Photogrammetry-based approach for collecting and processing information about an existing building

• Autorzy: Kontrimovičius Robertas , Juszczyk Michał , Leśniak Agnieszka , Ustinovichius Leonas , Miedziałowski Czesław

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24425/bpasts.2023.144453

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Due to the organization of construction works, one of the most difficult situations is when a building is planned in a heritage or a densely built-up location. Fixing an existing situation manually takes a lot of time and effort and is usually not accurate. For example, it is not always possible to measure the exact spacing between buildings at different levels and to consider all outside elements of an existing building. Improper fixation of the existing situation causes mistakes and collisions in design and the use of inappropriate construction solutions. The development and progress in technologies such as BIM, laser scanning, and photogrammetry broaden the options for supporting the management of construction projects. It is important to have an effective fast collection and processing of useful information for management processes. The purpose of this paper is to analyze and present some aspects of photogrammetry to collect and process information about existing buildings. The methodology of the study is based on the comparison of two alternative approaches, namely photogrammetry and BIM modelling. Case studies present an analysis of the quantity take-offs for selected elements and parts of the buildings based on the two approaches. In this article, the specific use of photogrammetry shows that the error between the detailed BIM model and the photogrammetry model is only 1.02% and the accuracy is 98.98%. Moreover, physical capabilities do not always allow us to measure every desired element in reality. This is followed by a discussion on the usability of photogrammetry.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

photogrammetry; building information modelling; building model development; quantity take-off; construction works; information processing

PL

fotogrametria; modelowanie informacji o budynku; opracowanie modelu budynku; zrzut ilościowy; roboty budowlane; przetwarzanie informacji

• Wydawca: Polska Akademia Nauk, Wydział IV Nauk Technicznych
• Czasopismo: Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences. Technical Sciences
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: Vol. 71, nr 1
• Strony: art. no. e144453
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 37 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Kontrimovičius Robertas

• Faculty of Civil Engineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Lithuania

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4311-1221

autor

Juszczyk Michał

• Faculty of Civil Engineering, Cracow University of Technology, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8353-9823

autor

Leśniak Agnieszka

• Faculty of Civil Engineering, Cracow University of Technology, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4811-5574

autor

Ustinovichius Leonas

• Faculty of Civil Engineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Lithuania

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0027-5501

autor

Miedziałowski Czesław

• Faculty of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences, Bialystok University of Technology, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7901-7598

Bibliografia

• [1] K. Zima, E. Plebankiewicz, and D. Wieczorek, “A SWOT analysis of the use of BIM technology in the Polish construction industry,” Buildings, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 16, 2020.
• [2] A. Leśniak, M. Górka, and I. Skrzypczak, “Barriers to BIM implementation in architecture, construction, and engineering projects – the polish study,” Energies, vol. 14, no. 8, p. 2090, 2021.
• [3] J. Konior and M. Szóstak, “Methodology of planning the course of the cumulative cost curve in construction projects,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 6, p. 2347, 2020.
• [4] N. Bruno and R. Roncella, “HBIM for conservation: A new proposal for information modeling,” Remote Sens., vol. 11, p. 1751, 2019.
• [5] J. Sztubecki, M. Mrówczyńska, and A. Bujarkiewicz, “Proposition of determination of displacements using the TDRA 6000 laser station,” E3S Web Conf., vol. 55, p. 00011, 2018.
• [6] C. Suchocki and J. Katzer, “Terrestrial laser scanning harnessed for moisture detection in building materials – problems and limitations,” Autom. Constr., vol. 94, pp. 127–134, 2018.
• [7] A. Bieda, J. Bydłosz, A. Warchoł, and M. Balawejder, “Historical underground structures as 3D cadastral objects,” Remote Sens., vol. 12, no. 10, p. 1547, 2020.
• [8] H. Lõhmus, A. Ellmann, S. Märdla, and S. Idnurm, “Terrestrial laser scanning for the monitoring of bridge load tests – two case studies,” Surv. Rev., vol. 50, no. 360, pp. 270–284, 2017.
• [9] P. P. Cacciari and M. M. Futai, “Modeling a shallow rock tunnel using terrestrial laser scanning and discrete fracture networks,” Rock Mech. Rock Eng., vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 1217–1242, 2017.
• [10] E. Quagliarini, P. Clini, and M. Ripanti, “Fast, low cost and safe methodology for the assessment of the state of conservation of historical buildings from 3D laser scanning: The case study of Santa Maria in Portonovo (Italy),” J. Cult. Herit., vol. 24, pp. 175–183, 2017.
• [11] M. Murphy, E. McGovern, and S. Pavia, “Historic Building Information Modelling–Adding intelligence to laser and image based surveys of European classical architecture,” ISPRS – J. Photogramm. Remote Sens., vol. 76, pp. 89–102, 2013.
• [12] A. Warchoł, “Analysis of possibilities to registration TLS point clouds without targets on the example of the castle bridge in Rzeszow,” Proceedings of the 15th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM, 2017, vol. 1, pp. 737–742.
• [13] S. M. Sepasgozaar, S. Shirowzhan, and C. C. Wang, “A scanner technology acceptance model for construction projects,” Procedia Eng., vol. 180, pp. 1237–1246, 2017.
• [14] R. Volk, J. Stengel, and F. Schultmann. “Building information modeling (BIM) for existing buildings – literature review and future needs,” Autom. Constr., vol. 38, pp. 109–127, 2014.
• [15] K. Strząbała, P. Ćwiąkała, W. Gruszczyński, E. Puniach, and W. Matwij, “Determining changes in building tilts based on UAV photogrammetry,” Measurement, vol. 202, p. 111772, 2022.
• [16] I. Piech, T. Adam, and P. Dudas, “3D modelling with the use of photogrammetric methods,” Arch. Civ. Eng., vol. 68, 2022.
• [17] J. Armesto, P. Arias, J. Roca, and H. Lorenzo, “Monitoring and assessing structural damage in historic buildings,” Photogramm. Rec., vol. 23, pp. 36–50, 2008.
• [18] M. Scaioni et al., “Photogrammetric techniques for monitoring tunnel deformation,” Earth Sci. Inform., vol. 7, pp. 83–95, 2014.
• [19] J. Hu, E. Liu, and J. Yu, “Application of structural deformation monitoring based on close-range photogrammetry technology,” Adv. Civ. Eng., vol. 2021, p. 6621440, 2021.
• [20] S. Varbla, A. Ellmann, and R. Puust, “Centimetre-range deformations of built environment revealed by drone-based photogrammetry,” Autom. Constr., vol. 128, p. 103787, 2021.
• [21] A. Braun, S. Tuttas, A. Borrmann, and U. Stilla, “A concept for automated construction progress monitoring using bim-based geometric constraints and photogrammetric point clouds,” J. Inf. Technol. Constr., vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 68–79, 2015.
• [22] P. Burdziakowski, “Uav in todays photogrammetry–Application areas and challenges,” International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference: SGEM, 2018, vol. 18, no. 2.3, pp. 241–248.
• [23] J.F. Reinoso, J.E. Gonçalves, C. Pereira, and T. Bleninger, “Cartography for civil engineering projects: photogrammetry supported by unmanned aerial vehicles. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology,” Trans. Civ. Eng., vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 91–96, 2018.
• [24] J.I. Rojas-Sola, J.B. Bouza-Rodríguez, and A. Comesaña-Campos, “Study of ancient forging devices: 3D modelling and analysis using current computer methods,” Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci., vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 377–390, 2019.
• [25] I. Skrzypczak, G. Oleniacz, A. Leśniak, K. Zima, M. Mrówczyńska, and J.K. Kazak, “Scan-to-BIM method in construction: assessment of the 3D buildings model accuracy in terms inventory measurements,” Build. Res. Informat., vol. 50, pp. 859–880, 2022.
• [26] S. Tuttas, “Validation of BIM components by photogrammetric point clouds for construction site monitoring,” ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., vol. II-3/W4, pp. 231–237, 2015.
• [27] H. Omar, L. Mahdjoubi, and G. Kheder, “Towards an automated photogrammetry-based approach for monitoring and controlling construction site activities,” Comput.Ind., vol. 98, pp. 172–182, 2018.
• [28] A. Braun, S. Tuttas, A. Borrmann, and U. Stilla, “A concept for automated construction progress monitoring using bim-based geometric constraints and photogrammetric point clouds,” J. Inf. Technol. Constr., vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 68–79, 2015.
• [29] J.R. Bognot, C.G. Candido, A.C. Blanco, and J.R.Y. Montelibano, “Building construction progress monitoring using unmanned aerial system (Uas), low-cost photogrammetry, and geographic information system (GIS),” ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., vol. IV-2, pp. 41–47, 2018.
• [30] R. Maalek and F. Sadeghpour, “Accuracy assessment of ultrawide band technology in tracking static resources in indoor construction scenarios,” Autom. Constr., vol. 30, pp. 170–183, 2013.
• [31] A. J. L. Conde, J. García-Sanz-Calcedo, and A. M. R. Rodríguez, “ Use of BIM with photogrammetry support in small construction projects. Case study for commercial franchises,” J. Civ. Eng. Manag., vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 513–523, 2020.
• [32] S. Zollini, M. Alicandro, D. Dominici, R. Quaresima, and M. Giallonardo, “ UAV photogrammetry for concrete bridge inspection using object-based image analysis (OBIA),” Remote Sens., vol. 12, no. 19, p. 3180, 2020.
• [33] M. Russo, L. Carnevali, V. Russo, D. Savastano, and Y. Taddia, “Modeling and deterioration mapping of façades in historical urban context by close-range ultra-lightweight UAVs photogrammetry,” Int. J. Archit. Herit., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 549–568, 2019.
• [34] L. Carnevali, E. Ippoliti, F. Lanfranchi, S. Menconero, M. Russo, and V. Russo, “Close-range mini-UAVs photogrammetry for architecture survey,” Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., vol. XLII-2, pp. 217–224, 2018.
• [35] R. A. Galantucci and F. Fatiguso, “Advanced damage detection techniques in historical buildings using digital photogrammetry and 3D surface anlysis,” J. Cult. Herit., vol. 36, pp. 51–62, 2019.
• [36] B. Wójcik and M. Żazrasrksi, “The measurements of surface defect area with an RGB-D camera for a BIM-backed bridge inspection,” Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci., vol. 69 , no. 3, e137123, 2021.
• [37] A. Szymczak-Graczyk, Z. Walczak, B. Ksit, and Z. Szyguła, “Multi-criteria diagnostics of historic buildings with the use of 3D laser scanning (a case study),” Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci., vol. 70, no. 2, p. e140373, 2022.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).