Regulating Deep Fakes in the Artificial Intelligence Act

Łabuz, Mateusz

doi:10.60097/ACIG/162856

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Regulating Deep Fakes in the Artificial Intelligence Act

Autorzy

Łabuz Mateusz

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.60097/ACIG/162856

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

The Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act) may be a milestone of regulating artificial intelligence by the European Union. Regulatory framework proposed by the European Commission has the potential to serve as a benchmark worldwide and strengthen the position of the EU as one of the main players of the technology market. One of the components of the regulation are the provisions on deep fakes, which include the definition, classification as a “specific risk” AI system and transparency obligations. Deep fakes rightly arouse controversy and are assessed as a complex phenomenon, the negative use of which significantly increases the risk of political manipulation, and at the same time contributes to disinformation, undermining trust in information or in the media. The AI Act may strengthen the protection of citizens against some of the negative consequences of misusing deep fakes, although the impact of the regulatory framework in its current form will be limited due to the specificity of creating and disseminating deep fakes. The effectiveness of the provisions will depend not only on the enforcement capabilities, but also on the precision of phrasing provisions to prevent misinterpretation and deliberate abuse of exceptions. At the same time, the AI Act will not cover a significant part of deep fakes, which, due to the malicious intentions of their creators, will not be subject to the protection in the form of transparency obligations. This study allows for the analysis of provisions relating to deep fakes in the AI Act and proposing improvements that will take into account the specificity of this phenomenon to a greater extent.

Słowa kluczowe

deep fake AI European Union

falsyfikat sztuczna inteligencja Unia Europejska

Wydawca

NASK – National Research Institute

Czasopismo

Applied Cybersecurity & Internet Governance

Rocznik

2023

Tom

Vol. 2, No. 1

Strony

1--42

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 116 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Łabuz Mateusz

mateusz.labuz@msz.gov.pl

Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Poland, Chemnitz University of Technology, Germany

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6065-2188

Bibliografia

1. J. Laux, S. Wachter, B. Mittelstadt, “Trustworthy artificial intelligence and the European Union AI act: On the conflation of trustworthiness and acceptability of risk,” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2023. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4230294.
2. P. Maham, S. Küspert, Governing General Purpose A I. Stiftung Neue Verantwortung, Berlin, 2023.
3. J. Schuett, “Risk Management in the Artificial Intelligence Act,” European Journal of Risk Regulation, pp. 1–19, 2023. doi:10.1017/err.2023.1.
4. European Commission, Proposal for Regulation of the European Parliament and the Council laying down harmonized rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and amending certain union legislative acts. COM(2021) 206 final. 2021. [Online]. Available: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/reso.... [Accessed: Sep. 13, 2023].
5. T. Brooks, G. Princess, J. Heatley, J. Jeremy, K. Scott, et al., Increasing Threats of Deep fake Identities, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.dhs.gov/sites/defa.... [Accessed: Sep. 13, 2023].
6. B. Chesney, D. Citron, “Deep Fakes: A Looming Challenge for Privacy, Democracy, and National Security,” California Law Review, vol. 107, no. 18, pp. 1753–1820, 2019. doi: 10.15779/Z38RV0D15J.
7. I. Dąbrowska, “Deepfake – nowy wymiar internetowej manipulacji,” Zarządzanie Mediami, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 89–101, 2020. doi: 10.4467/23540214ZM.20.024.11803.
8. D. L. Byman, C. Gao, C. Meserole, Deepfakes and international conflict. Washington: The Brookings Institution, 2023.
9. M. Pawelec, “Deepfakes and Democracy (Theory): How Synthetic Audio Visual Media for Disinformation and Hate Speech Threaten Core Democratic Functions,” Digital Society, vol. 2, no. 2, 2022. doi: 10.1007/s44206-022-00010-6.
10. M. Mustak, J. Salminen, M. Mäntymäki, A. Rahman, Y. K. Dwivedi, “Deepfakes: Deceptions, mitigations, and opportunities,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 154, 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113368.
11. E. Pashentsev, “The Malicious Use of Deepfakes Against Psychological Security and Political Stability,” in The Palgrave Handbook of Malicious Use of AI and Psychological Security, E. Pashentsev, Ed. London: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 2023, pp. 47–80.
12. H. Farid, H.-J. Schindler, Deep Fakes. On the Threat of Deep Fakes to Democracy and Society. Berlin: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung, 2020.
13. F. Juefei-Xu, R. Wang, Y. Huang, Q. Guo, L. Ma, et al., “Countering Malicious Deep Fakes: Survey, Battleground, and Horizon,” International Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 130, no. 7, pp. 1678–1734, 2022. doi: 10.1007/s11263-022-01606-8.
14. J. Ice, “Defamatory Political Deepfakes and the First Amendment,” Case Western Reserve Law Review, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 417–455, 2019.
15. E. Hine, L. Floridi, “New deepfake regulations in China are a tool for social stability, but at what cost?,” Nature Machine Intelligence, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 608–610, 2022. doi: 10.1038/s42256-022-00513-4.
16. R. T. Toparlak, “Criminalising Pornographic Deep Fakes: A Gender-Specific Inspection of Image-Based Sexual Abuse,” Sciences Po Law School The 10th Graduate Conference, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencespo.fr/publ.... [Accessed: Sep. 13, 2023].
17. E. Meskys, A. Liaudanskass, J. Kalpokiene, P. Jurcy, “Regulating Deep-Fakes: Legal and Ethical Considerations,” Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 24–31, 2020. doi: 10.1093/jiplp/jpz167.
18. K. Mamak, “Categories of Fake News from the Perspective of Social Harmfulness,” in Integrity of Scientific Research: Fraud, Misconduct and Fake News in the Academic, Medical and Social Environment, J. Faintuch, S. Faintuch, Ed. Springer, pp. 351–357, 2022 doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-99680-2_35.
19. M. Kop, “EU Artificial Intelligence Act: The European Approach to AI,” Transatlantic Antitrust and IPR Developments, vol. 2, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://law.stanford.edu/wp-co.... [Accessed: Sep. 13, 2023].
20. L. Edwards, The EU AI Act: a summary of its significance and scope, Ada Lovelace Institute, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.adalovelaceinstitu.... [Accessed: Sep. 13, 2023].
21. A. Fernandez, “‘Deep fakes’: disentangling terms in the proposed EU Artificial Intelligence Act,” UFITA Archiv für Medienrecht und Medienwissenschaft, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 392–433, 2021. doi: 10.5771/2568-9185-2021-2-392.
22. M. Mesarčík, S. Solarova, J. Podroužek, M. Bielikova, Stance on The Proposal for a Regulation Laying Down Harmonised Rules on Artificial Intelligence – Artificial Intelligence Act, Kempelen Institute of Intelligent Technologies, 2021. doi: 10.31235/osf.io/yzfg8.
23. M. Veale, F. Z. Borgesius, “Demystifying the Draft EU Artificial Intelligence Act — Analysing the good, the bad, and the unclear elements of the proposed approach,” Computer Law Review International, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 97–112, 2021. doi: 10.9785/cri-2021-220402.
24. European Parliament, Amendments adopted by the European Parliament on 14 June 2023 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act)and amending certain Union legislative acts. (COM(2021)0206 – C9-0146/2021–2021/0106(COD))1. P9_TA(2023)0236. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www. europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2023-0236_EN.pdf. [Accessed: Sep. 13, 2023].
25. M. van Huijstee, P. van Boheemen, D. Das, L. Nierling, J. Jahnel et al., Tackling deepfakes in European policy, European Parliamentary Research Service, Brussels, 2021.
26. R. Delfino, “Pornographic Deepfakes: The Case for Federal Criminalization of Revenge Porn’s Next Tragic Act,” Fordham Law Review, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 887–938, 2019. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3341593.
27. A. De Ruiter, “The Distinct Wrong of Deepfakes,” Philosophy & Technolology, vol. 34, pp. 1311–1332, 2021. doi: 10.1007/s13347-021-00459-2.
28. H. Farid, “Creating, Using, Misusing, and Detecting Deep Fakes,” Journal of Online Trust and Safety, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 1–33, 2022. doi: 10.54501/jots.v1i4.56.
29. A. Satariano, P. Mozur, The People Onscreen Are Fake. The Disinformation Is Real, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/0.... [Accessed: Sep. 13, 2023].
30. T. Weikmann, S. Lecheler, “Cutting through the Hype: Understanding the Implications of Deepfakes for the Fact-Checking Actor-Network,” Digital Journalism, 2023. doi: 10.1080/21670811.2023.2194665.
31. M. Westerlund, “The Emergence of Deepfake Technology: A Review,” Technology Innovation Management Review, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 39–52, 2019. doi: 10.22215/timreview/1282.
32. S. J. Nightingale, H. Farid, “AI-synthesized faces are indistinguishable from real faces and more trustworthy,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 119, no. 8, 2022. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2120481119.
33. C. Vaccari, A. Chadwick, “Deepfakes and Disinformation: Exploring the Impact of Synthetic Political Video on Deception, Uncertainty, and Trust in News,” Social Media + Society, vol. 6, no. 1, 2020. doi: 10.1177/2056305120903408.
34. B. van der Sloot, Y. Wagensveld, “Deepfakes: regulatory challenges for the synthetic society,” Computer Law & Security Review, vol. 46, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105716.
35. C. Okolie, “Artificial Intelligence-Altered Videos (Deepfakes), Image-Based Sexual Abuse, and Data Privacy Concerns,” Journal of International Women’s Studies, vol. 25, no. 2, 2023. [Online] Available: https://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vo.... [Accessed: Sep. 13, 2023].
36. L. Hurst, How a fake image of a Pentagon explosion shared on Twitter caused a real dip on Wall Street, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.euronews.com/next/.... [Accessed: Sep. 13, 2023].
37. C. Öhman, “The identification game: deepfakes and the epistemic limits of identity,” Synthese, vol. 200, no. 4, 2022. doi: 10.1007/s11229-022-03798-5.
38. A. Kleemann, “Deepfakes – Wenn wir unseren Augen und Ohren nicht mehr trauen können,” SWP-Aktuell, vol. 43, 2023. doi: 10.18449/2023A43.
39. K. Eckart, A growing problem of ‘deepfake geography’: How AI falsifies satellite images, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.washington.edu/new.... [Accessed:Sep. 13, 2023].
40. B. Zhao, S. Zhang, C. Xu, Y. Sun, C. Deng, “Deep fake geography? When geospatial data encounter Artificial Intelligence,” Cartography and Geographic Information Science, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 338–352, 2021. doi: 10.1080/15230406.2021.1910075.
41. K. Hiebert, Democracies Are Dangerously Unprepared for Deepfakes, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.cigionline.org/art.... [Accessed: Sep. 13, 2023].
42. European Parliament’s Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, Opinion on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and amending certain Union legislative acts, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.europarl.europa.eu.... [Accessed:Sep. 13, 2023].
43. J. Bateman, Deepfakes and Synthetic Media in the Financial System: Assessing Threat Scenarios. Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2020.
44. K. Giles, K. Hartmann, M. Mustaffa, The Role of Deepfakes in Malign Influence Campaigns. Riga: NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence, 2019.
45. J. R. Allen, D. M. West (2020). The Brookings glossary of AI and emerging technologies. [Online]. Available: https://www.brookings.edu/arti.... [Accessed: Sep. 13, 2023].
46. T. Hwang, Deepfakes: A Grounded Threat Assessment. Washington: Center for Security and Emerging Technology, 2020.
47. R. Mattioli, A. Malatras, Identifying Emerging Cyber Security Threats and Challenges for 2030. Athens: ENISA, 2023.
48. M. Atleson, Combatting Online Harms Through Innovation. Federal Trade Commission Report to Congress, 2022. [Online] Available: https://www.ftc.gov/system/fil... [Accessed: Sep. 13, 2023].
49. A. J. Goldstein, G. Sastry, M. Musser, R. DiResta, M. Gentzel, et al., Generative Language Models and Automated Influence Operations: Emerging Threats and Potential Mitigations. 2023. [Online]. Available: arxiv.org/abs/2301.04246. [Accessed: Sep. 13, 2023].
50. Z. Khanjani, G. Watson, V. P. Janeja, “Audio deepfakes: A survey,” Frontiers in Big Data, vol. 5, 2023. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2022.1001063.
51. J. Pu, Z. Sarwar, S. M. Abdullah, A. Rehman, Y. Kim et al., “Deepfake Text Detection: Limitations and Opportunities,” IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), 2023. doi: 10.1109/sp46215.2023.10179387.
52. European Parliament’s Committee on Culture and Education, Opinion on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and amending certain Union Legislative Acts. 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.europarl.europa.eu.... [Accessed: Sep. 13, 2023].
53. C. Rigotti, C. McGlynn, “Towards an EU criminal law on violence against women: The ambitions and limitations of the Commission’s proposal to criminalise image-based sexual abuse,” New Journal of European Criminal Law, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 452–477, 2022. doi: 10.1177/20322844221140713.
54. European Commission, Directive on combating violence against women and domestic violence. Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on combating violence against women and domestic violence’. COM(2022) 105 final.2022.
55. I. Georgieva, T. Timan, M. Hoekstra, Regulatory divergences in the draft AI act. Brussels: Scientific Foresight Unit (STOA), 2022.
56. European Union, Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 October 2022 on a Single Market For Digital Services and amending Directive 2000/31/EC (Digital Services Act). 2022.
57. European Commission, Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the transparency and targeting of political advertising. COM(2021)731 final. 2021.
58. C. Becker, R. Laycock, “Embracing deepfakes and AI-generated images in neuroscience research,” European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 2657–2661, 2023. doi: 10.1111/ejn.16052.
59. B. van der Sloot, Y. Wagensveld, B. J. Koops, Deepfakes: The Legal Challenges of the Synthetic Society, Tilburg Institute for Law, Technology, and Society, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105716.
60. Europol, Facing reality? Law enforcement and the challenge of deepfakes, an observatory report from the Europol Innovation Lab. Brussels: Publications Office of the European Union, 2022.
61. N. Schick, Deep Fakes and the Infocalypse. London: Octopus Books, 2020.
62. J. Ternovski, J. Kalla, P. M. Aronow, “Deepfake Warnings for Political Videos Increase Disbelief but Do Not Improve Discernment: Evidence from Two Experiments,” OSF Preprints, [Online]. Available: https://osf.io/dta97. [Accessed: Sep. 13, 2023].
63. J. De Cooman, “Humpty Dumpty and High-Risk AI Systems: The Ratione Materiae Dimension of the Proposal for an EU Artificial Intelligence Act,” Market and Competition Law Review, vol. 6, no. 1, 2022. doi: 10.34632/mclawreview.2022.11304.
64. L. Edwards, “Regulating AI in Europe: four problems and four solutions”, Ada Lovelace Institute, 2022. [Online] Available: https://www.adalovelaceinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Expert-opinion-Lilian-Edwards-Regulating-AI-in-Europe.pdf. [Accessed: Sep. 13, 2023].
65. Ada Lovelace Institute, People, risk and the unique requirements of AI, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.adalovelaceinstitu.... [Accessed: Sep. 13, 2023].
66. Commission Staff Working Document, Impact Assessment accompanying the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and amending certain Union legislative acts. 2021. [Online]. Available: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/lega.... [Accessed: Sep. 13, 2023].
67. W. Wahlster, C. Winterhalter, German Standardization Roadmap on Artificial Intelligence, DIN, DKE, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.din.de/resource/bl.... [Accessed: Sep. 13, 2023].
68. N. Helberger, N. Diakopoulos, “Chat GPT and the AI Act,” Internet Policy Review, vol. 12, no. 1, 2023. doi: 10.14763/2023.1.1682.
69. T. Mahler, “Between risk management and proportionality: The risk-based approach in the EU’s Artificial Intelligence Act Proposal,” Nordic Yearbook of Law and Informatics, pp. 247–270, 2022. doi: org/10.53292/208f5901.38a67238.
70. M. C. Sanchez, Deep fakes: the media and the legal system is under threat, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.lexology.com/libra.... [Accessed: Sep. 13, 2023].
71. T. T. Nguyen, Q. V. H. Nguyen, D. T. Nguyen, D. T. Nguyen, T. Huynh-The et al., “Deep Learning for Deepfakes Creation and Detection: A Survey,” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2022. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4030341.
72. V. Cianciaglini, C. Gibson, D. Sancho, O. McCarthy, M. Eira et al., Malicious Uses and Abuses of Artificial Intelligence, United Nations Interregional Crime and Justice Research Institute, Europol’s European Cybercrime Centre, 2020. [Online].Available: https://www.europol.europa.eu/.... [Accessed: Sep. 13, 2023].
73. R. Delfino, “The Deepfake Defense-Exploring the Limits of the Law and Ethical Norms in Protecting Legal Proceedings from Lying Lawyers,” Preview Ohio State Law Journal, vol. 84. doi: org/10.2139/ssrn.4355140.
74. L. Holbrook (2023). The EU Artificial Intelligence Act and its Human Rights Limitations. [Online]. Available: https://ohrh.law.ox.ac.uk/the-.... [Accessed: Sep. 13, 2023].
75. Centre for Digital Governance, The false promise of transparent deep fakes: How transparency obligations in the draft AI Act fail to deal with the threat of disinformation and image-based sexual abuse, Hertie School, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.hertie-school.org/.... [Accessed: Sep. 13, 2023].
76. K. Nagumotu, “Deep fakes are taking over social media: can the law keep up?,” Intellectual Property Law Review, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 102–146, 2022.
77. M. Ebers, V. R. S. Hoch, F. Rosenkranz, H. Ruschemeier, B. Steinrötter, “The European Commission’s Proposal for an Artificial Intelligence Act—A Critical Assessment by Members of the Robotics and AI Law Society (RAILS),” Multidisciplinary ScientificJournal, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 589–603, 2021. doi: 10.3390/j4040043.
78. R. J. Neuwirth, “Prohibited artificial intelligence practices in the proposed EU artificial intelligence act (AIA),” Computer Law & Security Review, vol. 48, 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105798.
79. J. B. Finke, M. F. Larra, M. U. Merz, H. Schächinger, “Startling similarity: Effects of facial self-resemblance and familiarity on the processing of emotional faces,” PLOS ONE, vol. 12, no. 12, 2017. doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0189028.
80. T. Dobber, N. Metoui, D. Trilling, N. Helberger, C. de Vreese, “Do (Microtargeted) Deepfakes Have Real Effects on Political Attitudes?,” The International Journal of Press/Politics, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 69–91, 2021. doi: 10.1177/1940161220944364.
81. T. Nakano, T. Yamamoto, “You trust a face like yours,” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, vol. 9, no. 1, 2022. doi: 10.1057/s41599-022-01248-8.
82. J. Newman, A Taxonomy of Trustworthiness for Artificial Intelligence, Center for Long-Term Cybersecurity, Berkeley, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://cltc.berkeley.edu/wp-c.... [Accessed: Sep. 13, 2023].
83. European Parliament’s Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection and Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, Draft Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and amending certain Union Legislative Acts. 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.europarl.europa.eu.... [Accessed: Sep. 13, 2023].
84. E. Morrow, Beyond disinformation: deep fakes and false memory implantation, International Neuroethics Society and International Youth Neuroscience Association, Neuroethics Essay Contest, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.dana.org/article/neuroethics-essay-general-audience-2021. [Accessed: Jul. 13, 2023].
85. Bundesrat, Beschluss des Bundesrates. Vorschlag für eine Verordnung des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates zur Festlegung harmonisierter Vorschriften für künstliche Intelligenz (Gesetz über künstliche Intelligenz) und zur Änderung bestimmterRechtsakte der Union. 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.bundesrat.de/Share.... [Accessed: Sep. 13, 2023].
86. European Parliament›s Committee on Legal Affairs, Report on artificial intelligence: questions of interpretation and application of international law in so far as the EU is affected in the areas of civil and military uses and of state authority outside the scope of criminal justice. 2020/2013(INI). 2021. [Online] Available: https://www.europarl.europa.eu.... [Accessed: Sep. 13, 2023].
87. R. Michaelson, Turkish presidential candidate quits race after release of alleged sex tape, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.theguardian.com/wo.... [Accessed: Sep. 13, 2023].
88. L. M. Böswald, B. A. Saab, What a Pixel Can Tell: Text-to-Image Generation and its Disinformation Potential, Democracy Reporting International, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://democracyreporting.s3..... [Accessed: Sep. 13, 2023].
89. P. Beuth, A. Demling, M. Hoppenstedt, T. Kleinz, A. Reiner, et al., “Die große Fake-Maschine,” Der Spiegel, no. 28, pp. 8–15, 2023.
90. M. Wong (2022). We Haven’t Seen the Worst of Fake News. [Online]. Available: https://www.theatlantic.com/te.... [Accessed: Sep. 13, 2023].
91. S. Kutzner (2023). Deepfake: Nein, Jordan B. Peterson zog nicht über Baerbock, Lauterbach und Scholz her. [Online]. Available: https://correctiv.org/faktench.... [Accessed: Sep. 13, 2023].
92. D. Neuerer, T. Stiens, Wie KI zur Gefahr für die Demokratie werden könnte. Handelsblatt, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.handelsblatt.com/p.... [Accessed: Sep. 13, 2023].
93. Center on Extremism, The Dangers of Manipulated Media and Video: Deepfakes and More, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.adl.org/resources/.... [Accessed: Sep. 13, 2023].
94. Der Standard, Emma Watson liest „Mein Kampf”: Trolle feiern Software für Stimmen-Deepfakes, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.derstandard.de/sto.... [Accessed: Sep. 13, 2023].
95. J. Habgood-Coote, “Deepfakes and the epistemic apocalypse,” Synthese, vol. 201, no. 3, 2023. doi 10.1007/s11229-023-04097-3.
96. D. Leufer, Access Now’s submission to the European Commission’s adoption consultation on the Artificial Intelligence Act, Accessed: Sep. 13, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.accessnow.org/wp-c.... [Accessed: Sep. 13, 2023].
97. G. Pennycook, T. D. Cannon, D. G. Rand, “Prior exposure increases perceived accuracy of fake news,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, vol. 147, no.12, pp. 1865–1880, 2018. doi: 10.1037/xge0000465.
98. M. Karaboga, “Die Regulierung von Deepfakes auf EU-Ebene: Überblick eines Flickenteppichs und Einordnung des Digital Services Act- und KIRegulierungsvorschlags,” in Digitale Hate Speech. Interdisziplinäre Perspektiven auf Erkennung, Beschreibung und Regulation, S. Jaki, S. Steger, Ed. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler, 2023. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-65964-9_10.
99. F. Palmiotto, Detecting Deep Fake Evidence with Artificial Intelligence A Critical Look from a Criminal Law Perspective, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/p.... [Accessed: Sep. 13, 2023].
100. Washington State Senate, Washington State Senate Bill on Defining synthetic media in campaigns for elective office, and providing relief for candidates and campaigns. S.B. 5152. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://lawfilesext.leg.wa.gov.... [Accessed: Sep. 13, 2023].
101. Center for an Informed Public (2023). New WA law requires clear disclosures for ‘deepfakes’ used in election media. [Online]. Available: https://www.cip.uw.edu/2023/06.... [Accessed:Sep. 13, 2023].
102. Bitkom, Täuschend echt, aber alles Lüge: 63 Prozent haben Angst vor Deepfakes, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.bitkom-research.de.... [Accessed: Sep. 13, 2023].
103. J. Laux, S. Wachter, B. Mittelstadt, “Three Pathways for Standardisation and Ethical Disclosure by Default under the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act,” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2023, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4365079.
104. T. Dobber, S. Kruikemeier, F. Votta, N. Helberger, E. P. Goodman, “The effect of traffic light veracity labels on perceptions of political advertising source and message credibility on social media,” Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 2023, doi: 10.1080/19331681.2023.2224316.
105. H. Farid, ChatGPT and Dall-E Should Watermark Their Results, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://gizmodo.com/chatgpt-da.... [Accessed: Sep. 13, 2023].
106. W. Fischer (2019). California’s governor signed new deepfake laws for politics and porn, but experts say they threaten free speech. [Online]. Available: https://www.businessinsider.co.... [Accessed: Sep. 13, 2023].
107. A. Walorska, Deepfakes & Disinformation. Berlin: Friedrich Naumann Fundation, 2020.
108. J. Langa, “Deepfakes, Real Consequences: Crafting Legislation to Combat Threats Posed by Deepfakes,” Boston University Law Review, vol. 101, pp. 761–801, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.bu.edu/bulawreview...: Sep. 13, 2023].
109. H. Ajder, J. Glick, JUST JOKING! Deepfakes, Satire and the Politics of Synthetic Media, WITNESS, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://cocreationstudio.mit.e...: Sep. 13, 2023].
110. M. Pawelec, “Deepfakes als Chance für die Demokratie?,” in Digitalisierung und die Zukunft der Demokratie: Beiträge aus der Technikfolgenabschätzung, A. Bogner, M. Decker, M. Nentwich, C. Scherz, Ed. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft,pp. 89–102, 2022. doi: org/10.5771/9783748928928-89.
111. F. Gollin, A. Gheorghita, A. Young, O. Ruiz Pilato, X. Chen, Deepfake. Legal Paper, Cyber Rights Organization, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://cyberights.org/wp-cont.... [Accessed: Sep. 13, 2023].
112. E. F. Judge, A. M. Korhani, “Deepfakes, Counterfeits, and Personality,” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2021. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3893890.
113. M. Liu, X. Zhang, “Deepfake Technology and Current Legal Status of It,” Proceedings of the 2022 3rd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education (IC-ICAIE 2022), 2023, pp. 1308–1314. doi: 10.2991/978-94-6463-040-4_194.
114. P. Grady, EU Proposals Will Fail to Curb Nonconsensual Deepfake Porn, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://datainnovation.org/202.... [Accessed: Sep. 13, 2023].
115. N. A. Smuha, “Beyond the Individual: Governing AI’s Societal Harm,” Internet Policy Review, vol. 10, no. 3, 2021. doi: 10.14763/2021.3.1574.
116. C. Pershan, R. Jonusaite, User-Guide to the EU Digital Services Act, EU DisinfoLab, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.disinfo.eu/wp-cont.... [Accessed: Sep. 13, 2023].

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2024).

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-3ebc7daf-1c7e-47dc-a495-642bc6933d27