Powiadomienia systemowe
- Sesja wygasła!
Tytuł artykułu
Treść / Zawartość
Pełne teksty:
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Zmiana gotowości jak proponowany wymiar modelu gotowości na Industry 4.0
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
Background: Change readiness at organizational level is a key competence needed for Industry 4.0 readiness, and one of the most important critical success factors for managers in implementing Industry 4.0 initiatives. Methods: This paper conducts a critical literature review of 184 peer-reviewed academic journals and industry reports from 1990 to 2019, and identifies 30 Industry 4.0 readiness models. Results: A closer review of dimensions from these Industry 4.0 readiness models reveal that change readiness as a model dimension has not been sufficiently addressed. Supporting the conceptualization and operationalization of this new dimension, the literature review in this paper presents six change related dimensions, specifically change commitment factor, change efficacy, change management, individual fear of change, organizational change readiness and change leadership. Conclusion: This study after critical analysis of the literature proposes change readiness as a new dimension for Industry 4.0 readiness models. Furthermore, in terms of future research, change readiness as a new dimension for studying Industry 4.0 readiness models offers valuable implications for individuals and organization.
Wstęp: Gotowość na zmiany na poziomie organizacyjnym jest kluczową kompetencją niezbędna dla gotowości do Industry 4.0 i jedną z najważniejszych krytycznych warunków powodzenia we wdrożeniu inicjatyw związanych z Industry 4.0. Metody: Praca zawiera krytyczny przegląd publikacji 184 pracy podlegających recenzji z czasopism naukowych oraz raportów przemysłowych z okresu 190-2019 identyfikująca 30 modeli gotowości na Industry 4.0. Wyniki: Analiza wymiarów modeli gotowości do Industry 4.0 wykazała, że zmiana gotowości, jako wymiar modelu, nie jest wystarczająco adresowana i eksponowana. W celu wspomożenia zdefiniowania i określenia nowego wymiaru, praca ta na podstawie dokonanego przeglądu literatury, proponuje zmianę sześciu powiązanych wymiarów, w szczególności współczynnika powiązania, skuteczności zmiany, zarządzania zmianą, indywidualna obawa przed zmianą, gotowość na zmianę organizacyjną oraz kierowanie zmianą. Wnioski: W wyniku przeprowadzonej krytycznej analizie literatury, zaproponowano zmianą koncepcji gotowości na Industry 4.0 na nowy wymiary modeli gotowości na zmianę na Industry 4.0. Dodatkowo, w kontekście dalszych badań, zmiana gotowości na zmiany, jako nowy wymiar w analizie modeli gotowości na Industry 4.0 oferuje wartościowe konsekwencje dla jednostek jak również organizacji.
Wydawca
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
83--96
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 55 poz., tab.
Twórcy
autor
- Faculty of Economics and Management, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia UKM, Bangi, Selangor, 43600, Malaysia
autor
- Faculty of Economics and Management, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia UKM, Bangi, Selangor, 43600, Malaysia
autor
- Faculty of Economics and Management, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia UKM, Bangi, Selangor, 43600, Malaysia
autor
- School of Business, Innovation and Technopreneurship, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Kangar, Perlis, 01000, Malaysia
Bibliografia
- 1. Armenakis A.A., Harris S.G. Mossholder K.W., 1993. Creating Readiness for Organizational Change. Human Relations. http://doi.org/10.1177/001872679304600601
- 2. Backer T.E. 1995. Assessing and enhancing readiness for change: implications for technology transfer. NIDA research monograph.
- 3. Baicu A.V. 2017. Methods of Assessment and Training of a Company Towards the Enterprise 4.0. 28TH Daaam International Symposium On Intelligent Manufacturing And Automation 1065-1073. http://doi.org/10.2507/28th.daaam.proceedings.148
- 4. Bankole F.O., Osei-Bryson K.M., Brown I., 2015. The Impacts of Telecommunications Infrastructure and Institutional Quality on Trade Efficiency in Africa. Information Technology for Development. http://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2013.874324
- 5. Basl J., Doucek P., 2019. A Metamodel for Evaluating Enterprise Readiness in the Context of Industry 4.0. MDPI Information 10(3): 89. http://doi.org/10.3390/info10030089
- 6. Bernerth J., 2004. Expanding Our Understanding of the Change Message. Human Resource Development Review. http://doi.org/10.1177/1534484303261230
- 7. Bibby L., Dehe B. 2018. Defining and assessing industry 4.0 maturity levels-case of the defence sector. Production Planning and Control 29(12): 1030-1043. http://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2018.1503355
- 8. Botha A.P., 2018. Rapidly Arriving Futures: Future Readiness for Industry 4.0. The South African Journal of Industrial Engineering 29(3): 148-160. http://doi.org/10.7166/29-3-2056
- 9. Bouckenooghe D., Devos G., Van H., 2009. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied Organizational Change Questionnaire - Climate of Change, Processes, and Readiness: Development of a New Instrument. The Journal of Psychology.
- 10. Brettel M., Bendig D., Keller M., Friederichsen N., Rosenberg M., 2014. Effectuation in manufacturing: How entrepreneurial decision-making techniques can be used to deal with uncertainty in manufacturing. Procedia CIRP. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.03.119
- 11. Burnes B., James H., 1995. Culture, cognitive dissonance and the management of change. International Journal of Operations and Production Management. http://doi.org/10.1108/01443579510094062
- 12. Cattell H.E.P., Mead A.D., 2008. The sixteen personality factor questionnaire (16PF). The SAGE Handbook of Personality Theory and Assessment: Volume 2 - Personality Measurement and Testing. http://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200479.n7
- 13. Christensen C.M., 2015. Surviving Disruption. HBR (December).
- 14. Cummings S., Bridgman T., Brown K.G., 2016. Unfreezing change as three steps: Rethinking Kurt Lewin’s legacy for change management. Human Relations. http://doi.org/10.1177/0018726715577707.
- 15. Demeter K., 2018. Assessing Industry 4.0 readiness: a multi-country industry level analysis. Corvinus 1: 1-10.
- 16. Felch V., Sucky E., 2019. Maturity Models in the Age of Industry 4.0 - Do the Available Models Correspond to the Needs of Business Practice? Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 6: 5165-5174.
- 17. Gabriel M., Pessl E., 2016. Industry 4.0 and Sustainability Impacts. ANNALS of Faculty Engineering Hunedoara - International Journal of Engineering.
- 18. Gareis R., 1989. Management by projects: the management approach for the future. International Journal of Project Management. http://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863(89)90013-6
- 19.Gerlitz L., 2016. Design Management As a Domain of Smart and Sustainable Enterprise: Business Modelling for Innovation and Smart Growth in Industry 4.0. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues 3(3): 244-268. http://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2016.3.3(3)
- 20. Gökalp E., 2017. Development of an Assessment Model for Industry 4.0: Industry 4.0-MM. Springer International Publishing 60: 1-2. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2018.05.002
- 21. Hamidi S.R., Aziz A.A., Shuhidan S.M., Aziz A.A., Mokhsin M., 2018. SMEs maturity model assessment of IR4.0 digital transformation. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing 739: 721-732. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8612-0_75
- 22. Hatch M.J., 2011. Material and meaning in the dynamics of organizational culture and identity with implications for the leadership of organizational change. The Handbook of Organizational Culture and Climate. http://doi.org/10.4135/9781483307961.n19
- 23. Holt D.T., Armenakis A.A., Feild H.S., Harris S.G., 2007. Readiness for organizational change: The systematic development of a scale. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 43(2): 232-255. http://doi.org/10.1177/0021886306295295
- 24. Holt D.T., Daspit J.J., 2015. Diagnosing Innovation Readiness in Family Firms. California Management Review 58(1): 82-96. http://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2015.58.1.82
- 25. Horvat D., Stahlecker T., Zenker A., Lerch C., Mladineo M., 2018. A conceptual approach to analysing manufacturing companies’ profiles concerning Industry 4.0 in emerging economies. Procedia Manufacturing 17: 419-426. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.10.065
- 26. Isabella L., 1990. Evolving Interpretations As A Change Unfolds: How Managers. Academy of Management.
- 27. Jacobson R., 1990. Unobservable Effects and Business Performance. Marketing Science. http://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.9.1.74
- 28. Kannan S.M., Suri K., Cadavid J., Barosan I., Brand M., Van Den A.M., Gerard S., 2017. Towards industry 4.0: Gap analysis between current automotive MES and industry standards using model-based requirement engineering. Proceedings - 2017 IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture Workshops, ICSAW 2017: Side Track Proceedings 0: 29-35. http://doi.org/10.1109/ICSAW.2017.53
- 29. Kotter J.P., 1999. John P. Kotter on What Leaders Really Do. Harvard Business Review 1. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-2616(00)80020-0
- 30. Kotter J.P., 2000. Leadership engine. Leadership Excellence 17(4): 7.
- 31. Kuo Y.L., 2013. Technology readiness as moderator for construction company performance. Industrial Management and Data Systems 113(4): 558-572. http://doi.org/10.1108/02635571311322793
- 32. Leyh C., Schäffer T., Bley K., Forstenhäusler S., 2016. SIMMI 4.0 - A Maturity Model for Classifying the Enterprise-wide IT and Software Landscape Focusing on Industry 4.0. IEEE 8: 1297-1302. http://doi.org/10.15439/2016F478
- 33. Lin D., Lee C.K.M., Lau H., Yang Y., 2018. Strategic response to Industry 4.0: an empirical investigation on the Chinese automotive industry. Industrial Management and Data Systems 118(3): 589-605. http://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2017-0403
- 34. Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A.B., Jabbour, C.J. C., Godinho Filho M., Roubaud D., 2018. Industry 4.0 and the circular economy: a proposed research agenda and original roadmap for sustainable operations. Annals of Operations Research 270(1-2): 273-286. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2772-8
- 35. Madsen S.R., Miller D., John C.R., 2005. Readiness for organizational change: Do organizational commitment and social relationships in the workplace make a difference? Human Resource Development Quarterly 16(2): 16(2), 213-234.
- 36. Manavalan E., Jayakrishna K., 2018. A review of Internet of Things (IoT) embedded sustainable supply chain for industry 4.0 requirements. Computers & Industrial Engineering. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.11.030
- 37. Methavitakul B., Santiteerakul S., 2006. Analysis of key dimension and subdimension for Supply Chian of Industry to fourth Industry Performance Measurement. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Service Operations and Logistics, and Informatics (SOLI) 191-195. http://doi.org/10.17226/11517
- 38. Muller H., 2018. The CEO of Technology. Wiley.
- 39. Patterson M.E., Williams D.R., 2005. Maintaining research traditions on place: Diversity of thought and scientific progress. Journal of Environmental Psychology. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.10.001
- 40. Pessl E., 2017. Roadmap Industry 4.0 - Implementation Guideline for Enterprises. International Journal of Science, Technology and Society 5(6): 193. http://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20170506.14
- 41. Riemann T.O., 2016. Industry 4.0: How to Manage Transformation as the New Normal. The Palgrave Handbook of Managing Continuous Business Transformation 1-610. http://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-60228-2
- 42. Rollnick S., Heather N., Gold R., Hall W., 1992. Development of a short “readiness to change” questionnaire for use in brief, opportunistic interventions among excessive drinkers. British Journal of Addiction 87(5): 743-754.
- 43. Schaupp E., Abele E., Metternich J., 2017. Potentials of Digitalization in Tool Management. Procedia CIRP 63: 144-149. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.172
- 44.Schneider P., 2018. Managerial challenges of Industry 4.0: an empirically backed research agenda for a nascent field. Review of Managerial Science,12. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-018-0283-2
- 45. Schneider P.A., Castells M., 2010. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Journal of Marketing, 61. http://doi.org/10.2307/1252090
- 46. Schumacher A., Erol S., Sihn W., 2016. A Maturity Model for Assessing Industry 4.0 Readiness and Maturity of Manufacturing Enterprises. Procedia CIRP 52: 161-166. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.07.040
- 47. Shea C.M., Jacobs S.R., Esserman D.A., Bruce K., Weiner B.J., 2014. Organizational readiness for implementing change: A psychometric assessment of a new measure. Implementation Science 9(1): 1-15. http://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-9-7
- 48. Solberg L.I., Asche S.E., Margolis K.L., Whitebird R.R., 2008. Measuring an organization’s ability to manage change: The change process capability questionnaire and its use for improving depression care. American Journal of Medical Quality 23(3): 193-200. http://doi.org/10.1177/1062860608314942
- 49. Stentoft J., Adsbøll Wickstrøm K., Philipsen K., Haug A., 2020. Drivers and barriers for Industry 4.0 readiness and practice: empirical evidence from small and medium-sized manufacturers. Production Planning and Control 0(0): 1-18. http://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2020.1768318
- 50. Swanson H.L., Berninger V.W., 1996. Individual differences in children’s working memory and writing skill. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. http://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1996.0054
- 51. Van De Ven, A.H., Poole M.S., 2005. Alternative approaches for studying organizational change. Organization Studies. http://doi.org/10.1177/0170840605056907
- 52. Verbano C., Crema M., Venturini K., 2015. The Identification and Characterization of Open Innovation Profiles in Italian Small and Medium-sized Enterprises. Journal of Small Business Management 53(4): 1052-1075. http://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12091
- 53. Weiner B.J., 2009. A theory of organizational readiness for change. Implementation Science 4(1): 1-9. http://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-67
- 54. Weiner B. J., Amick H., Lee S.Y.D., 2008. Review: Conceptualization and measurement of organizational readiness for change. A review of the literature in health services research and other fields. Medical Care Research and Review, hlm. 65. http://doi.org/10.1177/1077558708317802
- 55. Yagiz Akdil K., Ustundag A., Cevikcan E., Akdil K., Ustundag Á.E., Cevikcan Á.A., Ustundag A., Cevikcan E., 2018. Maturity and Readiness Model for Industry 4.0 Strategy Implementation of Industry 4.0 strategies require wide applications in companies. Springer International Publishing. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57870-5_4
Uwagi
PL
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-38ec33b4-4bd2-4f6b-952d-1f15c4f81c40