In search of excellence in organizational strategy formation in the context of deterministic chaos: the case of Grupa Azoty

• Autorzy: Chojnacka Małgorzata

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2023.172.6

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: This article addresses the challenge of creating an excellent strategy under nonlinear conditions, focusing on understanding the unique features and values of the 2021-2030 strategy. The framework for shaping the organization's future is presented through the case of Grupa Azoty Capital Group's strategy. Project/methodology/approach: To achieve this goal, a literature review and examination of the selected strategy were conducted. Grupa Azoty served as an autotelic case study. The research method employed allowed for a depiction of the analysed unit. The case study offers potential for adequately achieving the set boundaries of knowledge, which is particularly important in an era of nuanced phenomena. The choice of research methodology was dictated by the need to examine a specific group of organizations and the subject of interest, enabling the identification of unique features and values of the analysed Capital Group. The conceptual elements of the case were diagnostic (how is it?), symptomatic (why is it so?), and intervention- related (what to do?). Findings: It was recognized that the challenge of today's world lies in the constant redefinition of fundamental truths, given that the era of continuity and high predictability of the environment has ended. The importance of social, technological, and environmental determinants and their impact on organizational strategy formation was acknowledged. The case study revealed several changes that needed to be implemented for the Capital Group's development. Grupa Azoty's 2021-2030 strategy confirms the priority of climate and energy transformation, the necessity for investment in innovation, and the importance of environmentally friendly solutions and products. Limitations/research implications: Future research on the influence of the environment on organizational strategy formation seems justified. Efforts to verify the level of achievement of intended goals also appear appropriate. Moreover, it is valuable to explore the performative dimension of the strategy on Grupa Azoty's employees and stakeholders. Practical implications: Individuals responsible for improving organizational strategy should continue to monitor emerging development perspectives in the environment. Regulatory changes resulting from the European Union's intentions, which aim to achieve beneficial social effects through establishing a set of sustainable development goals, warrant particular attention. The actions of the EU (the directives and regulations it creates) can significantly influence the strategy of a specific enterprise. Originality/value: The article allowed for the identification of unique features and values embedded in Grupa Azoty's strategy, serving as a starting point for further explorations. The analysis of the content may be helpful in formulating strategies for other organizations, particularly those operating in the dynamically changing landscape of the chemical industry.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

organization strategy; future of organization; case study

PL

strategia organizacji; przyszłość organizacji; studium przypadku

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: z. 172
• Strony: 89--107
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 68 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Chojnacka Małgorzata

• Jakub of Paradyż Academy in Gorzów Wielkopolski

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6715-0650

Bibliografia

• 1. Artto, K., Martinsuo, M., Dietrich, P., Kujala, J. (2008). Project strategy: strategy types and their contents in innovation projects. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 1(1), pp. 49-70. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538370810846414.
• 2. Balogun, J., Hailey, V.H., Bailey, A. (2015). Exploring Strategic Change 4th edn PDF eBook. Pearson Higher Ed.
• 3. Baran, M. (2021). Struktura procesu badawczego. In: E. Sułkowski, R. Lenart-Gansiniec, K. Kolasińska-Morawska (eds.), Metody badań ilościowych w zarządzaniu (pp. 25-48). Łódź: Wydawnictwo Społecznej Akademii Nauk.
• 4. Bartncki, M., Kordel, P. (2002). Zaufanie a dialektyka procesu tworzenia strategii w przedsiębiorstwie. Przegląd Organizacji, no. 9, pp. 7-10.
• 5. Bartnicki, M. (2009). Strategiczna rola przedsiębiorczości w kształtowaniu rozwoju organizacji. In: R. Krupski (ed.), Zarządzanie strategiczne. Problemy, kierunki badań (pp. 49-62). Wałbrzych: Wałbrzyska Wyższa Szkoła Zarządzania i Przedsiębiorczości.
• 6. Brönneke, J.B., Hagen, J., Kircher, P., Matthies, H. (2021). Digitized healthcare in 2030 a possible scenario. Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz. Open Access, Vol. 64, Iss. 10, pp. 1285-1291. DOI: 10.1007/s00103-021-03416-8.
• 7. Brown, S., Eisenhardt, K. (1998). Competing on the edge. Strategy as structured chaos. Harvard Business Review Press.
• 8. Brown, S.L., Brown, S.I., Brown, S.L., Eisenhardt, K.M. (1998). Competing on the edge: Strategy as structured chaos. Harvard Business Press.
• 9. Brzeziński, J. (1997). Metodologia badań psychologicznych. Warszawa: PWN.
• 10. Chojnacka, M. (2013.) Założenia społecznej odpowiedzialności biznesu w warunkach nowej gospodarki. In: J. Rossa, M. Chojnacka (eds.), Społeczna odpowiedzialność biznesu. Studia i Prace Wydziału Ekonomicznego, nr 4. Gorzów Wielkopolski.
• 11. Chojnacka, M. (2021). Organizacja przyszłości. Gorzów Wielkopolski: Wydawnictwo Akademii im. Jakuba z Paradyża.
• 12. Clegg, S.R., Cunha da, J.V., Cunha e, M.P. (2002). Management paradoxes: A relational view. Human Relations, 55(5), pp. 483-502.
• 13. Czakon, W. (2021). Krótkowzroczność strategiczna menedżerów. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
• 14. Czarniawska, B. (2010). Trochę inna teoria organizacji. Organizowanie jako konstrukcja sieci działań. Warszawa.
• 15. Czarniawska, B. (2018). On Meshworks and Other Complications of Portraying. Contemporary Organizing. In: L. Garseth-Nesbakk, F. Mellemvik (Eds.), Dealing with Expectations and Traditions in Research (pp. 109-127). Oslo: Cappelen Damm Akademisk. https://doi.org/10.23865/noasp.42.ch7.
• 16. Degen, J., Tonhauser J. (2022). Prior Beliefs Modulate Projection. Open Mind, 5, pp. 59-70. https://doi.org/10.1162/opmi_a_00042.
• 17. Dougherty, D., Dunne, D.D. (2011). Organizing ecologies of complex innovation. Organization science, 22(5), pp. 1214-1223.
• 18. Drucker, P.F. (1995). Zarządzanie w burzliwych czasach. Kraków: Akademia Ekonomiczna.
• 19. Dylewski, M., Marek, S. (2013). Wstęp. In: M. Dylewski, S. Marek (eds.), Zarządzanie organizacją w zmiennym otoczeniu (pp. 9-10). Studia Zarządzania i Finansów Wyższej Szkoły Bankowej w Poznaniu, nr 4.
• 20. Eriksson-Zetterquist, U. (2019). The (RE?) emergence of new ideas in the field of organizational studies. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 59, pp. 123-139.
• 21. Fjeldstad, 0.D., Snow, C.C., Miles, R.E., Lettl, C. (2012). The architecture of collaboration. Strategic management journal, 33(6), pp. 734750. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1968.
• 22. George, C. (1995). The endorsement of the premises: Assumption-based or belief-based reasoning. British Journal of Psychology, 86, pp. 93-111, doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1995.tb02548.x.
• 23. Goranczewski, B., Szeliga-Duchnowska, A. (2021). Motivational Impact of Environmental Management on the Environmental Awareness in a Workplace. European Research Studies Journal, Vol. XXIV, Iss. 2B, pp. 443-455, DOI: 10.35808/2244.
• 24. Goranczewski, B. (2018). Klient wewnętrzny organizacyjne zachowania obywatelskie. Perspektywa humanistyczna. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
• 25. Graebner, M.E., Knott, A.M., Lieberman, M.B., Mitchell, W. (2023). Empirical inquiry without hypotheses: A question- driven, phenomenon- based approach to strategic management research. Strategic Management Journal, 44(1), pp. 3-10.
• 26. Gruszczyńska-Malec, G., Waligóra, Ł. (2017). Paradoksy eksploatacji i eksploracji w zarządzaniu różnorodnością w organizacjach. Edukacja Ekonomistów i Menedżerów, 3(45), pp. 23-36.
• 27. Hamel, G., Breen, B. (2007). The Future of Management. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
• 28. Haniff, A.P., Galloway, L. (2022). Modeling strategic alignment in project networks. International Journal of Project Management, 40(5), pp. 517-530.
• 29. Harikkala-Laihinen, R. (2022). Hooked on a feeling? An interpretive study of organizational identity (dis) continuity during strategic change programmes. International Journal of Project Management, 40(3), pp. 262-277.
• 30. Huy, Q.N., Corley, K.G., Kraatz, M.S. (2014). From support to mutiny: Shifting legitimacy judgments and emotional reactions impacting the implementation of radical change. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), pp. 1650-1680.
• 31. Janasz, K., Janasz, W. (2014). Myślenie strategiczne w długookresowej strategii rozwoju organizacji. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Studia i Prace Wydziału Nauk Ekonomicznych i Zarządzania, nr 38, T. 1, pp. 43-55.
• 32. Kądzielawski, G., Goranczewski, B. (2022). Przesłanki integracji systemów ISO14001 oraz ISO 50001 w przedsiębiorstwie chemicznym. Przemysł Chemiczny, 101(10), pp. 775-779, DOI: 10.15199/62.2022.10.4.
• 33. Ketchen Jr, D.J., Boyd, B.K., Bergh, D.D. (2008). Research methodology in strategic management: Past accomplishments and future challenges. Organizational Research Methods, 11(4), pp. 643-658.
• 34. Klessova, S., Thomas, C., Engell, S. (2020). Structuring inter-organizational R&D projects: Towards a better understanding of the project architecture as an interplay between activity coordination and knowledge integration. International Journal of Project Management, 38(5), pp. 291-306.
• 35. Koehler, J.J. (1993). The Influence of Prior Beliefs on Scientific Judgments of Evidence Quality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 56, Iss. 1, pp. 28-55, https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1993.1044.
• 36. Kriegel, J., Rissbacher, C. (2022). Digital maturity of hospital care - Current situation and management options for digital transformation in Austrian hospitals [Digitaler Reifegrad der Krankenhausversorgung - Ausgangssituation und Handlungsoptionen für eine forcierte digitale Transformation in österreichischen Krankenhäusern] Gesundheitsokonomie und Qualitatsmanagement, 1, pp. 4-59. DOI: 10.1055/a-1951-8197.
• 37. Lack, C.W., Rousseau, J. (2022). Mental health, Pop Psychology, and the Misunderstanding of clinical psychology. Reference Module in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Psychology. Comprehensive Clinical Psychology, Vol. 11, pp. 47-62, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818697-8.00052-2.
• 38. Lee, B., Saunders, M. (2017). Examples of Orthodox and Emergent Case Studies. SAGE Publications Ltd., https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781529716702.
• 39. Lehtonen, P., Martinsuo, M. (2009). Integrating the change program with the parent organization. International Journal of Project Management, 27(2), pp. 154-165.
• 40. Lewis, M.W. (2000). Exploring Paradox: Toward a More Comprehensive Guide. Academy ofManagement Review, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 760-776.
• 41. Lisiecka, K., Kostka-Bochenek, A. (2009). Case study research jako metoda badań naukowych. Przegląd Organizacji, nr 10, pp. 25-29.
• 42. Livengood, R.S., Reger, R.K. (2010). This is our plot! Identity domains and competitive dynamics. Management Academy Review, 35(1), pp. 48-66.
• 43. Luck, L., Jackson, D., Usher, K. (2006). Case study: a bridge across the paradigms. Nursing inquiry, 13 (2), pp. 103-109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1800.2006.00309.x.
• 44. Luoma, M. (2015). Revisiting the Strategy-Performance Linkage: An Application of an Empirically Derived Typology of Strategy Content Areas. Management Decision, 53(5), pp. 1083-1106.
• 45. Markovits, H., Nantel, G. (1989). The belief-bias effect in the production and evaluation of logical conclusions. Memory & cognition, 17(1), pp. 11-17.
• 46. Markowski, M.P. (2001). Interpretacja Literaturowa. Teksty Drugie, 5, pp. 50-60.
• 47. Martinsuo, M, Teerikangas, S., Stensaker, I, Meredith, J. (2022). Editorial: Managing strategic projects and programs in and between organizations. International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 40, Iss. 5, pp 499-504, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman. 2022.06.003.
• 48. Méndez-Sánchez, N., Fassio, E., Pal, S.C. (2023). Interpretive bias on research evidence, Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. Annals of hepatology, Vol. 28, https://doi.org/10.1016/_j.aohep.2022.100884.
• 49. Nag, R., Hambrick, D.C., Chen, M.J. (2007). What is strategic management, really? Inductive derivation of a consensus definition of the field. Strategic management journal, 28(9), pp. 935-955.
• 50. Nickerson, R.S. (1998). Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises. Review of General Psychology, 2, pp. 1175-220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175.
• 51. Nisula, A.M., Blomqvist, K., Bergman, J.P., Yrjölä, S. (2022). Organizing for knowledge creation in a strategic interorganizational innovation project. International Journal of Project Management, 40(4) pp. 398-410. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.03.011.
• 52. Nowosielski, R., Spilka, M., Kania, A. (2010). Zarządzanie środowiskowe i systemy zarządzania środowiskowego. Gliwice: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej.
• 53. Polowczyk, J. (2022). Paradoksy w zarządzaniu strategicznym. Podejście ewolucyjno-behawioralne. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego. https://doi.org/ 10.18559/978-83-8211-108-8.
• 54. Putnam, L.L., Fairhurst, G.T., Banghart, S. (2016). Contradictions, Dialectics, and Paradoxes in Organizations: A Constitutive Approach. Academy of Management Annals, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 65-171.
• 55. Rosenberg, J.P., Yates, P.M. (2007). Schematic representation of case study research designs. Journal of advanced nursing, 60(4), pp. 447-452. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04385.x.
• 56. Sahlin, K., Eriksson-Zetterquist, U. (2016). Collegiality in modern universities -the composition of governance ideals and practices. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 2-3, DOI: 10.3402/nstep.v2.33640.
• 57. Schad, J., Lewis, M.W., Smith, W.K. (2019). Quo vadis, paradox? Centripetal and centrifugal forces in theory development. Strategic Organization, 17(1), pp. 107-119.
• 58. Schoemaker, P.J., Heaton, S., Teece, D. (2018). Innovation, dynamic capabilities, and leadership. California management review, 61(1), pp. 15-42.
• 59. Smith, W.K., Lewis, M.W. (2011). Towards a Theory of Paradox: A Dynamic Equilibrium Model of Organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), pp. 381-403.
• 60. Sperry, L., Sperry, J.J. (2020). Core competencies: mastering this competency with ease and confidence. New York-London: Routledge Taylor & Francis.
• 61. Stake, R. (2009). Jakościowe studium przypadku. In: N.K. Denzin, Y.S. Lincoln (eds.), Metody badań jakościowych (pp. 623-654). Warszawa: PWN.
• 62. Stensaker, I. (2011). Using Projects to Implement Change. In: H.L. Colman, I. Stensakerog, J.E. Tharaldsen (eds.), A Merger of Equals? The Integration of Statoil and Hydro's Oil and Gas Activities (pp. 53-65).
• 63. Willems, T., van Marrewijk, A., Kuitert, L., Volker, L., Hermans, M. (2020). Practices of isolation: The shaping of project autonomy in innovation projects. International journal of project management, 38(4), pp. 215-228.
• 64. Wojcik, P., Obloj, K., Buono, A.F. (2021). A Cross-Sector Study of Co-Creating Social Responsibility Capability. Proceedings Academy of Management, No 1. doi/10.5465/AMBPP.2021.10704abstract.
• 65. Wojtczuk-Turek, A. (2015). Artefakty w badaniach jakościowych w naukach o zarządzaniu - wybrane problemy. Organizacja i Kierowanie, nr 2(167), pp. 11-36.
• 66. Yu, Xb (2021). Fundamental Elements of the Strategy Concept. In: The Fundamental Elements of Strategy. Management for Professionals. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981 -33-4713-7_3.
• 67. Zarębska, J. (2017). Gospodarka o obiegu zamkniętym drogą do zrównoważonego rozwoju. Systems Supporting Production Engineering, 6(7), pp. 286-295.
• 68. Zarębska, J., Żabińska, I., Zarębski, A. (2019). Eco-innovations in Poland - the extent of changes, development and barriers. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology - Organization and Management Series no. 135, pp. 245-256 http://dx.doi.org/10.29119/ 1641-3466.2019.135.19.