PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Safety analysis of the system of crude oil transhipment

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Konferencja
14th Summer Safety & Reliability Seminars - SSARS 2020, 26-30 September 2020, Ciechocinek, Poland
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
This chapter presents safety analysis of the crude oil transfer system that considers both its operation process and the human factor. The system’s safety is highly influenced by tasks performed during the crude oil transfer process, thus, its conditional safety characteristics are determined for individual operational states, which correspond to performed tasks. Moreover, human error and mistakes during the transhipment operations at the terminal can significantly affect the process’ safety. In light of this, the paper proposes an approach that allows for inclusion of the human factor in the system’s safety analysis. Finally, the unconditional safety characteristics for the system are determined. Specifically, the mean values in safety states and safety states' subsets are compared when the human factor is both included and excluded. Results are presented for a crude oil transfer system consisting of one transhipment line and four transhipment lines.
Twórcy
  • Gdynia Maritime University, Gdynia, Poland
  • Gdynia Maritime University, Gdynia, Poland
Bibliografia
  • [1] Akyuz, E. 2015. Quantification of human error probability towards the gas inerting process onboard crude oil tankers. Safety Science 80, 77-86.
  • [2] Akyuz, E. & Celik, E. 2016. A modified human reliability analysis for cargo operation in single point mooring (SPM) off-shore units. Applied Ocean Research 58, 11-20.
  • [3] Akyuz, E. & Celik, M. 2015. Application of CREAM human reliability model to cargo loading process of LPG tankers. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 34, 39-48.
  • [4] Akyuz, E., Celik, M., Akgun, I. & Cicek, K. 2018. Prediction of human error probabilities in a critical marine engineering operation on-board chemical tanker ship: The case of ship bunkering. Safety Science 110, 102-109.
  • [5] Aljaroudi, A., Khan, F., Akinturk, A., Haddara, M. & Thodi, P. 2015. Risk assessment of offshore crude oil pipeline failure. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 37, 101-109.
  • [6] Azevedo, C. R. F. 2007. Failure analysis of crude oil pipeline. Engineering Failure Analysis 14, 978-994.
  • [7] Blokus, A. & Kwiatuszewska-Sarnecka, B. 2018. Reliability analysis of the crude oil transfer system in the oil port terminal. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, IEEM 2018, Bangkok, 1145-1149.
  • [8] Blokus-Roszkowska, A., KwiatuszewskaSarnecka, B. & Wolny, P. 2017. Analysis of the crude oil transfer process and its safety. Proceedings of the 17th Applied Stochastic Models and Data Analysis International Conference with the 6th Demographics Workshop, ASMDA 2017, London, 141-151.
  • [9] Blokus, A., Kwiatuszewska-Sarnecka, B., Wilczyński, P. & Wolny, P. 2019. Crude oil transfer safety analysis and oil spills prevention in port oil terminal. Journal of Polish Safety and Reliability Association, Summer Safety and Reliability Seminars 10(1), 1-42.
  • [10] Chang, J. I. & Lin, C. C. 2006. A study of storage tank accidents. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 19, 51-59.
  • [11] Fabiano, B., Currò, F., Reverberi, A. P. & Pastorino, R. 2010. Port safety and the container revolution: A statistical study on human factor and occupational accidents over the long period. Safety Science 48, 980-990.
  • [12] Fuentes-Bargues, J. L., González-Cruz, M. C., González-Gaya, C. & Baixauli-Pérez, M. P. 2017. Risk analysis of a fuel storage terminal using HAZOP and FTA. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 14(7), 705-730.
  • [13] Gupta, S. S., Agarwal, D., Agarwal, D. K. & Kumar, S. 2019. A case study: failure analysis of crude oil pipeline rupture. Proceedings of the ASME 2019 India Oil and Gas Pipeline Conference, New Delhi, India, V001T03A003.
  • [14] Guze, S. 2019. Graph theory approach to the vulnerability of transportation networks. Algorithms 12, 270.
  • [15] Hollnagel, E. 1998. Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
  • [16] Kołowrocki, K. 2014. Reliability of Large and Complex Systems. 2nd ed. Elsevier, London.
  • [17] Kołowrocki, K. & Soszyńska-Budny, J. 2011. Reliability and Safety of Complex Technical Systems and Processes: Modeling - Identification - Prediction - Optimization. Springer, London - Dordrecht - Heildeberg - New York.
  • [18] Kristiansen, S. 2005. Maritime transportation: safety management and risk analysis. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.
  • [19] Trbojevic, V. M. & Carr, B. J. 2000. Risk based methodology for safety improvements in ports. Journal of Hazardous Materials 71, 467-480.
  • [20] Ung, S.-T. 2015. A weighted CREAM model for maritime human reliability analysis. Safety Science 72, 144-152.
  • [21] Xue, J. 1985. On multi-state system analysis. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 34, 329-337.
  • [22] Xue, J. & Yang, K. 1995. Dynamic reliability analysis of coherent multi-state systems. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 4(44), 683-88.
  • [23] Yang, Z. L., Bonsall, S., Wall, A., Wang, J. & Usman, M. 2013. A modified CREAM to human reliability quantification in maritime engineering. Ocean Engineering 58, 293-303.
  • [24] Zhou, Q., Wong, Y. D., Loh, H. S. & Yuen, K. F. 2018. A fuzzy and Bayesian network CREAM model for human reliability analysis - The case of tanker shipping. Safety Science 105, 149-157.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-3fd161ad-81c4-4397-bf41-93928326339d
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.