Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
Sustainability has become of paramount importance in the biofuel industry. Accordingly, various sustainability assessment schemes such as emergy analysis, techno-economic analysis, life cycle assessment, energy accounting, and exergy analysis and its extensions (exergoeconomic, exergoenvironmental, and exergoeconoenvironmental analyses) are being employed increasingly for decision-making on biofuel production and consumption systems. In this opinion paper, after classifying and describing biofuel generations, the developed sustainability assessment tools are critically explained, and their pros and cons are discussed. Overall, among the various sustainability assessment approaches introduced so far, exergy-based methods appear to be the most promising tools for developing sustainable biofuel systems. This can be attributed to the fact that the exergy concept is deeply rooted in the well-defined principles of thermodynamics.
Wydawca
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
67--73
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 31 poz.
Twórcy
autor
- Institute of Tropical Aquaculture and Fisheries (AKUATROP), Universiti Malaysia Terengganu 21030 Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysia
- Biofuel Research Team (BRTeam), Terengganu, Malaysia
- Microbial Biotechnology Department, Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran (ABRII), Agricultural Research, Extension, and Education Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran
autor
- Department of Mechanical Engineering of Agricultural Machinery, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran
Bibliografia
- [1] Watts N, Amann M, Arnell N, Ayeb-Karlsson S, Belesova K, Boykoff M, Byass P, Cai W, Campbell-Lendrum D, Capstick S. The 2019 report of The Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: ensuring that the health of a child born today is not defined by a changing climate. Lancet 394 (2019), 1836-1878.
- [2] Hossain MF. Invisible transportation infrastructure technology to mitigate energy and environment. Energy. Sustainability and Society 7 (2017), 1-12.
- [3] Hajjari M, Tabatabaei M, Aghbashlo M, Ghanavati H. A review on the prospects of sustainable biodiesel production: A global scenario with an emphasis on waste-oil biodiesel utilization. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 72 (2017), 445-464.
- [4] EPA, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Average Carbon Dioxide Emissions Resulting from Gasoline and Diesel Fuel, (2005). https://www.epa.gov/.
- [5] Sajjadi B, Aziz A, Raman A, Arandiyan H. A comprehensive review on properties of edible and non-edible vegetable oil-based biodiesel: Composition, specifications and prediction models. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 63 (2016), 62-92.
- [6] Aghbashlo M, Demirbas A, Biodiesel: hopes and dreads, Biofuel Research Journal 3 (2016), 379.
- [7] Mitchell D. A note on rising food prices (Policy Research Working Paper 4682), World Bank, Washington, DC. (2008).
- [8] Hajjari M, Tabatabaei M, Aghbashlo M, Ghanavati H. A review on the prospects of sustainable biodiesel production: A global scenario with an emphasis on waste-oil biodiesel utilization. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 72 (2017), 445-464.
- [9] Yang Y, Tilman D, Soil and root carbon storage is key to climate benefits of bioenergy crops. Biofuel Research Journal 7 (2020), 1143-1148.
- [10] Havlik P, Schneider UA, Schmid E, Bottcher H, Fritz S, Skalsky R, Aoki K, De Cara S, Kindermann G, Kraxner F, Global land-use implications of first and second generation biofuel targets. Energy Policy 39 (2011), 5690-5702.
- [11] Searchinger T, Heimlich R, Houghton RA, Dong F, Elobeid A, Fabiosa J, Tokgoz S, Hayes D, Yu T-H. Use of US croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science 319 (2008), 1238-1240.
- [12] Fargione J, Hill J, Tilman D, Polasky S, Hawthorne P. Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science 319 (2008), 1235-1238.
- [13] Aghbashlo M, Hosseinpour S, Tabatabaei M, Mojarab Soufiyan M. Multi-objective exergetic and technical optimization of a piezoelectric ultrasonic reactor applied to synthesize biodiesel from waste cooking oil (WCO) using soft computing techniques. Fuel 235 (2019), 100-112.
- [14] Chisti Y. Constraints to commercialization of algal fuels. Journal of Biotechnology 167 (2013), 201-214.
- [15] Aghbashlo M, Mandegari M, Tabatabaei M, Farzad S, Mojarab Soufiyan M, Gorgens JF, Soufiyan MM, Gorgens JF, Mojarab Soufiyan M, Gorgens JF. Exergy analysis of a lignocellulosic-based biorefinery annexed to a sugarcane mill for simultaneous lactic acid and electricity production. Energy 149 (2018), 623-638.
- [16] Kim KH, Eudes A, Jeong K, Yoo CG, Kim CS, Ragauskas A. Integration of renewable deep eutectic solvents with engineered biomass to achieve a closed-loop biorefinery. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 116 (2019), 13816-13824.
- [17] Rosen MA. Environmental sustainability tools in the biofuel industry. Biofuel Research Journal 5 (2018), 751-752.
- [18] Soltanian S, Aghbashlo M, Almasi F, Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha H, Nizami A-S, Ok YS, Lam SS, Tabatabaei M. A critical review of the effects of pretreatment methods on the exergetic aspects of lignocellulosic biofuels, Energy Conversion and Managment 212 (2020), 112792.
- [19] Roto 10 CC, Francis C, Ulgiati S. Emergy: A New Approach to Environmental Accounting, Supplement to Chapter 1, in Tow P, Cooper I, Prtridge I, Birch C (Eds.). Rainfed Farming System. Springer (2011), 35-42.
- [20] Wei Y, Li Y, Liu X, Wu M. Sustainable development and green gross domestic product assessments in megacities based on the emergy analysis method - A case study of Wuhan. Sustainable Development 28 (2020), 294-307.
- [21] Santagata R, Zucaro A, Viglia S, Ripa M, Tian X, Ulgiati S. Assessing the sustainability of urban eco-systems through Emergy-based circular economy indicators. Ecological Indicators 109 (2020), 105859.
- [22] Rugani B, Benetto E. Improvements to emergy evaluations by using life cycle assessment. Environmental Science & Technology 46 (2012), 4701-4712.
- [23] Meneses M, Pasqualino JC, Cespedes-Sanchez R, Castells F. Alternatives for reducing the environmental impact of the main residue from a desalination plant, Journal of Industrial Ecology 14 (2010), 512-527.
- [24] Ioannidou D, Zerbi S, Habert G. When more is better-Comparative LCA of wall systems with stone. Building and Environment 82 (2014), 628-639.
- [25] Dufour J, Iribarren D. Life cycle assessment of biodiesel production from free fatty acid-rich wastes. Renewable Energy 38 (2012), 155-162.
- [26] Aghbashlo M, Tabatabaei M, Soltanian S, Ghanavati H. Biopower and biofertilizer production from organic municipal solid waste: An exergoenvironmental analysis. Renewable Energy 143 (2019), 64-76.
- [27] Patel CD. Sustainable ecosystems: enabled by supply and demand management, in: International Conference on Distributed Computing Networking, Springer, 2011: pp. 12-28.
- [28] Rosen MA. Energy efficiency and sustainable development. International Journal of Global Energy Issues 17 (2002), 23-34.
- [29] Morosuk T, Tsatsaronis G. A new approach to the exergy analysis of absorption refrigeration machines. Energy 33 (2008), 890-907.
- [30] Aghbashlo M, Rosen MA. Exergoeconoenvironmental analysis as a new concept for developing thermodynamically, economically, and environmentally sound energy conversion systems. Journal of Cleaner Production 187 (2018), 190-204.
- [31] Tsatsaronis G, Morosuk T. A general exergy-based method for combining a cost analysis with an environmental impact analysis. Part I-theoretical development, in: Proceedings of ASME 2008 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. IMECE, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, 2008: p. 67219.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-384d7396-93a4-46d3-8026-6e554a2e0d10