State economic sovereignty as a key factor affecting its economic security

• Autorzy: Sałek-Imińska Agnieszka

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5604/01.3001.0055.1735

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The purpose of this article is to examine the relationship between economic sovereignty and the level ofneconomic security of NATO’s eastern flank states, with particular focus on the impact that the degree of economic independence has on the ability of the state to ensure stability, resilience and the development of its economy. The study aims to understand how economic sovereignty of the state translates into its ability to ensure stability, resilience and economic development. By analysing selected indicators of economic sovereignty and economic security, the study aims to provide a more comprehensive perspective on the role of economic sovereignty in the context of ensuring economic security of the state. For the purpose of the study, a critical analysis of the literature and a statistical analysis were used to assess the relationship between economic sovereignty and state economic security. The study covers 9 countries of NATO’s eastern flank, which include: Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Romania, Bulgaria and Hungary. The analysis was conducted at different levels of aggregation, focusing on the macroeconomic analysis of the national economies under study. The main research problem of this study is an attempt to find an answer to the question of whether the economic sovereignty of the state is an important determinant of its level of economic security, providing greater independence, control over resources and the ability to effectively manage economic policy. The purpose of the study is to attempt identifying the key determinants of economic sovereignty, to analyse mechanisms through which economic sovereignty influences economic security and to assess the consequences of this influence on the economic development of the state. The assumption that a higher level of economic sovereignty positively influences the economic security of states by providing them with greater stability and resilience in the case of external economic, political and financial crises was adopted as the primary research hypothesis. In order to achieve the stated aim of the article, the Perkal method was also used to accurately assess the relationship between economic sovereignty and economic security, taking into account both internal and external factors affecting both variables. The results of the analysis, based on a correlation coefficient of 0.69, indicate a strong positive correlation between economic sovereignty and the level of economic security of NATO’s eastern flank countries. This implies that states with higher economic sovereignty, characterised by greater independence and the ability to manage resources and economic policies effectively, achieve a higher level of economic stability, which promotes their resilience to crises and external threats. The study also provided an understanding that economic sovereignty not only enables states to better manage their resources, but also gives them greater flexibility and capacity to make economic decisions, which affects their long-term development and security.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

economic sovereignty; economic security; NATO; eastern flank

• Wydawca: Szkoła Główna Służby Pożarniczej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe SGSP / Szkoła Główna Służby Pożarniczej
• Rocznik: 2025
• Tom: Nr 94 (tom 2)
• Strony: 155--173
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 32 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Sałek-Imińska Agnieszka

• Pomeranian University in Slupsk, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2307-0605

Bibliografia

• 1. Aczel, A.D., (2005). Statistics in Management. Warsaw: PWN.
• 2. Aleksandrowicz, T.R., (2011). Anti-terrorist security. In: K. Liedel (ed.), Transsectoral areas of national security. Warsaw: Difin.
• 3. Aleksandrowicz, T.R., (2018). Security in the European Union. Warsaw: Difin.
• 4. Begg, D., Fisher, S., Gianluigi, V., Dornbusch, R., (2014). Macroeconomics. Warsaw: PWE.
• 5. Drabik, K., (2013). Bezpieczeństwo personalne i strukturalne. Warsaw: AON.
• 6. Fischer, S., (1993). The Role of Macroeconomic Factors in Growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, no. 32(3).
• 7. Frejtag-Mika, E., Kolodziejak, Z., Putkiewicz, W., (1996). Bezpieczeństwo ekonomiczne we współczesnym świecie. Radom: PR.
• 8. Grącik-Zajaczkowski, M., (2011). Suwerenność w warunkach globalizacji. In: Żukrowska, K. (ed.), Bezpieczeństwo międzynarodowe. Przegląd aktualnego stanu. Warsaw: IUSatTAX.
• 9. https://www.gov.pl/web/aktywa-panstwowe/dlug-publiczny-i-zadluzenie-skarbu-panstwa--poziom-i-struktura2. [06.09.2024]
• 10. https://pl.tradingeconomics.com/country-list [012.09.2024].
• 11. https://wise.com/pl/currency-converter/eur-to-usd-rate?amount=4012. [12.09.2024]
• 12. Kitler, W., (2018). Organizacja bezpieczeństwa narodowego Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej. Aspekty ustrojowe, prawno-administracyjne i systemowe. Toruń: Adam Marszałek.
• 13. Kostecki, J.P., (2016). Suwerenność ekonomiczna państwa i jej uwarunkowania. Studia Bezpieczeństwa Narodowego, no. 1, vol. 9.
• 14. Krugman, P.R., Obstfeld, M., Melitz, M.J., (2018). International Economics: Theory and Policy. London: Pearson.
• 15. Księżopolski, K.M., (2016). Bezpieczeństwo ekonomiczne – przedmiot badań i praktyka. In: Współczesne bezpieczeństwo ekonomiczne. Wymiar międzynarodowy, Gębska, M., Kubiak, M., (eds), Warsaw: ASWoj.
• 16. Malina, A., (2004). Wielowymiarowa analiza przestrzennego zróżnicowania struktury gospodarki Polski według województw. Zeszyty Naukowe / Akademia Ekonomiczna w Krakowie. Seria Specjalna, Monografie, 162.
• 17. Michałowski, S., (1990). Bezpieczeństwo ekonomiczne w stosunkach wschód-zachód. Warsaw: Elipsa.
• 18. Mishkin, F.S., (1999). International Experiences with Different Monetary Policy Regimes. Journal of Monetary Economics, no. 43(3).
• 19. Perkal J., (2009). O wskaźnikach antropologicznych, https://www.academia.edu/45647111/Perkal_J_O_wska%C5%BAnikach_antropologicznych.
• 20. Leszczyński, M., (2022). Bezpieczeństwo ekonomiczne państwa w warunkach finansyzacji. Res Politicae, vol. 14, 86–88.
• 21. Leszczynski M., (2016). Economic security in the era of hyperglobalization. Social Inequality and Economic Growth, no. 47(3).
• 22. Redo, M., Siemiątkowski, P., (2017). Zewnętrzne bezpieczeństwo finansowe państwa. Toruń: UMK.
• 23. Reinhart, C.M., Rogoff, K.S., (2009). This Time is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
• 24. Rodrik, D., (2007). One Economics, Many Recipes: Globalization, Institutions, and Economic Growth. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
• 25. Rodrik, D., (2011). The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy. New York: WW Norton & Company.
• 26. Siedlecki, J., (2000). Równowaga i wzrost gospodarczy. Warsaw: PWN.
• 27. Siemiątkowski, P., (2015). Uzależnienie finansowe jako zagrożenie bezpieczeństwa ekonomicznego państwa. Toruń: UMK.
• 28. Smith, A., (2010). Economic Growth and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• 29. Stachowiak, Z., (2012). Teoria i praktyka mechanizmu bezpieczeństwa ekonomicznego państwa: ujęcie instytucjonalne. Warsaw: AON.
• 30. Stiglitz, J.E., (2002). Globalization and its discontents. London: W.W. Norton & Company.
• 31. Yong, J., (2007). Economic Security: Redressing Imbalance. China Security, vol. 3, no. 2, 68.
• 32. https://www.obserwatorfinansowy.pl/bez-kategorii/rotator/zarzadzanie-rezerwami-dewizowyminbp. [05.09.2024]