Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Zaktualizowana ocena Indeksu Jakości Życia OECD
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
Indexing for measuring the quality of life have been developed by various countries or organizations. Probably the most comprehensive among these indexes is the Better Life Index, which is developed by OECD. The sampling of the study consists of 34 countries that are the members of OECD, and two countries that are not members of OECD. The data are obtained from the 2017 criteria of OECD life index. In this way, the welfare levels of the countries were compared through the 11 life index criteria defined by OECD. In the study, correlation and regression analyses were performed to reveal the relationships between the OECD life criteria and to measure the degree of these relationships. Thus, it was attempted to demonstrate to what extent the index criteria, particularly the safety criterion, affect a society's quality of life. When we evaluate these analyses in general sense, it was observed that there is a significant and positive relationship between the safety criterion and other parameters. However, a negative relationship between the safety and the satisfaction criteria was found according to another result of the analyses. This is because of the fact that, after a certain threshold level, an individual won't have a positive attitude towards the interventions to the living space.
Metody indeksowania danych w celu zmierzenia poziomu jakości życia są rozwijane przez wiele krajów i organizacji. Prawdopodobnie najbardziej obszernym z tych indeksów jest Better Life Index, opracowany przez OECD. W przypadku tego artykułu dane odnoszą się do 36 krajów, z których 34 należy do OECD, a pochodzą one z OECD Life Index z 2017 r. Poziomy dobrostanu w poszczególnych krajach zestawiono z 11 kryteriami określonymi przez OECD. Przeprowadzono analizy korelacji i regresji, aby wykazać powiązania pomiędzy kryteriami OECD Life i aby określić ich zakres. Umożliwiło to wykazanie w jakim zakresie kryteria indeksowania, w szczególności kryterium bezpieczeństwa, wpływają na jakość życia społecznego. Z ogólnej perspektywy można dostrzec istnienie znaczącego i pozytywnego związku pomiędzy kryterium bezpieczeństwa a innymi parametrami. Jednocześnie zauważono występowanie zależności negatywnej pomiędzy bezpieczeństwem a kryterium zadowolenia. Uwarunkowane jest to istnieniem pewnego poziomu progowego, powyżej którego jednostka nie będzie miała pozytywnego nastawienia do ingerowania w przestrzeń życiową.
Wydawca
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
7--18
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 75 poz., fig., tab.
Twórcy
autor
- Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Artvin Coruh University, Turkey
autor
- Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Department of Sociology, Artvin Coruh University, Turkey
Bibliografia
- 1. ACHAT H., KAWACHI I., LEVINE S., BE-RKEY C., COAKLEY E., COLDITZ G., 1998, Social Networks, Stress and Health-Related Quality of Life, in: Quality of Life Research, 7(8), p. 735-750.
- 2. ADAMS G.A., KING L.A., KING D.W., 1996, Relationships of Job and Family Involvement, Family Social Support, and Work-Family Conflict With Job and Life Satisfaction, in: Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(4), p. 411-420.
- 3. ANDERSON R. E., 2015, Implications of World Suffering for Human Progress, in: World Suffering and Quality of Life, ed. Anderson R.E., Springer, p. 3-30.
- 4. ANDREWS F.M., WITHEY S.B., 1976, Social Indicators of Well-Being: Americans’ Perceptions of Life Quality, Plenum, New York.
- 5. BARCACCIA B., ESPOSITOB G., MATA-RESEC M., BERTOLASO M., ELVIRA M., MARINIS M.G., 2013, Defining Quality of Life: A wild-Goose Chase?, in: Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 9(1), p. 181-203.
- 6. BEALEY F., JOHNSON A.G., 1999, The Dictionary of Political Science: A User's Guide to Its Terms, Blackwell, Massachusetts.
- 7. BISHOP M., 2004, Essential Economics, New York, Bloomberg Press.
- 8. BOARINI R., 2015, Wellbeing Quality of Life Reporting at the OECD, in: Global Handbook of Quality of Life: Exploration of Well-Being of Nations and Continents, eds. Glatzer W., Camfield L., Moller V., Rojas M., Springer Science, New York, p. 747-762.
- 9. BOWLING A., 2004, A Review of Quality of Life Measurement Scales, Open University Press.
- 10. BURGER J., 2003, Perceptions About Environmental Use and Future Restoration of an Urban Estuary, in: Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 46(3), p. 399-416.
- 11. CAMPBELL A., 1981, The Sense of Well-Being in America: Recent Patterns and Trends, McGraw-Hill, New York.
- 12. CARMENT D., PREST S., SAMY Y., 2011, Security, Development and the Fragile State, Routledge Group, New York.
- 13. CHOCHINOV H.M., 2002, Dignity, Conserving Care, A New Model for Palliative Care: Helping the Patient Feel Valued, in: JAMA, 287(17), p. 2253-2260.
- 14. CUMMINS R.A., 1997, Assessing Quality Of Life, in: Quality of Life for People with Disabilities: Models, Research and Practice, ed. Brown R.I., Stanley Thornes Publishers Ltd., United Kingdom, p. 116-150.
- 15. DIAMOND J., 1999, Guns Germs and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies, W.W. Norton, New York,.
- 16. DIENER E., 1984, Subjective Well-Being, in: Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), p. 542-575.
- 17. EC (EUROPEAN COMMISION), 2014, Life Programme: LIFE Sub-Programmes, Publications Office of the European Union.
- 18. EDGERTON J.D., ROBERTS L.W ., BELOW S., 2012, Education and Quality of Life, in: Handbook of Social Indicators and Quality of Life Research, eds. Land K.C., Michalos A.C., Sirgy M.J., Springer Science, New York, p. 265-296.
- 19. EKBLOM P., 2000, The Conjunction of Criminal Opportunity, in: Secure Foundations: Key Issues in Crime Prevention, Crime Reduction and Community Safety, eds. Ballintyne S., Pease K., McLaren V., The Institute for Public Policy Research, United Kingdom, p. 30-66.
- 20. EVANS R.W., VAN DER CAMMEN T.J.M., VERSCHOOR C.J., HARWOOD R., SHAH I., 1991, Quality of Life, in: The Lancet, 338 (8767), p. 636-637.
- 21. FALLOWFIELD L., 1990, The Quality of Life: The Missing Measurement in Health Care, Souvenir Press, London.
- 22. FELCE D., PERRY J., 1995, Quality Of Life: Its Definition and Measurement, in: Research in Developmental Disabilities, 16(1), p. 51-74.
- 23. FINE B., 2010, Theories of Social Capital,Pluto Press, New York.
- 24. FORETTE F., 2000, Quality of Life and Disorders of Longevity, in: Longevity and Quality of Life:Opportunities and Challenges, eds. Butler R.N., Jasmin C., International Longevity Center, Springer, New York, p. 69-76.
- 25. GASPER D., 2010, Understanding the Diversity of Conceptions of Well-Being and Quality of Life, in: The Journal of Socio-Economics, 39(3), p. 351-360.
- 26. GRAHAM C., 2008, Measuring Quality of Life in Latin America, in: Barometers of Quality of Life Around the Globe, eds. Moller V., Huschka D., Michalos A.C., Springer, Netherlands, p. 71-106.
- 27. GREENWOOD D., 2004, Measuring Quality Of Life With Local Indicators, in: What Has Happened to the Quality of Life in the Advanced Industrialized Nations?, ed. Wolff E.N., Northampton, Levy Economics Institute, Edward Elgar Press, New York, p. 334-74.
- 28. GREGORY D., JOHNSTON R., PRATT G., WATTS M., WHATMORE S., 2009, Dictionary of Human Geography, John Wiley & Sons, USA.
- 29. HAGERTY M.R., 1999, Unifying Livability and Comparison Theory: Cross National Times Series Analysis of Life Satisfaction, in: Social Indicators Research, 47(3), p. 343-356.
- 30. HART P.M., 1999, Predicting Employee Life Satisfaction: A Coherent Model of Personality, Work and Nonwork Experiences, and Domain Satisfactions, in: Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(4), p. 564-584.
- 31. HEADEY B., VEENHOVEN R., WEARING A., 1991, Top-Down Versus Bottom-Up Theories Of Subjective Well-Being, in: Social Indicators Research, 24 (1), p. 81-100.
- 32. HERZBERG F., MAUSNER B., SNYDERMAN B.B., 1993, The Motivation to Work, Transaction Publisher, USA.
- 33. HINTON J., 1994, Can Home Care Maintain an Acceptable Quality of Life for Patients with Terminal Cancer and Their Relatives?, in: Palliative Medicine, 8(3), p. 183-196.
- 34. HODGSON A., 2000, Policies, Politics and the Future of Lifelong Learning, Routledge, London.
- 35. HOLMES S., 2005, Assessing the Quality of Life: Reality or Impossible Dream? A Discussion Paper, in: International Journal of Nursing Studies, 42(4), p. 493-501.
- 36. JACKSON T., 1996, Material Concerns: Pollution, Profit and Quality of Life, Stockholm Environment Institute, Routledge.
- 37. JACOBS M., 1991, The Green Economy: Environment, Sustainable Development and the Politics of the Future, London, Pluto Press.
- 38. KAGAWA SINGER M., PADILLA G.V., ASHING GIWA K., 2010, Health-Related Quality of Life and Culture, in: Seminars in Oncology Nursing, 26(1), p. 59-67.
- 39. KAHNEMAN D., DIENER E., SCHWARZ N., 1999, Well-Being: Foundations of Hedonic Psychology: Close Relationships and Quality of Life, New York, Russel Sage Foundation.
- 40. KEITH, K.D., 1990, Quality of Life: Issues in Community Integration, in: Quality of Life: Perspectives and Issues, ed. Schalock R.L., Washington, American Association on Mental Retardation, p. 93-100.
- 41. LEHMAN A. F., 1988, A Quality of Life Interview for the Chronically Mentally ill, in: Evaluation and Program Planning, 11(1), p. 51-62.
- 42. LEISINGER K.M., 2009, The Role of Corporations in Shaping Globalization with a Human Face, in: The Role of Law and Ethics in the Globalized Economy, ed. Straus J., Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, p. 27-46.
- 43. LUCAS R.E., 2008, Personality and Subjective Well-Being, in: The Science of Subjective Well-Being, eds. Eid M., Larsen R.J., The Guilford Press, New York, p. 171-194.
- 44. LUTZ M., LUX K., 1988, Humanistic Economics: The New Challenge, Bootstrap, New York.
- 45. McCONNELL C.R., BRUE S.L., FLYNN S.M., 2011, Microeconomics, McGraw-Hill, USA.
- 46. MOTTNER S., FORD J.B., 2008, Internal Competition in A Nonprofit Museum Context: Development of a Scale, in: International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 13(2), p. 177-190.
- 47. NAR M., 2013, Kamu Ekonomisi, Ekonomik Etkinlik ve Vergileme, , Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara.
- 48. NAR M., 2014, Global Public Goods and Sustainable Development, in: Journal of Sustainable Development Studies, 6(2), p. 205-230.
- 49. NRC (NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL), 2002, Community and Quality of Life: Data Needs for Informed Decision Making, National Academy Press, Washington D.C.
- 50. OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development), 2008a, Glossary of Statistical Terms, OECD Press.
- 51. OECD, 2008b, Are We Growing Unequal? New Evidence on Changes in Poverty and Incomes Over the Past 20 Years, OECD Press.
- 52. OECD, 2011, How's Life? 2011: Measuring Well-Being, OECD Press.
- 53. OECD, 2013, How's Life? 2013: Measuring Well-Being, OECD Press.
- 54. OECD, 2017, Better Life Index, OECD Press.
- 55. PHELAN J., 2012, What Is Life? A Guide to Biology with Physiology & Prep, W.H. Freeman Company, USA.
- 56. RABKIN J., WAGNER G., GRIFFIN K.W., 2000, Quality of Life Measures, in: Handbook of Psychiatric Measures, ed. Rush A.J., American Psychiatric Association, Washington, p. 135-50.
- 57. RAPLEY M., 2003, Quality of Life Research: A Critical Introduction, First Edition, SAGE Publications.
- 58. ROMER C., 2011, Work-Life Balance and the Economics of Workplace Flexibility, Executive Office of The President, Council of Economic Advisers, DIANE publishing.
- 59. RYLE G., 1949, The Concept of Mind, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.
- 60. SEN A., 1993, Capability and Well-being, in: The Quality of Life, eds. Nussbaum M., Sen A., Oxford-Clarendon Press, United Kingdom, p. 30-53.
- 61. SHIN D.C., JOHNSON D.M., 1978, Avowed Happiness as an Overall Assessment of the Quality of Life, in: Social Indicators Research, 5(1-4), p. 475-492.
- 62. SOUBBOTINA T.P., 2004, Beyond Economic Growth: An Introduction to Sustainable Development, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Washington, D.C.
- 63. STEVENS A., 2011, Drugs, Crime and Public Health: The Political Economy of Drug Policy, in: The British Journal of Criminology, 51(5), p. 876-878.
- 64. STIGLITZ J.E., SEN A., FITOUSSI J.P., 2009, Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress, by OFCE, France.
- 65. STRADA E.A., 2011,The Cultural Context of Spirituality and Meaning, in: End-of-Life Issues, Grief, and Bereavement: What Clinicians Need to Know, eds. Qualls S.H., Godley J.E., John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey, USA p. 43-63.
- 66. TOBOSO F., 2011, Institutional Arrangements Matter for Both Efficiency and Distribution: Contributionsand Challenges of the New Institutional Economics, in: Political Economy of Institutions, Democracy and Voting, eds. Schofield N., Caballero G., Springer, New York, p. 137-156.
- 67. UN (United Nations), 2013, State of the World's Cities 2012/2013: Prosperity of Cities, London, Routledge.
- 68. UN, 1995, Human Development Report, United Nations Development Programme, Oxford University Press.
- 69. WALSH J., 2013, Work-life Balance: The End of the Overwork Culture?, in: Managing Human Resources: Human Resource Management in Transition, eds. Bach S., Edwards M., John Wiley & Sons, United Kingdom, p. 150-177.
- 70. WELFORD A.T., 1983, Social Skills and Aging: Principles and Problems, in: International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 17(1), p. 1-5.
- 71. WHO (WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION), 1997, Measuring Quality of Life: The World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument, WHO.
- 72. WHO, 1998, The World Health Organization Quality Of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): Development and General Psychometric Properties, in: Social Science and Medicine, 46 (12), p. 1569-1585.
- 73. WHO, 2001, The World Health Report 2001: Mental Health, New Understanding, New Hope, WHO Press, Geneva.
- 74. WISH N.B., 1986, Are We Really Measuring the Quality Of Life? Well-Being Has Subjective Dimensions, as Well as Objective Ones, in: The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 45(1), p. 93-99.
- 75. WOOD-DAUPHINEE S., 1999, Assessing Quality of Life in Clinical Research: From Where Have We Come and Where are We Going?, in: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 52(4), p. 355-63.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2019).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-3e7d600a-223c-4268-a913-baff2fa887cc