Assessing the entrepreneurial orientation by opportunity / necessity dichotomy : an institutional persepctive

• Autorzy: Parga-Montoya Neftali , Cuevas-Vargas Héctor

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17512/pjms.2019.19.1.23

Warianty tytułu

PL

Ocena orientacji przedsiębiorczej przez dychotomię szans i potrzeb : perspektywa instytucjonalna

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This paper aims to deepen in the influence played by the institutional burdens on the entrepreneurial orientation using a comparative analysis of opportunity vs necessity entrepreneurship. To prove our hypotheses, a Partial Least Squares - Structural Equation Modeling Multi-Group Analysis with repetition of indicators approach was implemented to run the hierarchical construct model in order to evaluate the effects on entrepreneurial orientation (EO) by institutional burdens in a sample of 250 micro and small firms in Mexico. The results show that, in a general view, the institutional burdens affect the entrepreneurial orientation in a stronger way when an opportunity entrepreneurship exists; the positive influence seems to benefit the proactivity of the firm. Regarding policy implications, it reveals the importance of the institutions to promote a competitive perception for increasing the entrepreneurship by opportunity.

PL

Niniejszy artykuł ma na celu pogłębienie wiedzy na temat wpływu obciążeń instytucjonalnych na orientację przedsiębiorczą, wykorzystując analizę porównawczą możliwości i konieczności przedsiębiorczości. Aby dowieść hipotez, zastosowano metodę częściowych najmniejszych kwadratów (Modelowanie Równań Strukturalnych, analiza wielogrupowa z powtarzaniem wskaźników), aby uruchomić hierarchiczny model konstrukcji w celu oceny wpływu na orientację przedsiębiorczości (EO) przez obciążenia instytucjonalne w próbie 250 mikro i małych przedsibiorstw w Meksyku. Wyniki pokazują, że w ogólnym ujęciu obciążenia instytucjonalne silniej wpływają na orientację przedsiębiorczą, gdy istnieje szansa na działalność gospodarczą; pozytywny wpływ wydaje się sprzyjać proaktywności firmy. Jeśli chodzi o implikacje polityczne, ujawnia się znaczenie instytucji w promowaniu konkurencyjnego postrzegania zwiększania przedsiębiorczości przez jej umożliwianie.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

opportunity and necessity; institutional burdens; entrepreneurial orientation; entrepreneurship types

PL

szansa i konieczność; obciążenia instytucjonalne; orientacja na przedsiębiorczość; typy przedsiębiorczości

• Wydawca: Czestochowa University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Management Studies
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: Vol. 19, No. 1
• Strony: 298--308
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 49 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Parga-Montoya Neftali

• Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes, Business Sciences Centre

autor

Cuevas-Vargas Héctor

• Universidad Tecnológica del Suroeste de Guanajuato, Department of Business Development

Bibliografia

• 1. Acs Z.J., Amorós J.E., 2008, Entrepreneurship and competitiveness dynamics in Latin America, "Small Business Economics", 31(3).
• 2. Ali D., 2015, The effects of demographic, cognitive and institutional factors on development of entrepreneurial intention: Toward a socio-cognitive model of entrepreneurial career, "Journal of International Entrepreneurship", 13.
• 3. Angulo-Guerrero M., Pérez-Moreno S., Abad-Guerrero I., 2017, How economic freedom affects opportunity and necessity entrepreneurship in the OECD countries, "Journal of Business Research", (73).
• 4. Aparicio S., Urbano D., Audretsch D., 2016, Institutional factors opportunity entrepreneurship and economic growth: Panel data evidence, "Technological Forecasting & Social Change", 102.
• 5. Chin W.W., 1998, The Patrial Least Squares Approach to Structural Equation Modeling, [In:] Modern Method for Business Research, (ed.) G.A.Marcoulides, New York-London: Psychology Press.
• 6. Clark L.A., Watson D., 1995, Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development, "Psychological assessment", 7(3).
• 7. Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, "Hillsdale, NJ".
• 8. Covin J., Slevin D., 1989, Strategic Management of Small Firms in Hostile and Benign Environments, "Strategic Management Journal", 10.
• 9. Covin J., Slevin D., 1991, A Conceptual Model of Entrepreneurship as Firm Behavior, "Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice", 16(1).
• 10. Cronbach L.J., 1951, Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests, "Psychometrika", 16(3).
• 11. Cuevas-Vargas H., 2016, La influencia de la innovación y la tecnología en la competitividad de las Pymes manufactureras del estado de Aguascalientes, (Ph.D.), Universidad Autonoma de Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes, Mexico.
• 12. Czarniewski S., 2016, Small and medium-sized enterprises in the context of innovation and entrepreneurship in the economy, "Polish Journal of Management Studies", 13.
• 13. De Clercq D., Meuleman M., Wright M., 2012, A cross-country investigation of micro-angel investment activity: The roles of new business opportunities and institutions, "International Business Review", 21.
• 14. Dwairi M., Akour I., 2014, The moderating role of country institutional profile on the entrepreneurial orientation-performance relationships in the service industry, "International Journal of Business, Marketing, & Decision Science", 7(1).
• 15. Fornell C., Larcker D., 1981, Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error, "Journal of Marketing Research", 18(1).
• 16. Fuentelsaz L., González C., Maícas J., Montero J., 2015, How different formal institutions affect opportunity and necessity entrepreneurship, "Business Research Quarterly", 18.
• 17. García-Cabrera A.M., García-Soto M.G., Días-Furtado J., 2015, Emprender en Economías Emergentes: el Entorno Institucional y su Desarrollo, "Innovar", 25.
• 18. Gold A.H., Arvind Malhotra A.H.S., 2001, Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective, "Journal of Management Information Systems", 18(1).
• 19. Gómez-Haro S., Aragón-Correa J.A., Cordón-Pozo E., 2015, Differentiating the effects of the institutional environment on corporate entrepreneurship, "Management Decision", 49(10).
• 20. Gupta V., Guo C., Canever M., Yim H., Sraw G., Liu M., 2012, Institutional environment for entrepreneurship in rapidly emerging major economies: the case of Brazil, China, India, and Korea, "International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal".
• 21. Hair J.F., Anderson R.E., Tatham R.L., Black W.C., 2014, Multivariate Data Analysis, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
• 22. Hair J.F., Sarstedt M., Ringle C.M., Mena J.A., 2012, An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research, "Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science", 40(3).
• 23. Hechavarria D.M., Reynolds P.D., 2009, Cultural norms & business start-ups: the impact of national values on opportunity and necessity entrepreneurs, "International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal", 5(4).
• 24. Henseler J., Ringle C.M., Sarstedt M., 2015, A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling, "Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science", 43(1).
• 25. Kline R., 2011, Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 3rd edn, New York: Guilford Press.
• 26. Kostova T., Roth K., 2002, Adoption of an Organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: Institutional and Relational Effects, "Academy of Management", 45(1).
• 27. Levie J., Autio E., 2011, Regulatory Burden, Rule of Law, and Entry of Strategic Entrepreneurs: An International Panel Study, "Journal of Management Studies".
• 28. Li Y., Zahra S., 2012, Formal institutions, culture, and venture capital activity: A cross-country analysis, "Journal of Business Venturing", 27.
• 29. Lohmöller J.-B., 2013, Latent variable path modeling with partial least squares, Springer Science & Business Media.
• 30. Martínez-Ferrero J., García-Sánchez I.-M., 2017, Coercive, normative and mimetic isomorphism as determinants of the voluntary assurance of sustainability reports, "International Business Review", 26(1).
• 31. Meyer N., Meyer D.F., Molefe K., 2016, Barriers to small informal business development and entrepreneurship: the case of the Emfuleni region, "Polish Journal of Management Studies", 13.
• 32. Ntayi J.M., Mutebi H., Kamanyi S., Byangwa K., 2013, Institutional framing for entrepreneurship in sub-Saharan Africa: a case of Uganda, "World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development", 9(2/3).
• 33. Nunnally J., 2009. Teoría Psicométrica, México: Trillas.
• 34. Parga-Montoya N., 2016, La influencia de los aspectos institucionales en la orientación emprendedora y las redes de trabajo de las pequeñas y micro empresas de la ciudad de Aguascalientes, (PhD), Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes, Mexico.
• 35. Ringle C.M., Sarstedt M., Straub D., 2012, A critical look at the use of PLS-SEM, "MIS Quarterly".
• 36. Ringle C.M., Wende S., Becker J.-M., 2015, SmartPLS 3, "Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH, http://www.smartpls.com".
• 37. Ruiz-Ortega M.J., Parra-Requena J.R., 2014, Environmental dynamism and entrepreneurial orientation. The moderating role of firm's capabilities, "Journal of Organizational Change Management", 26(3).
• 38. Sarstedt M., Becker J.M., Ringle C.M., Schwaiger M., 2011, Uncovering and Treating Unobserved Heterogenity with FIMIX-PLS: Which Model Selection Criterion Provides an Appropriate Number of Segments?, "Schmalenbach Business Review", 63(1).
• 39. Scott R., 1995, Institutions and Organizations, EUA: SAGE.
• 40. Schott T., Wickstrom K., 2016, Firms' innovation benefiting from networking and institutional support: A global analysis of antional and firm effects, "Research Policy", 45.
• 41. Szyliowicz D., Galvin T., 2010, Applying broader strokes: Extending institutional perspectives and agendas for international entrepreneurship research, "International Business Review", 19(4).
• 42. Tang Z., Hull C., 2012, An Investigation of Entrepreneurial Orientation, Perceived Environmental Hostility, and Strategy Application among Chinese SMEs, "Journal of Small Business Management", 50(1).
• 43. Teo T.S., Srivastava S.C., Jiang L., 2008, Trust and electronic government success: An empirical study, "Journal of Management Information Systems", 25(3).
• 44. Tripopsakul S., 2018, Entrepreneurial perceptions and intentions: the comparative study between Poland and Thailand, "Polish Journal of Management Studies", 17.
• 45. Valliere D., 2017, Belief patterns of entrepreneurship: exploring cross-cultural logics, "International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research", 23(2).
• 46. Volchek D., Saarenketo S., Jantunen A., 2015, Structural Model of Institutional Environment Influence on International Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, [In:] S. Marinova (Ed.), Institutional Impacts on Firm Internationalization, (pp. 190-216). UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
• 47. Wetzels M., Odekerken-Schröder G., Van Oppen C., 2009, Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration, "MIS Quarterly".
• 48. Williams N., Williams C., 2014, Beyond necessity versus opportunity entrepreneurship: some lessons from englis deprived urban neighbourhoods, "International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal", 10.
• 49. Zahra S., Garvis D., 1996, International Corporate Entrepreneurship and Firm Performance: The Moderating Effect of International Environmental Hostility, "Journal of Business Venturing", 15.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2019).