“Autonomisation” of security and defence systems

• Autorzy: Kuptel Artur

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.35467/sdq/105430

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Development of systems with an evolving level of autonomy is among the most controversial and yet promising aspects of military forces’ modernisation. The application of quasi- artificial intelligence in combat machines opens a new uncharted area of possibilities. In essence, these modifications aim to reduce the extent of human interference in the functioning of unmanned systems virtually to none. The potential risks are explored in dangerous scenarios, which consider that apart from off ering far-reaching advantages of using platforms with autonomic capabilities, they can be used against humanity. These scenarios assume a pivotal role in forecasting possible directions for development of the armed forces. This paper attempts to determine the essence of combat systems autonomy while focusing on a few of the most sensitive issues. For a transparent and credible debate on combat systems autonomy, it is adviseable that no ambiguity is present in terminological, ethical, legal and technological complexities, whose misinterpretation may become a source of unnecessary understatements or even lead to distortion of the debate.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

autonomy; autonomisation; unmanned autonomous systems; levels of autonomy

• Wydawca: Akademia Sztuki Wojennej
• Czasopismo: Security and Defence Quarterly
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: Vol. 23, No. 1
• Strony: 79--96
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 14 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Kuptel Artur

• Inspectorate for Implementation of Innovative Defence Technologies

Bibliografia

• 1. AAP-6 Słownik Terminów i Definicji NATO, 2014.
• 2. Bielawski, R., Rzadkowski, W. and Perz, R., 2018. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in the Protection of the Elements of a Country’s Critical Infrastructure – Selected Directions of Development. Security and Defence Quarterly 22(5).
• 3. Davis T.D., 2006. Design, implementation and testing of common data model supporting autonomous vehicle compatibility and interoperability. Naval Postgraduate School. Monterey, USA.
• 4. Grenda B., 2017. Nowe technologie w dowodzeniu siłami powietrznymi. In R. Bielawski, B. Grenda, Bezpieczeństwo lotnicze w aspekcie rozwoju technologicznego, pp. 118-144. Wydawnictwo ASzWoj. Warsaw.
• 5. International Committee for Robot Arms Control, n.d. [online] Available from: https://www.icrac.net/ [Accessed 25 Oct 2018].
• 6. Koncepcja wykorzystania bezzałogowych systemów autonomicznych w Siłach Zbrojnych RP, 2016. CDiS SZ, Bydgoszcz.
• 7. Kopeć, R., 2016. Autonomia systemów bojowych. Przeglad Geopolityczny. Vol. 17, 133- 147.
• 8. Koziej S., 1993. Teoria sztuki wojennej. Warszawa.
• 9. Kuptel A., 2017. Counter Unmanned Autonomous Systems (CUAxS): Priorities. Policy. Future Capabilities. [online] Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2963... [Accessed 26 Oct 2018].
• 10. Kuptel A., Grutza M., 2017. Review of National Practices of New Technology / System Review and Supplemental Analysis. Norfolk.
• 11. Kuptel A., Williams A., 2014. Policy Guidance: Autonomy in Defence Systems. [online] Available from: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/pa... [Accessed 25 Oct 2018].
• 12. Kuptel A., 2014. Zastosowanie bezzałogowych systemów powietrznych w aspekcie militarnym. Wydawnictwo AON. Warsaw.
• 13. Słownik Języka Polskiego, n.d. [online] Available from: https://sjp.pwn.pl/ [Accessed 26 Oct 2018].
• 14. Williams, R., 2008. Autonomous systems overview. BAE Systems. [online] Available from: http://www.aircraftbuilders.co... [Accessed 25 Oct 2018].

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2019).