A preliminary comparative study of seepage behaviour behind retaining walls with crumb rubber and geocomposite

• Autorzy: Sivapriya Vijayasimhan , Sudharasan Chinnusamy , Suraj Ravikumar , Abinaya Kalyansundaram

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/ceer-2020-0013

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

A retaining wall is built to provide support to the soil when there is a change in elevation of the ground. Weep holes present in the retaining wall help water to seep through it. Filter protection should be made behind the weep holes to prevent soil erosion around the weep holes. The classic filter material that is widely used is gravel, which is packed according to Hudson’s law. Laboratory experiments were conducted to understand the seepage function of alternative material such as crumb rubber and geocomposite (fabricated) in a homogenous sand layer and in-situ soil. The time taken by the water to reach the weep holes was calculated and compared. From the results, it is suggested to use crumb rubber as an alternative packing material behind the weep hole.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

crumb rubber; geocomposite; permeability; experimental study

PL

okruchy gumy; geokompozyt; przepuszczalność; badania eksperymentalne

• Wydawca: Oficyna Wydawnicza Uniwersytetu Zielonogórskiego
• Czasopismo: Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: Vol. 30, no. 1
• Strony: 171--184
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 18 poz., fot., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Sivapriya Vijayasimhan

• Department of Civil Engineering, SSN College of Engineering, India

autor

Sudharasan Chinnusamy

• Department of Civil Engineering, SSN College of Engineering, India, Undergraduate students

autor

Suraj Ravikumar

• Department of Civil Engineering, SSN College of Engineering, India, Undergraduate students

autor

Abinaya Kalyansundaram

• Department of Civil Engineering, SSN College of Engineering, India, Undergraduate students

Bibliografia

• 1. Brooks, H 2010. Basics of retaining wall design. HBA Publ., 11, 220.
• 2. Gopal, R, Rao, ASR 2014. Basic and applied soil mechanics. 2nd edition, New Age International Publishers.
• 3. Froehlich, D 2017. Guidelines for safety inspections of dams. www.damsafety.in.
• 4. IS 2720 – Part III/Sec 1 (1980 – Reaffirmed 2007) Indian Standard methods of tests for soils- Part III – Determination of specific gravity, Section 1 – drain pipe soils. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
• 5. IS 2720 – Part IV (1985 – Reaffirmed 2006) Indian Standard methods of tests for soils-Part 4 – Grain size analysis. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
• 6. IS 2720 – Part VII (1980- Reaffirmed 2011) Indian Standard methods of tests for soils - Determination of water content-dry density relation using light compaction. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
• 7. IS 2720 – Part XIII (1986 – Reaffirmed 2002) Indian Standard methods of tests for soils-Direct shear test. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
• 8. Furumoto, K, Miki, H, Tsuneoka, N and Obata, T 2002. Model test on the piping resistance of short fibre reinforced soil and its application to river levee, Geosynthetics - 7 ICG - Delmas, Gourc and Girard (eds),1241-1244.
• 9. Lee, KW, Cho, SD 2011. Case of damage and practice of reinforced earth wall in the country III; Damage cases of reinforced earth wall. Journal of the Korean Geosynthetics Society, 10 (1), 8-13.
• 10. Decorla-Souza, P 2013. Estimation of benefits for benefit-cost analysis: some troubling issues.
• 11. Paolo Di Pietro 2013. Geocompositesfor Drainage Experiences and Applications https://geosynt.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/maccaferri.pdf.
• 12. Dahal, RK, Hasegawa,S, Masuda, T and Yamanaka, M 2006. Roadside slope failures in nepal during torrential rainfall and their mitigation road construction practice in Nepal. Proc. Interpaevent Int. Symp, Niijigata, Disaster Mitig. debris flow, slope Fail. Landslides. 503-514.
• 13. Shin, EC, Cho, SD and Lee, KW 2011. Case study of reinforced earth wall failure during extreme rainfall. In: International symposium on backward problems in geotechnical engineering TC302-Osaka, 146-153.
• 14. Thomas, BS, Gupta, RC, Kalla, P and Cseteneyi, L 2014. Strength, abrasion and permeation characteristics of cement - concrete containing discarded rubber fine aggregates, Construction and Building Materials, 59, 204-212.
• 15. IS 2720 – Part XVII (1986 – Reaffirmed 2002) Indian Standard methods of tests for soils - Laboratory determination of permeability. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
• 16. IS 1498 (1970- Reaffirmed 2002) Indian standard classification and identification of soils for general engineering purposes. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
• 17. IS 14458 -1 (1998 – Reaffirmed 2002) Retaining wall for hill area - guidelines, selection of type of wall. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
• 18. Lawson, CR and Kempton, GT 1995. Geosynthetics and their use in reinforced soil. Terram Ltd., Mamhilad, Pontypool, Gwent, UK.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).