PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Powiadomienia systemowe
  • Sesja wygasła!
Tytuł artykułu

Can typical overdentures attachments prevent from bone overloading around mini-implants?

Autorzy
Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Purpose: High level of successful maintenance of implants located in anterior part of mandible popularizes economical solutions of implant-retained soft tissue supported dentures including those using narrow mini-implants with small diameter - of 1.8-2.2 mm. Design/methodology/approach: FEM modeling analyses were used to determine distribution of mastication loads between mucous foundation and bone tissue surrounding mini-implants that have 1.8 mm diameter. Examined were two types of commercial solitary denture attachments, described as biomechanically compatible due to their rotational movements freedom or due to the additional pivoting mobility. Findings: In case of both types of attachments the most dangerous lateral implants loadings significantly exceed half of oblique mastication loads value. In mini-implants and bone tissue lateral forces generate a high level of stresses. Research limitations/implications: Analyses were carried out with assumed linear characteristics of materials. Denture-to-soft foundation, as well as implant-to-bone complete adherence was assumed. Practical implications: While using mini-implants it is crucial to carefully evaluate the condition of bone foundation, due to the risk of quick development of atrophic processes in case of insufficient bone parameters. In case of mini-implants very important is very high strength value level and surface quality, due to the fact that in case of diameter of 1.8mm there might occur local yielding and propagation of fatigue cracks. Originality/value: Commercial types of attachments do not deserve the name of mechanically biocompatible, as they do not allow for such significant reduction of overloading effects, as the non-commercial silicone attachments.
Rocznik
Strony
542--551
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 36 poz., rys., tab., wykr.
Twórcy
autor
  • Department of Materials Technology, Silesian University of Technology, ul. Krasińkiego 8, 40-019 Katowice, Poland
Bibliografia
  • [1] A. Shor, Y. Goto, K. Shor, Mandibular two-implant-retained overdenture: prosthetic design and fabrication protocol, Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry 28/2 (2007) 28-32.
  • [2] N.U. Zitzmann, C.P. Marinello, Implant-supported removable overdentures in the edentulous maxilla: clinical and technical aspects, International Journal of Prosthodontics 12 (1999) 385-390.
  • [3] A. Schmitt, G.A Zarb, The notion of implant-supported overdentures, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 79 (1998) 60-65.
  • [4] R. Mericske-Stern, G.A. Zarb, Overdentures: an alternative implant methodology for edentulous patients, International Journal of Prosthodontics 6/2 (1993) 203-208.
  • [5] The McGill consensus statement on overdenture, Quintessence International 34/1 (2003) 78-79.
  • [6] J.N. Walton, A randomized clinical trial comparing two mandibular implant overdenture designs: 3-year prosthetic outcomes using a six-field protocol, International Journal of Prosthodontics 16 (2003) 255-260.
  • [7] M. Hooghe, I. Naert, Implant supported overdentures-the Leuven experience, Journal of Dentistry 25/1 (1997) 25-32.
  • [8] P.F. Allen, A.S. McMillan, D.G. Smith, Complications and maintenance requirements of implant-supported prostheses provided in a UK dental hospital, British Dental Journal 182 (1997) 298-302.
  • [9] R.M. Watson, T. Jemt, J. Chai, J. Harnett, M.R. Heath, J.E. Hutton, et al., Prosthodontic treatment, patient response, and the need for maintenance of complete implant-supported overdentures: an appraisal of 5 years of prospective study, International Journal of Prosthodontics 10 (1997) 345-354.
  • [10] M. Behr, R. Lang, A. Leibrook, M. Rosentritt, G. Handel, Complication rate with prosthodontic reconstructions on ITI and IMZ dental implants, Clinical Oral Implants Research 9 (1998) 51-58.
  • [11] E. Klemetti, A. Chehade, Y. Takanashi, J.S. Feine, Two-implant mandibular overdentures: simple to fabricate and easy to wear, Journal of the Canadian Dental Association 69/1 (2003) 29-33.
  • [12] J.N. Walton, M.I. MacEntee, Problems with prostheses on implants: A retrospective study, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 71 (1994) 283-288.
  • [13] A. Ekfeldt, L.A. Johansson, S. Isaksson, Implant-supported overdenture therapy: a retrospective study, International Journal of Prosthodontics 10 (1997) 366-374.
  • [14] T. Trakas, K. Michalakis, K. Kang, H. Hirayama, Attachment systems for implant retained overdentures: a literature review, Implant Dentistry 15 (2006) 24-34.
  • [15] T.C. Griffins, C.P. Collins, P.C. Collins, Mini dental implants: an adjunct for retention, stability, and comfort for the edentulous patent, Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology 100 (2005) e81-e84.
  • [16] A. Ziółkowska, M. Rybicki, Mini-implants – application in implantoprosthetics with particular focus on long-term loading. Literature review, Implantoprotetyka VII/4 (2006) 47-49.
  • [17] P. Vigolo, A. Givani, Clinical evaluation of single-tooth mini implant restoration: a five-year retrospective study, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 84 (2000) 50-54.
  • [18] O. C. Dilek, E. Tezulas, Treatment of a narrow, single tooth edentulous area with minidental implants: a clinical report, Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology 103 (2007) e22-e25.
  • [19] B. Balkin, D. Steflik, F. Naval, Mini-dental implant insertion with the auto-advance technique for ongoing applications, Journal of Oral Implantology 27 (2001) 32-37.
  • [20] H.F. El’Sheikh, B.J. MacDonald, M.S.J. Hasami, Finite element simulation of the hip joint during stumbling: a comparison between static and dynamic loading, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 143–144 (2003) 249-255.
  • [21] A. Ziębowicz, J. Marciniak, The use of miniplates in mandibular fractures-biomechanical analysis. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 175 (2006) 452-456.
  • [22] F. Nabhani, M. Wake, Computer modelling and stress analysis of the lumbar spine, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 127 (2002) 40-47.
  • [23] J. Okrajni, M. Plaza, S. Ziemba, Computer modelling of the heat flow in surgical cement during endoprosthesoplasty, Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering 20 (2007) 311-314.
  • [24] J. Żmudzki, W. Chladek, Identification of biomechanics related to single implant-retained tissue-supported dentures, Protetyka Stomatologiczna LX,1 (2010) 17-22.
  • [25] G. Cordioli, Z. Majzoub, S. Castagna, Mandibular overdentures anchored to single implants: A five-year prospective study, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 78 (1997) 159-165.
  • [26] G.J. Liddelow, P.J. Henry, A prospective study of immediately loaded single implant-retained mandibular overdentures: Preliminary one-year results, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 97 (2007) S126-S137.
  • [27] R. Kenney, MW. Richards, Photoelastic stress patterns produced by implant-retained overdentures, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 80 (1998) 559-564.
  • [28] H.J. Chun, D.N. Park, C.H. Han, S.J. Heo, M.S. Heo, J.Y. Koak, Stress distributions in maxillary bone surrounding overdenture implants with different overdenture attachments, Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 32/3 (2005) 193-205.
  • [29] W. Chladek, S. Majewski, J. Zmudzki, J. Krukowska, The mechanical conditions of the functionality of choosing implant-dentures constructions - model investigations. Implantoprotetyka 2 (2003) 3-10 (in Polish).
  • [30] H. Van Oosterwyck, J. Duyck, J. Vander Sloten, G. Van der Perre, M. De Cooman, S. Lievens, R. Puers, I. Naert, The influence of bone mechanical properties and implant fixation upon bone loading around oral implants, Clinical Oral Implants Research 9 (1998) 407-418.
  • [31] S. Szmukler-Moncler, H. Salama, Y. Reingewirtz, J.H. Dubruille, Timing of loading and effect of micromotion on bone-dental implant interface: review of experimental literature, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 43 (1998) 192-203.
  • [32] R. Boyer, G. Welsch, E.W. Collins, Materials Properties Handbook: Titanium Alloys, ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 1994.
  • [33] W. Chladek, Engineering Biomechanics of the Mastication Organ. Selected Problems, Monograph nr 165, Gliwice, 2008, 174 (in Polish).
  • [34] V.C. Mow, R. Huiskes, Basic Orthopaedic Biomechanics and Mechano-Biology, 3rd ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005, 136-137.
  • [35] J. Żmudzki, W. Chadek, Elastic silicone matrices as a tool for load relief in overdenture implants, Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics 10/4 (2008) 1-8.
  • [36] W. Chladek, G. Chladek, T. Lipski, J. Margielewicz, J. Żmudzki, Biomechanical Problems Related to Design of Implantological Overdenture Stabilization System, Silesian University of Technology Press, Gliwice, 2008 (in Polish).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-3b342ee0-a6cf-407a-87cc-8c0f8e57a91d
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.