Examples of bow-tie risk analysis at maritime transport

• Autorzy: Smolarek L.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5604/12314005.1216455

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

There are different approaches to risk assessment. The SOLAS Convention is the most important safety instruments at maritime transport. The biggest risk is a major navigational incident because it can result in fatalities and pollution. Possibly the major cause of collision incidents is not fully understanding and complying the COLREGS rules. It is not possible to create a simple flowchart to define a suitable approach to risk assessment of a ship. However, some of broad factors can be used to aid the selection of a suitable risk assessment approach in maritime transport. In the literature, we can find many methods and applications for maritime transportation risk analysis. There is a recent focus on foundational issues in risk analysis, especially for intensified research on fundamental concepts and principles. This paper presents the attempt of applying the Bow-Tie methodology at maritime transport. The benefits of using Bow-Tie diagrams for risk assessment have been showed at use, for many of technical systems and processes. This methodology known as barrier diagrams, provide a readily understandable visualization of the relationships between the causes of the failure's event, the escalation of such events to a range of possible outcomes, the controls preventing the event from occurring and the preparedness measures in place to limit the consequences. The Bow-Tie is very useful for structured assessment and communication of risks.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

transport; risk analysis; BowTie method; AHTS ships

• Wydawca: Łukasiewicz Research Network - Institute of Aviation ; European Science Society of Powertrain and Transport KONES Poland ; Wydawnictwo Instytutu Technicznego Wojsk Lotniczych
• Czasopismo: Journal of KONES
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: Vol. 23, No. 3
• Strony: 489--494
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 21 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Smolarek L.

• Gdynia Maritime University Department of Transport and Logistic Morska Street 81-87, 81-225 Gdynia, Poland tel.: [phone], fax: [phone]

Bibliografia

• [1] Aven, T., Quantitative risk assessment: the scientific platform, Cambridge University Press, New York, USA 2011.
• [2] Aven, T., Risk Analysis: Assessing Uncertainties beyond Expected Values and Probabilities, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, University of Stavanger, Norway 2008. 493
• [3] Chen, W., Design and Operation of Anchor Handling Tug Supply Vessels (AHTS), University of Stavanger, 2013.
• [4] COWI. Risk analysis of sea traffic in the area around Bornholm, P-65775-002, 2008.
• [5] Cross, R. B., (V), ABSG Consulting and Jorge E. Ballesio (V), A Quantitative Risk Assessment Model for Oil Tankers, Principal Engineer, American Bureau of Shipping, ABS Technical Papers, pp. 343-357, 2003.
• [6] Digital version, Anchor Handling Manual, Anchor manual, www.vryhof.com, Vryhof Anchors BV, 2010.
• [7] Debnath, A. K., Traffic-conflict-based modelling of collision risk in port waters, PhD dissertation. National University of Singapore, Singapore 2009.
• [8] Det Norske Veritas, Marine risk assessment, Offshore Technology Report 2001/063, London Technical Consultancy, Palace House, 3 Cathedral Street, London SE1 9DE, United Kingdom.
• [9] Goerlandt, F., Montewka, J., Maritime transportation risk analysis: Review and analysis in light of some foundational issues, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 138, pp. 115-134, 2015.
• [10] Gucma, S., Conditions of safe ship operation in sea waterway systems. Zeszyty Naukowe, Akademia Morska w Szczecinie, 36(108), Z. 1, pp. 55-58, 2013.
• [11] Gunton, T., A Spill Risk Assessment of the Enbridge Northern Gateway Project, School of Resource and Environmental Management Simon Fraser University, 2013.
• [12] Akhtar, J., Bjørnskau, T., Jean-Hansen, V., Oil spill risk analysis of routeing heavy ship traffic in Norwegian waters, WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, Vol. 11, Is. 2, pp. 233-247, 2012.
• [13] Lindgren, K., Sosnowski, M., Safety Assessment for Oil Tankers and Container Vessels Focused on Fire and Explosion In the Machinery Space, Department of Fire Safety Engineering and Systems Safety, Lund University, Sweden, Report 5312, Lund/Hamburg 2009.
• [14] Papanikolaou, A., Eliopoulou, E., Mikelis, N., Aksu, S., Delautre, S., Casualty Analysis of Tankers, The Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Learning from Marine Incidents III, London, UK 2006.
• [15] Przywarty, M., Probabilistic model of ships navigational safety assessment on large sea areas, In: Proceedings of the 16th International Symposiumon Electronics in Transport, Ljubljana, Slovenia 2008.
• [16] Soliwoda, J., Praktyczna ocena stateczności w eksploatacji a bezpieczeństwo statku, Zeszyty Naukowe Akademii Morskiej w Gdyni, No. 69, pp. 95-104, 2011.
• [17] Hamzah, S. Z., Use Bow Tie Tool for Easy Hazard Identification, 14th Asia Pacific Confederation of Chemical Engineering Congress, Singapore, 21-24 February 2012, http://rpsonline.com.sg/proceedings/9789810714451/html/SyedZaifulHamzah.pdf.
• [18] http://www.marineinsight.com/videos/watch-dangerous-anchor-handling-process-crew-life-risk/, 13.06.2016.
• [19] http://www.itopf.com/knowledge-resources/data-statistics/statistics/, 13.06.2016.
• [20] Risktec, Practical HSE Risk Management – An Introduction to the Bow-tie Method Presentation to the International Conference for Achieving Health & Safety Best Practice in Construction, Dubai, UAE, 26th-27th February 2007 By Gareth Book, Risktec Solutions Ltdrisk, www.risktec.com, 13.06.2016.
• [21] http://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Safety/Pages/Default.aspx.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę.