Barriers to knowledge sharing in the field of information security

• Autorzy: Żywiołek Justyna , Rosak-Szyrocka Joanna , Jereb Borut

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/mspe-2021-0015

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Today, sharing knowledge requires taking into account many aspects. Variable environmental conditions, the people factor, and the security of resources are just a few that should be considered for a noticeable improvement in the functioning of the company. Supporting this course of action requires the identification of all barriers that may exist in the enterprise. Only the owner and senior management by establishing system and organizational changes can influence this element of the business. The aim of the article is to indicate the problems in this respect that block the proper functioning of the company in the field of information and knowledge exchange. The survey was conducted with the help of a questionnaire among 189 respondents. The industry has significantly decreased in the last few decades, currently there are 307 companies operating in Poland. Conclusions from the conducted research were collected on the basis of a questionnaire survey. The further stage of the research will be to compare the collected results with the results from Western European countries.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

knowledge sharing; information security; knowledge management

• Wydawca: STE GROUP
• Czasopismo: Management Systems in Production Engineering
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: nr 2 (29)
• Strony: 114--119
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 34 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Żywiołek Justyna

• Czestochowa University of Technology Faculty of Management ul. Dąbrowskiego 69, 42-201 Częstochowa, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0407-0826

autor

Rosak-Szyrocka Joanna

• Czestochowa University of Technology Faculty of Management ul. Dąbrowskiego 69, 42-201 Częstochowa, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5548-6787

autor

Jereb Borut

• University of Maribor Faculty of Logistics Maribor, Slovenia

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5104-0852

Bibliografia

• [1] J. Żywiołek, “Monitoring of information security system elements in the metallurgical enterprises,” MATEC Web Conf., vol. 183, p. 1007, 2018, doi: 10.1051/matecconf/201818301007.
• [2] R. Merlo, “Factors Influencing Knowledge Management Use in Technology Enterprises in Southern United States,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 15-35, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.098.
• [3] A.M. Abubakar, H. Elrehail, M.A. Alatailat, and A. Elçi, “Knowledge management, decision-making style and organizational performance,” Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 104-114, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2017.07.003.
• [4] A.S. Aydiner, E. Tatoglu, E. Bayraktar, and S. Zaim, “Information system capabilities and firm performance: Opening the black box through decision-making performance and business-process performance,” International Journal of Information Management, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 168-182, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.12.015.
• [5] M. Hamdoun, C.J. Chiappetta Jabbour, and H. Ben Othman, “Knowledge transfer and organizational innovation: Impacts of quality and environmental management,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 193, no. 2, pp. 759-770, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.031.
• [6] V. Tkachenko, M. Klymchuk, and I. Tkachenko, “Recursive and Convergence Methodology of the Investment Management of the Enterprise Digitalization Processes,” Management Systems in Production Engineering, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 14-19, 2021, doi: 10.2478/mspe-2021-0002.
• [7] J. Pietraszek, N. Radek, and A.V. Goroshko, “Challenges for the DOE methodology related to the introduction of Industry 4.0,” Production Engineering Archives, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 190-194, 2020, doi: 10.30657/pea.2020.26.33.
• [8] M.-H. Wang and T.-Y. Yang, “Investigating the success of knowledge management: An empirical study of small- and medium-sized enterprises,” Asia Pacific Management Review, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 79-91, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.apmrv.2015.12.003.
• [9] M. Matuszny, “Building decision trees based on production knowledge as support in decision-making process,” Production Engineering Archives, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 36-40, 2020, doi: 10.30657/pea.2020.26.08.
• [10] P. Mandal and K. Bagchi, “Strategic role of information, knowledge and technology in manufacturing industry performance,” Industrial Management & Data Systems, vol. 116, no. 6, pp. 1259-1278, 2016, doi: 10.1108/IMDS-07- 2015-0297.
• [11] R. Falcone and C. Castelfranchi, “Trust and relational capital,” Comput Math Organ Theory, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 402- 418, 2011, doi: 10.1007/s10588-011-9095-5.
• [12] M. Ingaldi and R. Ulewicz, “How to Make E-Commerce More Successful by Use of Kano’s Model to Assess Customer Satisfaction in Terms of Sustainable Development,” Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 18, p. 4830, 2019, doi: 10.3390/su11184830.
• [13] J. Żywiołek and E. Nedeliaková, “Personal Data Protection as an Element of Competitive Advantage,” System Safety: Human - Technical Facility - Environment, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 55-61, 2020, doi: 10.2478/czoto-2020-0008.
• [14] K. Wojtasik, “New Impulse, New Challenges. Safety Procedures in a Production Enterprise. A Case Study,” System Safety: Human - Technical Facility - Environment, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 26-32, 2020, doi: 10.2478/czoto-2020-0004.
• [15] M. Suchacka, “Corporate Digital Responsibility – A New Dimension of the Human – Technology Relations,” System Safety: Human - Technical Facility - Environment, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1-8, 2020, doi: 10.2478/czoto-2020-0001.
• [16] K. Kowalik, “The role of safety in service quality in the opinion of traditional and digital customers of postal service,” Production Engineering Archives, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1-4, 2020, doi: 10.30657/pea.2020.26.01.
• [17] M. Krynke and K. Mielczarek, “Applications of linear programming to optimize the cost-benefit criterion in production processes,” MATEC Web Conf., vol. 183, p. 4004, 2018, doi: 10.1051/matecconf/201818304004.
• [18] M. Krynke, “Application of linear programming in supply chain management in the foundry,” Proceedings 29th International Conference on Metallurgy and Materials, Brno, Czech Republic, EU, May 20-22, 2020, pp. 1280-1286, doi: 10.37904/metal.2020.3648.
• [19] K.Z. Zhou and C.B. Li, “How knowledge affects radical innovation: Knowledge base, market knowledge acquisition, and internal knowledge sharing,” Strat. Mgmt. J., vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 1090-1102, 2012, doi: 10.1002/smj.1959.
• [20] O.O. Durodolu, “Technology Acceptance Model as a predictor ofusing information system’ to acquire informationliteracy skills,” Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 2016.
• [21] L. Bloice and S. Burnett, “Barriers to knowledge sharing in third sector social care: a case study,” Journal of Knowledge Management, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 125-145, 2016, doi: 10.1108/JKM-12-2014-0495.
• [22] D. Klimecka-Tatar and M. Ingaldi, “How to indicate the areas for improvement in service process - the Knowledge Management and Value Stream Mapping as the crucial elements of the business approach,” G&T, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 52-74, 2020, doi: 10.20397/2177-6652/2020.v20i2.1878.
• [23] D. Klimecka-Tatar and M. Niciejewska, “Small-sized enterprises management in the aspect of organizational culture,” Revista Gestão & Tecnologia - -Journal of Management and Technology, vol. 1, pp. 4-24, 2021, doi: 10.20397/2177-6652/2021.v21i1.2023.
• [24] A. Wiewiora, B. Trigunarsyah, G. Murphy, and V. Coffey, “Organizational culture and willingness to share knowledge: A competing values perspective in Australian context,” International Journal of Project Management, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 1163-1174, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.12.014.
• [25] P. Brangetto and M. Kert-Saint, Economic aspects of national cyber security strategies: Project Report, 2015.
• [26] E. Cahyaningsih, D.I. Sensuse, A.M. Arymurthy, and W.C. Wibowo, “NUSANTARA: A New Model of Knowledge Management in Government Human Capital Management,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 124, pp. 61-68, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2017.12.130.
• [27] N. Carvalho and I. Gomes, “Knowledge Sharing between Enterprises of the Same Group,” International Journal of Knowledge Management, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 34-52, 2017, doi: 10.4018/IJKM.2017010103.
• [28] S. d. A. Pereira and L. Quoniam, “Intellectual property and patent prospecting as a basis for knowledge and innovation – a study on mobile information technologies and virtual processes of communication and management,” RAI Revista de Administração e Inovação, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 301-310, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.rai.2017.07.006.
• [29] R.H. Shroff, C.C. Deneen, and E.M. W. Ng, “Analysis of the technology acceptance model in examining students' behavioural intention to use an e-portfolio system,” AJET, vol. 27, no. 4, 2011, doi: 10.14742/ajet.940.
• [30] C. Liyanage, T. Elhag, T. Ballal, and Q. Li, “Knowledge communication and translation – a knowledge transfer model,” Journal of Knowledge Management, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 118-131, 2009, doi: 10.1108/13673270910962914.
• [31] K. Haufe, R. Colomo-Palacios, S. Dzombeta, and K. Brandis, “A process framework for information security management,” International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management, vol. 4, no. 4, 2016, doi: 10.12821/ijispm040402.
• [32] A. Ganguly, D. Chatterjee, and J.V. Farr, “Evaluating Barriers To Knowledge Sharing Affecting New Product Development Team Performance,” International Journal of Innovation Management, vol. 22, no. 06, p. 1850048, 2018, doi: 10.1142/S1363919618500482.
• [33] M. Ingaldi and D. Klimecka-Tatar, “People’s Attitude to Energy from Hydrogen – From the Point of View of Modern Energy Technologies and Social Responsibility,” Energies, vol. 13, no. 24, p. 6495, 2020, doi: 10.3390/en13246495.
• [34] P. Hong, W.J. Doll, E. Revilla, and A.Y. Nahm, “Knowledge sharing and strategic fit in integrated product development proejcts: An empirical study,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 132, no. 2, pp. 186-196, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.04.004.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).