Determinants and relations of competition and performance in cable manufacturing industry

• Autorzy: Setiawan Adam Putranto , Primiana Ina , Sule Ernie Tisnawati , Kaltum Umi

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17512/pjms.2021.23.1.21

Warianty tytułu

PL

Uwarunkowania i zależności konkurencji i wyników w przemyśle produkcji kabli

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The objective of this paper is to empirically test the impact of government regulation, industry competition, and supply chain integration on cable manufacturers’ competitive strategy and how these factors affect manufacturers’ performance. There has not been much focus given by previous studies on cable manufacturers’ competition strategy, especially in emerging economies. Therefore, there is a lack of consensus regarding the determinants of cable manufacturers’ competitive strategy and its impact on business performance. Filling this gap and providing recommendations for both cable manufacturing and regulators to improve the cable manufacturing industry’s performance, the present study has been executed, and this proposed research also provides the novelties to this paper. Partial least square estimation was used with data from 31 cable manufacturers in Indonesia. The estimation result shows that cable manufacturers’ competitive strategy is significantly affected by industry competition and supply chain integration, while the government regulation variable is not significant. Regarding business performance, industry competition has the largest total effect, followed by supply chain integration, competitive strategy, and government regulation, respectively.

PL

Celem tego artykułu jest empiryczne przetestowanie wpływu regulacji rządowych, konkurencji branżowej i integracji łańcucha dostaw na strategię konkurencyjną producentów kabli oraz wpływu tych czynników na wyniki producentów. W poprzednich badaniach nie poświęcono zbyt wiele uwagi strategii konkurencji producentów kabli, zwłaszcza w gospodarkach wschodzących. Dlatego nie ma zgody co do determinantów strategii konkurencyjnej producentów kabli i jej wpływu na wyniki biznesowe. Wypełniając tę lukę i przedstawiając zalecenia zarówno dla producentów kabli, jak i dla organów regulacyjnych w celu poprawy wydajności przemysłu produkcji kabli, przeprowadzono niniejsze badanie, a proponowane badanie dostarcza również nowości do tego artykułu. Zastosowano częściowe oszacowanie metodą najmniejszych kwadratów z danymi od 31 producentów kabli w Indonezji. Wynik oszacowania pokazuje, że konkurencja w branży i integracja łańcucha dostaw znacząco wpływają na strategię konkurencyjną producentów kabli, podczas gdy zmienna regulacyjna rządu nie jest znacząca. Jeśli chodzi o wyniki biznesowe, największy łączny wpływ ma konkurencja w branży, a następnie odpowiednio integracja łańcucha dostaw, strategia konkurencji i regulacje rządowe.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

competitive strategy; business performance; government regulation; industry competition; supply chain integration; cable industry; PLS

PL

strategia konkurencji; wyniki biznesowe; regulacje rządowe; konkurencja branżowa; integracja łańcucha dostaw; przemysł kablowy; PLS

• Wydawca: Czestochowa University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Management Studies
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 23, No. 1
• Strony: 341--351
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 32 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Setiawan Adam Putranto

• Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Padjadjaran

autor

Primiana Ina

• Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Padjadjaran

autor

Sule Ernie Tisnawati

• Faculty of Economics and Business Universitas Padjadjaran

autor

Kaltum Umi

• Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Padjadjaran

Bibliografia

• 1.Al-Rfou, A. N., (2012). Competition and Organizational Performance: Empirical Evidence from Jordanian Firms. Journal of Economics, 3(1), 13-17.
• 2.Al-Tit, A. A., (2015). The Mediating Role of Knowledge Management and the Moderating Part of Organizational Culture between HRM Practices and Organizational Performance. International Business Research, 9(1), 43.
• 3.BPS. (2015). Statistical Year Book of Indonesia 2015. Badan Pusat Statistik Indonesia.
• 4.Chen, J., Huang, J., Zheng, L. and Zhang, C., (2019). An empirical analysis of telecommunication infrastructure promoting the scale of international service trade: Based on the panel data of countries along the belt and road. Transformations in Business and Economics.
• 5.Czernich, N., Falck, O., Kretschmer, T. and Woessmann, L., (2011). Broadband Infrastructure and Economic Growth. Economic Journal.
• 6.Eskandari, M. J., Miri, M., Gholami, S. and Nia, H. R. S., (2015). Factors Affecting the Competitiveness of the Food Industry By Using Porters Five Forces Model Case Study in Hamadan Province, Iran. Journal of Asian Scientific Research, 5(4), 185-197.
• 7.Flynn, B. B., Huo, B. and Zhao, X., (2010). The impact of supply chain integration on performance: A contingency and configuration approach. Journal of Operations Management, 28(1), 58-71.
• 8.Ghasemi, R., Mohamad, N. A., Karami, M., Hafiz Bajuri, N. and Asgharizade, E., (2015). The Relationship among Strategy, Competition and Management Accounting Systems on Organizational Performance. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 4(3), 565-581. http://www.european-science.com
• 9.Godfrey, N., (2008). Why Is Competition Important for Growth and Poverty Reduction ? Forum American Bar Association, 1-12.
• 10.Hair, Jr, J. F., (2015). Essentials of Business Research Methods. In Essentials of Business Research Methods.
• 11.Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B. and Anderson, R., (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective. In Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective.
• 12.Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L. and Kuppelwieser, V. G., (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106-121.
• 13.Henseler, J., Hubona, G. and Ray, P. A., (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Industrial Management and Data Systems.
• 14.Hu, J., Huang, Q. and Chen, X., (2020). Environmental regulation, innovation quality and firms’ competitivity-Quasi-natural experiment based on China’s carbon emissions trading pilot. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja.
• 15.Huo, B., Qi, Y., Wang, Z. and Zhao, X., (2014). The impact of supply chain integration on firm performance: The moderating role of competitive strategy. Supply Chain Management, 19(4), 369-384.
• 16.Ibrahim, T. M., Muritala, T. A., (2015). Does Government Policies Improve Business Performance ? Evidence from Nigeria. Journal of Studies in Social Sciences, 11(2), 143-159.
• 17.Jovanov Marjanova, T., Temjanovski, R.m, (2015). Business Environment Factors and Business Performance: the Case of Macedonia - a Developing Economy. 723, 435-442.
• 18.Kamunge, M. S., Njeru, A. and Tirimba, O. I., (2014). Factors Affecting the Performance of Small and Medium Enterprises in the Jua Kali Sector In Nakuru Town, Kenya. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 16(1), 80-93.
• 19.Kim, S. W., (2009). An investigation on the direct and indirect effect of supply chain integration on firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 119(2), 328-346.
• 20.Mia, L., Winata, L., (2014). Manufacturing strategy and organisational performance: The role of competition and MAS information. Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change, 10(1), 83-115.
• 21.Nimlaor, C., Trimetsoontorn, J. and Fongsuwan, W., (2014). Factors Affecting Business Performance : An Empirical Study in Thailand. Research Journal of Business Management, 8, 89-103.
• 22.Nyaga, N., (2015). Effects of Competitive Strategies on Performance of Express Connections Limited in Kenya Njiru John Nyaga a Research Project Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Award of Master of Business Administration, School of Business, Univ. 1-54.
• 23.Oghojafor, B. E. A., Kuye, O. L., Ogunkoya, O. A. and Peter B., S., (2014). Competitve Strategies, Technological Capabilities and Organizational Performance : Evidence from Nigerian Manufacturing Industry. Nigerian Chapter of Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 2(1), 11-22.
• 24.Özdemir, A., Aslan, E., (2011). Supply chain integration, competition capability and business performance: A study on Turkish SMEs. Asian Journal of Business Management, 3(4), 325-332.
• 25.Porter, M. E., (1979). The Structure within Industries and Companies’ Performance. The Review of Economics and Statistic, 61(2), 214-227.
• 26.Rajnoha, R., Galova, K. and Rozsa, Z., (2018). Measurement of impact of selected industrial engineering practices on companies’ economic performance. Engineering Economics.
• 27.Samiadji, S., Sanusi, A. and Manan, A., (2014). Influence Of Government Regulated On Performance Business By Entrepreneur Orientation And Environment Adaptability Small Medium Enterprise Chips Industry. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 16(11), 40-45.
• 28.Sharma, D., Krishna Sundar, D. and Murthy, R. V., (2012). Evaluating the Impact of Government Policies and Regulations on M-Commerce in India: A System Dynamics Modelling Approach. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(23), 54-80.
• 29.StatPlan Energy Ltd. (2018). Wire & Cable Report Edition 4 2018 - The Global Market for Energy and Telecoms Wire and Cable. https://doi.org/4480540
• 30.Suharto, R., Devie., (2013). Analisa Pengaruh Supply Chain Management Terhadap Keunggulan Bersaing dan Kinerja Perusahaan. Business Accounting Review.
• 31.Tuanmat, T. Z., Smith, M., (2011). The effects of changes in competition, technology and strategy on organizational performance in small and medium manufacturing companies. Asian Review of Accounting, 19(3), 208-220.
• 32.Ward, P. T., Duray, R., (2000). Manufacturing strategy in context: Environment, competitive strategy and manufacturing strategy. Journal of Operations Management, 18(2), 123-138.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).