PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Expectations of industrial enterprises towards suppliers related to management of quality, environment and occupational health and safety systems

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The aim of the article is to present the expectations of industrial enterprises towards suppliers related to quality, environment, occupational health and safety management systems (QEOH &SMS). The article presents the results of empirical research conducted in 151 companies operating on the Polish B2B market. The study was commissioned to a specialised research agency that conducted a targeted selection of companies registered in the Bisnode database, which is a business directory search platform. The expectations of production companies towards their suppliers regarding the implementation of QEOH&SMS were assigned a rank on a scale from one (the least important criterion) to five (the most significant). The methodological apparatus in this study was set so that it was possible to fulfil the research goal based on empirical data. A questionnaire was used to verify the characteristics of the operational process after the implementation of particular managerial systems. This article examines the relationship between the requirements for suppliers and the implementation of management systems by manufacturing companies. The results of the conducted research indicate that expectations of industrial enterprises towards suppliers related to QEOH&SMS are strongly focused on their development. Research shows that companies that adhere to the requirements of standardised management systems have a greater requirement for suppliers than companies that do not implement QEOH & SM requirements. In particular, the implementation of quality and environmental management systems by the surveyed organisations translates into increased requirements for suppliers. The article contributes to the existing scientific literature by analysing the impact of the implementation of individual management systems on the expectations towards suppliers. This study shows which of the 18 examined aspects are particularly important for manufacturing companies. Additionally, the expectations towards suppliers were classified into four groups (Corrective, Preventive, Improvement, Innovation).
Rocznik
Strony
87--104
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 73 poz., tab., wykr.
Twórcy
  • Department of Logistics, Faculty of Management, University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
  • Department of Management Systems and Logistics, Rzeszow University of Technology, Rzeszow, Poland
autor
  • Department of Management Systems and Logistics, Rzeszow University of Technology, Rzeszow, Poland
Bibliografia
  • [1] Abdallah, A.B., Alfar, N.A., & Alhyari, S. (2021). The effect of supply chain quality management on supply chain performance: the indirect roles of supply chain agility and innovation. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 51(7), 785-812.
  • [2] Abdolshah, M. (2013). A review of quality criteria supporting supplier selection. Journal of Quality and Reliability Engineering, 2013.
  • [3] Chiarini, A. (2019). Why are manufacturing SMEs cancelling their ISO 9001 certification? Research from Italy, Production Planning & Control, 30(8), 639-649.
  • [4] Andres-Jimenez, J., Medina-Merodio, J.A., Fernandez-Sanz, L., Martinez-Herraiz, J.J., & Ruiz-Pardo, E. (2020). An Intelligent Frame-work for the Evaluation of Compliance with the Requirements of ISO 9001:2015. Sustainability. 12, 1-16.
  • [5] Arab, S. D. B. (2021). Quality Management Practices and Innovation: the Moderating Effect of ISO 9001 Certification. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1-26.
  • [6] Aral, K. D., Beil, D. R., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2021). Supplier Sustainability Assessments in Total‐Cost Auctions. Production and Operations Management, 30(4), 902-920.
  • [7] Bai Ch., & Satir A.. (2020). Barriers for green supplier development programs in manufacturing industry. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 158, 1-12.
  • [8] Bastas, A., & Liyanage, K. (2018). Sustainable supply chain quality management: A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 181, 726-744.
  • [9] Benton Jr. W.C., Prahinski C., & Fan Y. (2020). The influence of supplier development programs on supplier performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 230, 107793.
  • [10] Cabecinhas, M., Domingues, P., Sampaio, P., & Arezes, P. (2020). Diffusion, drivers and trends on integrated management systems evolution among Portuguese companies. International Journal of Occupational and Environ-mental Safety, 4(1), 15-36.
  • [11] Cagnin, F., Oliveira, M. C. D., & Cauchick Miguel, P. A. (2019). Assessment of ISO 9001: 2015 implementation: focus on risk management approach requirements compliance in an automotive company. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 32(9-10), 1147-1165.
  • [12] Chen, J., Qi, A., & Dawande, M. (2020). Supplier centrality and auditing priority in socially responsible supply chains. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 22(6), 1199-1214.
  • [13] Cui, L., Wu, H., & Dai, J. (2021). Modelling flexible decisions about sustainable supplier selection in multitier sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 1-22.
  • [14] Curkovic, S., & Sroufe, R. (2011). Using ISO 14001 to promote a sustainable supply chain strategy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(2), 71-93.
  • [15] de Nadae, J., Carvalho, M.M., & Vieira, D.R. (2021). Integrated management systems as a driver of sustainability performance: exploring evidence from multiple-case studies. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 38(3), 800-821.
  • [16] De Oliveira Matias, J. C., & Coelho, D. A. (2002). The integration of the standards systems of quality management, environmental management and occupational health and safety management. International Journal of Production Research, 40(15), 3857-3866.
  • [17] Dellana, S., & Kros, J. (2018). ISO 9001 and supply chain quality in the USA. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 67(2), 297-317.
  • [18] Dellana, S., Kros, J. F., Falasca, M., & Rowe, W. J. (2020). Risk management integration and supply chain performance in ISO 9001-certi-fied and non-certified firms. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 69(6), 1205-1225.
  • [19] Dolgui, A., & Ivanov, D. (2021). 5G in digital supply chain and operations management: fostering flexibility, end-to-end connectivity and real-time visibility through internet-of-every-thing. International Journal of Production Research, 60(2), 442-451.
  • [20] Dowlatshahi, S. (2011). An empirical study of the ISO 9000 certification in global supply chain of maquiladoras. International Journal of Production Research, 49(1), 215-234.
  • [21] Fernández-Muñiz, B., Montes-Peón, J. M., & Vázquez-Ordás, C. J. (2012). Occupational risk management under the OHSAS 18001 standard: analysis of perceptions and attitudes of certified firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 24, 36-47.
  • [22] Field, J.M., & Meile, L.C. (2008). Supplier relations and supply chain performance in financial services processes. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 28(2), 185-206.
  • [23] Fonseca, L. (2015). From Quality Gurus and TQM to ISO 9001: 2015: a review of several quality paths. International Journal for Quality Research, 9(1), 167-180.
  • [24] Fonseca, L. M., & Lima, V. M. (2015). Impact of supplier management strategies on the organizational performance of ISO 9001 certified organizations. Quality Innovation Prosperity, 19(2), 32-54.
  • [25] Fonseca, L., Silva, V., Sá, J. C., Lima, V., Santos, G., & Silva, R. (2022). B Corp versus ISO 9001 and 14001 certifications: Aligned, or alternative paths, towards sustainable development?. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(3), 496-508.
  • [26] Wiengarten, F., Humphreys, P., Onofrei, G., & Fynes B. (2017). The adoption of multiple certification standards: perceived performance implications of quality, environmental and health & safety certifications, Production Planning & Control, 28(2), 131-141.
  • [27] Ghadge, A., Jena, S. K., Kamble, S., Misra, D., & Tiwari, M. K. (2020). Impact of financial risk on supply chains: a manufacturer-supplier relational perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 59(23), 7090-7105.
  • [28] Gomes, P. J., Silva, G. M., & Sarkis, J. (2020). Exploring the relationship between quality ambidexterity and sustainable production. International Journal of Production Economics, 224, 107560.
  • [29] González-Benito, J., & Dale, B. (2001). Supplier quality and reliability assurance practices in the Spanish auto components industry: a study of implementation issues. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 7(3), 187-196.
  • [30] Gören, H. G. (2018). A decision framework for sustainable supplier selection and order allocation with lost sales. Journal of Cleaner Production, 183, 1156-1169.
  • [31] Gray, J. V., Anand, G., & Roth, A. V. (2015). The influence of ISO 9000 certification on process compliance. Production and Operations Management, 24(3), 369-382.
  • [32] Habidin, N. F., Hibadullah, S. N., Mohd Fuzi, N., Salleh, M. I., & Md Latip, N. A. (2018). Lean manufacturing practices, ISO 14001, and environmental performance in Malaysian automotive suppliers. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 13(1), 45-53.
  • [33] Hernandez-Vivanco, A., Domingues, P., Sampaio, P., Bernardo, M., & Cruz-Cázares, C. (2019). Do multiple certifications leverage firm performance? A dynamic approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 218, 386-399.
  • [34] Hu, X., Chen, X., Zhao, J., Yu, K., Long, B., & Dai, G. (2022). Comprehensive service quality evaluation of public transit based on extension cloud model. Archives of Transport, 61(1), 103-115.
  • [35] Hu, X., Wang, G., Li, X., Zhang, Y., Feng, S., & Yang, A. (2018). Joint decision model of supplier selection and order allocation for the mass customization of logistics services. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 120, 76-95.
  • [36] Chen, C. K., Palma, F., & Reyes, L. (2019). Reducing global supply chains’ waste of overproduction by using lean principles. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 11(4), 441-454.
  • [37] Chiarini, A. (2015). Effect of ISO 9001 non-conformity process on cost of poor quality in capital-intensive sectors. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 32(2), 144-155.
  • [38] Jacyna-Gołda, I., Izdebski, M., Szczepański, E., & Gołda, P. (2018). The assessment of supply chain effectiveness. Archives of Transport, 45(1), 43-52.
  • [39] Jawaad, M., & Zafar, S. (2020). Improving sustainable development and firm performance in emerging economies by implementing green supply chain activities. Sustainable Development, 28(1), 25-38.
  • [40] Jedynak, M. (2018). The use of action research in diagnosing and improving cooperation between an enterprise and its suppliers. International Journal of Contemporary Management, 17(1), 59-75.
  • [41] Kim, S. K. (2015). Lean initiative practice for supplier developments in Philippines. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma. 6(4), 349-368.
  • [42] Kush, Y., Tonkoshkur, M., Vakulenko, K., Ryabev, A., Davidich, N., & Galkin, A. (2020). The efficiency of food supply chain engineer-ing (case study in Ukraine). Archives of Transport, 55(3), 51-71.
  • [43] Khatab, A., Diallo, C., Aghezzaf, E. H., & Venkatadri, U. (2019). Integrated production quality and condition-based maintenance optimisation for a stochastically deteriorating manufacturing system. International Journal of Production Research, 57(8), 2480-2497.
  • [44] Kumar, A., Cantor, D. E., & Grimm, C. M. (2019). The impact of a supplier’s environmental management concerns on a buyer’s environmental reputation: The moderating role of relationship criticality and firm size. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 122, 448-462.
  • [45] Kumar, D., & Rahman, Z. (2016). Buyer supplier relationship and supply chain sustainability: empirical study of Indian automobile industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 131, 836-848.
  • [46] Lee, M. S., Lee, Y. H., & Jeong, C. S. (2003). A high-quality-supplier selection model for supply chain management and ISO 9001 sys-tem. Production Planning & Control, 14(3), 225-232.
  • [47] Li, W., & Chen, J. (2020). Manufacturer’s ver-tical integration strategies in a three-tier supply chain. Transportation Research Part E: Logi-stics and Transportation Review, 135, 101884.
  • [48] Mami, E. F., Cheikh, A., Kadi, M., & Labadi, K. (2019). Maintenance optimisation through quality management: a case study in'Al-zinc'Plant in Algeria. International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, 27(1), 97-123.
  • [49] Naveh, E., & Marcus, A. A. (2004). When does the ISO 9000 quality assurance standard lead to performance improvement? Assimilation and going beyond. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 51(3), 352-363.
  • [50] Negash, Y. T., Kartika, J., Tseng, M. L., & Tan, K. (2020). A novel approach to measure product quality in sustainable supplier selection. Journal of Cleaner Production, 252, 119838.
  • [51] Ozturkoglu, Y., Kazancoglu, Y., & Ozkan-Ozen, Y. D. (2019). A sustainable and preventative risk management model for ship recycling industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 238, 117907.
  • [52] Rajaprasad, S. V. S., & Chalapathi, P. V. (2015). Factors influencing implementation of OHSAS 18001 in Indian construction organizations: interpretive structural modeling approach. Safety and health at work, 6(3), 200-205.
  • [53] Rebelo, M. F., Santos, G., & Silva, R. (2014). A generic model for integration of quality, environment and safety management systems. The TQM Journal, 26(2), 143-159.
  • [54] Sacristán-Díaz, M., Garrido-Vega, P., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2018). Mediating and non-linear relationships among supply chain integration dimensions. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 48(7), 698-723.
  • [55] Saghiri S., &Wilding R. (2021). On the effectiveness of supplier development programs: The role of supply-side moderators, Technovation, 103, 102234.
  • [56] Savic, M., Djordjevic, P., Milosevic, I., Mihajlovic, I., & Zivkovic, Z. (2017). Assessment of the ISO 9001 functioning on an example of relations with suppliers development: empirical study for transitional economy conditions. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 28(11-12), 1285-1306.
  • [57] Sroufe, R., & Curkovic, S. (2008). An examination of ISO 9000: 2000 and supply chain quality assurance. Journal of Operations Management, 26(4), 503-520.
  • [58] Su, H. C., Dhanorkar, S., & Linderman, K. (2015). A competitive advantage from the implementation timing of ISO management standards. Journal of Operations Management, 37(2), 31-44.
  • [59] Su, H. C., Kao, T. W. D., & Linderman, K. (2020). Where in the supply chain network does ISO 9001 improve firm productivity?. European Journal of Operational Research, 283(2), 530-540.
  • [60] Sweis, R., Nasser, A. H., Alawneh, A., Al-balkhy, W., Suifan, T., & Saa'da, R. (2021). ISO-9001 implementation and critical success factors of the Jordanian consulting engineering firms. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 71(4), 1407-1425.
  • [61] Tarí, J. J., Molina-Azorín, J. F., & Heras, I. (2012). Benefits of the ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 standards: A literature review. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management (JIEM), 5(2), 297-322.
  • [62] Tse, Y. K., & Tan, K. H. (2012). Managing product quality risk and visibility in multi-layer supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 139(1), 49-57.
  • [63] Tuczek, F., Castka, P., & Wakolbinger, T. (2018). A review of management theories in the context of quality, environmental and social responsibility voluntary standards. Journal of Cleaner Production, 176, 399-416.
  • [64] Urbaniak, M., & Zimon, D. (2022). Operational processes that the manufacturing companies expect to be improved by suppliers. International Journal for Quality Research, 16(3), 891-904.
  • [65] Vachon, S., Halley, A., & Beaulieu, M. (2009). Aligning competitive priorities in the supply chain: the role of interactions with supplier. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 29(4), 322-340.
  • [66] Vedantam, A., & Iyer, A. (2021). Revenue‐Sharing Contracts Under Quality Uncertainty in Remanufacturing. Production and Operations Management, 30(7), 2008-2026.
  • [67] Villena, V. H., Wilhelm, M., & Xiao, C. Y. (2020). Untangling drivers for supplier environmental and social responsibility: An investigation in Philips Lighting's Chinese supply chain. Journal of Operations Management, 292(3), 476-510.
  • [68] Wang, J., Shin, H., & Zhou, Q. (2021). The optimal investment decision for an innovative supplier in a supply chain. European Journal of Operational Research, 292(3), 967-979.
  • [69] Wu, W., Shi, K., Zhai, Y., Xu, G., & Jiang, X. (2021). An empirical study between OHSAS 18001 certification and innovation efficiency in green management: the moderating role of pay disparity and ownership. International Journal of Technology Management, 85(2-4), 142-164.
  • [70] Yoo, S. H., & Cheong, T. (2018). Quality improvement incentive strategies in a supply chain. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 114, 331-342.
  • [71] Zimon, D., & Madzík, P. (2020). Standardized management systems and risk management in the supply chain. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 37(2), 305-327.
  • [72] Zimon, D., Madzik, P., & Sroufe, R. (2020). Management systems and improving supply chain processes: Perspectives of focal companies and logistics service providers. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 48(9), 939-961.
  • [73] Zimon, D., Madzík, P., Dellana, S., Sroufe, R., Ikram, M., & Lysenko-Ryba, K. (2022). Environmental effects of ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 management system implementation in SSCM, The TQM Journal, 34(3), 418-447.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023)
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-3f3fdaa3-3447-4ce5-9e6c-40896562eb58
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.