PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

The Effect of Cold Eddy on Acoustic Propagation (Case Study : Eddy in the Persian Gulf)

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
It is essential for oceanographers to study the effects of marine phenomena such as currents, surface mixed layer, eddies, internal waves, and other ocean features on acoustic propagation, as most marine measurement equipment operates on this basis, like sonar. The eddy impact on acoustic transmission in the marine environment is very significant because changes in temperature and salinity disrupt the sound speed due to the presence of eddy, thus the acoustic propagation in the sea. Although cold eddies are in the Persian Gulf widely, one eddy is selected to study their impacts on acoustic propagation because they have similar properties in terms of temperature and salinity. In this research, after identifying eddies in the Persian Gulf automatically, the effect of a cold eddy on acoustic propagation was investigated at different depths using the BELLHOP model. Most eddies are cyclonic with 5–10 km of radius based on algorithm outputs. Studies on the lifespan of eddies showed that the occurrence of cyclonic eddies with a lifespan of more than three days is more than anticyclonic ones. Examination of the eddy effect on acoustic propagation showed that the transmission loss (TL) during the progress of the acoustic wave across the eddy increases with increasing the depth of the sound source. Also, the presence of cold eddy compared to the conditions it does not exist increases the transmission loss. The study of three-dimensional acoustic propagation also confirmed the obtained results in two-dimensional mode and clearly showed the role of cold eddy in increasing the TL.
Rocznik
Strony
413--423
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 36 poz., rys., tab., wykr.
Twórcy
  • Department of Physical Oceanography, Faculty of Marine Science and Oceanography Khorramshahr University of Marine Science and Technology Khorramshahr, Iran
  • Department of Physical Oceanography, Faculty of Marine Science and Oceanography Khorramshahr University of Marine Science and Technology Khorramshahr, Iran
  • Department of Marine Physics, Faculty of Marine and Oceanic Sciences University of Mazandaran Babolsar, Iran
Bibliografia
  • 1. Chaigneau A., Gizolme A., Grados C. (2008), Mesoscale eddies off Peru in altimeter records: identification algorithms and eddy spatio-temporal patterns, Progress Oceanography, 79(2-4): 106-119, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2008.10.013.
  • 2. Chang Y.-L., Miyazawa Y., Béguer-Pon M. (2017), The dynamical impact of mesoscale eddies on migration of Japanese eel larvae, PLoS ONE, 12 (3): e0172501, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172501.
  • 3. Chang Y.-L., Miyazawa Y., Guo X. (2015), Effects of the STCC eddies on the Kuroshio based on the 20-year JCOPE2 reanalysis results, Progress Oceanography, 135: 64-76, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2015.04.006.
  • 4. Chelton D.B., Schlax M.G., Samelson R.M. (2011), Global observations of nonlinear mesoscale eddies, Progress Oceanography, 91(2): 167-216, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2011.01.002.
  • 5. Chen C., Gao Y., Yan F., Jin T., Zhou Z. (2019), Delving into the two-dimensional structure of a cold eddy east of Taiwan and its impact on acoustic propagation, Acoustics Australia, 47: 185-193, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40857-019-00160-7.
  • 6. Dong C., Lin X., Liu Y., Nencioli F., Chao Y., Guan Y., Chen D., Dickey T., McWilliams J.C. (2012), Three dimensional oceanic eddy analysis in the Southern California Bight from a numerical product, Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans, 117: 1-17, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JC007354.
  • 7. Etter P.C. (2013), Underwater Acoustic Modeling and Simulation, 4th ed., CRC Press.
  • 8. Heathershaw A.D., Stretch C.E., Maskell S. J. (1991), Coupled ocean acoustic model studies of sound propagation through a front, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89(1): 145-155, https://doi.org/10.1121/1.400520.
  • 9. Jensen F.B., Kuperman W.A., Porter M.B., Schmidt H. (2000), Computational Ocean Acoustics, Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
  • 10. Katsnelson B., Petnikov V., Lynch J. (2012), Fundamentals of Shallow Water Acoustics, Springer.
  • 11. Kochańska I., Schmidt J.H., Marszal J. (2020), Shallow water experiment of OFDM underwater acoustic communications, Archives of Acoustics, 45(1): 11-18, https://doi.org/10.24425/aoa.2019.129737.
  • 12. Lam F.-P.A. et al. (2009), At-sea real-time coupled four-dimensional oceanographic and acoustic forecasts during Battlespace Preparation 2007, Journal of Marine Systems, 78: 306-320, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2009.01.029.
  • 13. Lermusiaux P.F.J., Xu J., Chen C.-F., Jan S., Chiu L.Y., Yang Y.-J. (2010), Coupled ocean-acoustic prediction of transmission loss in a continental shelfbreak region: predictive skill, uncertainty quantification, and dynamical sensitivities, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 35(4): 895-916, https://doi.org/10.1109/JOE.2010.2068611.
  • 14. Li J., Ren Z., Liu C., Fan H. (2012), Modeling of ocean mesoscale eddy and its application in the underwater acoustic propagation, Marine Science Bulletin, 14(1): 1-15, http://hdl.handle.net/1834/14814.
  • 15. Liang Z., Chunxia M., Haitao X. (2014), Comparison of sound propagation characteristic between deep and shallow water, Applied Mechanics and Materials, 577: 1198-1201, https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.577.1198.
  • 16. Linder C.A., Gawarkiewicz G.G. (2006), Oceanographic and sound speed fields for the ESME workbench, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 31(1): 22-32, https://doi.org/10.1109/JOE.2006.872206.
  • 17. Lynch J. F. et al. (2003), Spatial and temporal variations in acoustic propagation characteristics at the New England shelfbreak front, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 28(1): 129-150, https://doi.org/10.1109/JOE.2003.808833.
  • 18. Lysanov Y.P., Plotkin A.M., Shapiro, G.I. (1989), The effect of intrathermocline lenses on acoustic fields in the ocean, Izvestiya Akademii Nauk Sssr Fizika Atmosfery i Okeana, 25(12): 1272-1280, http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/9752.
  • 19. Mackenzie K.V., (1981), Nine-term equation for acoustic speed in the oceans, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 70: 807-812, https://doi.org/10.1121/1.386920.
  • 20. Mahpeykar O., Ashtari Larki A., Akbarinasab M. (2021), Numerical modelling and automatic detection of submesoscale eddies in Persian Gulf using a Vector geometry algorithm, Journal of the Earth and Space Physics, 47(1): 109-125, https://doi.org/10.22059/JESPHYS.2021.307109.1007237.
  • 21. Nencioli F., Dong C., Dickey T., Washburn L., McWillams J.C. (2010), A vector geometry-based eddy detection algorithm and its application to a high-resolution numerical model product and high-frequency radar surface velocities in the Southern California Bight, Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 27: 564-579, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JTECHO725.1.
  • 22. Peng Z., Fan J., Wang B. (2018), Analysis and modelling on radiated noise of a typical fishing boat measured in shallow water inspired by AQUO Project’s Model, Archives of Acoustics, 43(2): 263-273, https://doi.org/10.24425/122374.
  • 23. Peng Z., Zhou F., Fan J., Wang B., Wen H. (2021), Observation and modelling on the shipping noise in shallow waters with complex islands and reefs of the East China Sea, Archives of Acoustics, 46(2): 301-311, https://doi.org/10.24425/aoa.2021.136584.
  • 24. Porter M.B., Bucker H.P., (1987), Gaussian beam tracing for computing ocean acoustic fields, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 82(4): 1349-1359, https://doi.org/10.1121/1.395269.
  • 25. Pous S., Lazure P., Carton X. (2015), A model of the general circulation in the Persian Gulf and in the Strait of Hormuz: Intraseasonal to interannual variability, Continental Shelf Research, 94: 55-70, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2014.12.008.
  • 26. Reynolds R.M. (1993), Physical oceanography of the Gulf, Strait of Hormuz and the Gulf of Oman - Results from the Mt Mitchell expedition, Marine Pollution Bulletin, 27: 35-59, https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-326X(93)90007-7.
  • 27. Riley K.F., Hobson M.P., Bence S.J. (1998), Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • 28. Sun W., Dong C., Tan W., He Y. (2019), Statistical characteristics of cyclonic warm-core eddies and anticyclonic cold-core eddies in the North Pacific based on remote sensing data, Remote Sensing, 11(208): 1-22, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11020208.
  • 29. Thoppil P.G., Hogan P.J. (2010), A modeling study of circulation and eddies in the Persian Gulf, Journal of Physical Oceanography, 40: 2122-2134, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JPO4227.1.
  • 30. Torres J.C. (2007), Modeling of high-frequency acoustic propagation in shallow water, Master’s thesis, Department of Defense, Naval Postgraduate School.
  • 31. Urick R.J. (1996), Principles of Underwater Sound for Engineers, 3rd ed., Peninsula Publishing.
  • 32. Volkov D.L., Lee T., Fu L.-L. (2008), Eddy-induced meridional heat transport in the ocean, Geophysical Research Letters, 35(20): 1-5, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL035490.
  • 33. Xiao Y., Li Z., Li J., Liu J., Sabra K.G. (2019), Influence of warm eddies on acoustic propagation in the Gulf of Mexico, Chinese Physics B, 28(5): 1-11, https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/28/5/054301.
  • 34. Xu J., Lermusiaux P.F., Haley Jr. P.J., Leslie W.G., Logutov O.G. (2008), Spatial and temporal variations in acoustic propagation during the PLUSNet’07 exercise in Dabob Bay, Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, 4: 070001, https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2988093.
  • 35. Zarepoor V., Ezam M., Allahyaribeik S. (2015), Effect of thermocline formation on underwater acoustic waves propagation in Persian Gulf, International Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 5(1): 1-14, https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=565610.
  • 36. Zhang Z., Wang W., Qiu B. (2014), Oceanic mass transport by mesoscale eddies, Science, 345(6194): 322-324, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1252418.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-4350c311-f59c-4f37-95d2-17a109da3a07
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.