The pandemic dimension of new education and post-pandemic trends: technology in the service of education?

• Autorzy: Syryt Aleksandra

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.57599/gisoj.2023.3.2.117

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The COVID-19 pandemic, which swept across the globe, has left an indelible mark on various aspects of human life. Schools and educational institutions worldwide have had to adapt rapidly to the challenges posed by the pandemic. As a result, “new education” became a necessity, predominantly characterized by utilizing technology as an integral part of the learning process. This article examines the pandemic’s impact on education, focusing on its transformation. It also explores post-pandemic trends, particularly emphasizing how technology continues to reshape and serve the educational landscape.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

education; pandemic; new education; e-learning; technologies; GIS

PL

edukacja; pandemia; nowa edukacja; e-learning; technologie; GIS

• Wydawca: SILGIS Association ; Croatian-Polish Scientific Network
• Czasopismo: GIS Odyssey Journal
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: Vol. 3, no. 2
• Strony: 117--128
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 20 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Syryt Aleksandra

• Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Faculty of Law and Administration, Warsaw, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7501-0786

Bibliografia

• 1. 2021 Norton Cyber Safety Insights Report. https://www.nortonlifelock.com/us/en/newsroom/press-kits/2021-norton-cyber-safety-insights-report/ [access: 10.08.2023].
• 2. Aljawarneh Sh., Muhsin Z., Nsour A., Alkhateeb F., AlMaghayreh E. (2019). E-learning Tools and Technologies in Education: A Perspective, DOI: 10.13140/2.1.1017.9847.
• 3. Bernhäuserová V., Havelková L., Hátlová K., Hanus M. (2022). The Limits of GIS Implementation in Education: A Systematic Review. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, vol. 11, no. 12:592, pp. 1–27.
• 4. Bull G., Gardner D., Hyland L., Jennings Ch., Keith A., Mackenzie E., TerKeurs J., Turner S., Woolard A. (2006). Beyond eLearning: practical insights from the USA Report of A DTI Global Watch Mission. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/http://cedma-europe.org/newsletter%20articles/misc/Beyond%20e-Learning%20-%20Practical%20Insights%20from%20the%20USA%20(May%2006).pdf [access: 1.09.2023].
• 5. Frankfurt T. (2020). How The Pandemic Could Forever Change Higher Education, Forbes, 8.05.2020, https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2020/05/08/how-the-pandemic-could-forever-change-higher-education/#257a911b7b93 [access: 25.06.2023].
• 6. Horizon Report (2019). https://library.educause.edu/resources/2019/4/2019-horizon-report [access: 13.05.2023].
• 7. Keith A. (2006) The Future of Blended Learning. In: G. Bull, D. Gardner, L. Hyland, Ch. Jennings, A. Keith, E. Mackenzie, J. TerKeurs, S. Turner, A. Woolard, Beyond eLearning: practical insights from the USA Report of A DTI Global Watch Mission. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/http://cedma-europe.org/newsletter%20articles/misc/Beyond%20e-Learning%20-%20Practical%20Insights%20from%20the%20USA%20(May%2006).pdf [access: 1.09.2023].
• 8. McCloughlin T.J.J. (2015). The Role of Global Positioning Systems in Education: science, mathematics, geography and history – a tool for integration. ResearchGate, pp. 1–5. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323918536_GIS_in_Education#fullTextFileContent [access: 1.09.2023].
• 9. Miao Y., Li H. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Issues and trends. Educational Technology & Society, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 222–237.
• 10. NC State University, Teaching Resources. https://teaching-resources.delta.ncsu.edu/customize-learning-experiences/ [access: 23.07.2023].
• 11. Nguyen T. (2015) Effectiveness of Online Learning: Beyond No Significant Difference and Future Horizons. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 309–319.
• 12. Olivers A., Herrero A. (2018). Hybrid learning: Models, strategies and applications. Springer.
• 13. Picciano A.G. (2009). Blending with purpose: The multimodal model. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 7–18.
• 14. Polak M. (2008). Stary i nowy świat edukacji (The Old and New World of Education). edunews.pl, 30.09.2008, https://www.edunews.pl/nowoczesna- edukacja/innowacje-w-edukacji/467-stary-i-nowy-swiat-edukacji [access: 1.09.2023].
• 15. Raes A. (2022). Exploring Student and Teacher Experiences in Hybrid Learning Environments: Does Presence Matter? Postdigital Science and Education, no. 4, pp. 138–159.
• 16. Sheela Ch., Selvalakshmi V., Doss A. (2023). Perspectives on Augmented and Virtual Reality (AVR). In: Education: Current Technologies and the Potential for Education, pp. 48–69.
• 17. Toczauer Ch. (2023) How has Calbright Evolved Throughout the Pandemic?, OnlineEducation, https://www.onlineeducation.com/features/the-impact-of-pandemic-on-calbright [access: 1.09.2023].
• 18. UNESCO (2020). Education: From disruption to recovery. https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse [access: 13.07.2023].
• 19. Vinayak G. (2020). Six ways the pandemic has changed education, 31.07.2020, https://news.yahoo.com/covid-19-six-ways-the-pandemic-has-changed-education- 043142525.html?fr=sycsrp_catchall [access: 23.07.2023].
• 20. Zhao Y., Lei J., Yan B., Lai C., Tan S. (2005). What makes the difference? A practical analysis of research on the effectiveness of distance education. The Teachers College Record, vol. 107, no. 8, pp. 1836–1884.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2024).