Methodology for assessment of the cost effectiveness of simple energy efficient investments

• Autorzy: Szafranko Elżbieta

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17512/bozpe.2020.2.13

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The development of energy efficient buildings has been on the increase in recent years. This trend in architectural engineering reflects both the binding legal regulation and the rational approach of investors to the construction or refurbishment of buildings. When planning such an investment, it is necessary to scrutinize the underlying guidelines and the conditions in which the building will be developed, as well as its future useful life. Economic analysis of the effectiveness of investments in the building sector employs simple and discounted methods. Depending on the scope and complexity of envisaged construction work, it is possible to apply methods from both groups. However, simple methods should suffice for simple building projects, an example of which will be discussed in the article. Three variants of planned additional thermal insulation of external walls of a residential building will be presented. The results of our calculations showed that the payback period for such an investment would be too long, which is why it is recommended to combine the thermal insulation of outer walls with some broader measures so as to shorten the time needed to achieve a good return on investment ratio.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

cost effectiveness; energy efficient; thermal insulation

PL

opłacalność; energooszczędność; izolacja cieplna

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Częstochowskiej
• Czasopismo: Budownictwo o Zoptymalizowanym Potencjale Energetycznym
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: Vol. 9 Nr 2
• Strony: 111--119
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 19 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Szafranko Elżbieta

• University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn

Bibliografia

• 1.Diakaki, C., Grigoroudis, E. & Kolokotsa, D. (2008) Towards a multi-objective optimization approach for improving energy efficiency in buildings. Energy and buildings, 40(9), 1747-1754.
• 2.Diakaki, C., Grigoroudis, E., Kabelis, N., Kolokotsa, D., Kalaitzakis, K. & Stavrakakis, G. (2010) A multi-objective decision model for the improvement of energy efficiency in buildings. Energy, 35(12), 5483-5496.
• 3.Dylewski, R. & Adamczyk, J. (2011) Economic and environmental benefits of thermal insulation of building external walls. Building and Environment, 46(12), 2615-2623.
• 4.Faludi, J. & Lepech, M. (2012) Ecological payback time of an energy-efficient modular building. Journal of green building, 7(1), 100-119.
• 5.Gieseler, U.D.J., Heidt, F.D., Bier, W (2004) Evaluation of the cost efficiency of an energy efficient building. Renewable Energy, 29(3), 369-376.
• 6.Knapp, K. & Jester, T. (2001) Empirical investigation of the energy payback time for photovoltaic modules. Solar Energy, 71(3), 165-172.
• 7.Kuckshinrichs, W., Kronenberg, T. & Hansen, P. (2010) The social return on investment in the energy efficiency of buildings in Germany. Energy Policy, 38(8), 4317-4329.
• 8.Landsberg, D.R. & Stewart, R. (1980) Improving Energy Efficiency in Buildings. SUNY Press.
• 9.Malatji, E.M., Zhang, J. & Xia, X. (2013) A multiple objective optimisation model for building energy efficiency investment decision. Energy and Buildings, 61, 81-87.
• 10.Martinaitis, V., Kazakevičius, E. & Vitkauskas, A. (2007) A two-factor method for appraising building renovation and energy efficiency improvement projects. Energy Policy, 35(1), 192-201.
• 11.Navarro, V.B. & Sanchez, J.A. (2002) U.S. Patent No. 6,338,283. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
• 12.Noailly, J. (2012) Improving the energy efficiency of buildings: The impact of environmental policy on technological innovation. Energy Economics, 34(3), 795-806.
• 13.Patiño-Cambeiro, F., Armesto, J., Bastos, G., Prieto-López, J.I. & Patiño-Barbeito, F. (2019) Economic appraisal of energy efficiency renovations in tertiary buildings. Sustainable Cities and Society, 47, 101503.
• 14.Risholt, B. & Berker, T. (2013) Success for energy efficient renovation of dwellings - Learning from private homeowners. Energy Policy, 61, 1022-1030.
• 15.Weiner, M.H. & Curtis, M.A. (1995) U.S. Patent No. 5,415,009. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
• 16.Wilson, C., Crane, L. & Chryssochoidis, G. (2015) Why do homeowners renovate energy efficiently? Contrasting perspectives and implications for policy. Energy Research & Social Science, 7, 12-22.
• 17.Wiren, B.G. (1983) Effects of surrounding buildings on wind pressure distributions and ventilative heat losses for a single-family house. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 15(1-3), 15-26.
• 18.Rozporządzenie Ministra Transportu, Budownictwa i Gospodarki Morskiej z dnia 5 lipca 2013 r. zmieniające rozporządzenie w sprawie warunków technicznych, jakim powinny odpowiadać budynki i ich usytuowanie.
• 19.PN EN ISO 6946.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).