The role of biotechnology in the development of the bioeconomy

• Autorzy: Pokataiev Pavlo , Liezina Anastasiia , Andriushchenko Anhelina , Petukhova Helena

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.32933/ActaInnovations.46.2

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This paper analyzes the steps of the strategic development and use of innovations in the field of biotechnology in the largest and most developed countries of the world. Support for applied recommendations for state-level fundamental provisions regarding initiatives to develop the capacity of the biotechnology sector and increase the level of an international, strategic and competitive industry is presented. The authors conducted a study and evaluated the further promising use of innovations in biotechnology on the example of the EU-15 and EU13 countries. A regularity was revealed that the biotechnology of the EU countries (EU-15) is developed at a high national and international level. The overall results of our work have helped to define further strategic directions and presented potential prospects for innovation in the field of biotechnology, which will subsequently lead to increased investment in this area. Using the graphical method, a dynamic model of trade turnover in the bioeconomy of the EU-15 countries is presented, followed by the construction of a trend line. And also formulated and predicted the value of trade in the bioeconomy of the EU-15 and EU-13 for the next decade.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

bioeconomy; innovative opportunities; clusters; investments; strategic development; biotechnologies; ecosystem

PL

biogospodarka; klastry; inwestycje; rozwój strategiczny; biotechnologie; ekosystem

• Wydawca: Centrum Badań i Innowacji Pro-Akademia ; Ukrainian Academy of Sciences - Research and Development Centre for Industrial Problems of Development
• Czasopismo: Acta Innovations
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: no. 46
• Strony: 19--34
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 31 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Pokataiev Pavlo

• Classical Private University, 70-b Zhukovsky Str., Zaporizhzhia, 69002, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3806-2197

autor

Liezina Anastasiia

• Department of Economics and Entrepreneurship SHEE «Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman» 54/1 Peremogy ave., Kyiv, 03057, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0516-6598

autor

Andriushchenko Anhelina

• Department of Biochemistry, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 60 Vladimirskaya Str., Kyiv, 01601, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4174-2740

autor

Petukhova Helena

• Department of Mathematical Modeling and Statistics SHEE «Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman» 54/1 Peremogy ave., Kyiv, 03057 Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2105-7666

Bibliografia

• [1] K. Andriushchenko, A. Liezina, S. Vasylchak, M. Manylich, T. Shterma, U. Petrynyak, Management of the Development of the Innovative Potential of the Region, TEM J. 11 (2022) 339–347. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM111-43.
• [2] K. Andriushchenko, A. Khaletska, N. Ushenko, H. Zholnerchyk, I. Ivanets, S. Petrychuk, S. Uliganets, Education Process Digitalization and Its Impact on Human Capital of an Enterprise, J. Manag. Inf. Decis. Sci. 24 (2021) 1–9.
• [3] I. Sotiropoulou, P. Deutz, Understanding the bioeconomy: a new sustainability economy in British and European public discourse, Bio-Based Appl. Econ. 10 (2021) 283–304. https://doi.org/10.36253/bae-9534.
• [4] V. Kovtun, K. Andriushchenko, N. Horbova, O. Lavruk, Y. Muzychka, Features of the management process of ambidextrous companies, TEM J. 9 (2020) 1–6. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM91š]31.
• [5] Y. Bilan, V. Nitsenko, I. Ushkarenko, A. Chmut, O. Sharapa, Outsourcing in international economic relations, Montenegrin J. Econ. 13 (2017) 175–185. https://doi.org/10.14254/1800-5845/2017.13-3.14.
• [6] V. Nitsenko, I. Nyenno, I. Kryukova, T. Kalyna, M. Plotnikova, Business model for a sea commercial port as a way to reach sustainable development goals, J. Secur. Sustain. Issues. 7 (2017) 155–166. https://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2017.7.1(13).
• [7] European Commission, Innovating for sustainable growth: A bioeconomy for Europe, 2012. https://www.eea.europa.eu/policy-documents/innovating-for-sustainable-growth-a.
• [8] N. Robert, J. Giuntoli, R. Araujo, M. Avraamides, E. Balzi, J.I. Barredo, B. Baruth, W. Becker, M.T. Borzacchiello, C. Bulgheroni, A. Camia, G. Fiore, M. Follador, P. Gurria, A. la Notte, M. Lusser, L. Marelli, R. M’Barek, C. Parisi, G. Philippidis, T. Ronzon, S. Sala, J. Sanchez Lopez, S. Mubareka, Development of a bioeconomy monitoring framework for the European Union: An integrative and collaborative approach, N. Biotechnol. 59 (2020) 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2020.06.001.
• [9] U. Fritsche, G. Brunori, D. Chiaramonti, C.M. Galanakis, S. Hellweg, R. Matthews, C. Panoutsou, Future transitions for the bioeconomy towards sustainable development and a climate-neutral economy - knowledge synthesis. Final report, Luxembourg, 2020. https://doi.org/10.2760/667966.
• [10] I.M. Vlad, E. Toma, The Assessment of the Bioeconomy and Biomass Sectors in Central and Eastern European Countries, Agronomy. 12 (2022) 880. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12040880.
• [11] T. Olejarz, V. Nitsenko, O. Chukurna, M. Mykhailova, Evaluation of factors influencing labour performance of machine-building enterprises in mining industry, Nauk. Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. 1 (2018) 154–162. https://doi.org/10.29202/nvngu/2018-1/2.
• [12] European Comission, Regional Innovation Scoreboard 2019, Luxembourg, 2019. https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/statistics/performance-indicators/regional-innovation-scoreboard_en.
• [13] R. Wohlgemuth, T. Twardowski, A. Aguilar, Bioeconomy moving forward step by step – A global journey, N. Biotechnol. 61 (2021) 22–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2020.11.006.
• [14] G.B. Frisvold, S.M. Moss, A. Hodgson, M.E. Maxon, Understanding the U.S. bioeconomy: A new definition and landscape, Sustain. 13 (2021) 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041627.
• [15] S. Wydra, B. Hüsing, J. Köhler, A. Schwarz, E. Schirrmeister, A. Voglhuber-Slavinsky, Transition to the bioeconomy – Analysis and scenarios for selected niches, J. Clean. Prod. 294 (2021) 126092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126092.
• [16] S. Dahiya, A.N. Kumar, J. Shanthi Sravan, S. Chatterjee, O. Sarkar, S.V. Mohan, Food waste biorefinery: Sustainable strategy for circular bioeconomy, Bioresour. Technol. 248 (2018) 2–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.176.
• [17] H. Hellsmark, J. Mossberg, P. Söderholm, J. Frishammar, Innovation system strengths and weaknesses in progressing sustainable technology: The case of Swedish biorefinery development, J. Clean. Prod. 131 (2016) 702–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.109.
• [18] S. Wydra, Value chains for industrial biotechnology in the bioeconomy-innovation system analysis, Sustain. 11 (2019) 2435. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082435.
• [19] R. Bosman, J. Rotmans, Transition governance towards a bioeconomy: A comparison of Finland and The Netherlands, Sustain. 8 (2016) 1017. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8101017.
• [20] C.C. Chung, Technological innovation systems in multi-level governance frameworks: The case of Taiwan’s biodiesel innovation system (1997–2016), J. Clean. Prod. 184 (2018) 130–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.185.
• [21] A. Giurca, P. Späth, A forest-based bioeconomy for Germany? Strengths, weaknesses and policy options for lignocellulosic biorefineries, J. Clean. Prod. 153 (2017) 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.156.
• [22] T. Nevzorova, E. Karakaya, Explaining the drivers of technological innovation systems: The case of biogas technologies in mature markets, J. Clean. Prod. 259 (2020) 120819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120819.
• [23] A. Purkus, N. Hagemann, N. Bedtke, E. Gawel, Towards a sustainable innovation system for the German wood-based bioeconomy: Implications for policy design, J. Clean. Prod. 172 (2018) 3955–3968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.146.
• [24] S. Leipold, A. Petit-Boix, The circular economy and the bio-based sector - Perspectives of European and German stakeholders, J. Clean. Prod. 201 (2018) 1125–1137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.019.
• [25] D.D.T. Pham, P. Paillé, N. Halilem, Systematic review on environmental innovativeness: A knowledge-based resource view, J. Clean. Prod. 211 (2019) 1088–1099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.221.
• [26] J. Stilgoe, R. Owen, P. Macnaghten, Developing a framework for responsible innovation, Res. Policy. 42 (2013) 1568–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008.
• [27] T. Kuosmanen, N. Kuosmanen, A. El-Meligi, T. Ranzon, P. Gurria, S. Lost, R. M ́Barek, How big is the bioeconomy? Reflections from an economic perspective, Luxembourg, 2020. https://doi.org/10.2760/144526.
• [28] Eurostat, Patent applications to the EPO by priority year by NUTS 3 regions, (2015). http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/submitViewTableAction.do.
• [29] European Commission, CORDIS- Community Research and Development Information Service, (2022). http://cordis.europa.eu/project/rcn/ 193340_en.html.
• [30] Bio-Economy Technology Platforms (BECOTEPS), The European Bioeconomy in 2030: Delivering sustainable growth by addressing the grand societal challenges, Bio-Economy Technol. Platforms. (2011) 1–24. https://www.greengrowthknowledge.org/sites/default/files/downloads/resource/BECOTEPS_European Bioeconomy in 2030.pdf.
• [31] WIPO, Global Innovation Index 2021: Tracking Innovation through the COVID-19 Crisis, 2021. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2021.pdf.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2024).