PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

The determinants of cooperation and the need for better communication between stakeholders in EU countries : the case of posted workers

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
PL
Determinanty współpracy i potrzeby lepszej komunikacji pomiędzy zainteresowanymi stronami w krajach UE : przypadek pracowników delegowanych
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The article analyses the determinants of cooperation and better communication between stakeholders in EU countries on the issue of policy pertaining to posted workers. The methodology of the current research is based on the data collected through qualitative research. The interview method has been used in order to obtain the data from the stakeholders involved in the policy for posting workers. According to the research findings, information exchange and cooperation are well-developed on a regional level. The broad diversity of information exchange practices has been found in the policy stakeholders’ network. However, all the networks are in start-up phases.
PL
Artykuł analizuje uwarunkowania współpracy oraz lepszą komunikację między interesariuszami w krajach UE w zakresie polityki dotyczącej pracowników delegowanych. Metodologia obecnych badań opiera się na danych zebranych w badaniach jakościowych. Metoda wywiadów została wykorzystana w celu uzyskania danych od zainteresowanych stron zaangażowanych w politykę delegowania pracowników. Zgodnie z wynikami badań wymiana informacji i współpraca są dobrze rozwinięte na poziomie regionalnym. Szeroka różnorodność praktyk w zakresie wymiany informacji została odkryta w sieci zainteresowanych stron. Jednak wszystkie sieci są w fazie rozruchu.
Rocznik
Strony
94--106
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 39 poz., tab.
Twórcy
autor
  • Klaipėda University, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanity, Dept. of Public Administration and Political Sciences, Klaipeda, Lithuania
autor
  • Vytautas Magnus University, Faculty of Political Sciences and Diplomacy, Department of Public Administration, Kaunas, Lithuania
Bibliografia
  • 1. Auers D., 2015, Comparative politics and government of the Baltic States: Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania in the 21st century, Springer.
  • 2. Benz A., Corcaci A., Doser W.J., 2016, Unravelling multilevel administration. Patterns and dynamics of administrative co-ordination in European governance, “Journal of European Public Policy”, 23(7).
  • 3. Bernaciak M., 2017, Coming full circle? Contestation, social dialogue and trade union politics in Poland. Rough waters - European trade unions in a time of crises, [In:] Rough waters European trade unions in a time of crises, (Ed.) S. Lehndorff, H. Dribbusch, T. Schulten, European Trade Union Institute.
  • 4. Bernaciak M., Kahancová M., 2017, Drivers of union innovation in the CEE context, [In:] Innovative Union Practises in Central-Eastern Europe, https://www.etui.org/content/download/31692/291732/file/Conclusions.pdf (Accessed on 29-05-2018).
  • 5. Blauberger M., Rittberger B., 2015, Conceptualising and theorising EU regulatory networks, “Regulation & Governance”, 9(4).
  • 6. Conteh C., 2013, Strategic inter-organisational cooperation in complex environments, “Public Management Review”, 15(4).
  • 7. Cremers J., 2013, Free provision of services and cross-border labour recruitment, “Policy Studies”, 34(2).
  • 8. Cremers J., 2013, Posting of workers: enforcement problems and challenges, Conference paper, [In:] Posting of workers: improving collaboration between social partners and public authorities in Europe, p.164-171.
  • 9. Cristofoli D., Meneguzzo M., Riccucci N., 2017, Collaborative administration: the management of successful networks, “Public Management Review”, 19(3).
  • 10. Dvorak J., Karnite R., Guogis A., 2018, The Characteristic Features of Social Dialogue in the Baltics, “STEPP: Socialinė teorija, empirija, politika ir praktika”, 16.
  • 11. Egeberg M., Trondal J., 2017, Researching European Union agencies: What have we learnt (and where do we go from here)? “JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies”, 55(4).
  • 12. Galetta D.U., Hofmann H.C., Schneider J., 2014, Information Exchange in the European Administrative Union: An Introduction, “European Public Law”, 1.
  • 13. Gardawski J., Mrozowicki A., Czarzasty J., 2012, Trade unions in Poland, http://www.etui.org/content/download/6395/60671/file/12+etui-poland+r123+web+version.pdf.
  • 14. Hartlapp M., Heidbreder E.G., 2018, Mending the hole in multilevel implementation: Administrative cooperation related to worker mobility, “Governance”, 31(1).
  • 15. Heidbreder E.G., 2017, Strategies in multilevel policy implementation: moving beyond the limited focus on compliance, “Journal of European Public Policy”, 24(9).
  • 16. Hill C., Lynn L., 2003, Producing human services. Why do agencies collaborate? “Public Management Review”, 5(1).
  • 17. Hudson A., 2001, NGOs’ transnational advocacy networks: from ‘legitimacy’ to ‘political responsibility’? “Global networks”, 1(4).
  • 18. Kahancová M., 2015, Central and Eastern European trade unions after the EU enlargement: successes and failures for capacity building, “Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research”, 21(3).
  • 19. Kallaste E., Woolfson C., 2013, Negotiated responses to the crisis in the Baltic countries, “Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research”, 19(2).
  • 20. Kilger C., Reuter B., Stadtler H., 2015, Collaborative Planning, [In:] Stadtler H., Kilger C., Meyr H. (eds) Supply Chain Management and Advanced Planning, Springer Texts in Business and Economics, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  • 21. Korkut U., de Ruyter A., Maganaris M., Bailey D., 2017, What next for unions in Central and Eastern Europe? Invisibility, departure and the transformation of industrial relations, “European Journal of Industrial Relations”, 23(1).
  • 22. Kullmann M., 2015, Enforcement of labour law in cross-border situations. A legal study of the EU’s influence on the Dutch, German, and Swedish enforcement systems, Deventer: Wolters Kluwer.
  • 23. Lulle A., 2013, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania - labour relations and social dialogue. Regional Project on Labour Relations and Social Dialogue, Confederation of Swedish Enterprise https://www.svensktnaringsliv.se/english/ (accessed 2018.05.16).
  • 24. Maggetti M., 2014, The rewards of cooperation: The effects of membership in European regulatory networks, “European Journal of Political Research”, 53(3).
  • 25. Mandarano L.A., 2009, Social network analysis of social capital in collaborative planning, “Society and Natural Resources”, 22(3).
  • 26. Mastenbroek E., Martinsen D.S., 2018, Filling the gap in the European administrative space: the role of administrative networks in EU implementation and enforcement, “Journal of European Public Policy”, 25(3).
  • 27. May P.J., Winter S.C., 2007, Collaborative service arrangements: Patterns, bases, and perceived consequences, “Public Management Review”, 9(4).
  • 28. Mrozowicki A., 2014, Varieties of trade union organising in Central and Eastern Europe: A comparison of the retail and automotive sectors, “European Journal of Industrial Relations”, 20(4).
  • 29. Mrozowicki A., Roosalu T., Senčar T.B., 2013, Precarious work in the retail sector in Nordic Subsidiaries in the Baltic States, PhD thesis, University of Jyväskyla, Finland.
  • 30. OECD Statistics, 2018, https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=TUD# (accessed 2018.05.16).
  • 31. Palttala P., Boano C., Lund R., Vos M., 2012, Communication gaps in disaster management: Perceptions by experts from governmental and non-governmental organisations, “Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management”, 20(1).
  • 32. Patterson S.J., Radtke J.M., 2009, Strategic communications for non-profit organisations: Seven steps to creating a successful plan, John Wiley & Sons.
  • 33. Sippola M., 2017, Ideological underpinnings of the development of social dialogue and industrial relations in the Baltic States, http://www.lpsk.lt/lpsk-web/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Baltic-IR-development-Sippola-2017-02-23.pdf.
  • 34. Sroka W., Cygler J., 2014, Pathologies in inter-organisational networks, “Procedia Economics and Finance”, 12.
  • 35. Thomann E., Sager F., 2017, Moving beyond legal compliance: innovative approaches to EU multilevel implementation, “Journal of European Public Policy”, 24(9).
  • 36. Trappmann V., 2012, Trade unions in Poland: current situation, organisation and challenges, Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Central and Eastern Europe.
  • 37. Vifell Å.C., Sjögren E., 2014, The legal mind of the internal market: a governmentality perspective on the judicialisation of monitoring practices, “JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies”, 52(3).
  • 38. Wagner I., 2015, EU posted work and transnational action in the German meat industry, “Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research”, 21(2).
  • 39. Wall G., 2016, Linked National Public Authorities-a Study on IMI, available at http://www.sieps.se/publikationer/2016/linked-national-public-authorities--a-study-on-imi-201611/sieps202016_1120sammanfattning.pdf? (Accessed 15 October 2017).
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2018).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-3b62b633-0e7d-4b33-9544-d9e1d4d4f0af
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.