin: An Alpine perspective. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, 109: 324-346.
• 59. Spötl, C. & Vennemann, T. W., 2003. Continuous-flow isotope ratio mass spectrometric analysis of carbonate minerals. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 17: 1004-1006.
• 60. Stendal, H., Toteu, S. F., Frei, R., Penaye, J., Njel, U. O., Bassahak, J., Nni, J., Kankeu, B., Ngako, V. & van Hell, J., 2006. Derivation of detrial rutile in the Yaoundé region from the Neoprotorezoic Pan-African belt in southern Cameroon (Central Africa). Journal of African Earth Sciences, 44: 443-458.
• 61. Štelcl, J. & Svoboda, L., 1962. Petrografické studie kulmských sedimentů Drahanské vysočiny (těžké minerály kulmských drob). Folia Universitatis Purkynianae Brunensis, Geologia, 3: 1-50. [In Czech.]
• 62. Triebold, S., von Eynatten, H. & Zack, T., 2005. Trace elements in detrital rutile as provenance indicators: a case study from the Erzgebirge, Germany. Schriftenreihe der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Geowissenschaften, 38: 44-145.
• 63. Tucker, M. (ed.), 1988. Techniques in Sedimentology. Blackwell Science, Oxford, 394 pp.
• 64. Vysloužil, O., 1981. Fauna spodního badenu na lokalitě Služín v karpatské předhlubní na Moravě. Unpublished MSc Thesis, Masaryk University, Brno. [In Czech.]
• 65. Walker, R. G. & James, N. P., 1992. Facies Models: Response to Sea Level Changes. Geological Association of Canada, St. John’s, 380 pp.
• 66. Zack, T., von Eynatten, H. & Kronz, A., 2004. Rutile geochemistry and its potential use in quantitative provenance studies. Sedimentary Geology, 171: 37-58.
• 67. Zapletal, J., 2004. Contribution to paleogeographic evolution of Lower Bedenian sedimentation in central Moravia (Czech Republic). Scripta Facultatis Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Masarykianae Brunensis, Geology, 31-32: 87-98. [In Czech.]
• 68. Zapletal, J., Hladilová, Š. & Doláková, N., 2001. Matine sediments of the Lower Badenian marginal facies in Olomouc. Scripta Facultatis Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Masarykianae Brunensis, Geology, 30: 75-86. [InCzech].
• 69. Zágoršek, K., 2010. Bryozoa from the Langhian (Miocene) of the Czech Republic. Part I and II. Acta Musei Nationalis Pragae, Series B, Historia Naturalis, 66: 1-255.
• 70. Zágoršek, K., Holcová, K., Nehyba, S., Kroh, A. & Hladilová, Š., 2008, The invertebrate fauna of the Middle Miocene (Lower Badenian) sediments of Kralice nad Oslavou (Central Paratethys, Moravian part of the Carpathian Foredeep). Bulletin of Geosciences, 84: 465-496.
• 71. Zágoršek, K., Nehyba, S., Tomanová Petrová, P., Hladilová, Š., Bitner, M. A., Doláková, N., Hrabovský, J. & Jašková, V., 2011, Local catastrophe near Přemyslovice (Moravia, Czech Republic) during Middle Miocene due to the tephra input. Geological Quarterly, 56: 269-284.
• 72. Zágoršek, K., Tomanová Petrová, P., Nehyba, S., Jašková, V. & Hladilová, Š., 2010. Fauna vrtů HL 1a HL 2 u Hlucho va (střední miocén), Prostějovsko. Geologické výzkumy na Moravě a ve Slezsku v roce 2009, 17: 99-103.