PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Features of Growth and Design of Protective Forests Plantings Along Highways of the South of Russia

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Protective forest plantations along highways are an integral element and one of the important factors of road safety. The main units of such plantings are tree and shrub species, which in turn form a stand capable of performing useful protective functions. The protective forest stands along highways in Southern Russia were studied on the example of the objects that grow along the M-4 Don highway 30 km from Rostov-on-Don. The forest taxation indices of 18 species of tree and shrub species that form linear plantings were studied. The main tree species in the plantings are: Robinia false acacia, lanceolate ash, small-leaved elm, holly maple, three-pronged gledichia. The main shrubs are: svidina blood red and sumac leather. When designing roadside forest stands, great importance should be given to the initial variant of mixing tree and shrub species. It is not allowed to mix the tree species with different life periods in plantings, as this leads to difficulties in carrying out subsequent forestry care. Thus, the participation of black poplar or pyramidal poplar in plantings with the participation of sharp-leaved maple is unacceptable. The life span of woody plants should be in the same period. The conducted research allowed recommending the optimal mixing schemes for the creation of new protective forest plantations along the highways of Southern Russia.
Twórcy
  • Novocherkassk Engineering and Ameliorative Institute of A.K. Kortunov, Branch of the Don State Agrarian University, Novocherkassk, Russia
  • Novocherkassk Engineering and Ameliorative Institute of A.K. Kortunov, Branch of the Don State Agrarian University, Novocherkassk, Russia
  • Novocherkassk Engineering and Ameliorative Institute of A.K. Kortunov, Branch of the Don State Agrarian University, Novocherkassk, Russia
  • Novocherkassk Engineering and Ameliorative Institute of A.K. Kortunov, Branch of the Don State Agrarian University, Novocherkassk, Russia
Bibliografia
  • 1. Kruzhilin S.N., Taran S.S., Semenyutina A.V., Matvienko E.Y. 2018. Growth peculiarities and age dynamics of Quercus Robur L. formation in steppe region conditions. Kuwait Journal of Science, 45(4), 52–58.
  • 2. Ivonin V.M., Voskoboinikova I.V., Yu Matvienko E., Kaklyugina A.A. 2020. Study of forest strip systems agrolandscapes structure. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 574(1), 012034.
  • 3. Zdornov I.A., Nagimov Z.Y., Kapralov A.V. 2018. Sanitary state of roadside protective forest strips under northern kazakhstan conditions. Advances in current natural sciences, 3, 44–51. http://naturalsciences.ru/en/article/view?id=36701
  • 4. Carreiro M.M., Song Y.C. 2008. Planning, and Management of Urban Forests: International Perspective. Springer Series on Environmental Management. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9780387714240
  • 5. Magnoux A., Cogliastro A., Paquette A. 2018. Growth of planted seedlings inside protective sleeves under strip openings of different widths in a post-agricultural forest. New Forests, 49(2), 279–296. https://kopernio.com/viewer?doi=10.1007%2Fs11056-017-9619z&token=WzI4NDAxMzYsIjEwLjEwMDcvczExMDU2LTAxNy05NjE5LXoiXQ.1CSekDI-9RUkALz0iiVwPxTEqMs
  • 6. Balandier P., Collet C., Miller J.H., Reynolds P.E., Zedaker S.M. 2006. Designing forest vegetation management strategies based on the mechanisms and dynamics of crop tree competition by neighbouring vegetation. Forestry, 79(1), 3–27. https://kopernio.com/viewer?doi=10.1093/forestry/cpi056&route=6
  • 7. Esaulko A.N., Trubacheva L.V., Vlasova O.I., Volters I.A., Perederieva V.M. 2016. Effect of protective forest strip on the crop productivity in the central fore-caucasus. Biosciences Biotechnology Research Asia, 13(1), 129–134. https://kopernio.com/viewer?doi=10.13005%2fbbra%2f2015&token=wzi4ndaxmzysijewljezmda1l2jicmevmjaxnsjd.hst95zazikny9tlmgh5n46n_mec
  • 8. Dubenok N.N., Tanyukevich V.V., Tyurin S.V. 2017. State and reclamation efficiency of forest shelterbelts of Krasnodar Krai. Russian Agricultural Sciences, 43(2), 170–172. https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_28201624_63347909.pdf
  • 9. Dubenok N.N., Tanyukevich V.V., Zhuravleva A.V. 2016. Meliorative resource pine shelter belts in the conditions of the Middle Don. Russian Agricultural Sciences, 4, 56–59. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_26367841_48278787.pdf
  • 10. Tanyukevich V.V., Rulev A.S., Borodychev V.V., Tyurin S.V., Khmeleva D.V., Kvasha A.A. 2020. Productivity and Environmental Role of Forest Shelterbelts of Robinia pseudoacacia L. of the Kuban Lowland. Lesnoy Zhurnal. Russian Forestry Journal, 6, 88–97. DOI: 10.37482/0536-1036-2020-6-88-97
  • 11. Ozer S., Akif Irmak M., Yilmaz H. 2018. Determination of roadside noise reduction effectiveness of Pinus sylvestris L. and Populus nigra L. in Erzurum, Turkey. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 144(1–3), 191–197.
  • 12. Khuzhakhmetova A.S., Semenyutina A.V., Semenyutina V.A. 2020. Deep neural network elements and their implementation in models of protective forest stands with the participation of shrubs. International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering, 9(4), 6742–6746. http://www.warse.org/IJATCSE/static/pdf/file/ijatcse371942020.pdf
  • 13. Ivonin V.M., Shumakova G.E. 1991. Influence of technogenic pollution on the state of roadside forest belts. Izvestia of higher educational institutions. Lesnoy Zhurnal (Russian Forestry Journal), 12–17.
  • 14. Ivonin V.M., Serdyukov A.V. 1997. The protective role of forest plantations along the railways. Lesovedenie, 57–63.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-3f4e55a1-aec9-41d2-8dcc-3452cc653f64
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.