Capabilities of Ship Handling Simulators to Simulate Shallow Water, Bank and Canal Effects

• Autorzy: Kobyliński L.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Safe operation of ships in restricted areas, in particular in canals and waterways of restricted width and depth, often with presence of current. depends on operator skill. One way to influence operator skill and hence to increase safety against collisions and groundings is proper training of operators in realistic envi-ronment. Training could be accomplished on board ships, which takes, however, long time but also on simula-tors. There are two types of simulators: full mission bridge simulators (FMBS) working in real time and phys-ical simulators using large manned models in purposeful prepared training areas (MMS). Capabilities of both type simulators are discussed in detail. Capability of FMBS depends on computer codes governing them. Few examples of capability of FMBS to reproduce correctly ship handling situations are shown. There are few MMS in the world, one of which is Ilawa Ship Handling Research and Training Centre. In the centre models of several types of ships are available and training areas are developed representing different naviga-tional situations. The main purpose of the training exercises is to show the trainees how to handle the ship in many close proximity situations, in the presence of current, in very restricted water areas etc.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

ship handling simulator; navigational simulators; shallow water effect; bank effect; Capabilities of Simulators

• Wydawca: Faculty of Navigation, Gdynia Maritime University
• Czasopismo: TransNav : International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation
• Rocznik: 2011
• Tom: Vol. 5, no. 2
• Strony: 247--252
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 11 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Kobyliński L.

• Foundation for Safety of Navigation and Environment Protection Iława Poland

Bibliografia

• [1] Ankudinov V.(2010): Azipod cruise ship. Manoeuvring in deep and shallow water. AZIPILOT Project Report WP2 de Mello Petey F. (2008): Advanced podded drive simulation for marine training and research. International Marine Safety Forum Meeting, Warnemuende
• [2] Gofman A.D., Manin V.M.(1999): Ship handling simulators validity - the real state and the ways of mathematical models correction. International conference. HYDRONAV'99 - MANOEUVRABILITY'99, Ostroda.
• [3] Gofman A.D., Manin V.M.(2000): Shiphandling simulator validity. Validation and correction of mathematical models. International Conference on Marine Simulation and Ship Manoeuvring, MARSIM, Orlando.
• [4] Gronarz A. (2010): Shallow water, bank effect and canal inter-action. AZIPILOT Project Report Wp 2.2a
• [5] Heinke H.J. (2004): Investigations about the forces and moments at podded drives. 1st International Conference on Technological Advances in Podded Propulsion, Newcastle
• [6] Kobylinski L. (2008): Training for safe operation of ships in canals and waterways Proceedings SOCW Conference, Glasgow
• [7] Kobylinski L. (2009):Risk analysis and human factor in pre-vention of CRG casualties Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation. A. Weintrit editor CRC Press
• [8] Payer H. (1994): Schiffssicherheit und das menschliche Ver-sagen. Hansa-Schffahrt-Schiffbau-Hafen, 131 Jahrgang, Nr.10
• [9] Samuelides E., Friese P. (1984): Experimental and numerical simulation of ship collisions. Proc. 3rd Congress on Marine Technology, IMAEM, Athens
• [10] Sorensen P.K (2006): Tug simulation training - request for realism and accuracy. International Conference on Marine Simulation and Ship Manoeuvring, MARSIM 2006,
• [11] U.S.Coast Guard (1995): Prevention through people. Quality Action Team Report.