PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Hydric potential of the river basin: Prądnik, Polish Highlands

Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Human society deals with floods, drought and water pollution. Facing those problems, the question how to prevent or at least to minimalize the adverse effects of water-related issues is asked of the landscape managers. In this way, any help given to landscape managers seems to be an additional useful tool. Within this paper, an approach leading to mitigation of water-related problems is presented that relates the retention of precipitation and the use of ecosystems as a tool for improving the quality, quantity of water resources and availability throughout the region. One approach is the determination of the landscape’s hydric potential (LHP). This study examines one example of using this method within the conditions of Poland. The results of the research show that national data are entirely appropriate for implementation of the LHP method. Further, this approach revealed the classes of the hydric potential of the Prądnik river basin which was selected as the experimental territory. LHP results reflect the ecosystem attributes of the model river basin; areas of average LHP cover 63.26%, areas of high and limited hydric potential cover approximately 18.3% each. The spatial distribution of LHP means the results of this study provide a baseline for management of the river basin.
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Strony
1253--1267
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 74 poz.
Twórcy
autor
  • Department of Applied Ecology, Faculty of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Technical University in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia
  • Institute of Structural Mechanics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Cracow University of Technology, Cracow, Poland
autor
  • Department of Ecology, Climatology and Air Protection, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Cracow, Poland
autor
  • Department of Sanitary Engineering and Water Management, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Cracow, Poland
Bibliografia
  • 1. Act No. 34/2014 Coll., on the conservation and use of agricultural land
  • 2. Ali HE, Reineking B (2016) Extensive management of field margins enhances their potential for off-site soil erosion mitigation. J Environ Manag 169:202–209
  • 3. Altieri MA (1999) The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 74(1–3):19–31
  • 4. Balvanera P, Pfisterer AB, Buchmann N, He J-S, Nakashizuka T, Raffaelli D, Schmid B (2006) Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. Ecol Lett 9:1146–1156
  • 5. Becker A, Güntner A, Katzenmaier D (1999) Required integrated approach to understand runoff generation and flow-path dynamics in catchments. IAHS-AISH Publisher, Birmingham, Great Britain, pp 3–9
  • 6. Bedrna Z (2002) Environmental pedology. VEDA, Bratislava
  • 7. Brown AE, Zhang L, McMahon TA, Western AW, Vertessy RA (2005) A review of paired catchment studies for determining changes in water yield resulting from alterations in vegetation. J Hydrol 310(1):28–61
  • 8. Brzeźniak E (2009) Time structure of precipitation in Ojców. Pradnik Prace Muz Szafera 19:53–66
  • 9. Budnik A (2016) Miejscowy plan zagospodarowania przestrennego obszaru “Tonie-Zachod”: Prognoza oddiaływania na środowisko. Krakow
  • 10. Charman PEV, Murphy BW (1998) Soils: their properties and management. Oxford University Press, South Melbourne, Australia
  • 11. Dale VH (1996) The relationship between land-use change and climate change. Ecol Appl 7(3):753–769
  • 12. European Community (2000) Directive 2000/60/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. Off J Eur Communities L327:1–72
  • 13. European Union (2012) A blueprint to safeguard Europe’s water resources. Communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions
  • 14. Evrard O, Heitz C, Liegeois M, Boardman J, Vandaele K, Auzet AV, Van Wesemael B (2010) A comparison of management approaches to control muddy floods in central Belgium, northern France and southern England. Land Degrad Dev 21(4):322–335
  • 15. Fishburn PC (1971) A comparative analysis of group decision methods. Syst Res Behav Sci 16(6):538–544
  • 16. Fox DM, Bryan RB, Price AG (1997) The influence of slope angle on final infiltration rate for interrill conditions. Geoderma 80:181–194. 10.1016/S0016-7061(97)00075-X
  • 17. Gabrielli CP, McDonnell JJ, Jarvis WT (2012) The role of bedrock groundwater in rainfall–runoff response at hillslope and catchment scales. J Hydrol 450:117–133
  • 18. Geroy IJ, Gribb MM, Marshall HP, Chandler DG, Benner SG, McNamara JP (2011) Aspect influences on soil water retention and storage. Hydrol Process 25(25):3836–3842. 10.1002/hyp.8281
  • 19. GIOS (2015) CORINE land cover 2012. Inspectorate of environmental protection 2015. Shapefile. GIOS, Warszawa
  • 20. Guyomard H, Le Bris K (2004) Multilateral agricultural negotiations and multifunctionality: some research issues. ENARPRI Thematic Network on Trade Agreements and European Agriculture, Policy Brief, Brussels (4)
  • 21. Hough-Snee N, Roper BB, Wheaton JM, Lokteff RL (2015) Riparian vegetation communities of the American Pacific Northwest are tied to multi-scale environmental filters. River Res Appl 31:1151–1165. 10.1002/rra.2815
  • 22. Hudson BD (1994) Soil organic matter and available water capacity. J Soil Water Conserv 49(2):189–194
  • 23. IMiGW (2016) Meteorological data (1971–2000). Institute of Meteorology and Water Management—National Research Institute. CD—DBF. IMiGW Warszawa
  • 24. IUSS Working Group (2014) World reference base for soil resources 2014 international soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. FAO, Rome
  • 25. Jarvis N, Koestel J, Messing I, Moeys J, Lindahl A (2013) Influence of soil, land-use and climatic factors on the hydraulic conductivity of soil. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 17(12):5185–5195. 10.5194/hess-17-5185-2013
  • 26. Keating K, Keeble H, Pettit A, Stark D (2015) Cost estimation for SUDS—summary of evidence. Environment Agency, Bristol
  • 27. Kowalewski Z (2008) Actions for small water retention undertaken in Poland. J Water Land Dev 12:155–167
  • 28. Krásný J (1993) Classification of transmissivity magnitude and variation. Groundwater 31(2):230–236
  • 29. Kundzewicz W (2002) The flood of the floods—Poland, summer 1997. The extremes of the extremes: extraordinary floods. In: Proceedings of a symposium held at Reykjavik, Iceland, July 2000, vol 273. IAHS-AISH Publisher, Reykjavik, Iceland, pp 147–153
  • 30. Kutílek M, Nielsen DR (1994) Soil hydrology: textbook for students of soil science, agriculture, forestry, geoecology, hydrology, geomorphology and other related disciplines. Catena Verlag, Cremlingen-Destedt, Germany
  • 31. Lepeška T (2010) Hydric potential of landscape and integrated river basin management in mountain and submontane regions. Ecohydrol Hydrobiol 10(1):13–24
  • 32. Lepeška T (2013) Hydric potential of selected river basins in Slovakia. Ecohydrol Hydrobiol 13(3):201–209
  • 33. Lepeška T (2016) The impact of impervious surfaces on ecohydrology and health in urban ecosystems of Banská Bystrica (Slovakia). Soil Water Res 11(1):29–36
  • 34. Lerer LB, Scudder T (1999) Health impacts of large dams. Environ Impact Assess 19(2):113–123
  • 35. Lewicki L (2015) Preliminary assessment of urban watercourse capacity under significant anthropogenic impact. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Formatio Circumiectus 14(1):135–147
  • 36. Linnerooth-Bayer J, Dubel A, Damurski J, Schröter D, Sendzimir J (2013) Climate change mainstreaming in agriculture: Natural water retention measures for flood and drought risk management. IIASA Policy Report. IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria (XQ-13-805)
  • 37. Loucks DP, Van Beek E, Stedinger JR, Dijkman JP, Villars MT (2005) Water resources systems planning and management: an introduction to methods, models and applications. UNESCO, Paris
  • 38. Majlingová A, Závacká M, Kliment D (2012) An assessment of Hucava mountain stream catchment susceptibility to flooding. J For Sci 58(12):553–559
  • 39. Marsalek J, Jimenez-Cisneros E, Malmquist PA, Karamouz M, Goldenfum J, Chocat B (2006) Urban water cycle processes and interactions. International Hydrological Programme—V, Technical Documents in Hydrology, vol 78. UNESCO, Paris
  • 40. Montgomery R (2007) Soil erosion and agricultural sustainability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(33):13268–13272
  • 41. Naef F, Scherrer S, Weiler M (2002) A process based assessment of the potential to reduce flood runoff by land use change. J Hydrol 267(1):74–79
  • 42. Nakamura T (2003) Ecosystem-based river basin management: its approach and policy-level application. Hydrol Process 17(14):2711–2725
  • 43. Nuttle WK (2002) Is ecohydrology one idea or many? Hydrol Sci J 47(5):805–807
  • 44. O’Connor JE, Duda JJ, Grant GE (2015) 1000 dams down and counting. Science 348(6234):496–497
  • 45. Petrovič F, Stránovský P, Muchová Z et al (2017) Landscape-ecological optimalization of hydric potential in foothills region with dispersed settlements—a case study of Nová Bošáca, Slovakia. Appl Ecol Environ Res 15(1):379–400
  • 46. PIG (2016) Hydrogeological map of Poland in scale 1:50,000. Polish Geological Institute—National Research Institute. CD—GeoTIFF. PIG Warszawa
  • 47. Plummer R, de Loë R, Armitage D (2012) A systematic review of water vulnerability assessment tools. Water Resour Manag 26(15):4327–4346. 10.1007/s11269-012-0147-5
  • 48. Power AG (2010) Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 365(1554):2959–2971
  • 49. Price K (2011) Effects of watershed topography, soils, land use, and climate on baseflow hydrology in humid regions: a review. Prog Phys Geogr 35(4):465–492
  • 50. Radecki-Pawlik A, Wojkowski J, Wałęga A, Pijanowski J (2015) Zastosowanie metod gis do analizy zasobów wodnych krajobrazów kulturowych regionu zbiornika wodnego mściwojów. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Formatio Circumiectus 14(4):109–133
  • 51. Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson GD, Bennett EM (2010) Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:11140–11144
  • 52. Robarts R (1998) Factors controlling primary production in hypertrophic lakes (Hartbeespoort Dam, South Africa). J Plankton Res 6:91–105
  • 53. Roub R, Novák P, Hejduk T (2013) Optimization of flood protection by semi-natural means and retention in the catchment area: a case study of Litavka River (Czech Republic). Moravian Geogr Rep 21(1):51–66
  • 54. Šatalová B (2016) Hydric significance of landscape in a mountain river basin. In: Koulov B, Zhelezov G (eds) Sustainable mountain regions: challenges and perspectives in Southeastern Europe. Springer, Switzerland, pp 89–103
  • 55. Šatalová B, Kenderessy P (2017) Assessment of water retention function as tool to improve integrated watershed management (case study of Poprad river basin, Slovakia). Sci Total Environ 599:1082–1089
  • 56. Sharma K, Singh H, Pareek O (1983) Rainwater infiltration into bare loamy sand. Hydrol Sci J 28:417–424. 10.1080/02626668309491980
  • 57. Škarpich V, Horáček M, Galia T, Kapustová V, Šala V (2016) How the river pattern influences riparian vegetation: a comparison of anabranching and single-thread incised channel. Morav Geogr Rep 24(3):42–49
  • 58. Soja R (2008) Hydrology of the Ojców National Park. Monograph of the Ojców National Park. Nature. Ojców, Poland
  • 59. Somorowska U (2016) Changes in drought conditions in Poland over the past 60 years evaluated by the standardized precipitation-evapotranspiration index. Acta Geophys 64(6):2530–2549
  • 60. Stranovský P (2013) Present landscape structure elements in attitude to landscape hydric potential in Bošáca valley. Mendel Net, pp 492–498
  • 61. Szolgay J, Holko J, Hlavčová K, Novák V, Kohnová S (2010) Possibilities of flood prevention, protection and mitigation by increasing the retention capacity of the landscape. Environment 44(5):232–236
  • 62. Szwed M, Pińskwar I, Kundzewicz ZW, Graczyk D, Mezghani A (2017) Changes of snow cover in Poland. Acta Geophys 65(1):65–76
  • 63. Van Lanen HA, Laah G, Kingston DG et al (2016) Hydrology needed to manage droughts: the 2015 European case. Hydrol Process 30:3097–3104
  • 64. Viola MR, Mello CR, Beskow S, Norton LD (2014) Impacts of land-use changes on the hydrology of the Grande river basin headwaters, Southeastern Brazil. Water Resour Manag 28(13):4537–4550
  • 65. Walega A, Grzebinoga M (2014) The flood risk assessment in Cracow agglomeration as an element of a flood risk management. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Formatio Circumiectus 13(4):259–273
  • 66. Walega A, Kowalik T, Bogdał A (2016) Estimating the occurrence of trends in selected elements of a small sub-mountain catchment hydrological regime. Pol J Environ Stud 25(5):2151–2159. 10.15244/pjoes/62960
  • 67. Wemple BC, Jones JA (2003) Runoff production on forest roads in a steep, mountain catchment. Water Resour Res 39(8):1–17
  • 68. WMO (2006) Technical regulations, volume III: hydrology. Basic documents no. 2, WMO-No. 49, Genova, Switzerland
  • 69. WMO (2015) Technical regulations, basic documents no. 2, volume I: general meteorological standards and recommended practices, WMO-No. 49, Genova, Switzerland
  • 70. WODGiK (2011) Digital elevation model of the Prądnik river basin with a 20-m resolution. Provincial Centre for Geodesic and Cartographic Documentation 2011. CD. WODGiK, Kraków
  • 71. WODGiK (2016) Soil-agronomic vector map in scale 1:25,000. Provincial centre for geodesic and cartographic documentation. CD—Shapefile. WODGiK Kraków
  • 72. Zalewski M (2002) Ecohydrology—the use of ecological and hydrological processes for sustainable management of water resources. Hydrol Sci J 47(5):825–834
  • 73. Zalewski M (2007) Ecohydrology as a concept and management tool. In: King C et al (eds) Water and ecosystems: managing water in diverse ecosystems to ensure human well-being. UNU-INWEH, Hamilton, Canada, pp 39–50
  • 74. Zalewski M, Wagner I (2005) Ecohydrology—the use of water and ecosystem processes for healthy urban environments. Ecohydrol Hydrobiol 5(4):263–268
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2018)
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-3eb2bf92-8cac-4f67-bb25-6ec6ea8dbc6a
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.