Recycling of waste granodiorite powder as a partial cement replacement material in ordinary concrete

• Autorzy: Fathy Islam N. , Elfakharany Maged E. , El-Sayed Alaa A.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/adms-2024-0017

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In this study, the effect of using waste granodiorite powder (WGP) as a cement replacement material in percentages ranging from 1 to 9% on various physical and mechanical properties of ordinary concrete was investigated. The resistance of produced concretes with WGP to the high temperature effects on the 28 days compressive strength were studied as well. Granodiorite is one of the well-known igneous rocks that have been used in previous research as a replacement for coarse or fine aggregates due to the hardness of its grains. However, rare studies have investigated its powder as a partial cement replacement material. Results showed the ability of investigated WGP with high surface area to act as a supplementary cementitious material that contributed to enhance the results of mechanical and physical properties of concrete. At traditional room temperature, the optimal replacement percentage was 7%, where the 28 days compressive and tensile strengths were improved by 28.3% and 17.3%, respectively. The optimal replacement ratio varied between 7 and 9% in the case of high temperatures, according to exposure time and temperature degree. Statistical and sensitivity analysis was conducted on 66 available compressive strength value represents all variables before and after elevated temperature exposure. While the regression equation showed good R2 value of 85.3%, sensitivity analysis indicated that compressive strength value is most sensitive to temperature, followed by WGP ratio and exposure time, with importance values of 56, 26, and 18 %, respectively. Results showed also that the setting times and consistency was decreased with increasing the replacement ratio with WGP, while the workability was slightly improved up to 5% replacement ratio. Furthermore, microstructure analysis showed that WGP can help to densify the concrete matrix due to its small size and ability to fill the interstitial voids in the concrete matrix.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

granodiorite; igneous rocks; waste concrete; supplementary cementing material; granodiorite powder

PL

granodioryt; skały magmowe; odpady betonowe; dodatek do cementu; proszek granodiorytowy

• Wydawca: Politechnika Gdańska
• Czasopismo: Advances in Materials Science
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: Vol. 24, nr 3(81)
• Strony: 56--88
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 54 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Fathy Islam N.

• Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Fayoum University, Egypt
• Construction and Building Engineering Department, October High Institute for Engineering & Technology, Giza, Egypt

autor

Elfakharany Maged E.

• Raw Materials Department, Housing and Building National Research Center (HBRC), Egypt

autor

El-Sayed Alaa A.

• Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Fayoum University, Egypt

Bibliografia

• 1. Naik T. R. (2020). Sustainability of the cement and concrete industries. Sustainable Construction Materials and Technologies (pp. 19-25). CRC Press.
• 2. Amin M., Tayeh, B. A., & Agwa, I. S. (2020). Effect of using mineral admixtures and ceramic wastes as coarse aggregates on properties of ultrahigh-performance concrete. Journal of Cleaner Production, 273, 123073.
• 3. Nagrockienė D., Girskas G., & Skripkiūnas G. (2017). Properties of concrete modified with mineral additives. Construction and Building Materials, 135, 37-42.
• 4. Vishwakarma V., & Ramachandran D. (2018). Green Concrete mix using solid waste and nanoparticles as alternatives–A review. Construction and Building Materials, 162, 96-103.
• 5. Hamza R. A., El-Haggar S., & Khedr S. (2011). Marble and granite waste: characterization and utilization in concrete bricks. International Journal of Bioscience, Biochemistry and Bioinformatics, 1(4), 286-291.
• 6. Abouelnour M. A., Abd EL-Aziz M. A., Osman K. M., Fathy I. N., Tayeh B. A., & Elfakharany M. E. (2024). Recycling of marble and granite waste in concrete by incorporating nano alumina. Construction and Building Materials, 411, 134456.
• 7. Costa F. N., & Ribeiro D. V. (2020). Reduction in CO2 emissions during production of cement, with partial replacement of traditional raw materials by civil construction waste (CCW). Journal of Cleaner Production, 276, 123302.
• 8. Torres P., Fernandes H. R., Olhero S., & Ferreira J. M. F. (2009). Incorporation of wastes from granite rock cutting and polishing industries to produce roof tiles. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 29(1), 23-30.
• 9. Allen K. G., Von Backström T. W., Kröger D. G., & Kisters A. F. M. (2014). Rock bed storage for solar thermal power plants: Rock characteristics, suitability, and availability. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 126, 170-183.
• 10. Sen G., & Sen G. (2014). Introduction to igneous rocks. Petrology: Principles and Practice, 19-49.
• 11. Kemp S. J., Lewis A. L., & Rushton J. C. (2022). Detection and quantification of low levels of carbonate mineral species using thermogravimetric-mass spectrometry to validate CO2 drawdown via enhanced rock weathering. Applied Geochemistry, 146, 105465.
• 12. Gautam L., Jain J. K., Kalla P., & Danish M. (2021). Sustainable utilization of granite waste in the production of green construction products: a review. Materials Today: Proceedings, 44, 4196-4203.
• 13. Danish A., Mosaberpanah M. A., Salim M. U., Fediuk R., Rashid M. F., & Waqas R. M. (2021). Reusing marble and granite dust as cement replacement in cementitious composites: A review on sustainability benefits and critical challenges. Journal of Building Engineering, 44, 102600.
• 14. Dobiszewska M., & Beycioğlu A. (2020). Physical Properties and Microstructure of Concrete with Waste Basalt Powder Addition. Materials, 13(16), 3503.
• 15. Dobiszewska M., Schindler A. K., & Pichór W. (2018). Mechanical properties and interfacial transition zone microstructure of concrete with waste basalt powder addition. Construction and Building Materials, 177, 222-229.
• 16. Binici H., Yardim Y., Aksogan O., Resatoglu R., Dincer A., & Karrpuz A. (2020). Durability properties of concretes made with sand and cement size basalt. Sustainable Materials and Technologies, 23, e00145.
• 17. Brown D., Ryan P. D., DeBari S. M., & Greene A. R. (2011). Vertical stratification of composition, density, and inferred magmatic processes in exposed arc crustal sections. Arc-continent collision, 121-144.
• 18. Kılıç A., Atiş C. D., Teymen A., Karahan O. K. A. N. Özcan F., Bilim C., & Özdemir M. E. T.(2008). The influence of aggregate type on the strength and abrasion resistance of high strength concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites, 30(4), 290-296.
• 19. Baki V. A., Nayır S., Erdoğdu Ş., & Ustabaş İ. (2020). Determination of the pozzolanic activities of trachyte and rhyolite and comparison of the test methods implemented. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 18, 1053-1066.
• 20. Afshinnia K., & Rangaraju P. R. (2016). Impact of combined use of ground glass powder and crushed glass aggregate on selected properties of Portland cement concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 117, 263-272.
• 21. Reubi O., & Blundy J. (2009). A dearth of intermediate melts at subduction zone volcanoes and the petrogenesis of arc andesites. Nature, 461(7268), 1269-1273.
• 22. Uzun İ., & Terzi S. (2012). Evaluation of andesite waste as mineral filler in asphaltic concrete mixture. Construction and Building Materials, 31, 284-288.
• 23. Davraz M., Ceylan H., Topçu İ. B., & Uygunoğlu T. (2018). Pozzolanic effect of andesite waste powder on mechanical properties of high strength concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 165, 494-503.
• 24. Ezzat M. Performance of dolomitic cementitious mortars as a repairing material for normal concrete in Egypt. European Materials Research Society, 34.
• 25. Glinicki M. A., Jóźwiak-Niedźwiedzka D., Gibas K., & Dąbrowski M. (2016). Influence of blended cements with calcareous fly ash on chloride ion migration and carbonation resistance of concrete for durable structures. Materials, 9(1), 18.
• 26. Smarzewski P., & Barnat-Hunek D. (2018). Property assessment of hybrid fiber-reinforced ultra-high-performance concrete. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 16, 593-606.
• 27. Bodnárová L., Ťažký M., Ťažká L., Hela R., Pikna O., & Sitek L. (2020). Abrasive wear resistance of concrete in connection with the use of crushed and mined aggregate, active and non-active mineral additives, and the use of fibers in concrete. Sustainability, 12(23), 9920.
• 28. Góra J., & Piasta W. (2020). Impact of mechanical resistance of aggregate on properties of concrete. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 13, e00438.
• 29. Lagerblad B., Gram H. E., & Westerholm M. (2014). Evaluation of the quality of fine materials and filler from crushed rocks in concrete production. Construction and Building Materials, 67, 121-126.
• 30. Meziani M., Amiri O., Leklou N., & Chelouah N. (2019). Transport properties study of supplementary cementitious materials: case of tuff, limestone filler and granodiorite. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 33(3), 286-300.
• 31. ASTM C 150. Standard Specification for Portland cement. American society for testing and materials, West Conshohocken. 2007, PA (USA).
• 32. ASTM C 33-03. Standard Specification for Concrete Aggregates. American society for testing and materials, West Conshohocken. 2003, PA (USA).
• 33. ASTM C494. Standard specification for chemical admixtures for concrete. West Conshohocken, PA, USA.
• 34. Elsayd, A. A., & Fathy, I. N. (2019). Experimental Study of fire effects on compressive strength of normal-strength concrete supported with nanomaterials additives. IOSR J. Mech. Civ. Eng, 16(1), 28-37.
• 35. Whitney D. L., & Evans, B. W. (2010). Abbreviations for names of rock-forming minerals. American Mineralogist, 95(1), 185-187.
• 36. American Concrete Institute. Committee 211. Standard Practice for Selecting Proportions for Normal, Heavyweight, and Mass Concrete:(ACI 211.1-91). American Concrete Institute.
• 37. ASTM C143. Standard test method for slump of hydraulic cement concrete; ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2008.
• 38. ASTM C 187. Standard Test Method for Normal Consistency of Hydraulic Cement, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Pennsylvania, USA, 1998.
• 39. ASTM C 191. Standard Test Method for Time of Setting of Hydraulic Cement by Vicat Needle, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Pennsylvania, USA, 2004.
• 40. Ying P. J., Liu F. S., Ren S. X., & Dong G. G. (2012). The research on the effect of granite powder on concrete performance. Applied Mechanics and Materials (Vol. 204, pp. 3760-3764). Trans Tech Publications Ltd.
• 41. Prokopski G., Marchuk V., & Huts A. (2020). The effect of using granite dust as a component of concrete mixture. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 13, e00349.
• 42. Vijayalakshmi M., & Sekar A. S. S. (2013). Strength and durability properties of concrete made with granite industry waste. Construction and Building Materials, 46, 1-7.
• 43. Vardhan K., Siddique R., & Goyal S. (2019). Strength, permeation and micro-structural characteristics of concrete incorporating waste marble. Constr. and Building Materials, 203, 45-55.
• 44. Abd Elmoaty A. E. M. (2013). Mechanical properties and corrosion resistance of concrete modified with granite dust. Construction and Building Materials, 47, 743-752.
• 45. Ghorbani S., Taji, I., De Brito J., Negahban M., Ghorbani S., Tavakkolizadeh M., & Davoodi A. (2019). Mechanical and durability behaviour of concrete with granite waste dust as partial cement replacement under adverse exposure conditions. Construction and Building Materials, 194, 143-152.
• 46. Zhang H., Ji T., He B., & He L. (2019). Performance of ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) with cement partially replaced by ground granite powder (GGP) under different curing conditions. Construction and Building Materials, 213, 469-482.
• 47. Heikal M., El-Didamony H., Sokkary T. M., & Ahmed I. A. (2013). Behavior of composite cement pastes containing microsilica and fly ash at elevated temperature. Construction and Building materials, 38, 1180-1190.
• 48. Haneefa K. M., Santhanam M., & Parida F. C. (2013). Review of concrete performance at elevated temperature and hot sodium exposure applications in nuclear industry. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 258, 76-88.
• 49. Singh S., Nagar R., & Agrawal V. (2016). Performance of granite cutting waste concrete under adverse exposure conditions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 127, 172-182.
• 50. Ghrieb, A., & Abadou, Y. (2022). Physical and mechanical properties of dune sand mortar reinforced with recycled pet fiber: an experimental study. Advances in Materials Science, 22(4), 41-56.
• 51. El-Sayed A. A., Fathy I. N., Tayeh B. A., & Almeshal I. (2022). Using artificial neural networks for predicting mechanical and radiation shielding properties of different nano-concretes exposed to elevated temperature. Construction and Building Materials, 324, 126663.
• 52. Allam M. E., Bakhoum E. S., Ezz H., & Garas G. L. (2016). Influence of using granite waste on the mechanical properties of green concrete. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 11(5), 2805-2811.
• 53. Kim JJ., Foley EM., Taha MM. Nano-mechanical characterization of synthetic calcium–silicate–hydrate (C–S–H) with varying CaO/SiO2 mixture ratios. Cement and Concrete Composites. 2013; 36:65-70.
• 54. Kavitha O. R., Shanthi V. M., Arulraj G. P., & Sivakumar P. (2015). Fresh, micro-and macrolevel studies of metakaolin blended self-compacting concrete. Applied Clay Science, 114, 370-374.