PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Wyznaczanie terenu ochrony pośredniej ujęcia wód podziemnych : porównanie wyników uzyskanych metodami analitycznymi z modelowaniem numerycznym

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
EN
Delineation of wellhead protection area :comparative study of results obtained by analytical methods and numerical modeling
Konferencja
VI Konferencja „Modelowanie przepływu wód podziemnych” Ciechocinek, 16–18.11.2014
Języki publikacji
PL
Abstrakty
EN
In case of groundwater intakes with a low well discharge, localized in simple hydrogeological conditions, the wellhead protection area (WHPA) can be delineated by one of available analytical methods. The differences between the WHPA ranges delineated by analytical methods, give rise to the question which method would be optimal to be used to handle simple hydrogeological conditions. Analytical methods considered in the study include the Wyssling method, the Krijgsman and Lobo-Ferreira (K&L-F) method, and the Analytical Element Method (AEM). WHPA delineated using analytical methods are compared with data obtained from hydrogeological numerical model, which becomes the reference method. The study was performed for two single wells, and a simplified case was considered too, whereby two wells were represented by an equivalent one. The criterion used in the assessment is the distance upstream from the well to the zone boundary (Lu ), for various time-of-travel to the intake (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 years), and the shape and lateral extent of the WHPA. Discrepancies between the analytical methods vary depending on the time-of-travel, reaching 11% at most. Discrepancies between the analytical methods and numerical modelling results for single wells vary depending on the time-of-travel and the employed analytical approach, reaching 25% at most. For time-of-travel longer than 5 years, the maximal distances Lu calculated by the analytical methods are found to be smaller than those obtained by the reference method. The study indicate that results obtained by compared analytical methods are rather similar each other, but not similar to numerical modelling data. For scenario with the equivalent well there is major discrepancy between the reference values and analytical data.
Rocznik
Strony
694--699
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 15 poz., rys., tab., wykr.,
Twórcy
autor
  • AGH Akademia Górniczo-Hutnicza im. Stanisława Staszica w Krakowie, Wydział Geologii, Geofizyki i Ochrony Środowiska, al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Kraków
autor
  • AGH Akademia Górniczo-Hutnicza im. Stanisława Staszica w Krakowie, Wydział Wiertnictwa, Nafty i Gazu, al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Kraków
autor
  • AGH Akademia Górniczo-Hutnicza im. Stanisława Staszica w Krakowie, Wydział Geologii, Geofizyki i Ochrony Środowiska, al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Kraków
Bibliografia
  • 1. CERIC A. & HAITJEMA H. 2005 - On Using Simple Time-of-Travel Capture Zone Delineation Methods. Ground Water, 43 (3): 408-412.
  • 2. DONG Y., XU H. & LI G. 2013 - Wellhead protection area delineation using multiple methods: a case study in Beijing. Environ. Earth Sci.,70: 619-628.
  • 3. DUDA R., WINID B., ZDECHLIK R. & STĘPIEŃ M. 2013 - Metodyka wyboru optymalnej metody wyznaczania zasięgu stref ochronnych ujęć zwykłych wód podziemnych z uwzględnieniem warunków hydrogeologicznych RZWG w Krakowie. RZGW w Krakowie, Wyd. AGH w Krakowie WGGiOŚ: s. 154 [http://www.krakow.rzgw.gov.pl/download/wytycz- ne_strefy_ochronne.pdf]
  • 4. KRIJGSMAN B. & LOBO-FERREIRA J.P.C. 2001 - A methodology for delineating wellhead protection areas. Laboratório Nacional de Engenharia Civil, Lisbon: 75.
  • 5. MCDONALD M.G. & HARBAUGH A.W. 1988 - A modular three dimensional finite-difference ground-water flow model. USGS Techniques of Water Resources Investigations, Book 6, Washington, DC: 586.
  • 6. MILLER C. 2005 - The use of a GIS to compare the land areas captured by very basic and complex wellhead protection area models. J. Environ. Health, 68 (4): 21-26.
  • 7. MILLER C., CHUDEK P. & BABCOCK S. 2003 - A comparison of wellhead protection area delineation methods for public drinking water systems in Whatcom county, Washington. J. Environ. Health, 66 (2): 17-24.
  • 8. MOGHEIR Y. & TARAZI G. 2010 - Comparative identification of wellhead protection areas for municipal supply wells in Gaza. J. Water Resour. Prot., 2 (2): 105-114.
  • 9. MOINANTE M.J. & LOBO-FERREIRA J.P. 2005 - On wellhead protection assessment methods and a case-study application in Montemor-o-Novo, Portugal. [W:] The Fourth Inter-Celtic Colloquium on hydrology and management of Water Resources Guimaraes, Portugal, July 11-14.
  • 10. PARADIS D., MARTEL R., KARANTA G., LEFEBVRE R., MICHAUD Y., THERRIEN R. & NASTEV M. 2007 - Comparative study of methods for WHPA delineation. Ground Water, 45 (2): 158-167.
  • 11. POLLOCK D.W. 1989 - Documentation of computer programs to compute and display pathlines using results from the US Geological Survey modular three dimensional finite-difference groundwater flow model. USGS open-file report 89-381, Reston, Virginia.
  • 12. RAYMOND H.A., BONDOC M., MCGINNIS J., METROPULOS K., HEIDER P., REED A. & SAINES S. 2006 - Using analytic element models to delineate drinking water source protection areas. Ground Water, 44 (1): 16-23.
  • 13. STROBL R.Q. & ROBILLARD PD. 2006 - Comparison of several US EPA-Recommended and German wellhead protection area delineation methods in agricultural settings. Water SA, 32 (4): 507-517.
  • 14. WYSSLING L. 1979 - Eine neue Formel zur Berechnung der Zustromungsdauer (Laufzeit) des Grundwassers zu einem Grundwasser-Pumpwerk. Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae, 72 (2): 401-406.
  • 15. ZDECHLIK R. & KULMA R., 2009 - Kilka uwag o modelowaniu filtracji wód podziemnych. Biul. Państw. Inst. Geol., 436: 569-574.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-3ef75c80-a35d-4131-9664-8f5490b59b23
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.