Functions and forms of managerial communication

• Autorzy: Vladutescu S. , Budica I. , Dumitru A. , Stanescu G. C.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Funkcje i formy komunikacji zarządczej

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This study is circumscribed to the domain of organizational communication and it is located within the specific field of managerial communication. It aims to clarify the purpose, functions and forms of managerial communication. The central approach is one of clarification and classification; in this respect, the approach is one of ontology of managerial communication (ontology includes vocabulary, terminology, classifications and typologies of a knowledge field). The research method that is used is complex and consists of a mix of meta-analytic procedures, procedures for collation, corroboration and synthesis procedures. Specialty literature is subject to a radiographic view in order to delineate ideas, opinions and theses related to the topic. Finally, our contribution consists of a) revealing, that managerial communication fulfills seven functions (information, decision transmission, influence, instruction, image, motivation, promotion) and c) in emphasizing that managerial communication is presented under seven forms (internal, external, vertical, horizontal, diagonal, linear, bipolar, and network communication).

PL

Badanie to ograniczone jest do dziedziny komunikacji organizacyjnej i usytuowane jest w konkretnym obszarze komunikacji zarządczej. Ma ono na celu wyjaśnienie celów, funkcji i formy komunikacji zarządczej. Główne podejście jest jednym z wyjaśnień i klasyfikacji; w tym zakresie, podejście jest jedną z ontologii komunikacji zarządczej (ontologia obejmuje słownictwo, terminologię, klasyfikacje i typologie pola wiedzy). Użyta metoda badania jest złożona i składa się z kombinacji meta-procedur analitycznych, procedur porównywania, potwierdzania i syntezy. Literatura specjalności jest przedmiotem radiograficznego widzenia w celu wytyczenia pomysłów, opinii i tez związanych z tematem. Ostatecznie nasz wkład składa się z: ujawnienia, że komunikacja zarządcza spełnia siedem funkcji (informacyjną, przekazywania decyzji, wpływu, nauki, obrazu, motywacji, promocji) oraz podkreślenia, że komunikacja zarządcza prezentowana jest w siedmiu postaciach (wewnętrzna, zewnętrzna, pionowa, pozioma, ukośna, liniowa, bipolarna i komunikacja sieciowa).

Słowa kluczowe

EN

organizational communication; managerial communication; purpose; functions; forms

PL

komunikacja organizacyjna; komunikacja zarządcza; cel; funkcje; formy

• Wydawca: Czestochowa University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Management Studies
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: Vol. 12, No. 2
• Strony: 191--201
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 33 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Vladutescu S.

• University of Craiova

autor

Budica I.

• University of Craiova

autor

Dumitru A.

• University of Craiova

autor

Stanescu G. C.

• University of Craiova

Bibliografia

• 1. Ahmed Z., Shields F., White R., Wilbert J., 2010, Managerial communication: the link between frontline leadership and organizational performance, “Journal of Organizational Culture, Communications & Conflict”, 14(1).
• 2. Bell R.L., Martin J.S., 2014, Managerial Communication. Business Expert Press.
• 3. Bell R.L., Roebuck D., 2015, An Increasing Usefulness for Managerial Communication Research on the Main Topics of Management, Available at SSRN 2552340.
• 4. Budică I., Dumitru-Traistaru A., 2015, The Ascending Trend of Environmental Marketing in the Current Austerity/Crisis Period, “Polish Journal of Environmental Studies”, 24(5).
• 5. Cerban M., 2012, A functional interpretation of grammatical metaphor, “Analele Universităţii din Craiova. Seria Ştiinţe Filologice. Lingvistică”, 1-2.
• 6. Cooren F., Kuhn T., Cornelissen J.P., Clark T., 2011, Communication, organizing and organization: An overview and introduction to the special issue, “Organization Studies”, 32(9).
• 7. Craig R.T., 2015, The Constitutive Metamodel: A 16-Year Review, “Communication Theory”, 25(4).
• 8. Fayol H., 1949, General and industrial management, Pitman, London
• 9. Ferencová M., Jeleňová I., Kakalejčík L., 2015, Social Media Usage in Product Information Searching, “Applied Mechanics and Materials”, 795.
• 10. Grabara J., Man M., 2014, Assessment of logistic outlays in industrial solid waste management, “Social Sciences and Education Research Review”, 1(2).
• 11. Grabara I., 2014, The Innovative Methods of Future Professional Staff Education, “Polish Journal of Management Studies”, 10(1).
• 12. Grandien C., Johansson C., 2012, Institutionalization of communication management: A theoretical framework, “Corporate Communications: An International Journal”, 17(2).
• 13. Grunig J.E., 2013, Excellence in public relations and communication management, Routledge.
• 14. Hynes G.E., 2005, Managerial communication: Strategies and applications, McGraw-Hill.
• 15. Ionescu A., 2010, Marqueurs évidentiels dans la presse écrite roumaine, communication présentée au XXVIe Congrès de Philologie et de Linguistique Romane, Valence, Espagne, 06-11 septembre 2010.
• 16. Kot S., Pigoń Ł., 2014, Effective Occupational Counselling for the Unemployed, “Polish Journal of Management Studies”, 10(1).
• 17. Morrison E.W., Milliken F.J., 2000, Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world, “Academy of Management Review”, 25(4).
• 18. Munter M., 1992, Guide to managerial communication, Pearson Education India.
• 19. Negrea X., 2015, Public Interest, Procedural and Discursive Limitations, “Social Sciences and Education Research Review”, 2(1).
• 20. Neher W.W., 1997, Organizational Communication – Challenges of Change, Diversity, and Continuity, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
• 21. Nothhaft H., 2010, Communication management as a second-order management function: Roles and functions of the communication executive-results from a shadowing study, “Journal of Communication Management”, 14(2).
• 22. Robertson E., 2005, Placing leaders at the heart of organizational communication - As a tribute to Ed Robertson, a return to the Managerial Communication Climate Model shared in SCM in January 1997, an approach as “Strategic Communication Management”, 9(5).
• 23. Ruck K., Welch M., 2012, Valuing internal communication; management and employee perspectives, “Public Relations Review”, 38(2).
• 24. Seeger M.W., Sellnow T.L., Ulmer R.R., 2012, 6 Communication, Organization, and Crisis, “Communication yearbook”, 21.
• 25. Smarandache F., Vlăduțescu Ș., 2014, Towards a Practical Communication Intervention, “Revista de cercetare şi intervenţie socială", 46.
• 26. Smeltzer L.R., Hynes G.E., 1994, Managerial communication: Strategies and applications, Tata McGraw-Hill Education.
• 27. Smeltzer L., Glab J., Golen S., Gilsdorf J., 1986, A model for managerial communication, “Business Communication Quarterly”, 49(3).
• 28. Stan N.R., 2015, Fr Dumitru Stăniloae on Dogmatic Development, “Sobornost Incorporating Eastern Churches Review”, 36(2).
• 29. Stănescu G.C., 2015, Breaking News and News Alert, between Information and Spectacle for Rating, “Social Sciences and Education Research Review”, 2(2).
• 30. Teodorescu B., Călin R.-A., 2015, The Base Articulations of the Liminality Concept, “Review of European Studies”, 7(12).
• 31. Van Ruler B., Vercic D., 2005, Reflective communication management, future ways for public relations research, “Communication yearbook”, 29.
• 32. Vasile E., Grabara I., 2014, Agricultural exploitation from the perspective of Romania’s integration into the European Union, “Polish Journal of Management Studies”, 10(2).
• 33. Voinea D.V., 2015, The journalists’ obligation of protecting the victims of sexual assault, “Social Sciences and Education Research Review”, 2(1).