Decision making scenarios in military transport processes

• Autorzy: Milewski R. , Smal T.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5604/01.3001.0012.0945

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The dynamics of change in the contemporary world affect all areas including cross-border material flows. On the one hand, globalization has disseminated thought models and patterns of behavior based on decision patterns, thus bringing logistics to the "templates" of efficient logistics. On the other hand, has imposed and forced the need for continuous changes in the optimization of decision-making processes that are adequate to increasingly complex challenges. The main purpose of this article is to introduce the reader to decision making scenarios taken in military transport processes with particular emphasis to logistics and transport costs. This article is an attempt as well at evaluating decision scenarios in transport processes, determined mainly by the cost criterion. The whole of the considerations relates to the security of transports carried out for the purpose of military operations, that is to say, military security, understood as a safe and reliable implementation of a military operation, which must be preceded by the movement of troops into theater operations. The publication uses the experience of "lessons learned", resulting from the actions of Polish military contingents abroad. The conducted studies and analyzes show that it is possible to model transport taking into consideration the cost of specific cargo mass to areas of peacekeeping operations using services provided by carriers operating on the transport market. This kind of approach will lead in the future to changes in the logistics system without the need to spend a great deal on the purchase or hire of transport resources needed to carry out the transport function at the strategic level. As it was proved, logistics processes that take place in an international system require interpersonal cooperation and consequently appropriate relations and a high level of coordination, which change should be determined by the extent of responsibility.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

transport system; logistics cost; decision making process

PL

transport; system transportowy; logistyka; proces podejmowania decyzji

• Wydawca: Warsaw University of Technology, Faculty of Transport
• Czasopismo: Archives of Transport
• Rocznik: 2018
• Tom: Vol. 45, iss. 1
• Strony: 65--81
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 24 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Milewski R.

• The general Tadeusz Kosciuszko Military Academy of Land Forces, Faculty of Management, Wroclaw, Poland

autor

Smal T.

• The general Tadeusz Kosciuszko Military Academy of Land Forces, Faculty of Management, Wroclaw, Poland

Bibliografia

• [1] BAKER, K., 1977. An experimental study of rolling schedules in production planning. Decision Sciences, 8(1), 19-27.
• [2] BERTALANFFY, L., 1976. Historia rozwoju i status ogólnej teorii systemów. In: Klir G. J. (Edit.), Ogólna teoria systemów. Warszawa: WNT Publishing House, 27-49.
• [3] BOLESTA-KUKUŁKA, K., 2003. Decyzje menedżerskie. Warszawa: PWE Publishing House.
• [4] CPCS Transcom. 2010: Analytical Comparative Transport Costs Study Along the Northern Corridor Region. [online cit.: 2017-06-01]. Available from: https://people.hofstra.edu/geotrans/eng/ch7en/conc7en/costs_ Mombasa_ Nairobi.html.
• [5] DUCK, O., KRAUSE, H., SCHULTE, C., 2001: Gospodarka materiałowa. Praktyczny poradnik. Warszawa: Alfa-Weka Publishing House Ltd.
• [6] FLAKIEWICZ, W., WAWRZYNIAK, B., 1978. Zasady i metody podejmowania decyzji kierowniczych. Warszawa: PWE Publishing House.
• [7] FOLTIN, P., GONTARCZYK, M., ŚWIDERSKI, A., ZELKOWSKI, J., 2015. Evaluation model of the companies operating within logistic network. Archives of Transport, 36(4), 21-33.
• [8] HANCZAR, P., 2013. Modele decyzyjne w koordynacji strumieni podaży produktów w łańcuchu dostaw. Wrocław: Economic University of Wrocław Publishing House.
• [9] HOLT, C., MODIGLIANI, F., MUTH, J., SIMON, H., 1960. Planning Production, Inventories, and Work Force. Prentice-Hall.
• [10] IZDEBSKI, M., 2014. The use of heuristic algorithms to optimize the transport issues on the example of municipal services companies, Archives of Transport, 29(1), 27-36.
• [11] JACYNA-GOŁDA, I., 2015. Decision-making model for supporting supply chain efficiency evaluation. Archives of Transport, 33(1), 17-31.
• [12] JANASZ, D., SMAL, T., 2013. Modelling of polish military contingent redeployment from ISAF operation in Afghanistan. Logistics and Transport, 20(4), 107-112.
• [13] KOZIELECKI, J. 1977: Psychologiczna teoria decyzji. Warszawa: PWE Publishing House.
• [14] KURT, F. 1973. Die Metaphysik des Einen bei Nikolaus von Kues. Problemgeschichtliche Stellung und systematische Bedeutung. Leiden: Brill.
• [15] LOPEZ, E., MONZON, A. 2010. Integration of Sustainability Issues in Strategic Transportation Planning: A Multicriteria Model for the Assessment of Transport Infrastructure Plans. Computer-aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 25(6), 440-451.
• [16] MAJKA, A. 2014. Multiobjective optimization applied for planning of regional European airline. Archives of Transport, 29(1), 37-46.
• [17] MESAROVIČ, M. 2017. Cybernetics of Global Change: Human Dimension and Managing of Complexity [online cit.: 2017-02-07]. Available from: Source: http://unesdoc.unesco.org.
• [18] MILEWSKI, R., SMAL, T., 2015. The use of Multidimensional Comparative Analysis in the Choice of Means of Transport for the Army. Proc. 25th ESREL 2015 on Safety and Reliability of Complex Engineered Systems. Editors: PODOFILLINI L., SUDRET B., STOJADINOVIC B., ZICO E., KROGER W.. CRC Press/Balkema. ISBN: 978-1-138-02879-1 (Hbk+CD-ROM), ISBN: 978-1-315-64841-5 (eBook PDF), p. 17 and CD.
• [19] NARUNIEC, A., BORKO, H., GĘBSKI, P. 2005. Uzbekistan-Guide for entrepreneurs. Warsaw: PARP Publishing House,.
• [20] SEMIN, V.G., GRIGOREVA, S.V., DMITRIEVA, T.V., ILUINA, E.A. 2016. A Process Model of Risk Management in the System of Management of Strategic Sustainability of Cargo Motor Transport Enterprises. Proc. 2016 IEEE Conference on Quality Management, Transport and Information Security, Information Technologies (IT&MQ&IS). Nalchik, RUSSIA.
• [21] TYSZKA, T. 2010. Decisions. The prospect of psychological and economic. Warszawa: Scholar Publishing House, 332- 339.
• [22] TYSZKA, T., ZALEŚKIEWICZ, T. 2001. Racjonalność decyzji: pewność i ryzyko. Warszawa: PWE Publishing House.
• [23] Universite Catholique de Louvain – Brussels – Belgium [online cit.: 2016-04-10]. Available from: www.emdat.net.
• [24] ZAK, L., VALIS, D., GLOS, J., WALEK, A., 2012. Comparison of statistical and fuzzy approaches used on field data. Mendel Journal series, 2012(1), 46-51.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2018).