The method of selecting the interval of functional tests taking into account economic aspects and legal requirements

• Autorzy: Piesik Jan , Piesik Emilian , Śliwiński Marcin

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.14313/JAMRIS/2-2020/24

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The article discusses the problem of choosing the optimal frequency of functional tests, taking into account the reliability and law requirements, but also the impact of business aspects in the company. The subject of functional test interval is well described for purposes of the process industry. Unfortunately, this is not the case for the machinery safety functions with low demand mode. This is followed by a presentation of the current business approach, which, in order to achieve industrial excellence, monitor their performance through the appropriate selection of key performance indicators. In addition, companies are increasingly exploring potential risks in the following areas: new challenges in advanced risk management, including the perception of the company’s facilities as a safe workplace insight of customers and business partners. Eliminating potential hazards is increasingly taking into account, especially the impact of human activity and its interaction with machines. The case study has been presented based on the machines used for the production of tire semi-finished products. In this article, the authors propose a solution for selecting the interval of functional tests of safety functions and additional machine protection measures as a compromise to achieve satisfactory results in terms of safety requirements, performance and legal requirements.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

functional test; maintenance engineering; parameter; optimisation; safety analysis; time-schedule control; tires

• Wydawca: Łukasiewicz Industrial Research Institute for Automation and Measurements PIAP
• Czasopismo: Journal of Automation Mobile Robotics and Intelligent Systems
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: Vol. 14, No. 2
• Strony: 91--98
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 22 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Piesik Jan

• Michelin Polska S.A., Olsztyn, Poland

autor

Piesik Emilian

• Gdansk University of Technology, Gdańsk, Poland

autor

Śliwiński Marcin

• Gdansk University of Technology, Gdańsk, Poland

Bibliografia

• [1] T. Carannante, “The introduction and implementation of TPM using a conceptual model developed in-house – phase I”, Maintenance & Asset Management, vol. 18, no. 5/6, 2003.
• [2] D. Gołębiewski and K. Kosmowski, “Towards a process based management system for oil port infrastructure in context of insurance”, Journal of Polish Safety and Reliability Association, vol. 8, No. 1, 2017.
• [3] H. Guo, F. Szidarovszky, A. Gerokostopoulos and P. Niu, “On determining optimal inspection interval for minimizing maintenance cost”. In: 2015 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS), 2015, DOI: 10.1109/RAMS.2015.7105163.
• [4] IEC 61508 1-7:2010: Functional safety of electrical/ electronic/programmable electronic safety-related systems, International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, 2010.
• [5] IEC 61511 1-3:2016: Functional safety – Safety instrumented systems for the process industry sector, International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, 2016.
• [6] ISO 12100-2:2010: Safety of machinery – Basic concepts, general principles for design – Part 2: Technical principles, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 2010.
• [7] EN ISO 14119:2013: Safety of machinery – interlocking devices associated with guards – Principles for design and selection, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 2013.
• [8] ISO 9001:2015: Quality Management System –Requirements, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 2015.
• [9] EN 62061:2005: Safety of machinery – Functional safety of safety-related electrical, electronic and programmable electronic control system, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 2005.
• [10] ISO 22400: Automation Systems and integration – Key performance Indicators for Manufacturing Operations Management, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 2014.
• [11] ISO 22301: Societal security – Business continuity management – Requirements, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 2012.
• [12] ISO 31000: Risk management- Principles and guidelines, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 2009.
• [13] T. P. Kelly and J. A. McDermid, “A systematic approach to safety case maintenance”, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 71, no. 3, 2001,271–284, DOI: 10.1016/S0951-8320(00)00079-X.
• [14] L. Lu and J. Jiang, “Analysis of on-line maintenance strategies for k-out-of-n standby safety systems”, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 92, no. 2, 2007, 144–155, DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2005.11.012.
• [15] Application of IEC 61508 and IEC 61511 in the Norwegian Petroleum Industry (Recommended SIL requirements), Norwegian Oil and Gas Association, 2004.
• [16] J. Piesik and K. T. Kosmowski, “Aktualne problemy zarządzania niezawodnością i bezpieczeństwem linii produkcyjnej”, Zeszyty Naukowe Wydziału Elektrotechniki i Automatyki Politechniki Gdańskiej, vol. 51, 2016 (in Polish).
• [17] J. Piesik, E. Piesik and M. Śliwiński, “A method of Functional Test interval selection with regards to Machinery and Economical aspects”, Contemporary Computational Science: 3rd conference on nformation Technology, Systems Research and Computational Physics, 2018, 31–44.
• [18] M. Rausand, “Reliability centered maintenance”, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 60, no. 2, 1998, 121–132, DOI: 10.1016/S0951-8320(98)83005-6.
• [19] Reliability prediction method for safety instrumented systems: PDS method handbook 2010 edition, SINTEF Technology and Society, 2010.
• [20] M. Subhash, “Optimal inspection frequency: A tool for maintenance planning/forecasting”, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, vol. 21, no. 7, 2004, 763–771, DOI: 10.1108/02656710410549109.
• [21] J. K. Vaurio, “A Note on Optimal Inspection Intervals”, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, vol. 11, no. 6, 1994, 65–68, DOI: 10.1108/02656719410064685.
• [22] E. Zio and M. Compare, “Evaluating maintenance policies by quantitative modeling and analysis”, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 109, 2013, 53–65, DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2012.08.002.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).