Logistics coordination in building the resilience of the distribution network

• Autorzy: Kramarz Marzena

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2023.170.14

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: The research article is an extension of the concept related to logistics coordination in distribution networks. The concept of logistics coordination extends the flow mechanisms of network governance presented in the literature so far. The aim of the article is to conceptualize logistics coordination as a set of network coordination flow mechanisms that are to strengthen the resilience of the distribution network. Disruptions analysis was used to assess the resilience of the distribution network. Design/methodology/approach: The first stage of the research was to identify the gap in the research on network governance. The assumptions of logistic coordination indicated in the literature research were the basis for the methodology of empirical research. The research was carried out in the distribution network of household appliances/electronics. The resilience of the distribution network to disruptions was assessed. Disruptions and deviations in the implemented processes were identified on the measurement cards. In assessing the resilience of the network, indicators of timeliness, completeness and orders without damage were used. Subsequently, a cause and effect analysis and FMEA were carried out. The conducted research was completed with recommendations for the coordinator of flows in the distribution network. Findings: Recommendations for the coordinator of the household appliances/electronics distribution network include mechanisms for logistics coordination that strengthen the resilience of the network. Other mechanisms that the coordinator is already using have also been identified. Among the identified mechanisms are both proactive and reactive actions. The set of mechanisms, in accordance with the proposed concept of logistics coordination, includes mechanisms focused on flexible resources, redundancy of partners in the network, redundancy of stocks at the material distribution point, extraordinary transport and forecasting for the entire network. Originality/value: The indicated mechanisms, both those used by the coordinator and those proposed to be used to increase the resilience of the distribution network, go beyond the flow mechanisms proposed in network coordination. Thus, it makes sense to extend the flow mechanisms to include logistics coordination in the broadest sense, which aims to synchronise flows, ensure the continuity of the processes carried out and the coherence of the activities of the network nodes.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

distribution network; network governance; logistics coordination; resilience; disruptions

PL

sieć dystrybucji; zarządzanie siecią; koordynacja logistyczna; odporność; zakłócenia

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: z. 170
• Strony: 233--248
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 26 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Kramarz Marzena

• Silesian University of Technology

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0619-5809

Bibliografia

• 1. Abbasi, M., Varga, L. (2022). Steering supply chains from a complex systems perspective. European Journal of Management Studies. 27(1), DOI 10.1108/EJMS-04-2021-003, pp. 5-38.
• 2. Brintrup, A., Wang, Y., Tiwari, A. (2015). Supply Networks as Complex Systems: A Network-Science-Based Characterization. IEEE Systems Journal, 11(4), pp. 1-12.
• 3. Bukowski, L. (2019). Reliable, Secure and Resilient Logistics Networks: Delivering Products in a Risky Environment. Springer.
• 4. Christopher, M., Peck, H. (2004). Building the resilient supply chain. International Journal of Logistic Management, 5(2), pp. 1-14.
• 5. Czakon, W. (2008). Koordynacja sieci – wielkoraka forma organizacji. Przegląd Organizacji, 9, pp. 7-10.
• 6. Czakon, W. (2013). Uwarunkowania i mechanizmy koordynacji sieci. Studia Ekonomiczne. Governance – korporacje, instytucje publiczne, sieci, 141, pp. 62-71.
• 7. Dos Santos, M.G., Alcantara, R.L. (2015). Management capabilities in supply chain resilience. Proceedings of the POMS 26th Annual Conference. Washington.
• 8. Fadda, N., Rotondo, F. (2020). What Combinations of Conditions Lead to High Performance of Governance Networks? A Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis of 12 Sardinian Tourist Networks. International Public Management Journal. doi:10.1080/10967494.2020.1755400, pp. 1-27.
• 9. Fiksel, J. (2004). Designing Resilient, Sustainable Systems. Environmental Science and Technology. 37(23), pp. 5330-5339.
• 10. Guan, Y., Aamir, M., Dayo, Z., Rahman, Z., Abro, W., Ali, I., Hu, Z. (2021). A Coordinated Optimization Model of the Complex System of the Green Supply Chain Distribution Network. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2(12), pp. 1-12.
• 11. Heide, J. (2003). Plural Form Governance in Industrial Purchasing. Journal of Marketing. 67(10), pp. 18-29.
• 12. Hoetker, G., Mellewigt, T. (2009), Choice and performance of governance mechanisms: matching alliance governance to asset type. Strategic Management Journal, 30, pp. 1025-1044.
• 13. Isett, K., Mergel, I., LeRoux, K., Mischen, P., Rethemeyer, R. (2011). Networks in Public Administration Scholarship: Understanding Where We are and Where We Need to Go. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(1), pp. i157-i173.
• 14. Kazmi, S., Shahzad, M., Khan, A., Shin, D. (2017). Smart Distribution Networks: A Review of Modern Distribution Concepts from a Planning Perspective. Energies, 10(501), doi:10.3390/en10040501, pp. 1-45.
• 15. Khan, J., Ishizaka, A., Mangla, S.K. (2022). Assessing risk of supply chain disruption due to COVID-19 with fuzzy VIKORSort. Annals Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04940-9.
• 16. Kramarz, M. (2018). Problem odporności w koordynacji sieci dystrybucji. Studia Ekonomiczne, 351, pp. 34-45.
• 17. Kramarz, M., Kmiecik, M. (2017). Pomiar zakłóceń w wybranym węźle sieci dystrybucji, Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Częstochowskiej, Zarządzanie, Nr 26, pp. 178-187.
• 18. Kramarz, M. (2012). Strategie adaptacyjne przedsiębiorstw flagowych sieci dystrybucji z odroczoną produkcją. Gliwice: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej.
• 19. Kramarz, M., Kramarz, W. (2017) Elastyczność w kształtowaniu odporności sieci dystrybucji. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej, Organizacja i Zarządzanie, 103, pp. 95-108.
• 20. Kramarz, M., Twaróg, S. (2017), Koordynacja sieciowa – model badań nad koordynacją sieci zdominowanych i równorzędnych parterów. In: R. Matwiejczuk, I. Pisz (eds.), Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie, Logistyka w Naukach Zarządzaniu, tom XVIII, z. 8 (pp. 309-322).
• 21. Kramarz, W., Kramarz, M. (2014). Czynniki ryzyka w kontekście odporności sieciowego łańcucha dostaw wyrobów hutniczych. Marketing i Rynek, 5, pp. 434-441.
• 22. Lu, P., Stead, D. (2013). Understanding the notion of resilience in spatial planning: A case study of Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Cities, 35, pp. 200-212.
• 23. Provan, K.G., Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), pp. 229-252.
• 24. Sahin, B.F., Mentzer, J.T. (2006). Supply Chain Management Coordination Mechanisms. Business Logistics, 27(2), pp. 129-161.
• 25. Sheffi, Y., Rice, J. (2005). A Supply Chain View of the Resilient Enterprise. MITSolan Management Review, 47(1), pp. 41-18.
• 26. Young, M., Dulewicz, V. (2008). Similarities and Differences between Leadership and Management: High – Performance Competencies in the British Royal Navy. British Journal of Management, 19, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2007.00534.x, pp. 17-32.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2024).