Initial approach to safety on cruises ships: structure of the sector

• Autorzy: Arranz S. , Piniella F. , Cerbán-Jiménez M. M.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12716/1001.12.04.15

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The importance of safety on ships is beyond dispute, however, there are some types of ship for which this matter deserves special consideration. One of these types of ships are passenger cruises, due to the high number of human lives that travel on board. For this reason, we believe that a particular study of safety in cruise ships is needed. The Port State Control (PSC) mechanism of coastal States to try to ensure security in their territorial waters in respect of the traffic of foreign ships may, a priori, be an impartial and reliable indicator of security, according to the deficiencies it detect in ships and the detentions that carried out. Thus, we will use the PSC inspections in this paper. The source of information about PSC inspections is EQUASIS, which is the information system of the majority of regional agreements PSC and US Coast Guard. The study period is 5 years (2012-2016) and the cruise ships analysed are belonging to the International Association of Cruise Lines (CLIA). The objective of this work is an initial approach to safety on cruise ships and the structure of the sector according several factors (company, cruise type, age and pavilion).

Słowa kluczowe

EN

safety at sea; Port State Control (PSC); International Association of Cruise Lines (CLIA); EQUASIS; US Coast Guard; PSC inspection; cruise ships; passanger cruises

• Wydawca: Faculty of Navigation, Gdynia Maritime University
• Czasopismo: TransNav : International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation
• Rocznik: 2018
• Tom: Vol. 12, no. 4
• Strony: 755--759
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 21 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Arranz S.

• University of Cádiz, Spain

autor

Piniella F.

• University of Cádiz, Spain

autor

Cerbán-Jiménez M. M.

Bibliografia

• 1.Barton, J.R. ʺFlags of convenienceʹ: Geoeconomics and regulatory minimisation.ʺ Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 90 (2): 142‐155
• 2. Cruise Industry Outlook ‐ Cruise Lines International Association (CLIA). ʺAnnual Report 2016ʺ.
• 3. Det Norske Veritas. 2016. Consultado el 21 de agosto. http://www.dnv.com
• 4. Dinu, O. y Ilie, A. M. 2015. ʺMaritime vessel obsolescence, life cycle cost and design service life.ʺ IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 95 012067.
• 5. Eliopoulou, E. Apostolos, P., y Voulgarellis, M. 2016. ʺStatical analysis of ship accidents and review of safety level.ʺ Safety Science 85: 282–292.
• 6. ITF Global. 2017. ʺBanderas de conveniencia.ʺ Checked on 28/12/2018. http://www.itfglobal.org/es/transportsectors/seafarers/in‐focus/flags‐of‐conveniencecampaign/
• 7. Mileski, J.P., Wang, G. y Beacham, L.L. 2014.“Understanding the causes of recent cruise ship mishaps and disasters.” Research in Transportation Business & Management 13: 65‐70.
• 8. Monedero, Joaquín. 2014. El esplendor de la Industria del crucero. Universidad de Cádiz
• 9. Paris MoU. 2017. ʺPerformance lists paris MoU.ʺ Checked on 17/09/2017. https://www.parismou.org/2012‐performance‐lists‐paris‐mou
• 10. Paris MoU. 2017. ʺPerformance lists paris MoU.ʺ Checked on 17/09/2017. https://www.parismou.org/2013‐performance‐lists‐paris‐mou
• 11. Paris MoU. 2017. ʺPerformance lists paris MoU.ʺ Checked on 17/09/2017. https://www.parismou.org/2014‐performance‐lists‐paris‐mou
• 12. Paris MoU. 2017. ʺPerformance lists paris MoU.ʺ Checked on 17/09/2017. https://www.parismou.org/2015‐performance‐lists‐paris‐mou
• 13. Paris MoU. 2017. ʺPerformance lists paris MoU.ʺ Checked on 17/09/2017. https://www.parismou.org/2016‐performance‐lists‐paris‐mou
• 14. Paris MoU. 2017. ʺAnnual ParisMoU ‐ final.ʺ Checked on 17/09/2017. https://www.parismou.org/2016‐paris‐mouannual‐report‐%E2%80%9Cseafarersmatter%E2%80%9D
• 15. Paris MoU. 2017. ʺList of Paris MoU deficiency codes on public website_1.ʺ Checked on 14/08/2017.https://www.parismou.org/list‐paris‐mou‐deficiencycodes
• 16. Piniella, Francisco. 2009. La seguridad del Transporte Marítimo (1ª Ed.). Universidad de Cádiz
• 17. Rodrigo, Jaime. 2015. Seguridad marítima. Teoría genera del riesgo. Marge Books.
• 18. Rodríguez‐Díaz, E. ʺEl Control del Estado Rector del Puerto: Port State Controlʺ. Universidad de Cádiz, Máster de Gestión Portuaria y Logística, 30 de enero de 2016.
• 19. US Coast Guard. 2017. ʺList of US Coast Guard deficiency codes on public website_1.ʺ Checked on 14/08/2017. https://www.uscg.mil/forms/cg/CG_5437B.pdf
• 20. Vidmar, P. y Perkovič, M. 2015. “Methodological approach for safety assessment of cruise ship in port”. Safety Science 80:189‐200.
• 21. Vukonic, D., Bielic, T., y Russo, A. 2016: “Organizational factors in management of “Mega Cruise Ships” from Crowd Management Control aspec.t. Scientific Journal of Maritime Research 30: 58‐66.