Modelling Safety of Baltic Port and Shipping Critical Infrastructure Network

• Autorzy: Guze S. , Kołowrocki K.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In the paper, the three critical infrastructure networks are introduced, i.e. port, shipping, and ship traffic and port operation information. For every of them the main safety paremeters are defined. Furthermore, the multistate system component and the multistate system main safety characteristics, i.e. their mean values of the lifetimes and in the safety state subsets and in the particular safety states and standard deviations and the moment when the system risk function exceeds a fixed permitted level are determined. Finally, the Baltic Port and Shipping Critical Infrastructure Network is defined and described in the same way.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

safety; critical infrastructure network; Baltic Port; modelling

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Bezpieczeństwa i Niezawodności
• Czasopismo: Journal of Polish Safety and Reliability Association
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: Vol. 8, No. 3
• Strony: 55--72
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 23 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Guze S.

• Gdynia Maritme University, Gdynia, Poland

autor

Kołowrocki K.

• Gdynia Maritme University, Gdynia, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Amari S.V., Misra R.B., Comment on: Dynamic reliability analysis of coherent multistate systems. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 46, 460-461, 1997
• 2. Aven T., Reliability evaluation of multistate systems with multistate components. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 34, 473-479, 1985
• 3. Aven T., Jensen U., Stochastic Models in Reliability. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1999
• 4. Aven T., On performance measures for multistate monotone systems. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 41, 259-266, 1993
• 5. Bach C., Bouchon S., Fekete A., Birkmann J., Serre D., Adding value to critical infrastructure research and disaster risk management: the resilience concept. S.A.P.I.E.N.S, 2013, Vol. 6, No 1 - resilience Cities.
• 6. Barbu V. and Limnios N. 2006 Empirical estimation for discrete-time semi-Markov processes with applications in reliability. Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Vol. 18, No. 7-8, 483-498.
• 7. Barlow R.E., Wu A.S., Coherent systems with multistate components. Mathematics of Operations Research, 4, 275-281, 1978
• 8. Brunelle R.D., Kapur K.C., Review and classification of reliability measures for multistate and continuum models. IEEE Transactions,31, 11171180, 1999
• 9. EU-CIRCLE Report D1.4-GMU3, Holistic approach to analysis and identification of critical infrastructures within the Baltic Sea area and its surroundings – Formulating the concept of Global Baltic Network of Critical Infrastructure Networks, 2016
• 10. EU-CIRCLE Report D3.1-GMU3, Southern Baltic Sea area port, shipping and ship traffic and port operation information critical infrastructures network assets and interconnections, 2016
• 11. EU-CIRCLE Report D3.3-GMU10, Port, shipping and ship traffic and port operation information critical infrastructures at the Baltic Sea area network safety modelling, identification and prediction (without climate-weather change influence), 2016
• 12. Guze S., Kołowrocki K., Reliability analysis of multi-state ageing consecutive „k out of n: F” systems. International Journal of Materials and Structural Reliability, Vol. 6, No 1, 47-60, 2008
• 13. Hudson J.C., Kapur K.C., Reliability theory for multistate systems with multistate components. Microelectronics Reliability, 22, 1-7, 1982
• 14. Hudson J., Kapur K., Reliability bounds for multistate systems with multistate components. Operations Research, 33, 735-744, 1985
• 15. Kołowrocki K., Reliability of Large and Complex Systems, Amsterdam, Boston, Heidelberd, London, New York, Oxford, Paris, San Diego, San Francisco, Singapore, Sidney, Tokyo, Elsevier, 2014b
• 16. Kołowrocki K., Soszyńska-Budny J., Reliability and Safety of Complex Technical Systems and Processes: Modeling - Identification - Prediction - Optimization, London, Dordrecht, Heildeberg, New York, Springer, 2011
• 17. Lisnianski A., Levitin G., Multi-State System Reliability. Assessment, Optimisation and Applications. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., New Jersey, London, Singapore, Hong Kong, 2003
• 18. Natvig B., Two suggestions of how to define a multistate coherent system. Advancesin Applied Probability, 14, 434-455, 1982
• 19. Ohio F., Nishida T., (1984) On multistate coherent systems. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 33, 284287, 1984
• 20. Xue J., On multi-state system analysis. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 34, 329-337, 1985
• 21. Xue J., Yang K., Dynamic reliability analysis of coherent multi-state systems, IEEE Trans on Reliab. 4(44), 683-688, 1995a
• 22. Xue J., Yang K., Symmetric relations in multi-state systems, IEEE Trans on Reliab 4(44), 689-693, 1995b
• 23. Yu K., Koren I., Guo Y., Generalised multistate monotone coherent systems. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 43, 242-250, 1994

Uwagi

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (zadania 2017).