Increasing divergence of patent activity in certain european regions - space-time analysis

• Autorzy: Szajt Marek

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17512/pjms.2021.24.1.23

Warianty tytułu

PL

Rosnąca dywergencja aktywności patentowej w wybranych regionach Europy - analiza przestrzenno-czasowa

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The article attempts to analyse the impact of changes taking place within patent activity at the regional level. The study included regional data (NUTS1) for the years 2000- 2012 from EUROSTAT. The space-time models used an error correction construction with fixed effects was proposed in research. Analysis of data at the regional level pointed to existing and deepening divergence. Countries but also some regions that have reached high ranks of innovation in the past, are leaving the other countries and regions behind. On the other hand weaker regions are not able to compete with the stronger ones. Research shows, that regions of Germany, Austria, France, the Netherlands, Luxembourg will be far ahead of the most of European countries in terms of innovation in the coming years. Coefficients obtained for Croatia, Cyprus, Lithuania and Malta, indicate a "waste" of expenditures under decidedly unfavourable development of innovation.

PL

W artykule podjęto próbę analizy wpływu zmian zachodzących w obrębie aktywności patentowej na poziomie regionów. Badanie obejmowało dane regionalne (NUTS1) za lata 2000-2012 pozyskane z bazy EUROSTAT. W badaniu zaproponowano model przestrzenno-czasowy z efektami stałymi, zawierający konstrukcję korekty błędem. Analiza danych na poziomie regionalnym wskazała na istniejącą i pogłębiającą się dywergencję. Państwa, ale także niektóre regiony, które osiągnęły wysokie stopnie innowacyjności w przeszłości, pozostawiają inne kraje i regiony w tyle. Z drugiej strony słabsze regiony nie są w stanie konkurować z silniejszymi. Badania pokazują, że regiony Niemiec, Austrii, Francji, Holandii, Luksemburga będą w najbliższych latach znacznie wyprzedzać większość krajów europejskich pod względem innowacyjności. Współczynniki uzyskane dla Chorwacji, Cypru, Litwy i Malty wskazują na "marnotrawstwo" wydatków w ramach zdecydowanie niezadowalającego rozwoju innowacyjności.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

innovation activity; patents; regional analysis

PL

aktywność innowacyjna; patenty; analiza regionalna

• Wydawca: Czestochowa University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Management Studies
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 24, No. 1
• Strony: 392--406
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 45 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Szajt Marek

• Częstochowa University of Technology, Faculty of Management

Bibliografia

• 1.Acosta M., Coronado D. and Ángeles Martínez M., (2012). Spatial differences in the quality of university patenting: Do regions matter? Research Policy, 41, 692-703.
• 2.Acs, Z. J. Audretsch D. B., (1989). Patents as a Measure of Innovative Activity, Kyklos, 42, 171-180.
• 3.Acs, Z.. Anselin J. L. and Varga A., (2002). Patents and Innovation Counts as Measures of Regional Production of New Knowledge, Research Policy, 31, 1069-1085.
• 4.Andrijauskiene M., Dumciuviene D. and Stundziene A., (2021). EU framework programmes: positive and negative effects on member states' innovation performance, Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 16(3), 471-502.
• 5.Androniceanu, A., Nica, E., Georgescu, I. and Sabie, O. M., (2021). The influence of the ICT on the control of corruption in public administrations of the EU member states: a comparative analysis based on panel data. Administratie si Management Public, 37, 41- 59
• 6.Androniceanu, A., (2020). Major structural changes in the EU policies due to the problems and risks caused by COVID-19. Administratie si Management Public, 34, 137-149.
• 7.Antonelli C., (2009). The economics of innovation: from the classical legacies to the economics of complexity, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 18(7), 611- 646.
• 8.Asheim B., Grillitsch M. and Trippl M., (2017). Introduction: Combinatorial knowledge bases, regional innovation, and development dynamics, Economic Geography, 93(5), 429-435.
• 9.Baltagi B.H., (2009). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
• 10.Broekel T., Brenner T. and Buerger M., (2015). An Investigation of the Relation between Cooperation Intensity and the Innovative Success of German Regions, Spatial Economic Analysis, 10(1), 52-78,
• 11.Buesa M., Heijs J. and Baumert T., (2010). The Determinants of Regional Innovation in Europe: A Combined Factorial and Regression Knowledge Production Function Approach, Research Policy, 39, 722-735.
• 12.Choi I., Bhum Suk Ch., (1995). Sampling frequency and the power of tests for a unit root: A simulation study, Economics Letters, 49(2), August, 131-136.
• 13.Corradini C., De Propris L., (2015). Technological diversification and new innovators in European regions: evidence from patent data, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 47(10), 2170-2186.
• 14.Dang J., Motohashi K., (2015). Patent Statistics: A Good Indicator for Innovation in China? Patent Subsidy Program Impacts on Patent Quality, China Economic Review, 35, 137-155.
• 15.Ermasova N., (2016). The Impact of Risks on Regional Patent Activity in Russia, Problems of Economic Transition, 58(5), 377-399.
• 16.Evangelista R., Meliciani V. and Vezzani A., (2018). Specialisation in key enabling technologies and regional growth in Europe, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 27(3), 273-289.
• 17.Feldman M.P., Kogler D.F., (2010). Stylized facts in the geography of innovation, [in:] Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edited by Hall B. H., Rosenberg N., 1, 381- 410. North-Holland.
• 18.Frietsch R., Schmoch U., Neuhäusler P. and Rothengatter O., (2010b). Patent Applications - Structures, Trends and Recent Developments, Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem, 9-2010.
• 19.Frietsch R., Schmoch U., van Looy B., Walsh J.P., Devroede R., Du Plessis M., Jung T., at all., (2010a). The Value and Indicator Function of Patents, Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem, 15-2010.
• 20. Furman J. L., Porter M. E. and Stern S., (2000). The Determinants of National Innovative Capacity, Research Policy, 31(6), 899-933.
• 21.Górna J., Górna K. and Szulc E., (2013). Analysis of β-Convergence. From Traditional Cross-Section Model to Dynamic Panel Model, Dynamic Econometric Models, 13, 127-143.
• 22.Griliches Z., (1990). Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey, Journal of Economic Literature, 28(4), 1661-1707.
• 23.Groutsis D., Vassilopoulou J., Kyriakidou O. and Özbilgin M. F., (2019). The , New’ Migration for Work Phenomenon: The Pursuit of Emancipation and Recognition in the Context of Work, Work, Employment and Society, 34(5), 864-882.
• 24.Hauser Ch., Siller M., Schatzer T., Walde J. and Tappeiner G., (2018). Measuring Regional Innovation: A Critical Inspection of the Ability of Single Indicators to Shape Technological Change, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 129, 43-55.
• 25.Hottenrott H., Hall B. H. and Czarnitzki D., (2016). Patents as quality signals? The implications for financing constraints on R&D, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 25(3), 197-217.
• 26.Iammarino S., Rodríguez-Pose A. and Storper M., (2019). Regional inequality in Europe: evidence, theory and policy implications, Journal of Economic Geography, 19(2), 273- 298.
• 27.Kica E., Groenendijk N., (2011). The European patent system: dealing with emerging technologies, Innovation The European Journal of Social Science Research, 24, Nos. 1- 2, March-June 2011, 85-105.
• 28.Kowalik J., (2008). An Analysis of the Innovation Level of Enterprises in the European Union, Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica, 223, 46-65.
• 29.Lewandowska A., Švihlíková I., (2020). Regional Innovation System in the Podkarpackie against selected Polish and EU regions, Journal of International Studies, 13(2), 212-223.
• 30.Markowska M., (2014). The Analysis of Diversification Tendencies in the Regional Innovativeness of EU Countries 1999‒2012, Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica, 307(5), 77-96.
• 31.Niklewicz-Pijaczyńska M., (2019). The role of the patent system in the internationalization of the technical knowledge diffusion, Economic and Environmental Studies, 19(3), 51, 253-263.
• 32.Ostraszewska Z., Tylec A., (2019). Eco-innovation: the profile of Poland in comparison to the European Union, Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 5(SI), 206-214.
• 33.Pater R., Lewandowska A., (2014). Human capital and innovativeness of the European Union regions, Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 28(1), 31-51.
• 34.Pedroni P., (1995). Panel Cointegration, Asymptotic and Finite Sample Properties of Pooled Time Series Tests, with an Application to the PPP Hypothesis, Econometric Theory, 20, 2004, 597-625.
• 35.Prokop V., Kotkova Striteska M. and Stejskal, J., (2021). Fostering Czech firms’ innovation performance through efficient cooperation, Oeconomia Copernicana, 12(3), 671-700.
• 36.Shuba, B. Sotskyi A., (2019). World Experience in Financing Innovative Small Businesses, Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 5(1), 239-244.
• 37.Simmie J., (2003). Innovation and Urban Regions as National and International Nodes for the Transfer and Sharing of Knowledge, Regional Studies, 37(6&7), 607-620.
• 38.Sipa M., Lemańska-Majdzik A. and Okręglicka M., (2016). Factors Differentiating the Level of Innovation of the Visegrad Group Countries, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on European Integration, 2016, 858-866. VSB - Technical University of Ostrava.
• 39.Szajt M., (2006). Modeling of State Innovativeness Based on Space-Time Models, Dynamic Econometric Models, 7, 231-238.
• 40.Škrinjarić T., (2020). R&D in Europe: Sector Decomposition of Sources of (in)Efficiency, Sustainability, 12(4), 1432.
• 41.Teslenko V., Melnikov R. and Bazin D., (2021). Evaluation of the impact of human capital on innovation activity in Russian regions, Regional Studies, Regional Science, 8(1), 109-126.
• 42.Torrecillas C., Fischer B. B. and Sánchez A., (2017). The dual role of R&D expenditures in European Union’s member states: short- and long-term prospects, Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 30(4), 433-454.
• 43.Valinurova, L.S., Gazitdinov, A.M., Kazakova, O.B. and Kuzminykh, N.A., (2022), “Higher Education and Innovation Potential in Russian Regions: Territorial Distribution”, Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 17(1), 193-201.
• 44.Wiśniewska J., Janasz K., (2018). Patent Protection Management for Research Results of Research Entities in Poland, Journal of Eastern Europe Research in Business and Economics, 2018, Article ID 263329.Grabara J., 2013, Sustainable Logistics Management, Sibiu Editura Universitatii "Lucian Blaga"din Sibiu.
• 45.Zaytsev, A., Talerchik, S. and Dmitriev, N., (2021), “Evaluating Rental Factors of Innovation Sustainability in Russian Regions Using Index Methods”, Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 17(2), 93-103.