Research on high-pressure hose with repairing fitting and influence on energy parameter of the hydraulic drive

• Autorzy: Karpenko Mykola , Prentkovskis Olegas , Šukevičius Šarūnas

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17531/ein.2022.1.4

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Reliability and maintenance analysis of transport machines hydraulic drives, basically focused to power units: pumps, cylinders etc., without taking in to account junction elements. Therefore, this paper proposes a research analysis on high-pressure hoses and junctions during technical maintenance. Comparative analysis of fluid behavior and energy efficiency inside non-repaired and repaired high-pressure hoses is presented in this research. Theoretical and experimental research results for hydraulic processes inside high-pressure hose is based on the numerical simulations using Navier–Stokes equations and experimental measurement of fluid flow pressure inside high-pressure hoses. Research of fluid flow dynamics in the hydraulic system was made with main assumptions: system flow rate in the range from 5 to 100 l/min, diameter of the hoses and repairing fitting are 3/8". The pressure drops, power losses, flow coefficients at non-repaired and after maintenance hose was obtained as a result. Simulation results were verified by running physical experiments to measure the pressure losses.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

high-pressure hose; fitting; maintenance; energy; pipeline; fluid flow; numerical modelling; hydraulic system; CFD

• Wydawca: Polskie Naukowo-Techniczne Towarzystwo Eksploatacyjne
• Czasopismo: Eksploatacja i Niezawodność
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: Vol. 24, no. 1
• Strony: 25--32
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 44 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Karpenko Mykola

• Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Department of Mobile Machinery and Railway Transport, Plytinės st. 27, LT-10105, Vilnius, Lithuania

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1915-5219

autor

Prentkovskis Olegas

• Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Department of Mobile Machinery and Railway Transport, Plytinės st. 27, LT-10105, Vilnius, Lithuania

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0910-591X

autor

Šukevičius Šarūnas

• Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Department of Mobile Machinery and Railway Transport, Plytinės st. 27, LT-10105, Vilnius, Lithuania

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1393-1731

Bibliografia

• 1. ANSYS Fluent Theory Guide, 2013. ANSYS, Inc., 275 Technology Drive Canonsburg, PA 15317.
• 2. Biluš I, Škerget L, Predin A, Hriberšek M. Experimental and numerical analyses of the cavitational flows around a hydrofoil. Strojniški vestnik - Journal of Mechanical Engineering 2005; 51(2): 103-118.
• 3. Bogdevičius P, Prentkovskis O, Bogdevičius M. Transmission with cardan joint parametre influence to centrifugal pump characteristics. Mokslas – Lietuvos Ateitis / Science – Future of Lithuania 2017; 9(5): 559-564, https://doi.org/10.3846/mla.2017.1073.
• 4. Budinski M. Failure analysis of a rubber hose in anhydrous ammonia service. Case Studies in Engineering Failure Analysis 2013; 1(2): 156-164, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csefa.2013.04.009.
• 5. Cho J. Anisotropic large deformation and fatigue damage of rubber-fabric braid layered composite hose. Procedia Engineering 2017; 173: 1169-1176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.12.097.
• 6. Doerfler P, Sick M, Coutu A. Flow-induced pulsation and vibration in hydroelectric machinery. Engineer’s guidebook for planning design and troubleshooting, Springer-Verlag 2013: 242, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4252-2.
• 7. Domagała Z, Kędzia K, Stosiak M. The use of innovative solutions improving selected energy or environmental indices of hydrostatic drives. IOP Conference Series. Materials Science and Engineering 2019; 679(1): 12, https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/679/1/012016.
• 8. Drumond G, Pasqualino I, Ferreira da Costa M. Study of an alternative material to manufacture layered hydraulic hoses. Polymer Testing 2016; 53: 29-39, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.05.003.
• 9. European standard. EN 853 2SN:2015. Rubber hoses and hose assemblies. Wire braid reinforced hydraulic type. Specification 2015; 17.
• 10. Fedorko G, Molnar V, Dovicab M, Tothb T, Fabianova J. Failure analysis of irreversible changes in the construction of the damaged rubber hoses. Engineering Failure Analysis 2015; 58(1): 31–43, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.08.042.
• 11. Firoozabad E, Jeon B, Choi H, Kim N, Failure criterion for steel pipe elbows under cyclic loading. Engineering Failure Analysis 2016; 66: 515-525, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2016.05.012.
• 12. Foias C, Manley O, Rosa R, Temam R. Navier-Stokes equations and turbulence (Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2001; 347, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511546754.
• 13. Gates Corporation. A Guide to Preventive Maintenance & Safety for Hydraulic Hose & Couplings. Printed in Denver, USA by Tomkins Company 2009; 76, http://www.marshall-equipement.com/Library/SafeHydraulics.pdf.
• 14. German Institute for Standardisation. DIN 51524-2:2016. Pressure Fluids – Hydraulic Oils – Part 2: HLP Hydraulic Oils, Minimum Requirements. Specification 2016; 11.
• 15. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 8434-1:2018. Metallic tube connections for fluid power and general use — Part 1: 24° cone connectors. Specification 2018; 51.
• 16. Karpenko M, Bogdevičius M. Review of energy-saving technologies in modern hydraulic drives. Science – Future of Lithuania - Mokslas – Lietuvos Ateitis 2017; 9(5): 553–558, https://doi.org/10.3846/mla.2017.1074.
• 17. Karpenko M, Bogdevičius M. Investigation of hydrodynamic processes in the system – “Pipeline-Fittings”. TRANSBALTICA XI: Transportation Science and Technology. TRANSBALTICA 2020; 331-340. Lecture Notes in Intelligent Transportation and Infrastructure. Springer, Cham, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38666-5_35.
• 18. Karpenko M, Bogdevičius M. Investigation into the hydrodynamic processes of fitting connections for determining pressure losses of transport hydraulic drive. Transport 2020; 35(1): 108-120, https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2020.12335.
• 19. Kubrak M, Malesińska A, Kodura A, Urbanowicz K, Stosiak M. Hydraulic transients in viscoelastic pipeline system with sudden crosssection changes. Energies 2021; 14(14): 4071, https://doi.org/10.3390/en14144071.
• 20. Kwak S, Choi N. Micro-damage formation of a rubber hose assembly for automotive hydraulic brakes under a durability test. Engineering Failure Analysis 2009; 16: 1262-1269, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2008.08.009.
• 21. Launder B, Spalding D. Lectures in mathematical models of turbulence. Academic Press, London, England 1972; 16, https://doi.org/10.1002/zamm.19730530619.
• 22. Lee G, Kim H, Park J, Jin H, Lee Y, Kim J. An experimental study and finite element analysis for finding leakage path in high pressure hose assembly. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing 2011; 12: 537–542, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-011-0067-y.
• 23. Lisowski E, Panek M. CFD modeling method of vanes working in the vane pump. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc - Maintenance and Reliability 2004; 2: 36-41.
• 24. Liu H, Zhang X, Quan L, Zhang H. Research on energy consumption of injection molding machine driven by five different types of electrohydraulic power units. Journal of Cleaner Production 2020: 242: 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118355.
• 25. Lu X, Huang M. Novel multi-level modeling method for complex forging processes on hydraulic press machines. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2015; 79: 1869–1880, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-6970-0.
• 26. Lubecki M, Stosiak M, Bocian M, Urbanowicz K. Analysis of selected dynamic properties of the composite hydraulic microhose. Engineering Failure Analysis 2021; 125: 1-9, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105431.
• 27. Luczko, J., Czerwiński, A. 2014. Parametric vibrations of pipes induced by pulsating flows in hydraulic systems, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 52 (3): 719–730.
• 28. Mazurkiewicz L, Malachowski J, Damaziak K, Tomaszewski, M. Evaluation of the response of fibre reinforced composite repair of steel pipeline subjected to puncture from excavator tooth. Composite Structures 2018; 202: 1126–1135, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.065.
• 29. Mikota G. Modal analysis of hydraulic pipelines. Journal of Sound and Vibration 2013; 332(16): 3794 – 3805, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2013.02.021.
• 30. Miller S. Systematic techniques of hose failure mode analysis. SAE Transactions 1991; 100: 687–703, http://www.jstor.org/stable/44632066.
• 31. Obrien P, Meldrum E, Overton C, Picksley J, Anderson K, Ian M. Outcomes from the SureFlex joint industry project - an international initiative on flexible pipe integrity assurance. Paper presented at the Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, USA, May 2011, https://doi.org/10.4043/21524-MS.
• 32. Parvaresh A, Mardani M. Model predictive control of a hydraulic actuator in torque applying system of a mechanically closed-loop test rig for the helicopter gearbox. Aviation 2019; 23(4): 143-153, https://doi.org/10.3846/aviation.2019.11869.
• 33. Pavloušková Z, Klakurková L, Man O, Čelko L, Švejcar J. Assessment of the cause of cracking of hydraulic hose clamps. Engineering Failure Analysis 2015; 56: 14-19, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.05.014.
• 34. Pelevin L, Machyshyn G, Bogdevičius M, Karpenko M. Assessment of application high pressure hoses using mathematical model calculation load distribution between the metal braid. Mining, constructional, road and melioration machines: AllUkrainian collection of scientific works 2016; 88: 64-70.
• 35. Pierce S, Evans J. Failure analysis of a metal bellows flexible hose subjected to multiple pressure cycles. Engineering Failure Analysis 2012; 22: 11-20, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2011.12.005.
• 36. Santos F, Brito A, de Castro A, Almeida M, da Cunha Lima A, Zebende G, da Cunha Lima I. Detection of the persistency of the blockages symmetry on the multi-scale cross-correlations of the velocity fields in internal turbulent flows in pipelines. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 2018; 509(1): 294–301, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2018.06.009.
• 37. Romaniuk M. Optimization of maintenance costs of a pipeline for a V-shaped hazard rate of malfunction intensities. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc – Maintenance and Reliability 2018; 20 (1): 46–56, https://doi.org/10.17531/ein.2018.1.7.
• 38. Τawancy Η, Al-Hadhrami L. Failure analysis of a welded outlet manifold pipe in a primary steam reformer by improper selection of materials. Engineering Failure Analysis 2009; 16(3): 816-824, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2008.07.001.
• 39. Taylor C, Thompson J, Handewith H, Thimons E. Hose safety during high-pressure water-jet cutting. Information Circular by USA Bureau of Mines Information, Pittsburgh 1987; 9.
• 40. Urbanowicz K, Stosiak M, Towarnicki K, Bergant A. Theoretical and experimental investigations of transient flow in oil-hydraulic smalldiameter pipe system. Engineering Failure Analysis 2021; 128: 105607, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105607.
• 41. Urbanowicz K, Bergant A, Kodura A, Kubrak M, Malesińska A, Bury P, Stosiak M. Modeling transient pipe flow in plastic pipes with modified discrete bubble cavitation model. Energies 2021; 14(20):6756, https://doi.org/10.3390/en14206756.
• 42. Vardeman S, Jobe M. Statistical methods for quality assurance: basics, measurement, control, capability and improvement. Part of the Springer Texts in Statistics book series (STS) Springer–Verlag, New York 2016: 437, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79106-7.
• 43. Wei Q, Huailiang Z, Wenqian S, Wei L. Stress response of the hydraulic composite pipe subjected to random vibration. Composite Structures 2021; 255: 1-8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112958.
• 44. Yangyang Y, Mengjiang C. Sealing failure and fretting fatigue behavior of fittings induced by pipeline vibration. International Journal of Fatigue 2020; 136: 105602, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105602.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).