Model systemu zarządzania informacją instytucjonalną dla szkoły wyższej

• Autorzy: Janiak M.
• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

PL

Celem artykułu jest udowodnienie poglądu, że biblioteki akademickie muszą sprostać zadaniom, jakie przyniosło zastosowanie badań 2.0 w nauce. Przeanalizowano przede wszystkim zagadnienia: rola społecznych instrumentów medialnych dla pracowników naukowych, natura zarządzania danymi badawczego i obsług danych badawczych, jakość danych i konieczność standaryzowania danych. Zadania postawione przed bibliotekami to zapewnianie obsług danych badawczych, dostosowanie swoich usług do poszczególnych użytkowników oraz wydziałów. Biblioteki akademickie powinny również włączać się w zadania, które nie są standardowymi zadaniami bibliotek uczelnianych, a które są realizowane w procesie badawczym.

EN

The purpose of this paper is to provide a literature based inventory of tasks and roles that academic libraries have to fulfil in order to react to the developments brought in by the appearance and growing importance of Research 2.0, the main features of which are identified in its relationship to data-intensive research. The role of social media tools for researchers, the nature of research data management and research data services, questions of data quality and the need for standardized data citation are examined. The tasks, faced by libraries include providing research data services, information literacy education and support to individual faculty members. Libraries also should be involved in raising awareness of different services and movements, mainly not offered directly by the libraries themselves, even if this is a nontraditional activity for them. New role models for academic librarians, required by the new environment are also part of the discussion.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

szkoła wyższa; zarządzanie informacją; system zarządzania informacją

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Informacji Naukowej
• Czasopismo: PTINT Praktyka i Teoria Informacji Naukowej i Technicznej
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: T. 24, nr 4
• Strony: 31--41
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 34 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Janiak M.

• Uniwersytet Jagielloński, KRAKÓW

Bibliografia

• [1] Adamczewski P.: Słownik informatyczny. Warszawa 2005.
• [2] Association for Institutional Research (USA) [online] [19.11.2016], http://www.airweb.org/pages/default.aspx
• [3] Audyt informacji instytucjonalnej Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. Współautorzy: M. Janiak, M. Jaskowska, R. Sapa, M. Wójcik, M. Deja, P. Motylińska, K. Piaśnik, A. Pieczka, J. Płaszewska. Kraków 2015. Maszynopis.
• [4] Biuletyn Informacji Publicznej UJ [online] [19.11.2016], http://www.bip.uj.edu.pl
• [5] Buffalo State The State University of New York, Institutional Research Office [online] [19.11.2016], http://www.buffalostate.edu/offices/instrsch/
• [6] Burke J.C., Minassians, H.P. (eds.): Reporting higher education results: Missing links in the performance chain. New Directions for Institutional Research (116). San Francisco 2003.
• [7] Burke J.C., Serban, A.M. (eds.): Performance funding for public higher education: Fad or trend? New Directions for Institutional Research (97). San Francisco 1998.
• [8] Carnegie Mellon University, Office of Institutional Research and Analysis [online] [19.11.2016], http://www.cmu.edu/ira/
• [9] Chowdhury G., McMenemy D., Poulter A.: MEDLIS: Model for Evaluation of Digital Libraries and Information Services. „World Digital Libraries“ 2008 Vol. 1 s. 35–36.
• [10] Columbia University, Planning and Institutional Office of the Provost [online] [19.11.2016], http://www.columbia.edu/cu/opir/
• [11] Cornell University, Institutional Research and Planning [online] [19.11.2016], http://dbp.cornell.edu/offices/institutional–research–and–planning
• [12] Dressel P.L.: Nature of institutional research in self–study. W: Institutional Research in the University: a Handbook. P.L. Dressel (ed.). San Francisco 1971, s. 19–37.
• [13] Dressel, P.L.: The shaping of institutional research and planning. “Research in Higher Education” 1981 14 s. 229–258.
• [14] Eimers M.T., Wan Ko J., Gardner D.: Practicing instututional research. W: The handbook of institutional research. Ed. by R. D. Howard, G. W. McLaughlin, W. E. Knight. San Francisco 2012 s. 40–56.
• [15] Fincher, C.: Institutional research as organizational intelligence. “Research in Higher Education” 1978 8 (2) p. 189–192 [online] [19.11.2016], http://www.jstor.org/stable/40195147?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
• [16] Fuhr N. [i in.]: Evaluation of digital libraries “The International Journal on Digital Libraries” 2007 [online] [19.11.2016], http://www.scribd.com/doc/185523/Evaluation–of–Digital–Libraries–Fulltext
• [17] Huber G.P.: Organizational learning: the contributing process and the literature. “Organizational Science” 1991 2(2), s. 88–115.
• [18] Integrity in Scientific Research: Creating an Environment That Promotes Responsible Conduct. Washington 2002 [online] [19.11.2016], https://www.nap.edu/read/10430/chapter/2#2
• [19] Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Institutional Research Office of the Provost [online] [19.11.2016], http://web.mit.edu/ir/staff.html
• [20] Muraszkiewicz H., Rybiński H.: Bazy danych. Warszawa 1993.
• [21] Peterson M.W.: The role of institutional research: From improvement to redesign. W: What is institutional research all about? A critical and comprehensive assessment of the profession. J. F. Volkwein (ed.). New Directions for Institutional Research (104). San Francisco 1999, s. 83–104.
• [22] Peterson M.W.: Institutional research: An evolutionary perspective. W: Institutional research in transition. M. W. Peterson, M. Corcoran (eds.). New Directions for Institutional Research (46). San Francisco 1985, s. 5–15.
• [23] Princeton University, Institutional Research Office [online] [19.11.2016], http://www.princeton.edu/provost/institutional–research/
• [24] Rutgers University, Institutional Research & Academic Planning [online] [19.11.2016], http://oirap.rutgers.edu/
• [25] Saupe J.L.: The functions of institutional research (2nd ed.). Tallahassee 1990. [online] [19.11.2016], http://www.airweb.org/EducationAndEvents/Publications/Pages/FunctionsofIR.aspx
• [26] Seymour D.T.: On Q: Causing quality in higher education. Phoenix 1992.
• [27] Stanford University, Institutional Research & Decision Support Data [online] [19.11.2016], http://web.stanford.edu/dept/pres–provost/irds/about/about.html
• [28] Terenzini P.T. Assessment with open eyes: Pitfalls in studying student outcomes. “The Journal of Higher Education” 1989 60(6), s. 644–664.
• [29] Terenzini P.T.: On the nature of institutional research and the knowledge and skills it requires. “Research in Higher Education” 1993 34(1), s. 1–10.
• [30] The European Association for Institutional Research [online] [19.11.2016], http://www.eairweb.org/
• [31] The handbook of institutional research. R.D. Howard, G.W. McLaughlin, W.E. Knight and associates (eds.). San Francisco 2012, 727 s.
• [32] Volkwein J.F.: Assessing institutional effectiveness and connecting the pieces of a fragmented university. W: Fixing the fragmented university. J.C. Burke (ed.). Bolton 2007, s. 145–180.
• [33] Volkwein J.F. :Gaining Ground: The Role of Institutional Research in Assessing Student Outcomes and Demonstrating Institutional Effectiveness. 2011 [online], [19.11.2016], www.learningoutcomesassessment.org/documents/Volkwein.pdf
• [34] Wilensky H.L.: Organizational Intelligence: Knowledge and Policy in Government and Industry. New York 1969.