The study of co-design in the area of manufacturing

• Autorzy: Krawczyk-Dembicka Elżbieta , Urban Wiesław , Łukaszewicz Krzysztof

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24425/bpasts.2022.143930

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The study is devoted to the co-design concept which is not widely studied in the manufacturing industry area. The concept is just practiced but not theorized and not investigated enough, although it greatly deserves it because of its perspectives and advantages potential in the technology changes era. This study aims to present an investigation of literature views on co-design in manufacturing operations, with the comparison to service literature where it is widely discussed; the study also aims at in-depth investigations of co-design occurrences in two industrial cases of product development to understand their nature and circumstances. In addition, the influence of Industry 4.0 technologies and their coexistence with the concept of sustainability will also be strongly taken into consideration in the empirical part of this study. The process of the individualized production of the industrial line for animal food packing and cardboard packaging production has been studied according to case study methodology. The study demonstrates that co-design could contribute to bettering the process of new product development and achieving products more accurate for the final users’ requirements. It goes hand in hand with one of the core ideas of sustainability, which is to have long-lasting products, exploited by the customer with a high level of satisfaction for a longer time. The study implies that the technologies of Industry 4.0 could support wider and more effective co-design exploitation by manufacturing entities.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

co-design; manufacturing; sustainable production; Industry 4.0; simulation

PL

współprojektowanie; produkcja; zrównoważona produkcja; Przemysł 4.0; symulacja

• Wydawca: Polska Akademia Nauk, Wydział IV Nauk Technicznych
• Czasopismo: Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences. Technical Sciences
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: Vol. 70, nr 6
• Strony: art. no. e143930
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 47 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Krawczyk-Dembicka Elżbieta

• Bialystok University of Technology, Wiejska 45A Street, 15-351 Białystok, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7383-8248

autor

Urban Wiesław

• Bialystok University of Technology, Wiejska 45A Street, 15-351 Białystok, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8240-381X

autor

Łukaszewicz Krzysztof

• Bialystok University of Technology, Wiejska 45A Street, 15-351 Białystok, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4323-7190

Bibliografia

• [1] M.J. Milne and R. Gray, “W(h)ither ecology? The triple bottom line, the global reporting initiative, and corporate sustainability reporting,” J. Bus. Ethics, vol. 118, no. 1, pp. 13–29, 2013, doi: 10.1007/s10551-012-1543-8.
• [2] A.D. Basiago, “The search for the sustainable city in. 20th century urban planning,” Environmentalist, vol. 16, pp. 135–155, 1996, doi: 10.1007/BF01325104.
• [3] J. Mensah, “Sustainable development: Meaning, history, principles, pillars, and implications for human action: Literature review,” Cogent Soc. Sci., vol. 5, p. 1653531, 2019, doi: 10.1080/23311886.2019.1653531.
• [4] R. Dou, R. Huang, G. Nan, and J. Liu, “Less diversity but higher satisfaction: An intelligent product configuration method for type-decreased mass customization,” Comput. Ind. Eng., vol. 142, p. 106336, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2020.106336.
• [5] A. Hamrol, J. Gawlik, and J. Sładek, “Mechanical engineering in Industry 4.0,” Manag. Prod. Eng. Rev., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 14–28, 2019, doi: 10.24425/mper.2019.129595.
• [6] C. Anderson, The long tail: Why the future of business is selling less of more. New York: Hyperion, 2006.
• [7] M. Fischer, F. Imgrund, and Ch. Janiesch, “Prioritizing and organizing the modeling of the long tail of business processes,” in Proc. 28th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS2020), 2020, pp. 1–15. [Online]. Available: https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2020_rp/18.
• [8] F. Imgrund, M. Fischer, Ch. Janiesch, and A. Winkelmann, “Managing the long tail of business processes,” in Proc. 25th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS2017), Portugal, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2017_rp/39.
• [9] J. Son, A. Sadachar, S. Manchiraju, A.M. Fiore, and L.S. Niehm, “Consumer adoption of online collaborative customer co-design,” J. Res. Interact. Mark., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 180–197, 2012, doi: 10.1108/17505931211274660.
• [10] M. Antikainen, M. Mäkipää, and M. Ahonen, “Motivating and supporting in open innovation,” Eur. J. Innov. Manag., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 100–115, 2010, doi: 10.1108/14601061011013258.
• [11] P.V. Ulrich, L. Jo Anderson-Connell, and W. Wu, “Consumer co-design of apparel for mass customization,” J. Fash. Mark. Manag., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 398–412, 2003, doi: 10.1108/13612020310496985.
• [12] H. Gebauer, M. Paiola, N. Saccani, and M. Rapaccini, “Digital servitization: Crossing the perspectives of digitization and servitization,” Ind. Mark. Manage., vol. 93, pp. 382–388, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.05.011.
• [13] M.A. Cusumano, S.J. Kahl and F.F. Suarez, “Services, industry evolution, and the competitive strategies of product firms,” Strateg. Manage. J., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 559–575, 2015, doi: 10.1002/smj.2235.
• [14] K. Santos, E. Loures, F. Piechnicki and O. Canciglieri, “Opportunities Assessment of Product Development Process in Industry 4.0,” Procedia Manuf., vol. 11, pp. 1358–1365, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.265.
• [15] H. Lercher, Big Picture the Innovation Model. Graz, Austria: Anzeigen und Marketing Kleine Zeitung GmbH & Co KG Verlagsort, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2929258 [Accessed: 24 Mar. 2020].
• [16] D. Amaral, H. Rozenfeld, and C. de Araujob, “A case study about the product development process evaluation,” in Complex Systems Concurrent Engineering, G. Loureiro and R. Curran, Eds., London, UK: Springer, 2007, pp. 211–218, doi: 10.1007/978-1-84628-976-7_24.
• [17] P. Liu and C. Tsai, “Research on the influences of new product design and new product development process management on new product development performance in Taiwan’s industries,” Asian J. Qual., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 89–106, 2009, doi: 10.1108/15982680980000629.
• [18] L. Aristodemou, F. Tietze, E. O’Leary and M. Shaw, “A Literature Review on Technology Development Process (TDP) Models”, in Centre for Technology Management Working Paper Series, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2019, pp. 1–31, doi: 10.17863/CAM.35692.
• [19] G.H. Rossetti, F. Giraudo, P. Murer, and L. Arcusin, “Comparative analysis of product development process management models,” Am. J. Ind. Eng. vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 5–9, 2014, doi: 10.12691/ajie-2-1-2.
• [20] R.G. Cooper, “What’s Next? After Stage-Gate,” Res.-Technol. Manage., vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 20–31, 2014, doi: 10.5437/08956308X5606963.
• [21] R.G. Cooper, “Stage-gate systems: A new tool for managing new products,” Bus. Horiz., vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 44–54, 1990, doi: 10.1016/0007-6813(90)90040-I.
• [22] A. Sukhov, P.R. Magnusson, and J. Netz, “Chapter 3: What is an Idea for Innovation?” in Service Innovation for Sustainable Business: Stimulating, Realizing and Capturing the Value from Service Innovation, P. Kristensson, P. Magnusson and L. Witell, Eds. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., 2019, pp. 29–47, doi: 10.1142/9789813273382_0003.
• [23] P.R. Magnusson, “Exploring the contributions of involving ordinary users in ideation of technology-based services,” J. Prod. Innov. Manage., vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 578–593, 2009, doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00684.x.
• [24] C.K. Prahalad and V. Ramaswamy, The future of competition: co-creating unique value with customers, Boston: Harvard Business Scholl Press, 2004.
• [25] S.L. Vargo and R.F. Lusch, “From goods to service(s): Divergences and convergences of logics,” Ind. Mark. Manage., vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 254–259, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2007.07.004.
• [26] J. Wind and A. Rangaswamy, “Customization: The next revolution in mass customization,” J. Interact. Mark., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 13–32, 2001, doi: 10.1002/1520-6653(200124)15:1<13::AID-DIR1001>3.0.CO;2-#.
• [27] C. Grönroos and A. Ravald, “Service as business logic: implications for value creation and marketing,” J. Serv. Manage., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 5–22, 2011, doi: 10.1108/09564231111106893.
• [28] B. Tronvoll, “Customer complaint behaviour from the perspective of the service-dominant logic of marketing,” Manag. Serv. Qual. Int. J., vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 601–620, 2007, doi: 10.1108/09604520710834966.
• [29] A.F. Payne, K. Storbacka, and P. Frow, “Managing the co-creation of value,” J. Acad. Mark. Sci., vol. 36, pp. 83–96, 2008, doi: 10.1007/s11747-007-0070-0.
• [30] T. Eichentopf, M. Kleinaltenkamp, and J. van Stiphout, “Modelling customer process activities in interactive value creation,” J. Serv. Manage., vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 650–663, 2011, doi: 10.1108/09564231111174997.
• [31] B. Edvardsson, G. Ng, C. Zhi Min, R. Firth, and D. Yi, “Does service-dominant design result in a better service system?” J. Serv. Manage., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 540–556, 2011, doi: 10.1108/09564231111155114.
• [32] Y.-C. Chang, W.-H. Chiu, J.-H. Wang and M.-J. Teng, “Customer involvement in the new process innovation: antecedents, mediation and performance,” Eur. J. Innov. Manag., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 1115–1141, 2022, doi: 10.1108/EJIM-09-2019-0268.
• [33] J. Trischler, P. Kristensson, and D. Scott, “Team diversity and its management in a co-design team,” J. Serv. Manage., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 120–145, 2018, doi: 10.1108/JOSM-10-2016-0283.
• [34] E. Hurley, J. Trischler and T. Dietrich, “Exploring the application of co-design to transformative service research,” J. Serv. Mark., vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 715–727, 2018, doi: 10.1108/JSM-09-2017-0321.
• [35] A.L. Ostrom, A. Parasuraman, D.E. Bowen, L. Patrício, and C.A. Voss, “Service research priorities in a rapidly changing context,” J. Serv. Res., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 127–159, 2015, doi: 10.1177/ 1094670515576315.
• [36] H. El-Jarn and G. Southern, “Can co-creation in extended reality technologies facilitate the design process?” J. Work-Appl. Manag., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 191–205, 2020, doi: 10.1108/JWAM-04-2020-0022.
• [37] J. Trischler, S.J. Pervan, S.J. Kelly, and D.R. Scott, “The value of codesign: the effect of customer involvement in service design teams,” J. Serv. Res., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 75–100, 2018, doi: 10.1177/1094670517714060.
• [38] C. Storey and C. Larbig, “Absorbing customer knowledge: how customer involvement enables service design success,” J. Serv. Res., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 101–118, 2018, doi: 10.1177/1094670517712613.
• [39] P.E. Baxter and S.M. Jack, “Qualitative case study methodology: study design and implementation for novice researchers,” Qual. Rep., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 544–559, 2008, doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2008.1573.
• [40] J. Rowley, “Using case studies in research,” Manage. Res. News, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 16–27, 2002, doi: 10.1108/01409170210782990.
• [41] W. Urban, E. Krawczyk-Dembicka and K. Łukaszewicz, “Product Co-design Supported by Industry 4.0 in Customized Manufacturing,” in Advances in Manufacturing III. MANUFACTURING 2022. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, J. Trojanowska, A. Kujawińska, J. Machado and I. Pavlenko, Eds., Cham, Springer, 2022, pp. 186-199, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-99310-8_15.
• [42] I. Rojek, M. Macko, D. Mikołajewski, M. Sága, and T. Burczyński, “Modern methods in the field of machine modelling and simulation as a research and practical issue related to Industry 4.0,” Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci., vol. 69, no. 2, p. e136717, 2021, doi: 10.24425/bpasts.2021.136717.
• [43] P. Buń, D. Grajewski, F. Górski, and R. Wichniarek, “Application of haptic devices in virtual and hybrid design,” Inżynieria Maszyn, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 18–29, 2013 [in Polish].
• [44] M. Sinclair et al., “Three haptic shape-feedback controllers for virtual reality,” in 2018 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR), 2018, pp. 777–778, doi: 10.1109/VR.2018.8446399.
• [45] H. Skórska, “Augmented reality systems and their applications,” Przegląd Mechaniczny, vol. 1, pp. 48–52, 2017, doi: 10.15199/148.2017.7-8.7 [in Polish].
• [46] A.C. Pereira and F. Romero, “A review of the meanings and the implications of the Industry 4.0 concept”, Procedia Manuf., vol. 13, pp. 1206–1214, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.032.
• [47] I. Rojek and E. Dostatni, “Machine learning methods for optimal compatibility of materials in ecodesign”, Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci., vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 199–206, 2020, doi: 10.24425/bpasts.2020.131848.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).