Financial, spatial and systemic determinants of ESG scoring assigned to commercial banks

• Autorzy: Gospodarowicz Marcin , Korzeb Zbigniew , Niedziółka Paweł , Torre de la Antonio

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.34659/eis.2023.87.4.686

Warianty tytułu

PL

Finansowe, przestrzenne i systemowe determinanty scoringów ESG nadanych bankom komercyjnym

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The aim is to verify which financial, spatial and systemic importance variables interact with ESG scoring. Based on data from 628 banks from 63 countries, a multinomial ordered logit model was built with the explanatory variables of Sustainalytics and Moody's ESG scores. Results indicate that membership in the EU, being an SIB, capitalisation, and revenues have a positive effect on ESG. In contrast, an increase in leverage, NPL ratio, and profitability are associated with a deterioration in scorings. Results differ in terms of the spatial aspect (in the case of Sustainalytics, additionally, location in the US favours ESG scoring) and the spectrum of systemic importance (in the case of Moody's, it is both global and local dimensions). This study is the first attempt to identify common (to different methodologies) determinants of ESG scoring. Its originality is also determined by the demonstration of a relationship between spatial variables and SIB's membership and ESG scoring.

PL

Celem badania jest weryfikacja, które zmienne finansowe, przestrzenne oraz związane ze znaczeniem systemowym, oddziałują na scoring ESG. W oparciu o dane 628 banków z 63 krajów zbudowano wielomianowy uporządkowany model logitowy ze zmiennymi objaśnianymi w postaci scoringów ESG Sustainalytics oraz Moody’s. Wyniki wskazują na to, że przynależność do Unii Europejskiej, do grupy banków o znaczeniu systemowym, kapitalizacja oraz przychody pozytywnie oddziałują na ocenę ESG. Z kolei wzrost dźwigni finansowej, wskaźnika NPL oraz rentowności banku wiążą się z pogorszeniem scoringu. Wyniki różnią się w zakresie aspektu przestrzennego (w przypadku Sustainalytics dodatkowo lokalizacja w USA sprzyja ocenie ESG) oraz spektrum znaczenia systemowego (w przypadku Moody’s jest to wymiar zarówno globalny, jak i lokalny). Przedmiotowe badanie jest pierwszą próbą identyfikacji wspólnych (dla różnych metodyk oceny) determinant scoringu ESG. O jego oryginalności przesądza także wykazanie zależności między zmiennymi przestrzennymi oraz przynależnością do grupy instytucji o znaczeniu systemowym a scoringiem ESG.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

commercial bank; ESG scoring; NPL; EU; SIB

PL

bank komercyjny; scoring ESG; NPL; UE; SIB

• Wydawca: Fundacja Ekonomistów Środowiska i Zasobów Naturalnych
• Czasopismo: Economics and Environment
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: No. 4
• Strony: 1--25
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 39 poz., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Gospodarowicz Marcin

• Institute of Banking, SGH Warsaw School of Economics

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5011-3247

autor

Korzeb Zbigniew

• Department of Management, Economy and Finance, Bialystok University of Technology, o. Stefan Tarasiuk Street 2, 16-001 Kleosin, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9690-3842

autor

Niedziółka Paweł

• Institute of Banking, SGH Warsaw School of Economics

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1659-7310

autor

Torre de la Antonio

• Department of Financial Economics and Operations Management, University of Seville, Spain

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7839-0385

Bibliografia

• Abdul, R. R., & Alsayegh, M. F. (2021). Determinants of Corporate Environment, Social and Governance (ESG) Reporting among Asian Firms. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(4), 167. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14040167
• Alam, Md. M., Tahir, Y. M., Saif-Alyousfi, A. Y. H., Ali, W. B., Muda, R., & Nordin, S. (2022). Financial factors influencing environmental, social and governance ratings of publicly listed companies in Bursa Malaysia. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), 2118207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2118207
• Bernardelli, M., Korzeb, Z., & Niedziółka, P. (2022). Does Fossil Fuel Financing Affect Banks' ESG Ratings? Energies, 15(4), 1495. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15041495
• Bernhardsen, F., & Ligard, M. (2022). The Determinants of ESG Ratings in Family Firms: Evidence from the Nordic Market [Master thesis]. Norwegian Business School. https://biopen.bi.no/bi-xmlui/handle/11250/3037333
• Caiazza, S., Galloppo, G., & La Rosa, G. (2023). The mitigation role of corporate sustainability: Evidence from the CDS spread. Finance Research Letters, 52, 103561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103561
• Chih, H. L., Chih, H. H., & Chen, T. H. (2010). On the determinants of corporate social responsibility: International evidence on the financial industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0186-x
• Ciciretti, R., Kobeissi, N., & Zhu, Y. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: An analysis of bank community responsibility. International Journal of Banking, Accounting and Finance, 5(4), 342-373. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBAAF.2014.067026
• Crespi, F., & Migliavacca, M. (2020). The Determinants of ESG Rating in the Financial Industry: The Same Old Story or a Different Tale? Sustainability, 12(16), 6398. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166398
• Deegan, C. M. (2019). Legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 32(8), 2307-2329. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-08-2018-3638
• Drempetic, S., Klein, C., & Zwergel, B. (2020). The Influence of Firm Size on the ESG Score: Corporate Sustainability Ratings Under Review. Journal of Business Ethics, 167(2), 333-360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04164-1
• Ehlers, T., Elsenhuber, U., Jegarasasingam, A., & Jondeau, E. (2022). Deconstructing ESG Scores: How to Invest with Your Own Criteria. https://www.bis.org/publ/work1008.pdf
• El Khoury, R., Nasrallah, N., & Alareeni, B. (2023). The determinants of ESG in the banking sector of MENA region: a trend or necessity? Competitiveness Review, 33(1), 7-29. https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-09-2021-0118
• Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: a stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
• Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210-233. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917
• Fullerton, A. S. (2009). A Conceptual Framework for Ordered Logistic Regression Models. Sociological Methods & Research, 38(2), 306-347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124109346162
• Gholami, A., Sands, J., & Rahman, H. U. (2022). Environmental, social and governance disclosure and value generation: Is the financial industry different? Sustainability, 14(5), 2647. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052647
• Hickel, J. (2020). The sustainable development index: Measuring the ecological efficiency of human development in the Anthropocene. Ecological Economics, 167, 106331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.05.011
• Hossain, M., & Reaz, M. (2007). The determinants and characteristics of voluntary disclosure by Indian banking companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 14(5), 274-288. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.154
• Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2012). What drives corporate social performance? The role of nation-level institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(9), 834-864. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2012.26
• Izcan, D., & Bektas, E. (2022). The Relationship between ESG Scores and Firm-Specific Risk of Eurozone Banks. Sustainability, 14(14), 8619. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148619
• Jastrzębowski, A. (2014). The theory of legitimacy and the functions of accounting. Studia Oeconomica Posnaniensia, 2(4), 50-60. (in Polish).
• Khan, M., Serafeim, G., & Yoon, A. (2016). Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality. Accounting Review, 91(6), 1697-1724. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51383
• Korzeb, Z., Niedziółka, P., & Nistor, S. (2023). Sovereign creditworthiness and bank foreign ownership. An empirical investigation of the European banking sector. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 89, 101857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2023.101857
• Kumar, P., & Firoz, M. (2022). Determinants of environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosures of top 100 Standard and Poor's Bombay Stock Exchange firms listed in India. Sri Lanka Journal of Social Sciences, 45(1), 77-91. https://doi.org/10.4038/sljss.v45i1.8074
• Lööf, H., & Andreas, S. (2019). The Impact of ESG on Stocks' Downside Risk and Risk Adjusted Return. Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation, 477. https://ideas.repec.org/p/hhs/cesisp/0477.html
• Margolis, J. D., Elfenbein, H. A., & Walsh, J. P. (2007). Does it pay to be good? A Meta-analysis and redirection of research on the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Ann Arbor, 1001, 1-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1866371
• Mathis, S. (2022). What is environmental, social and governance (ESG)? https://www.techtarget.com/whatis/definition/environmental-social-and-governance-ESG
• Menicucci, E., & Paolucci, G. (2023). ESG dimensions and bank performance: an empirical investigation in Italy. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 23(3), 563-586.
• Moody’s. (2023). Adaptable ESG Risk Solutions. https://www.moodys.com/web/en/us/capabilities/esg-risk.html
• Moura-Leite, R. C., Padgett, R. C., & Galan, J. I. (2012). Is social responsibility driven by industry or firm-specific factors? Management Decision, 50(7), 1200-1221. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741211246969
• Neisen, M., Bruhn, B., & Lienland, D. (2022). ESG rating as input for a sustainability capital buffer. Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions, 15(1), 72-84.
• Nurhayati, R., Taylor, G., Rusmin, R., Tower, G., & Chatterjee, B. (2016). Factors determining social and environmental reporting by Indian textile and apparel firms: a test of legitimacy theory. Social Responsibility Journal, 12(1), 167-189. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-06-2013-0074
• Short, J. C., McKenny, A. F., Ketchen, D. J., Snow, C. C., & Hult, G. T. M. (2016). An empirical examination of firm, industry, and temporal effects on corporate social performance. Business and Society, 55(8), 1122-1156. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315574848
• Sustainalytics. (2021). ESG Risk Ratings – Methodology Abstract. Version 2.1. https://connect.sustainalytics.com/esg-risk-ratings-methodology
• Tang, D. Y., Yan, J., & Yao, Y. (2021). The Determinants of ESG Ratings: Rater Ownership Matters. Proceedings of Paris December 2021 Finance Meeting EUROFIDAI – ESSEC, France, Paris, 1-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3889395
• Tarmuji, I., Maelah, R., & Tarmuji, N. (2016). The Impact of Environmental, Social and Governance Practices (ESG) on Economic Performance: Evidence from ESG Score. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 7, 67-74. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijtef.2016.7.3.501
• Trinh, V. Q., Cao, N. D., Li, T., & Elnahass, M. (2023). Social capital, trust, and bank tail risk: The value of ESG rating and the effects of crisis shocks. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 83, 101740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2023.101740
• Wu, M. L. (2006). Corporate social performance, corporate financial performance, and firm size: A meta-analysis. Journal of American Academy of Business, 8(1), 163-171.
• Wu, M.-W., & Shen, C.-H. (2013). Corporate social responsibility in the banking industry: Motives and financial performance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(9), 3529-3547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.04.023