Using the Composite EEPSE Green Economy Index to Assess the Progress of Emerging Economies in Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals

Stanković, Sunčica; Ilić, Biljana; Rabrenović, Mihajlo

doi:10.35784/preko.5751

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Using the Composite EEPSE Green Economy Index to Assess the Progress of Emerging Economies in Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals

Autorzy

Stanković Sunčica , Ilić Biljana , Rabrenović Mihajlo

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.35784/preko.5751

Warianty tytułu

Wykorzystanie złożonego indeksu zielonej gospodarki EEPSE do oceny postępu gospodarek rozwijających się w osiąganiu Celów zrównoważonego rozwoju

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

As a concept, the green economy refers to the transition from coal to renewable energy sources to reduce pollution, the energy efficiency of production processes to achieve savings, the reuse of materials from waste in business and energy production, changes designed to stop harmful climate change and bring new opportunities for economic development. In this way, conflicts between economic development and environmental issues are resolved, with the aim of achieving sustainability of the economy and society. The aim of the study is to provide a comparative analysis of the level of development of the green economy in selected 20 emerging economies and their progress towards achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) from the 2030 Agenda using the EEPSE Green Economy Index (EEPSE GEI), based on Quintuple Helix Innovation Model (QHIM), and examine the interdependence between each of the 5 subsystems (quality of education system, economic aspects, political system, civil society, and natural environment) with this index. The results indicate that among the group of countries observed, Estonia is the best performer, while Egypt has the lowest performance. The results, also, indicate the important role of each of the subsystems in EEPSE GEI. The study can be useful for policy makers to identify weaknesses in achieving the SDGs.

Jako koncepcja, zielona gospodarka odnosi się do przejścia z węgla na odnawialne źródła energii w celu ograniczenia zanieczyszczeń, efektywności energetycznej procesów produkcyjnych w celu osiągnięcia oszczędności, ponownego wykorzystania materiałów z odpadów w biznesie i produkcji energii, zmian mających na celu zatrzymać szkodliwe zmiany klimatyczne i stworzyć nowe możliwości rozwoju gospodarczego. W ten sposób rozwiązywane są konflikty pomiędzy rozwojem gospodarczym a kwestiami środowiskowymi, umożliwiając osiągnięcie zrównoważonego rozwoju gospodarki i społeczeństwa. Celem artykułu jest dokonanie analizy porównawczej poziomu rozwoju zielonej gospodarki w wybranych 20 gospodarkach rozwijających się oraz ich postępu w realizacji Celów zrównoważonego rozwoju (SDGs) wynikających z Agendy 2030 z wykorzystaniem Indeksu Zielonej Gospodarki EEPSE (EEPSE GEI), w oparciu o Model Innowacji Pięciokrotnej Helisy (QHIM) i bada współzależność pomiędzy każdym z 5 podsystemów (jakość systemu edukacji, aspekty ekonomiczne, system polityczny, społeczeństwo obywatelskie i środowisko naturalne) za pomocą tego indeksu. Wyniki wskazują, że wśród obserwowanej grupy krajów najlepiej radzi sobie Estonia, a najgorzej Egipt. Wyniki wskazują także na ważną rolę każdego z podsystemów w EEPSE GEI. Badanie może być przydatne dla decydentów w celu zidentyfikowania słabych punktów w osiąganiu Celów zrównoważonego rozwoju.

Słowa kluczowe

green economy sustainable development strategies Quintuple Helix model EEPSE Green Economy Index cluster analysis correlation analysis

zielona gospodarka strategia zrównoważonego rozwoju model pięciokrotnej helisy wskaźnik zielonej gospodarki EEPSE analiza klastrów analiza korelacji

Wydawca

Lublin University of Technology

Czasopismo

Problemy Ekorozwoju

Rocznik

2024

Tom

Vol. 19, no. 1

Strony

78--88

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 35 poz., fig., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Stanković Sunčica

suncica.stankovic@vspep.edu.rs

Faculty of Business Economics and Entrepreneurship, Belgrade

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8824-1973

autor

Ilić Biljana

Educons University, Faculty of Project and Innovation Management, Belgrade

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6137-8478

autor

Rabrenović Mihajlo

Faculty of Business Economics and Entrepreneurship, Belgrade

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8188-663X

Bibliografia

1. AHMED A.A., NAZZAL M.A., DARRAS B.M., 2022, Cyber-Physical Systems as an Enabler of Circular Economy to Achieve Sustainable Development Goals: A Comprehensive Review. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 9: 955–975.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-021-00398-5
2. ALI E.B., ANUFRIEV V.P., AMFO B., 2021, Green economy implementation in Ghana as a road map for a sustainable development drive: A review, Scientific African, 2: e00756.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2021.e00756
3. AVTAR R., AGGARWAL R., KHARRAZI A., KUMAR P., KURNIAWAN T.A., 2019, Utilizing geospatial information to implement SDGs and monitor their Progress, Environmental monitoring and assessment, 192(35), https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7996-9.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7996-9
4. BARCELLOS-PAULA L., DE LA VEGA I., GIL-LAFUENTE A.M., 2021, The Quintuple Helix of Innovation Model and the SDGs: Latin-American Countries’ Case and Its Forgotten Effects, Mathematics, 9(4): 416.DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math9040416
5. CARAYANNIS E.G., BARTH T.D., CAMPBELL D.F., 2012, The Quintuple Helix innovation model: Global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1(2): 1-12.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-5372-1-2
6. CHAABEN N., ELLEUCH Z., HAMDI B., KAHOULI B., 2022, Green economy performance and sustainable development achievement: empirical evidence from Saudi Arabia, Environment, Development and Sustainability, https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02722-8.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02722-8
7. ĐORIĆ Ž., 2021, Green economy and sustainable development in the Western Balkan countries, Ekonomske ideje i praksa [Economic ideas and practice], 41: 67-91.
8. EVANS J.D., 1996, Straightforward statistics for the behavioral sciences, Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.
9. GIBBONS M., LIMOGES C., NOWOTNY H., 1994, The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, SAGE Publications Ltd.
10. GRUNDEL I., DAHLSTRÖM M., 2016, A Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Approach to Regional Innovation Systems in the Transformation to a Forestry-Based Bioeconomy, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 7: 963–983.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-016-0411-7
11. ILIĆ B., 2020, Social Component of Sustainable Development and Quality of Life: Region of the Balkans, Eastern Serbia, Handbook of Research on Creating Sustainable Value in the Global Economy, ed. Akkucuk U., IGI Global: 452-462.DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1196-1.ch026
12. ILIĆ B., STOJANOVIC D., DJUKIC G., 2019, Green economy: mobilization of international capital for financing projects of renewable energy sources, Green Finance, 1(2): 94-109.DOI: https://doi.org/10.3934/GF.2019.2.94
13. JAFARZADEGAN M., SAFI-ESFAHANI F., BEHESHTI Z., 2019, Combining hierarchical clustering approaches using the PCA method, Expert System with Applications, 137: 1–10.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.06.064
14. JIN X., 2012, Guang Yuan Low-carbon Development Path Based on SWOT Analysis, Journal of Sustainable Development, 5(8): 78-83.DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v5n8p78
15. KÖNIG J., SUWALA L., DELARG, C., 2021, Helix Models of Innovation and Sustainable Development Goals, Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals, eds. Leal Filho W., Azul A.M., Brandli L., Lange Salvia A., Wall T., Springer, Cham: 1-15.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71059-4_91-1
16. LAFORTUNE G., FULLER G., SCHMIDT-TRAUB G., KROLL C., 2020, How Is Progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals Measured? Comparing Four Approaches for the EU, Sustainability, 12(18): 7675.DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187675
17. LAVRINENKO O., IGNATJEVA S., OHOTINA A., RYBALKIN O., LAZDANS D., 2019, The Role of Green Economy in Sustainable Development (Case Study: The EUStates), Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 6(3): 1113-1126.DOI: https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2019.6.3(4)
18. ŁĄCKA I., 2020, Barriers to Using of Quintuple Helix Model to Create Innovations in Polish Regions, Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology, Organization and Management Series No 146, Silesian University of Technology Publishing House: 233-251.DOI: https://doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2020.146.18
19. MILLARD J., 2018, How social innovation underpins sustainable development, Atlas of Social Innovation: New Practices for a Better Future, ed. Howaldt, J., Kaletka, C., Schröder, A., Zirngiebl, M., SI-DRIVE: 41-43.
20. MIOLA A., SCHILTZ F., 2019, Measuring sustainable development goals performance: How to monitor policy action in the 2030 Agenda implementation? Ecological economics: The Journal of the International Society for Ecological Economics, 164: 106373.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106373
21. NAIDOO D., NHAMO L., LOTTERING S., MPANDELI S., LIPHADZI S., MODI A. T., TROIS C., MABHAUDHI T., 2021, Transitional Pathways towards Achieving a Circular Economy in the Water, Energy, and Food Sectors, Sustainability, 13(17): 9978.DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179978
22. OSPANOVA A., POPOVYCHENKO I., CHUPRINA E., 2022, Green Economy – Vector of Sustainable Development, Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, 17(1): 171-181.DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2022.1.16
23. PRASAD A., LOUKOIANOVA E., XIAOCHEN FENG A., OMAN W., 2022, Mobilizing Private Climate Financing in Emerging Market and Developing Economies, Staff Climate Notes, 2022(007), International Monetary Fund.DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400216428.066
24. QUACOE D., KONG Y., QUACOE D., 2023, Analysis of How Green Growth and Entrepreneurship Affect Sustainable Development: Application of the Quintuple Helix Innovation Model in the African Context, Sustainability, 15: 907.DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15020907
25. RYBALKIN O., 2022, Sustainable development goals progress in the European Union: correlation with EEPSE green economy index, Access to science, business, innovation in digital economy, ACCESS Press, 3(2): 121-135.DOI: https://doi.org/10.46656/access.2022.3.2(3)
26. RYBALKIN O., LAVRINENKO O., IGNATJEVA S., DANILEVICA A., 2021, Introduction of EEPSE Green Economy Index for the analysis of regional trends. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 9(1): 415-435.DOI: https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2021.9.1(26)
27. RYSZAWSKA B., 2015, Towards a green economy. From ideas to practice, ed. Burchard-Dziubińska, M., Chapter: Green Economy Indicators, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź, Poland: 31-52.
28. SWART J., GROOT L., 2020, Sustainable development: The transition to the green economy, Quality - Access to Success, 15(SUPPL.1): 129-133.
29. TADASHI H., 2022, A balancing act between economic growth and sustainable development: Historical trajectory through the lens of development indicators. Sustainable Development, 30(6): 1900-1910.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2357
30. UNITED NATIONS, 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable development, New York/
31. UNSTAT, 2022, Global indicator framework for the Sustainable Development Goals and targets of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/Global%20Indicator%20Framework%20after%202022%20refinement_Eng.pdf (April 28, 2023).
32. VENKATESH G., 2021, Sustainable Development Goals – Quo Vadis, Cities of the World? Problemy Ekorozwoju/Problems of Sustainable Development, 16(1): 171-179.DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2021.1.18
33. VERTAKOVA Y., PLOTNIKOV V., 2017, Problems of sustainable development worldwide and public policies for green economy, Economic Annals-XXI, 166(7–8): 4-10.DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V166-01
34. ZHAO L., HE W., WANG A., ZHU F., 2023, Time and Frequency Spillovers between the Green Economy and Traditional Energy Markets, Systems, 11(3): 153.DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11030153
35. ZHIRONKIN S., CEHLÁR M., 2022, Green Economy and Sustainable Development: The Outlook, Energies, 15(3): 1167.DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en15031167

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-3bcdb1ab-a3fd-4990-ba41-cc07f72b5f0a