Research on dynamics of the knee joint for different types of loads

• Autorzy: Dygut J. , Kuchta M.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1515/bams-2015-0022

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Modern clinical and sports medicine increasingly uses training and diagnostic equipment. They allow monitoring of the training process, cycle control, and evaluation of the basic parameters. These devices are used to carry out the training process for healthy people as well as for the rehabilitation of persons with impaired organ movement functions. The developed measurement properties allow defining many parameters and biomechanical functions. They can estimate the state of a particular biomechanical group and monitor its efficiency for a long period of time. The main aim of the research was to determine the impact of the type of load on the dynamic parameters during straightening of the knee joint. It compared parameters of the sick and healthy limbs under the influence of a particular load. The article presents the results of measurements of dynamic parameters of the knee joint. Measurements were obtained during the use of different types of loads for healthy people. The second part of the article concerns the comparison of functions in the sick and healthy limbs of the test person.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

biomedical engineering; medical biology; medical science

• Wydawca: Uniwersytet Jagielloński - Collegium Medicum ; Index Copernicus Sp. z o.o.
• Czasopismo: Bio-Algorithms and Med-Systems
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: Vol. 11, no. 4
• Strony: 249--255
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 16 poz., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Dygut J.

• The Regional Hospital St.Padre Pio, ul. Monte Cassino Przemyśl, Poland

autor

Kuchta M.

• Department of Electronic, Military University of Technology, Warszawa, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Food and Drug Administration, HHS. Medical devices; physical medicine devices; classification of the powered lower extremity exoskeleton; republication. Final order; republication. Fed Regist 2015;80:25226–30.
• 2. Ainsworth B, Cahalin L, Buman M, Ross R. The current state of physical activity assessment tools. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2015;57:387–95.
• 3. Hew-Butler T, Holexa BT, Fogard K, Stuempfle KJ, Hoffman MD. Comparison of body composition techniques before and after a 161-km ultramarathon using DXA, BIS and BIA. Int J Sports Med 2015;36:169–74.
• 4. Guo Y, Ma Y, Huang G, Tao L, Li H, Wang J. [Application and development of intelligent adjustable leg raising system]. Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi 2014;38:417–9, 432.
• 5. Nigg BM, Herzog W. Biomechanics of the musculo-skeletal system. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 1994.
• 6. Roszkowski A, Nitecki G, Preibisch P. Projekt hydraulicznego generatora momentu oporowego. Acta Bioeng Biomech 2001;3:453–8.
• 7. Weiss MR. Psychological aspects of sport-injury rehabilitation: a developmental perspective. J Athl Train 2003;38:172–5.
• 8. Brewer BW. Developmental differences in psychological aspects of sport-injury rehabilitation. J Athl Train 2003;38:152–3.
• 9. Barzykowski J, Kuchta M, Wychowański M, Nitecki G, Fokow K. Porównanie dynamiki ruchu stawu kolanowego dla różnych rodzajów obciążeń. Biocybernetyka i Inżynieria Biomedyczna, 2001.
• 10. Morecki A, Ekiel J, Fidelus K. Bionika Ruchu, PWN, 1971. 11. Hart HF, Culvenor AG, Collins NJ, Ackland DC, Cowan SM, Machotka Z, et al. Knee kinematics and joint moments during gait following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med 2015;pii: bjsports-2015-094797.
• 12. Barzykowski J, Fidelus K, Kuchta M, Wychowański M. Stanowisko do badań dynamiki prostowania w stawie kolanowym, XIII. Krakow: Szkoła Biomechaniki, 1995:63–7.
• 13. Barzykowski J, Fidelus K, Kuchta M, Wychowałski M. Modelowanie matematyczne dynamiki prostowania stawu kolanowego, XIII. Poznań: Szkoła Biomechaniki, 1996:summary of the programme on p. 32.
• 14. da Silva FS, de Melo FE, do Amaral MM, Caldas VV, Pinheiro ÍL, Abreu BJ, et al. Efficacy of simple integrated group rehabilitation program for patients with knee osteoarthritis: single-blind randomized controlled trial. J Rehabil Res Dev 2015;52:309–22.
• 15. Haberfehlner H, Maas H, Harlaar J, Newsum IE, Becher JG, Buizer AI, et al. Assessment of net knee moment-angle characteristics by instrumented hand-held dynamometry in children with spastic cerebral palsy and typically developing children. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2015;12:67.
• 16. Hofstede SN, Nouta KA, Jacobs W, van Hooff ML, Wymenga AB, Pijls BG, Nelissen RG, Marang-van de Mheen PJ. Mobile bearing vs fixed bearing prostheses for posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty for postoperative functional status in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;2:CD003130.