Performance Comparison of Homogeneous and Heterogeneous 3D Wireless Sensor Networks

• Autorzy: Thalore R. , Bhattacharya P. P. , Jha M. K.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.26636/jtit.2017.110216

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Recent developments in wireless sensor networks include their applications in safety, medical monitoring, environment monitoring and many more. Limited battery energy and efficient data delivery are most considered constraints for sensor nodes. Depletion of node battery ceases functioning of the node. The network lifetime can be enhanced with the help of Multi-Layer protocol (ML-MAC). This paper presents a practical approach including 3-dimensional deployment of sensor nodes and analyzes two different types of networks – homogeneous and heterogeneous WSNs. To analyze various QoS parameters, two types of nodes are considered in a heterogeneous network. The performance of both the networks is compared through simulations. The results show that ML-MAC performs better for a 3D heterogeneous WSNs.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

heterogeneous WSN; homogeneous WSN; ML-MAC; QualNet 6.1 Network Simulator; wireless sensor networks

• Wydawca: Instytut Łączności - Państwowy Instytut Badawczy
• Czasopismo: Journal of Telecommunications and Information Technology
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: nr 2
• Strony: 32--37
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 14 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Thalore R.

• College of Engineering and Technology, Mody University of Science and Technology, Lakshmangarh – 332311, Rajasthan, India

autor

Bhattacharya P. P.

• College of Engineering and Technology, Mody University of Science and Technology, Lakshmangarh – 332311, Rajasthan, India

autor

Jha M. K.

• ABES Engineering College, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India

Bibliografia

• [1] A. More, S. Wagh, and K. Joshi, “A test-bed for habitat monitoring system using Wi-Fi in Wireless Sensor Networks”, in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Comput. Intellig. and Comput. Res. ICCIC 2015, Madurai, India, 2015 (doi: 10.1109/ICCIC.2015.7435758).
• [2] L. Le Guennec, N. E. Rachkidy, A. Guitton, M. Misson, and K. Kelfoun, “MAC protocol for volcano monitoring using a Wireless Sensor Network”, in Proc. 6th Int. Conf. on the Netw. of the Future NOF 2015, Montreal, QC, Canada, 2015 (doi: 10.1109/NOF.2015.7333310).
• [3] M. Dominguez-Morales et al., “Technical viability study for behavioral monitoring of wildlife animals in Donana: An 802.15.4 coverage study in a Natural Park”, in Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Data Commun. Netw. DCNET 2011, Seville, Spain, 2011, pp. 98–101.
• [4] M.-W. Lu and C.-W. Chan, “Tracking of multiple objects in WSN based on prediction-based profile using GA”, in Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Comput. Commun. & Netw. Technol. ICCCNT 2012, Coimbatore, India, 2012 (doi: 10.1109/ICCCNT.2012.6396027).
• [5] R. Balamurali and K. Kathiravan, “An analysis of various routing protocols for Precision Agriculture using Wireless Sensor Network”, in Proc. IEEE Technol. Innov. in ICT for Agriculture and Rural Develop. TIAR 2015, Chennai, India, 2015, pp. 156–159.
• [6] J. Elson and D. Estrin, “Sensor networks: A bridge to the physical world”, in Wireless Sensor Networks, C. S. Raghavendra, K. M. Sivalingam, and T. Znati, Eds. Springer, 2004, pp. 3–20.
• [7] M. K. Jha, A. K. Pandey, D. Pal, and A. Mohan, “An energy-efficient multi-layer MAC (ML-MAC) protocol for wireless sensor networks”, Int. J. of Electron. and Commun. (AEU), vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 209–216, 2011 (doi: 10.1016/j.aeue.2010.03.006).
• [8] R. Thalore, J. Sharma, M. Khurana, and M. K. Jha, “QoS evaluation of energy-efficient ML-MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks”, Int. J. of Electron. and Commun. (AEU), vol. 67, no. 12, pp. 1048–1053, 2013 (doi: 10.1016/j.aeue.2013.06.006).
• [9] R. Thalore, Manju, M. K. Jha, “Optimized ML-MAC for EnergyEfficient Wireless Sensor Network Protocol”, in Proc. 5th IEEE Int. Conf. – Confluence the Next Gener. Inform. Technol. Summit CONFLUENCE 2014, Noida, India, 2014, pp. 396–400, 2014 (doi: 10.1109/CONFLUENCE.2014.6949326).
• [10] R. Thalore, M. Khurana, and M. K. Jha, “Performance Comparison of 2D and 3D ZigBee Wireless Sensor Networks”, in Proceedings of International Conference on ICT for Sustainable Development, S. C. Satapathy, A. Joshi, N. Modi, and N. Pathak, Eds. Springer, 2016, pp. 215–222.
• [11] H. Gupta, S. Rao, and T. Venkatesh, “Sleep Scheduling Protocol for k-Coverage of Three-Dimensional Heterogeneous WSNs”, IEEE Trans. on Veh. Technol., vol. 65, no. 10, pp. 8423–8431, 2015 (doi: 10.1109/TVT.2015.2508801).
• [12] J. Guo and H. Jafarkhani, “Sensor deployment with limited communication range in homogeneous and heterogeneous Wireless Sensor Networks”, IEEE Trans. on Wirel. Commun., vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 6771-6784, 2016 (doi: 10.1109/TWC.2016.2590541).
• [13] Q. Yuan, C. Ma, X. Zhong, G. Du, and J. Yao, “Optimization of key predistribution protocol based on supernetworks theory in heterogeneous WSN”, Tsinghua Sci. and Technol., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 333–343, 2016 (doi: 10.1109/TST.2016.7488744).
• [14] C. Perkins, E. Belding-Royer, and S. Das, “Ad hoc on demand distance vector (AODV) routing”, IETF RFC no. 3561, July 2003 [Online]. Available: www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3561.txt

Uwagi

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (zadania 2017).