Simulation of water cycle components in the Narmada River basin by forcing SWAT model with CFSR data

Goswami, S. B.; Kar, S. C.

doi:10.26491/mhwm/76250

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Simulation of water cycle components in the Narmada River basin by forcing SWAT model with CFSR data

Autorzy

Goswami S. B. , Kar S. C.

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.26491/mhwm/76250

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

In the present study, an attempt has been made through a hydrological model (SWAT – Soil and Water Assessment Tool) to simulate water cycle components over the Narmada river basin, one of the largest rivers in the Indian peninsula. The model was forced with observed as well as CFSR rainfall data to calibrate surface runoff simulated by the model. The spatial and temporal variability of the water cycle components were examined by running the SWAT model for 30 years (1984-2013) at a daily time-scale using CFSR precipitation, temperature, humidity, winds and solar radiation. It was found that there are large variations in hydrological parameters simulated by the model from sub-basin to sub-basin and year to year. During the monsoon seasons, surface runoff is maximum but during other seasons, almost no surface runoff is seen as there is almost no rain. Groundwater increase is seen after about 1 month of rainfall peaks in the basin. Evapotranspiration has two peaks, one in March-April and the other in August. Much less evaporation takes place in the basin in the month of May. These components (other than surface runoff) are also sensitive to climatic forcing (winds, relative humidity and solar radiation in addition to temperature and rainfall) applied. Evapotranspiration increases when all the climatic parameters are used, which then reduces the water availability on the surface for percolation and groundwater recharge. However, rainfall is the key parameter which decides the hydrology in the Narmada basin. The SWAT model has been able to compute water balance at basin and sub-basin scales.

Słowa kluczowe

hydrology water cycle SWAT CFSR data

hydrologia dane CFSR symulacja cykl dorzecze rzeka Narmada

Wydawca

Instytut Meteorologii i Gospodarki Wodnej - Państwowy Instytut Badawczy

Czasopismo

Meteorology Hydrology and Water Management. Research and Operational Applications

Rocznik

2018

Tom

Vol. 6, Iss. 1

Strony

13--25

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 41 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Goswami S. B.

National Center for Medium Range Weather Forecasting, Ministry of Earth Sciences, A-50, Sector-62, NOIDA, UP, Pin: 201 309, India

autor

Kar S. C.

National Center for Medium Range Weather Forecasting, Ministry of Earth Sciences, A-50, Sector-62, NOIDA, UP, Pin: 201 309, India

Bibliografia

1. Abbaspour K.C., Yang J., Maximov I., Siber R., Bogner K., Mieleitner J., Zobrist J., Srinivasan R., 2007, Modelling hydrology and water quality in the pre-alpine/alpine Thur watershed using SWAT, Journal of Hydrology, 333 (2-4), 413-430, DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.09.014
2. Adeogun A.G., Sule B.F., Salami A.W., Daramola M.O., 2014, Validation of SWAT model for prediction of water yield and water balance: case study of upstream catchment of Jebba dam in Nigeria, International Journal of Mathematical, Computational, Physical and Computer Engineering, 8 (2), 264-270
3. Allan R.P., Liepert B.G., 2010, Anticipated changes in the global atmospheric water cycle, Environmental Research Letters, 5 (2), DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/5/2/025201
4. Allen R.G., Jensen M.E., Wright J.L., Burman R.D., 1989, Operational estimate of reference evapotranspiration, Agronomy Journal, 81, 650-662
5. Allen R.G., Pereira L.S., Raes D., Smith M., 1998, Crop evapotranspiration – Guidelines for computing crop water requirements, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper, 56, FAO, Rome, Italy, available at http://www.fao.org/docrep/X0490E/ X0490E00.htm (data access 22.08.2017)
6. Arnold J.G., Srinivasan R., Muttiah R.S., Williams J.R., 1998, Large-area hydrologic modeling and assessment: Part I. Model development, Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 34 (1), 73-89, DOI: 10.1111/j.1752- 1688.1998.tb05961.x
7. Bastidas L.A., Gupta H.V., Hsu K.-L.,Sorooshian S., 2003, Parameter, structure and model performance evaluation for land-surface schemes, [in:] Calibration of watershed models, Q. Duan, H.V. Gupta, S. Sorooshian, A. Rousseau, R. Turcotte (eds.), American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C., DOI: 10.1029/WS006p0229
8. Brutsaert W., Parlange M.B., 1998, Hydrologic cycle explains the evaporation paradox, Nature, 396, 30, DOI: 10.1038/23845
9. Chung W.H.,. Wang I.T, Wang R.Y., 2010, Theory-based SCS-CN method and its applications, Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 15 (12), 1045-1058, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE) HE.1943-5584.0000281
10. Earls J., Dixon B., 2008, A comparison of SWAT model-predicted potential evapotranspiration using real and modeled meteorological data, Vadose Zone Journal, 7 (2), 570-580
11. Fontaine T.A., Cruickshank T.S, Arnold J.G., Hotchkiss R.H., 2002, Development of a snowfall-snowmelt routine for mountainous terrain for the soil water assessment tool (SWAT), Journal of Hydrology, 262 (1-4), 209-223, DOI: 10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00029-X
12. Geetha K.,. Mishra S.K, Eldho T.I., Rastogi A.K., Pandey R.P., 2007, Modification to SCS-CN method for long-term hydrologic simulation, Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 133 (5), 475-489, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733- 9437(2007)133:5(475)
13. Green W.H., Ampt G., 1911, Studies of soil physics. Part I: The flow of air and water through soils, Journal of Agricultural Science, 4 (1), 1-24, DOI: 10.1017/S0021859600001441
14. Hargreaves G.L., Hargreaves G.H., Riley J.P., 1985, Agricultural benefits for Senegal River basin, Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 111 (2), 113-124, DOI: 10.1061/ (ASCE)0733-9437(1985)111:2(113)
15. Huntington T.G., 2006, Evidence for intensification of the global water cycle: review and synthesis, Journal of Hydrology, 319 (1-4), 83-95, DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.003
16. IPCC, 2001, Climate change 2001: Synthesis report, Contribution of Working Groups I, II, and III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, R. Watson and the Core Writing Team (eds.), Cambridge University Press, 148 pp.
17. Jain S.K., Storm B., Bathurst J.C., Refsgaard J.C., Singh R.D., 1992, Application of the SHE to catchments in India. Part 2. Field experiments and simulation studies with the SHE on the Kolar subcatchment of the Narmada River, Journal of Hydrology, 140 (1-4), 25-47, DOI: 10.1016/0022-1694(92)90233-L
18. Karl T.R., Melillo J.M., Peterson T.C. (eds.), 2009, Global Climate Change Impacts in the United States, A State of Knowledge from the U.S. Global Change Research Program, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 188 pp., available at https://downloads.globalchange.gov/usimpacts/ pdfs/climate-impacts-report.pdf (data access 22.08.2017)
19. Kleinn J., Frei C., Gurtz J., Lüthi D., Vidale P.L., Schär C., 2005, Hydrologic simulations in the Rhine basin driven by a regional climate model, Journal of Geophysical Research, 110 (D4), DOI: 10.1029/2004JD005143
20. Liepert B.G., Previdi M., 2009, Do models and observations disagree on the rainfall response to global warming?, Journal of Climate, 22, 3156-3166, DOI: 10.1175/2008JCLI2472.1
21. Manaswi C.M., Thawait A.K., 2014, Application of soil and water assessment tool for runoff modeling of Karam River basin in Madhya Pradesh, International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Technology, 3 (5), 529-532
22. Mehran A., AghaKouchak A., Phillips T.J., 2014, Evaluation of CMIP5 continental precipitation simulations relative to satellite-based gauge-adjusted observations, Journal Geophysical Research. Atmospheres, 119 (4), 1695-1707, DOI: 10.1002/2013JD021152
23. Miller S.N., Kepner W.G., Mehaffey M.H, Hernandez M., Miller R.C., Goodrich D.C., Devonald F.K., Heggem D.T., Miller W.P., 2002, Integrating landscape assessment and hydrologic modeling for Land Cover change analysis, Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 38 (4), 915-929, DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2002.tb05534.x
24. Monteith J.L., 1965, Evaporation and environment, [in:] The State and Movement of Water in Living Organisms, Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology, G.E. Fogg (ed.), Cambridge University Press, XIX, 205-23
25. Music B., Caya D., 2009, Investigation of the sensitivity of water cycle components simulated by the Canadian regional climate model to the land surface parameterization, the lateral boundary data, and the internal variability, Journal of Hydrometeorology, 10, 3-21, DOI: 10.1175/2008JHM979.1
26. Nash J.E., Sutcliffe J.V., 1970, River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part I: A discussion of principles, Journal of Hydrology, 10 (3), 282-290, DOI: 10.1016/0022- 1694(70)90255-6
27. Nearing M., Liu B., Risse L., Zhang X., 1996, Curve number and Green-Ampt effective hydraulic conductivities, Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 32 (1), 125-136, DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1996.tb03440.x
28. Netnapa Pongpetch, Pongthep Suwanwaree, 2013, Simulation of stream flow for Upper Lam Takongsub-Watershed using SWAT model, International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 4 (3), 261-263, DOI: 10.7763/IJESD.2013. V4.349
29. Notter B., Hurni H., Wiesmann U., Abbaspour K.C., 2012, Modelling water provision as an ecosystem service in a large East African river basin, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 16, 69-86, DOI: 10.5194/hess-16-69-2012
30. Peterson T.C., Golubev V.S., Groisman P.Y., 1995, Evaporation losing its strength, Nature, 377, 687-688, DOI: 10.1038/377687b0
31. Priestley C.H.B., Taylor R.J., 1972, On the assessment of surface heat flux and evaporation using large-scale parameters, Monthly Weather Review, 100 (2), 81-92, DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(1972)100<0081:OTAOSH>2.3.CO;2
32. Saha S., Moorthi S., Pan H.-L., Wu X., Wang J., Nadiga S., Tripp P., Kistler R., Woollen J., Behringer D., Liu H., Stokes D., Grumbine R., Gayno G., Wang J., Hou Y.-T., Chuang H.-Y., Juang H.-M., Sela J., Iredell M., Treadon R., Kleist D., Van Delst P., Keyser D., Derber J., Ek M., Meng J., Wei H., Yang R., Lord S., van den Dool H., Kumar A., Wang W., Long C., Chelliah M., Xue Y., Huang B., Schemm J.-K., Ebisuzaki W., Lin R., Xie P., Chen M., Zhou S., Higgins W., Zou C.-Z., Liu Q., Chen Y., Han Y., Cucurull L., Reynolds R.W., Rutledge G., Goldberg M., 2010, The NCEP Climate Forecast System Reanalysis, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 1015-1057, DOI: 10.1175/2010BAMS3001.1.
33. Sharma R.K., Goswami S.B., Tiwari S., Kar S.C., 2015, Evaluation of daily rainfall-runoff simulations in Narmada River basin, International Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering, 8 (3), 1123-1132
34. Siebert S., Burke J., Faures J.M., Frenken K., Hoogeveen J., Dӧll P., Portmann F.T., 2010, Groundwater use for irrigation – a global inventory, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 14, 1863-1880, DOI: 10.5194/hess-14-1863-2010
35. Spruill C.A., Workman S.R., Taraba J.L., 2000, Simulation of daily and monthly stream discharge from small watersheds using the SWAT model, Transactions of the ASAE, 43 (6), 1431-1439, DOI: 10.13031/2013.3041
36. Stehr A., Debels P., Romero F., Alcayaga H., 2008, Hydrological modelling with SWAT under conditions of limited data availability: evaluation of results from a Chilean case study, Hydrological Sciences Journal, 53 (3), 588-601, DOI: 10.1623/hysj.53.3.588
37. Vazquez-Amabile G.G., Engel B.A., 2005, Use of SWAT to compute groundwater table depth and stream flow in the Muscatatuck River watershed, Transactions of the ASAE, 48 (3), 991-1003
38. Wada Y., Van Beek L.P.H., Van Kempen C.M., Reckman J.W.T.M., Vasak S., Bierkens M.F.P., 2010, Global depletion of groundwater resources, Geophysical Research Letters, 37 (20), DOI: 10.1029/2010GL044571
39. Waliser D., Seo K.-W., Schubert S., Njoku E., 2007, Global water cycle agreement in the climate models assessed in the IPCC AR4, Geophysical Research Letters, 34 (16), DOI: 10.1029/2007GL030675
40. Wang X., Melesse A.M., Yang W., 2006, Influences of potential evapotranspiration estimation methods on SWAT’s hydrologic simulation in a Northwestern Minnesota watershed, Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 49, 1755-1771, DOI: 10.13031/2013.22297
41. Xu C.-Y., Singh V.P., 2005, Evaluation of three complementary relationship evapotranspiration models by water balance approach to estimate actual regional evapotranspiration in different climatic regions, Journal of Hydrology, 308 (1-4), 105-121, DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.10.024

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-45af750f-71c3-47b0-b219-a06b098be511