Institutions as a factor in sustainable development

• Autorzy: Staniek Zbigniew

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.14254/jsdtl.2023.8-2.14

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

For many years, the concept of 'sustainable development' has been the subject of interest both in theory (variety of interpretations) and the broader social and economic life practice. It is also the subject of legislation - the principle of sustainable development is a constitutional norm in many countries. The focus is present in various international agreements and regulations of regional integration groups, such as the EU. Sustainability can be considered from various perspectives and approaches, including institutional. Institutions are becoming less of a condition than a factor in development processes. At the same time, institutions are characterised by relative permanence (mainly cultural elements and social norms) and variability at different times. Persistence is a problem of institutional equilibrium, while variability results from technical, technological and social conditions and development needs. This interweaving of endo and exogenous institutional factors underpins the institutional determinants of sustainable development characterised by a peculiar balance between environmental, economic and social values. It is also the increasing interconnection of local problems with global change. Dynamic economic changes result from many factors, including technological change - mainly digitisation and containerisation. Development dynamics require openness to new institutional arrangements. The institutional system contributes to the realisation of sustainable economic development mainly by improving the quality of institutions, a kind of approximation to the desired institutional pattern. This takes place at various levels of analysis, both on a global, regional, state scale and on the scale of a particular economic entity - mainly an enterprise. In doing so, the institutional matrix is supplemented by new institutions reconciling the requirements of efficient management with environmental goals and social inclusion processes.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

sustainable development; development factors; institutions; institutional balance

• Wydawca: Fundacja Centrum Badań Socjologicznych ; Scientific Publishing House "SciView"
• Czasopismo: Journal of Sustainable Development of Transport and Logistics
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: Vol. 8, No. 2
• Strony: 195--208
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 21 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Staniek Zbigniew

• Calisia University, Kalisz, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7443-5312

Bibliografia

• Acemoglu, D., Naidu, S., Restrepo, P., & Robinson, J. A. (2019). Democracy does cause growth. Journal of political economy, 127(1), 47-100. https://doi.org/10.1086/700936
• Andrejczuk, M. (2023). Startups and their ecosystem in Poland. PhD dissertation SGH.
• Aoki, M. (2001). Toward a comparative institutional analysis. MIT press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6867.001.0001
• Cooter, R., & Ulen, T. (2012). Law and Economics. 6th. New York, AddisonWeslay pub.
• Dąbrowski, T. J., & Majchrzak, K. (2022). Społeczna odpowiedzialność i nieodpowiedzialność biznesu. Przyczyna, przejawy, konsekwencje ekonomiczne. Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH.
• Garbicz, M. (2012). Problems of economic development and backwardness. Why some countries are poor while others are rich. Oficyna Wolters Kluwer business.
• Garbicz, M. (2023). Technological change. Concentration of Economic Power in Capitalism at the Beginning of the 21st Century.
• Hausner, J., Jessop, B., & Mazur, S. (2016). Governance: Wybór tekstów klasycznych (No. first). Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
• Makarewicz-Marcinkiewicz, A. (2015). Nierówności społeczne na drodze do zrównoważonego rozwoju Problem polityki społecznej i gospodarczej. Adam Marszałek Publishing House. https://www.znak.com.pl/ksiazka/nierownosci-spoleczne-na-drodze-do-zrownowazonego-rozwoju-problem-polityki-spolecznej-i-gospodarczej-agnieszka-makarewicz-marcinkiewicz-98562
• Mukand, S. W., & Rodrik, D. (2020). The political economy of liberal democracy. The Economic Journal, 130(627), 765-792. https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueaa004
• North, D. (2014). Understanding economic change. Oficyna Wolters Kluver business.
• Ostrom, E. (2009). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton university press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt7s7wm
• Polanyi, K. (2018). Economy and society: selected writings. John Wiley & Sons. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Economy+and+Society%3A+Selected+Writings-p-9781509523313
• Prochniak, M. (2006). Factors of Economic Growth-Results from an Empirical Study. Ekonomista (The Economist), 3, 305-345.
• Rudolf, S. (2017). Nowe spojrzenie na równowagę instytucjonalną i zmianę instytucjonalną. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, (493), 22-35. https://doi.org/10.15611/PN.2017.493.02
• Shirley, M. M. (2005). Institutions and Development. In Handbook of New Institutional Economics. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-25092-1_25
• Staniek, Z. (2009). Institutional system and economic growth and development. In W. Pacho (Ed.), Sketches from the dynamics and stabilization of the economy. Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH.
• Sukiennik, J., Dokurno, Z., & Fiedor, B. (2017). System instytucjonalnej równowagi a proces zmian instytucjonalnych z perspektywy zrównoważonego rozwoju. Ekonomista, 2, 121-143.
• Totleben, B. (2018). Ekonomiczne i polityczne uwarunkowania upadłości państwa. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar Sp. z oo.
• Wilkin, J. (2011). Institutional equilibrium. What is it about and what is its role in the economy?. Ekonomia, (15), 26-37. https://doi.org/10.2/JQUERY.MIN.JS
• Wilkin, J., Kargol-Wasiluk, A., & Zalesko, M. (2019). Równowaga instytucjonalna - fundament równowagi gospodarczej. Ekonomista, 6, 659-679. https://doi.org/10.52335/dvqp.te144