Integrating Concepts of Blue-green Infrastructure to Support Multidisciplinary Planning of Sustainable Cities

• Autorzy: Kopp Jan , Frajer Jindřich , Lehnert Michal , Kohout Michal , Ježek Jiří

Identyfikatory

DOI

DOI: 10.35784/pe.2021.2.14

Warianty tytułu

PL

Integracja koncepcji niebiesko-zielonej infrastruktury jako narzędzie wspierania interdyscyplinarnego planowania Zrównoważonych Miast

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Currently, there is a tendency to apply nature-based landscape components as an important element in decentralised stormwater management, an essential part of sustainable urban development. The term blue-green infrastructure (BGI) is now used for many planning solutions of sustainable cities. Using thematic analysis of 27 studies and documents between 20062019, we identified 6 types of approaches to BGI. We then reclassified the six observed approaches into three basic categories of conceptual approaches to BGI. We distinguished four basic guidelines for the development of science and practice, aimed at promoting of an integrated concept of BGI to support multidisciplinary planning of sustainable cities. Based on the benefits of BGI presented in studies and documents, we show the importance of BGI from the perspective of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.

PL

Obecnie istnieje tendencja do wykorzystywania naturalnego krajobrazu jako ważnego elementu w zdecentralizowanej gospodarce wodami opadowymi, będącej istotnej części zrównoważonego rozwoju obszarów miejskich. Termin niebiesko-zielona infrastruktura (BGI) jest używany w wielu rozwiązaniach planistycznych miast zrównoważonych. Korzystając z analizy tematycznej 27 badań i dokumentów z lat 2006-2019, zidentyfikowaliśmy 6 typów podejść do BGI. Następnie dokonaliśmy ich przeklasyfikowania na 3 podstawowe kategorie podejść koncepcyjnych. Wyróżniliśmy 4 podstawowe wytyczne dotyczące rozwoju nauki i praktyki, mające na celu promowanie zintegrowanej koncepcji BGI wspierającej interdyscyplinarne planowanie miast zrównoważonych. Opierając się na korzyściach płynących z BGI przedstawionych w omówionych opracowaniach i dokumentach, pokazujemy znaczenie BGI z perspektywy Agendy na rzecz zrównoważonego rozwoju 2030.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

blue-green infrastructure; BGI; sustainable cities; urban planning; sustainable development goals

PL

infrastruktura niebiesko-zielona; BGI; zrównoważone miasto; urbanistyka; cele zrównoważonego rozwoju

• Wydawca: Lublin University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Problemy Ekorozwoju
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 16, nr 2
• Strony: 137--146
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 89 poz., fig., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Kopp Jan

• Department of Geography, Faculty of Economics, University of West Bohemia, Univerzitní 22, 306 14 Plzeň, Czech Republic

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4768-613X

autor

Frajer Jindřich

• Department of Geography, Faculty of Science, Palacký University Olomouc, 17. listopadu 12, 771 46 Olomouc, Czech Republic

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0817-3128

autor

Lehnert Michal

• Department of Geography, Faculty of Science, Palacký University Olomouc, 17. listopadu 12, 771 46 Olomouc, Czech Republic

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7691-1618

autor

Kohout Michal

• Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, California State University, San Bernardino, 5500 University Parkway, San Bernardino CA 92407, USA

autor

Ježek Jiří

• Department of Geography, Faculty of Economics, University of West Bohemia, Univerzitní 22, 306 14 Plzeň, Czech Republi

Bibliografia

• 1. ALHOLJAILAN M.I., 2012, Thematic analysis: A critical review of its process and evaluation, West East Journal of Social Sciences, 1(1): 39-47.
• 2. ALLEN J. G., BERNSTEIN A., EITLAND E., CEDENO-LAURENT J., MACNAUGHTON P., SPENGLER J. D., WILLIAMS, A., 2017, Building for Health, The nexus of green buildings, global health, and U.N. Sustainable Development Goals, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health.
• 3. ALVES A., VOJINOVIC Z., KAPELAN Z., SANCHEZ A., GERSONIUS B., 2020, Exploring trade-offs among the multiple benefits of green-bluegrey infrastructure for urban flood mitigation, Science of the Total Environment, 703: 134980.
• 4. BACCHIN T., ASHLEY R., BLECKEN G., VIKLANDER M., GERSONIUS B., 2016, Green-blue Infrastructure for Sustainable Cities: Innovative Socio-technical Solutions Bringing Multifunctional value, Novatech, 28 June/1 July: 1-4.
• 5. BAI X., NATH I., CAPON A., HASAN N., JARON D., 2012, Health and wellbeing in the changing urban environment: complex challenges, scientific responses, and the way forward, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 4(4): 465-472.
• 6. BAYNES T. M., WIEDMANN T., 2012, General approaches for assessing urban environmental sustainability, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 4: 458-464.
• 7. BLEWITT J., 2008, Understanding sustainable development, Earthscan, London.
• 8. BOWEN G.A., 2009, Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method, Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2): 27-40.
• 9. BOZOVIC R., MAKSIMOVIC C., MIJIC A., SMITH K.M., SUTER I., VAN REEUWIJK M., 2017, Blue Green Solutions, A Systems Approach to Sustainable, Resilient and Cost-Efficient Urban Development, Climate-KIC Limited, Imperial College London, London.
• 10. BROWDER G., OZMENT S., BESCOS I. R., GARTNER T., LANGE G.-M, 2019, Integrating Green and Gray, Creating Next Generation Infrastructure, World Resources Institute, Washington, DC.
• 11. CENTER FOR NEIGHBORHOOD TECHNOLOGY, 2010, The Value of Green Infrastructure, A Guide to Recognizing Its Economic, Environmental and Social Benefits, Center for Neighborhood Technology, Washington, American Rivers, Chicago.
• 12. CHICAGO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, 2007, The Chicago green alley handbook: An action guide to create a greener, environmentally sustainable Chicago, City of Chicago, Chicago.
• 13. CONDON P. M., 2010, Seven rules for sustainable communities: design strategies for the post-carbon world, Island Press, Washington.
• 14. DE JONG M., JOSS S., SCHRAVEN D., ZHAN CH., WEIJNEN M., 2015, Sustainable–Smart–Resilient–Low Carbon–Eco–Knowledge Cities; Making sense of a multitude of concepts promoting sustainable urbanization, Journal of Cleaner Production, 109: 25-38.
• 15. DE LEEUW E., TSOUROS A. D., DYAKOVA M., GREEN G., (Eds.), 2014, Healthy cities. Promoting health and equity – evidence for local policy and practice, Summary evaluation of Phase V of the WHO European Healthy Cities Network, WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen.
• 16. DELWP, 2017, Planning a Green-Blue City, A howto guide for planning urban greening and enhanced stormwater management in Victoria, Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (DELWP), Melbourne.
• 17. DEPIETRI Y., McPHEARSON T., 2017, Integrating the Grey, Green, and Blue in Cities: Nature-Based Solutions for Climate Change Adaptation and Risk Reduction, Nature‐based Solutions to Climate Change Adaptation in Urban Areas, Linkages between Science, Policy and Practice, eds. Kabisch N. et al., Springer, Cham: 91-109.
• 18. EC, 2013a, Green infrastructure (GI)-enhancing Europe’s Natural Capital, COM(2013)249, European Commission, Brussels.
• 19. EDLUND F., 2020, The Function and Perception of Urban Ecosystem Services in the Society, Problemy ekorozwoju/ Problems of sustainable development, 15(1): 15-23.
• 20. EEA, 2015, Exploring nature-based solutions: The role of green infrastructure in mitigating the impactsof weather- and climate change-related natural hazards, European Environment Agency, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
• 21. ELMQVIST T., SETÄLÄ H., HANDEL S.N., VAN DER PLOEG S., ARONSON J., BLIGNAUT J.N., GÓMEZ-BAGGETHUN E., NOWAK D.J., KRONENBERG J., DE GROOT R., 2015, Benefits of restoring ecosystem services in urban areas, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 14: 101-108.
• 22. ESCOBEDO F. J., GIANNICO V., JIM C. Y., SANESI G., LAFORTEZZA R., 2019, Urban forests, ecosystem services, green infrastructure and naturebased solutions: Nexus or evolving metaphors? Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 37: 3-12.
• 23. EU, 2016, Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services, Urban ecosystems, 4th Report, European Union, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
• 24. FALTERMAIER M., STOCK H., TONNDORF T., eds., 2016, Stadtentwicklungsplan Klima KONKRET Klimaanpassung in der Wachsenden Stadt, Senatsverwaltung für Stadtentwicklung und Umwelt, Berlin.
• 25. FARRELLY M., BROWN R., 2011, Rethinking urban water management: Experimentation as a way forward? Global Environmental Change, 21: 721- 732.
• 26. FLETCHER T.D., SHUSTER W., HUNT W.F., ASHLEY R., BUTLER D., ARTHUR S., TROWSDALE S., BARRAUD S., SEMADENI-DAVIES A., BERTRAND-KRAJEWSKI J.-L., MIKKELSEN P.S., RIVARD G., UHL M., DAGENAIS D., VIKLANDER M., 2015, SUDS, LID, BMPs, WSUD and more – The evolution and application of terminology surrounding urban drainage, Urban Water Journal, 12(7): 525-542.
• 27. FREYLING V., 2015, The importance of all Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) for cities and communities, ICLEI BRIEFING SHEET – Urban Issues, 4, ICLEI – Local Governments for Sustainability.
• 28. FRISCHENBRUDER M.T.M., PELLEGRINO P., 2006, Using greenways to reclaim nature in Brazilian cities, Landscape and Urban Planning, 76(1-4): 67- 78.
• 29. FUGARD A.J.B., POTTS H.W.W., 2015, Supporting thinking on sample sizes for thematic analyses: a quantitative tool, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, (18)6: 669-684.
• 30. GEHRELS H., VAN DER MEULEN S., SCHASFOORT F., eds., 2016, Designing green and blue infrastructure to support healthy urban living, TO2 federatie.
• 31. GHOFRANI Z., SPOSITO V., FAGGIAN R., 2017, A Comprehensive Review of Blue-Green Infrastructure Concepts, International Journal of Environment and Sustainability, 6(1): 15-36.
• 32. GIORDANO F., CAPRIOLO A., MASCOLO R.A., 2013, Planning for adaptation to climate change, Guidelines for municipalities, Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale, Roma.
• 33. HEGETSCHWEILER K.T., DE VRIES S., ARNBERGER A., BELL S., BRENNAN M., SITER N., OLAFSSON A.S., VOIGT A., HUNZIGER M., 2017, Linking demand and supply factors in identifying cultural ecosystem services of urban green infrastructures: A review of European studies, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 21: 48-59.
• 34. HOANG L., FENNER R.A., 2016, System interactions of stormwater management using sustainable urban drainage systems and green infrastructure, Urban Water Journal, 13(7): 739-758.
• 35. HOANG L., FENNER R.A., SKENDERIAN M., 2017, A conceptual approach for evaluating the multiple benefits of urban flood management practices, Journal of Flood Risk Management, 11: S943- S959.
• 36. HOWE C., MITCHELL C., eds., 2012, Water Sensitive Cities, IWA Publishing, London.
• 37. KABISCH N., KORN H., STADLER J., BONN A., 2017, Nature-Based Solutions to Climate Change Adaptation in Urban Areas – Linkages Between Science, Policy and Practice, in: Nature‐based Solutions to Climate Change Adaptation in Urban Areas, Linkages between Science, Policy and Practice, eds. Kabisch N. et al., Springer, Cham: 1-11.
• 38. KAZMIERCZAK A., CARTER J., 2010, Adaptation to climate change using green and blue infrastructure, A database of case studies, University of Manchester, Manchester.
• 39. KOC C.B., OSMOND P., PETERS A., 2017, Towards a comprehensive green infrastructure typology: a systematic review of approaches, methods and typologies, Urban Ecosystems, (20): 15-35.
• 40. KOPP J., PREIS J., 2019, The potential implementation of stormwater retention ponds into the blue-green infrastructure of the suburban landscape of Pilsen, Czechia, Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 17(6): 15055-15072.
• 41. KOPP J., RAŠKA P., VYSOUDIL M., JEŽEK J., DOLEJŠ M., VEITH T., FRAJER J., NOVOTNÁ M., HAŠOVÁ E., 2017, Ekohydrologický management mikrostruktur městské krajiny, University of West Bohemia, Plzeň.
• 42. KRAUZE K., WAGNER I., 2019, From classical water-ecosystem theories to nature-based solutions – Contextualizing nature-based solutions for sustainable city, Science of the Total Environment, 655: 697- 706.
• 43. LAMOND J., EVERETT G., 2019, Sustainable BlueGreen Infrastructure: A social practice approach to understanding community preferences and stewardship, Landscape and Urban Planning, 191: 103639.
• 44. LEHNERT M., TOKAR V., JUREK M., GELETIČ J., 2020, Summer thermal comfort in Czech cities: measured effects of blue and green features in city centres, International Journal of Biometeorology, DOI:10.1007/s00484-020-02010-y.
• 45. LOUDA J., MACHAC J., DUBOVA L., 2016, Green and Blue Infrastructure: An Opportunity for Smart Cities? in: Smart Cities Symposium Prague (SCSP), May 26-27, 2016, Prague.
• 46. MELL I., ALLIN S., REIMER M., WILKER J., 2017, Strategic green infrastructure planning in Germany and the UK: a transnational evaluation of the evolution of urban greening policy and practice, International Planning Studies, 22(4): 333-349.
• 47. MORISON P.J., BROWN R.R., 2011, Understanding the nature of publics and local policy commitment to Water Sensitive Urban Design, Landscape and Urban Planning, 99: 83-92.
• 48. MROWIEC M., OCIEPA E., MALMUR R., DESKA I., 2018, Sustainable Water Management in Cities under Climate Changes, Problemy ekorozwoju/ Problems of sustainable development, 13(1): 133-138.
• 49. MROWIEC, M., 2016, Sustainable Urban Drainage Infrastructure, Problemy ekorozwoju/ Problems of sustainable development, 11(2): 113-118.
• 50. NEIROTTI P., DE MARCO A., CAGLIANO A.C., MANGANO G., SCORRANO F., 2014, Current trends in Smart City initiatives: Some stylised facts, Cities, 38: 25-36.
• 51. NEWELL J.P., SEYMOUR M., YEE T., RENTERIA J., LONGCORE T., WOLCH J.R., SHISHKOVSKY A., 2013, Green Alley Programs: Planning for a sustainable urban infrastructure? Cities, 31: 144- 155.
• 52. PAULEIT S., AMBROSE-OJI B., ANDERSSON E., ANTON B., BUIJS A., HAASE D., ELANDS B., HANSEN R., KOWARIK I., KRONENBERG J., MATTIJSSEN T., OLAFSSON A. S., RALL E., VAN DER JAGT A. P.N., VAN DEN BOSCH C. K., 2019, Advancing urban green infrastructure in Europe: Outcomes and reflections from the GREENSURGE project, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 40: 4-16.
• 53. PAULEIT S., ZÖLCH T., HANSEN R., RANDRUP T. B., KONIJNENDIJK VAN DEN BOSCH C., 2017, Nature-Based Solutions and Climate Change – Four Shades of Green, Nature‐based Solutions to Climate Change Adaptation in Urban Areas, Linkages between Science, eds. Kabisch N. et al., Policy and Practice, Springer, Cham: 29-49.
• 54. PERINI K., SABBION P., 2017, Urban Sustainability and River Restoration, Green and Blue Infrastructure, WILEY Blackwell, Chichester.
• 55. PHILADELPHIA WATER DEPARTMENT, 2009, Green City Clean Waters, The City of Philadelphia’s Program for Combined Sewer Overflow Control, A Long Term Control Plan Update, Summary Report, Philadelphia Water Department, Philadelphia.
• 56. PLANNING DEPARTMENT HKSARG, 2016, Green and Blue Space Conceptual Framework. Hong Kong 2030+.
• 57. PÖTZ H., 2016, Green-blue urban grids for sustainable and resilient cities, Water challenge, Atelier Groenblauw, Delft,
• 58. PURVIS B., MAO Y., ROBINSON D., 2019, Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins, Sustainability Science, 14: 681-695.
• 59. SCHANDL H., BOYDEN S., CAPON A., HOSKING K., 2012,‘Biosensitive’ cities – a conceptual framework for integrative understanding of the health of people and planetary ecosystems, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 4: 378-384.
• 60. SCHRIJNEN P.M., 2000, Infrastructure networks and red-green patterns in city regions, Landscape and Urban Planning, 48(3-4): 191-204.
• 61. SEXTON G., JEREMIAH S., 2017, The Southeast Tennessee Green Infrastructure Handbook for Local Governments, Chattanooga Area Regional Council of Governments.
• 62. SILVA J. M. C., WHEELER E., 2017, Ecosystems as infrastructure, Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation, 15: 32-35.
• 63. SØRUP H. J. D., FRYD O., LIU L., ARNBJERGNIELSEN K., JENSEN M. B., 2019, An SDG-based framework for assessing urban stormwater management systems, Blue-Green Systems, 1(1): 102-118.
• 64. STRICKLAND C., LICATA A., SISKIND E., 2010, NYC Green Infrastructure Plan, NYC Department of Environmental Protection, New York.
• 65. SUSSAMS L.W., SHEATE W.R., EALES R.P., 2015, Green infrastructure as a climate change adaptation policy intervention: Muddying the waters or clearing a path to a more secure future? Journal of Environmental Management, 147: 184-193.
• 66. SZULCZEWSKA B., GIEDYCH R., MAKSYMIUK G., 2017, Can we face the challenge: how to implement a theoretical concept of green infrastructure into planning practice? Warsaw case study, Landscape Research, 42(2): 176-194.
• 67. THORNE, C., ed., 2016, Delivering and Evaluating Multiple Flood Risk Benefits in Blue-Green Cities, Key Project Outputs, EPSRC Project EP/K013661/1, University of Nottingham, Nottingham.
• 68. UK GREEN BUILDING COUNCIL, 2015, Demystifying Green Infrastructure, UK Green Building Council, London.
• 69. UN, 2012, Challenges and way forward in the urban sector, Sustainable Development in the 21st century (SD21), United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
• 70. UNITED NATIONS, 2015, Transforming Our World, the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, General Assembly Resolution A/RES/70/1.
• 71. VAN TIMMEREN A., BACCHIN T. K., AIRES C., 2016, Green Blue Infrastructures: Overview of Smart Spatial Strategies: implications for future innovation in design processes, Department of Urbanism Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology, Delft.
• 72. VIERIKKO K., NIEMELÄ J., 2016, Bottom-up thinking – Identifying socio-cultural values of ecosystem services in local blue–green infrastructure planning in Helsinki, Finland, Land Use Policy, 50: 537-547.
• 73. VLAAMSE LANDMAATSCHAPPIJ 2015, Green4grey, Green and Blue infrastructure for grey peri-urban landscapes, Vlaamse Landmaatschappij, Leuven.
• 74. VÖLKER S., KISTEMANN T., 2015, Developing the urban blue: Comparative health responses to blue and green urban open spaces in Germany, Health & Place, (35): 196-205.
• 75. VOSKAMP I.M., VAN DE VEN F.H.M., 2015, Planning support system for climate adaptation: composing effective sets of blue-green measures to reduce urban vulnerability to extreme weather events, Building and Environment, (83): 159-167.
• 76. WAGNER I., BREIL P., 2013, The role of ecohydrology in creating more resilient cities, Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology, 13(2): 113-134.
• 77. WAGNER I., KRAUZE K., ZALEWSKI M., 2013, Blue aspects of green infrastructure, Sustainable Development Applications, 4: 145-155.
• 78. WANG Y.-C., SHEN J.-K., XIANG W.-N., 2018, Ecosystem service of green infrastructure for adaptation to urban growth: function and configuration, Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, 4(5): 132- 143.
• 79. WATER BY DESIGN, 2009, Concept Design Guidelines for Water Sensitive Urban Design, Brisbane, South East Queensland Healthy Waterways Partnership.
• 80. WEF, 2014, Green infrastructure implementation: a special publication, WEF special publication, Water Environment Federation, Alexandria.
• 81. WONG T. H. F., BROWN R., 2009, The water sensitive city: principles for practice, Water Science & Technology, 60(3): 673-682.
• 82. WOODBRIDGE M., 2015, Cities and the Sustainable Development Goals, ICLEI BRIEFING SHEET – Urban Issues, 2, ICLEI – Local Governments for Sustainability.
• 83. WOODS BALLARD B., WILSON S., UDALECLARKE H., ILLMAN S., SCOTT T., ASHLEY R., KELLAGHER R., 2015, The SUDS manual (C753), CIRIA, London.
• 84. WÖRLEN M., WANSCHURA B., DREISEITL H., NOIVA K., WESCOAT J., MOLDASCHL M., eds., 2016, Strengthening blue-green infrastructure in our cities, Enhancing Blue-Green Infrastructure and Social Performance in High Density Urban Environments, Ramboll Liveable Cities Lab, Überlingen.
• 85. WOUTERS P., DREISEITL H., WANSCHURA B., WÖRLEN M., MOLDASCHL M., WESCOAT J., NOIVA K., 2016, Blue-green infrastructures as tools for the management of urban development and the effects of climate change, Ramboll Environ, Madrid.
• 86. YOUNG R., ZANDERS J., LIEBERKNECHT K., FASSMAN-BECK E., 2014, A comprehensive typology for mainstreaming urban green infrastructure, Journal of Hydrology, 519(C): 2571-2583.
• 87. ZALEWSKI M., 2000, Ecohydrology – the scientific background to use ecosystem properties management tools toward sustainability of water resources, Ecological Engineering, (16): 1-8.
• 88. ZALEWSKI M., 2015, Ecohydrology and hydrologic engineering: regulation of hydrology-biota interactions for sustainability, Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 20(1): A4014012.
• 89. ZARĘBA A., 2014, Multifunctional and Multiscale Aspects of Green Infrastructure in Contemporary Research, Problemy ekorozwoju/ Problems of sustainable development, 9(2): 149-156.