Tytuł artykułu
Treść / Zawartość
Pełne teksty:
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
The success of the crop production industry in the southern region of Ukraine always depended on weather and climatic factors. Among the factors of crop formation, the availability of moisture in plants occupied the first place. This dependence has been increasing in recent decades due to changes in the climatic conditions occurring not only in Ukraine, but also around the world. In this situation, it is necessary to improve the known elements of field crop cultivation technology and develop new measures to ensure the stability of the industry as well as reduce its dependence on climatic factors. This should help to obtain stable yield levels in all years, regardless of the significant deviations in temperature, precipitation and other weather factors. The solution of this issue is also becoming relevant in connection with the conditions of martial law in Ukraine, when the area of cultivation of agricultural products partially decreased. Adjustments to the development of measures also arise in connection with a significant reduction in the area of irrigated land. At the same time, it is necessary to select not only more drought-resistant crops for cultivation, but even their varieties or hybrids with a high level of productivity. After all, regardless of the specified state and a certain weakening of the economic capacity of agricultural enterprises, it is still necessary to receive the planned amount of crop production. This will determine not only the state of the agricultural sector, but also the stability of Ukraine as a whole.
Wydawca
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
211--220
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 49 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
autor
- Mykolaiv National Agrarian University, Georgiya Gongadze Str., 9, Mykolaiv City, 54008, Ukraine
autor
- Mykolaiv National Agrarian University, Georgiya Gongadze Str., 9, Mykolaiv City, 54008, Ukraine
autor
- Kherson State Agrarian and Economic University, Streetenska Str., 23, Kherson City, 73006, Ukraine
autor
- State Institution Mykolaiv State Agricultural Experimental Station of the Institute of Climate, Oriented Agriculture of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Tsentralna Str., 17, Polygon village, Mykolaiv region, 57217, Ukraine
Bibliografia
- 1. Gamayunova V.V., Khomenko L.G., Baklanova T.V., Kovalenko O.A., Pilipenko T.V. 2020. Suchasni pidkhodi do zastosuvannya mineralnih dobriv za zberezhennya gruntova rodyuchosti v umovakh zmini klimatu. Scientific Horizons, 2(87), 89–101. DOI: 10.332491/2663-2144-2020-87-02-89-101.
- 2. Gamayunova V.V., Litovchenko A.A. 2017. Features of water consumption of winter wheat depending on varieties, place in crop rotation and fertilizer in the southern steppe of Ukraine. Bulletin of the Dnepropetrovsk Eau, 2(44), 17–21.
- 3. Gamayunova V.V. 1983. The effectiveness of the joint use of straw and mineral fertilizers on the yield and quality of agricultural crops in the conditions of irrigation of the south of the Ukrainian SSR. Abstract, 22.
- 4. Gamajunova V., Panfilova A., Kovalenko O., Khonenko L., Baklanova T., Sydiakina O. 2021. Better Management of Soil Fertility in the Southern Steppe Zone of Ukraine. Springer International Publishing Switzerland. Soils Under Stress. 163–171. Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68394-8_16
- 5. Gamayunova V.V., Honenko L.G., Glushko T.V., Muzika N.M. 2019. Significant rodyuchosti ґruntiv ta dotrimannya zakoniv zemlerobstva u zbilshenni virobnitsva grain ta efective vikoristanni vologda roslinami in the minds of the native Steppe of Ukraine. Collection of scientific papers «Azerbaijani scientific production». XXXIX volume. Baku, 192–198.
- 6. Mathur S., Umakanth A.V., Tonapi V.A., Sharma R., Sharma M.K. 2017. Sweet sorghum as biofuel feedstock: Recent advances and available resources. Biotechnol. Biofuels, 10, 1–19.
- 7. Gavrish V.I., Nosenko V.S. 2016. Current state of the world market of alternative motor irrigation. Current Problem, 7, 41–52.
- 8. Lopushniak V.I., Hrytsulyak H.M., Lopushniak G.S., Kotsiubynsky A.O. 2021. Forecasting the Productivity of the Agrophytocenoses of the Miscanthus Giganteus for the Fertilization Based on the Wastewater Sedimentation Using Artificial Neural Networks. Ecological Engineering & Environmental Technology, 11–19. https://doi.org/10.12912/27197050/134867
- 9. Meyer-Aurich A., Lochmann Y., Klauss H., Prochnow A. 2016. Comparative Advantage of Maizeand Grass-Silage Based Feedstock for Biogas Production with Respect to Greenhouse Gas Mitigation. Sustainability, 8, 617.
- 10. Mayer F., Gerin P.A., Noo A., Foucart G., Flammang J., Lemaigre S., Sinnaeve G., Dardenne P., Delfosse P. 2014. Assessment of factors influencing the biomethane yield of maize silages. Bioresource technologies, 153, 260–268.
- 11. Guo Y.Y., Tian S.S., Liu S.S., Wang W.Q., Sui N. 2017. Energy dissipation and antioxidant enzyme system protect photosystem II of sweet sorghum under drought stress. Photosynthetica, 56, 861–872.
- 12. Assefa Y., Staggenborg S.A., Prasad V.P.V. 2010. Grain Sorghum Water Requirement and Responses to Drought Stress: A Review. Crop management, 9, 1–11.
- 13.Bórawski P., Bełdycka-Bórawska A., Szymańska E., Jankowski K.J., Dubis B., Dunn J.W. 2019. Development of renewable energy sources market and biofuels in The European Union. Pure manufacturer, 228, 467–484.
- 14. Nitsenko V., Mardani A., Streimikis J., Shkraba, I., Klopov I., Novomlynets O., Podolska O. 2018. Criteria for Evaluation of Efficiency of Energy Transformation Based on Renewable Energy Sources. Montenegrin Economic Journal, 14, 237–247.
- 15.Roozeboom K.L., Wang D., McGowan A.R., Propheter J.L., Staggenborg S.A., Rice C.W. 2019. Long-term Biomass and Potential Ethanol Yields of Annual and Perennial Biofuel Crops. Agronomic journal, 111, 74–83.
- 16. Wannasek L., Ortner M., Amon B., Amon T. 2017. Sorghum, a sustainable feedstock for biogas production. Impact of climate, variety and harvesting time on maturity and biomass yield. Biomass Bioenergy, 106, 137–145.
- 17. Dar R., Dar E., Kaur A., Phutela U.G. 2018. Sweet sorghum-a promising alternative feedstock for biofuel production. Renew. Sustainable energy reviews, 82, 4070–4090.
- 18.Cattani M., Sartori A., Bondesan V., Bailoni L. 2016. In vitro Degradability, Gas Production, and Energy Value of Different Hybrids of Sorghum after Storage in Mini-Silos. Annals of Animal Science, 16, 769–777.
- 19. Ostovareh S., Karimi K., Zamani A. 2015. Efficient conversion of sweet sorghum stalks to biogas and ethanol using organosolv pretreatment. Industrial Crops and Products, 66, 170–177.
- 20. Amaducci S., Colauzzi M., Battini F., Fracasso A., Perego A. 2016. Effect of irrigation and nitrogen fertilization on the production of biogas from maize and sorghum in a water limited environment. European Journal of Agronomy, 76, 54–65.
- 21. Gamayunova V.V., Khomenko L.G., Fedorchuk M.I., Kovalenko O.A. 2021. Selection of drought-resistant crops for the Southern steppe of Ukraine. Institute of grain crops of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. Scientific journal: cereals. 5(1). Dnipro, 13–22. https://doi.org/10.31867/2523-4544/0153
- 22. Kovalenko O.A., Chernova A.V. 2018. Influence of seeding rates, biologics and microfertilizers on the formation of plant heights of sugar sorghum varieties and hybrids in the conditions of southern Ukraine. Tavrichesky scientific bulletin, 101, 54–62.
- 23. Gamayunova V.V., Khomenko L.G., Kovalenko O.A., Baklanova T.V. 2021. Zaluchennya sorgovyh y inshih adaptations to the zone of the middle of the day of Ukraine posukhostiyky roslin that the main ambush pidvishchennya productivity. The formation of a new paradigm for the development of the agro-industrial sector in the XXI century: a collective monograph: at 2 h. h. 1. Lviv-Torun: Liga-Pres, 1–29.
- 24. Batog J., Frankowski J., Wawro A., Łacka A. 2020. Bioethanol Production from Biomass of Selected Sorghum Varieties Cultivated as Main and Second Crop. Energies, 13, 6291.
- 25. Barcelos C.A., Maeda R.N., Anna L.M.M.S., Pereira N. 2016. Sweet sorghum as a whole-crop feedstock for ethanol production. Biomass-Bioenergy, 94, 46–56.
- 26. Bonin C.L., Heaton E.A., Cogdill T.J., Moore K.J. 2016. Management of Sweet Sorghum for Biomass Production. Sugar Tech, 18, 150–159.
- 27. Gamayunova V.V., Khonenko L.G., Kovalenko O.O. 2021. Sorghum culture in the South of Ukraine, state of production, use and possibility of processing into bioethanol. Achievements of Ukraine and the EU in ecology, biology, chemistry, geography and agricultural sciences: Collective monograph. Riga, Latvia: Baltija Publishing, 150–176. DOI: 10.30525/978-9934-26-086-5-8
- 28. Mishra J.S., Kumar R., Rao S.S. 2016. Performance of Sweet Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) Cultivars as a Source of Green Fodder Under Varying Levels of Nitrogen in Semi-arid Tropical India. Sugar Tech, 19, 532–538.
- 29. Meyer-Aurich A., Lochmann Y., Klauss H., Prochnow A. 2016. Comparative Advantage of Maizeand Grass-Silage Based Feedstock for Biogas Production with Respect to Greenhouse Gas Mitigation. Sustainability, 8, 617.
- 30. Larnaudie V., Rochón E., Ferrari M.D., Lareo C. 2016. Energy evaluation of fuel bioethanol production from sweet sorghum using very high gravity conditions. Renewable energy, 88, 280–287.
- 31. Mishra J.S., Kumar R., Rao S.S. 2016. Performance of Sweet Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) Cultivars as a Source of Green Fodder Under Varying Levels of Nitrogen in Semi-arid Tropical India. Sugar Tech, 19, 532–538.
- 32. State Statistics Service of Ukraine. Agriculture of Ukraine. Statistical Yearbook 2019; State Statistics Service of Ukraine: Kyiv, Ukraine, 2020. Available online: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/druk/publicat/kat_u/2020/zb/09/zb_sg_Ukr_2019.pdf (accessed on 26 March 2021).
- 33. Boiko M. 2016. The impact of sowing density and time on the productivity of grain sorghum hybrids under conditions in the South of Ukraine. Ukrainian Black Sea region agrarian science, 3, 96–103.
- 34. Gamayunova V.V., Khomenko L.G., Kovalenko O.A. 2022. Production of bioethanol from sorghum crops. Bulletin of Agrarian science of the Black Sea region. Scientific journal, 26(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.56407/2313-092x/2022-26(1)-1
- 35. Bazaluk O., Havrysh V., Fedorchuk M., Nitsenko V. 2021. Energy assessment of sorghum cultivation in southern Ukraine. Agriculture (Switzerland), 11(8). DOI: 10.3390/agriculture11080695
- 36. Kalenskaya S.M., Naidenko V.M. 2018. yield of grain sorghum depending on the width of row spacing and fertilizer system. Nauk.PR. Institute of bioenergy crops and sugar beet, 26, 67–75.
- 37. Lopushniak V., Hrytsulyak G. 2016. Impact of sewage sludge application on the humus state of sodpodzolic soil of Subcarpathia under energetic willow plantation. Agricultural Science and Practice, 3(2), 26–31. https://doi.org/10.15407/agrisp3.02.026
- 38. Rakhmetova S.O., Vergun O.M., Blume R.Y., Bondarchuk O.P., Shymanska O.V., Tsygankov S.P., Yemets A.I., Blume Y.B., Rakhmetov D.B. 2020. Ethanol Production Potential of Sweet Sorghum in North and Central Ukraine. The Open Agriculture Journal, 14, 321–338.
- 39. Kobernyuk O.T., Mulyarchuk O.I. 2017. Vpliv mineral zhivlenya on vihid bioethanol z zukrovy sorghum. Podilski visnik: silske gospodarstvo, technika, ekonomika, 26(1), 94–101.
- 40. Krzystek L., Wajszczuk K., Pazera A. et al. 2018. Analiza energetyczna produkcji biogazu z wybranych odmian sorgo. Biotechnologia Acta, 17(1), 69–76. DOI: 10.30825/5.biot.51.2018.17.1
- 41. Garofalo P., D’Andrea L., Vonella A.V. 2016. Sweet sorghum in a bioethanol supply chain: Effects of different soil and nitrogen management on energy performances and greenhouse gas emissions. Italian Journal of Agrometeorology, 2, 15–24.
- 42. Lopushniak V., Тоnkha О., Hrytsuliak Н., Lopushniak Н., Polutrenko М., Poberezhna L., Gamayunova V., Pikovska O., Jakubowski T., Kotsyubynska Y. 2022. Productivity Model of Herbal Bioenergy Cultures Depending on Biometric Indicators of Overhead Mass. Ecological Engineering & Environmental Technology, 23(2), 162–172. DOI: 10.12912/27197050/145731
- 43. Gamayunova V.V., Dvoretsky V.F., Sidyakina E.V. 2017. Change in water consumption of spring grain crops under the influence of nutrition background and biological product Escort-bio. Aeconomics: economics and rural hazyaystvo, 8(20). http://aeconomy.ru/science/agro/izmenenie-vodopotrebleniya-yarovykh/
- 44. Gamayunova V.V., Kudrina V.S. 2018. Water consumption of sunflower depending on the use of biologics for growing in the conditions of the Southern steppe of Ukrain Scientific horizons, Scientific Horizons, 7–8(70), 27–35.
- 45. Panfilova A.V., Gamayunova V.V. 2018. water consumption and yield of spring barley depending on varietal characteristics and optimization of nutrition in the conditions of the Southern steppe of Ukraine. Agrarian University series. Agronomy and biology, 9(36).
- 46. Gamajunova V.V., Kuvshinova A.O., Kudrina V.S, Sydiakina O.V. 2020. Influence of biologics on water consumption of winter barley andsunflower in conditions of Ukrainian Southern Steppe/ Innovative Solutions In Modern Science, New York, 6(42), 149–176.
- 47. Panfilova A.‚ Mohylnitska A.‚ Gamayunova V.‚ Fedorchuk M.‚ Drobitko A., Tyshenko S. 2020. Modeling the impact of weather and climatic condition and nutrition variants on the yield of spring barley varieties (Hordeum vulgare L.) Agronomy Research 18(S2) 1388–1403. DOI: 10.15159/AR20/159
- 48. Gamayunova V.V., Zadorozhny Yu.V. 2015. The influence of irrigation and nutrition regime on water consumption and yield of onions. Scientific Journal of the Russian Research Institute of Problems of Melioration, 3 (19), 40–50.
- 49. Gamayunova V.V., Dvoretsky V.F., Sidyakina O.V., Glushko T.V. 2017. Formation of the aboveground mass of spring wheat and triticale under the influence of optimization of their nutrition in the south of Ukraine, 2(61), 20–28.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-3cbc6636-080e-4cb6-8ce7-8b8d2c30aff8